Asian Providers

[QUOTE=FreeWally;6649874]Cherri is slender, also white bod, natural tits, really loves to suck cock as I mentioned.[/QUOTE]Cheri is my favorite. Love her tits but they're enhanced.

[QUOTE=FreeWally;6651226]If you look at the chronology of this and take the statement as 100% true, it must have happened a while ago. Because I've long gotten requests from the booker to post reviews but no less than a 7 since it hurts the girl's business. I didn't have any problem with the wording on the texts, it was polite and a suggestion, no hint of threat. But some other user on TER does take it that way, and for all I know maybe he got a different message at a different time than me. And he claims there has been retaliation but without hard proof. So I'm not going to speak for anyone else. I don't know either way and neither do 99% of people.

[/QUOTE]Just going to throw in my experience with this, a year or so ago I made the mistake of posting a negative review on here of a new SDAG girl pretty much right after I left, like i pretty much sat in my car and wrote it before I drove off. 10 minutes late I got a bunch of angry texts from the booker first telling me to let him know if the girl wasn't great and not to post reviews first. That eventually turned into threatening to black list me if I didn't delete the review. Idk, maybe he was getting impatient because I wasn't replying to his texts as I was driving at the time. But I did eventually delete the review. That girl disappeared 2 or 3 days after that and I think that girl came back a few months later under a different name (same pics so I think its probably her? Maybe the negative review affected business, but I'm not sure how many people actually read it as it was up for maybe 45 minutes at most, though I did get a few DMs asking why I deleted my review.

As a new monger to the scene, I've been looking at some of the k girls agencies but I'm not sure how to contact anyone from ca k-dolls. I tried the email on their website, but the address was not found.

Any advice?

[QUOTE=FreeWally;6648438]Does anyone take up the offer on duo service? It just seems like a lot of work to first verify you like each girl, then book them both.

I check the OC forum periodically and see the same post about this same girl when she was in OC, from the same user. Weird![/QUOTE]Doubles are beat up in LA. Rarely if ever are there doubles in San Diego, and there used to be a great doubles pair down here years back (Joy and Kaycee). But your best bet is LA.

The Palace offers MILFs that have incredible service, best in business. But best looking doubles offerings in general would be with CGLA.

[QUOTE=BDDelti3;6654026]As a new monger to the scene, I've been looking at some of the k girls agencies but I'm not sure how to contact anyone from ca k-dolls. I tried the email on their website, but the address was not found.

Any advice?[/QUOTE]You can contact them through [URL]Humaniplex.com[/URL].

They advertise under a few different names there, both in OC and SD.

[QUOTE=InstinctGoku;6640503]Anyone have intel on this HX group? Their network seems fairly new.

If anyone can give me a hand.

TIA.[/QUOTE]Hi.

Very interested in this too.

Any girl names, reviews?

Need verification that no milfs are catfishing.

[QUOTE=Clclcl;6654742]Hi.

Very interested in this too.

Any girl names, reviews?

Need verification that no milfs are catfishing.[/QUOTE]I believe that's the Flanders and Ronson Spas with Ivy as the mamasan.

[QUOTE=InstinctGoku;6640503]Anyone have intel on this HX group? Their network seems fairly new.

If anyone can give me a hand.

TIA.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Dwykz619;6640531]It's been mentioned in the AMP boards. Ronson and Erma I believe....matches the pic I was sent for either location.[/QUOTE]Here's the reply from them and looks like an AMP operation:

30 minutes $280.

60 minutes $350.

Massage-GFE-CFS-LFK-BBBJ-CIM-69.

Is pretty steep for AMP-like operation. Even comparing with SDAG and FEC, is more expensive.

[QUOTE=SirBishop;6654894]Here's the reply from them and looks like an AMP operation:

30 minutes $280.

60 minutes $350.

Massage-GFE-CFS-LFK-BBBJ-CIM-69.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Clclcl;6654742]Hi.

Very interested in this too.

Any girl names, reviews?

Need verification that no milfs are catfishing.[/QUOTE]This is the same old AMP that has been around for many many years but they are using Humaniplex as a marketing tool / scam. You can simply walk in and pay 60 for 30 minutes and then tip the girl $160 and be out the door for $220. Why would you want to pay $280? It's really just silly.

Joy and Kaycee. That's a blast from the past. I saw Kaycee once for a phenomenal session. The next week I was going for doubles, but got cold feet. Its one of the biggest regrets I have in the hobby from the good old days. Finally got to achieve the Asian doubles bucket list st VIP last year.

[QUOTE=CityboysUp;6654665]Doubles are beat up in LA. Rarely if ever are there doubles in San Diego, and there used to be a great doubles pair down here years back (Joy and Kaycee). But your best bet is LA.

The Palace offers MILFs that have incredible service, best in business. But best looking doubles offerings in general would be with CGLA.[/QUOTE]

I'm guessing I have to chime in since I'm the "some other user on ter".

I posted their policy, which was long unspoken policy. You can find in this very thread the instances of people claiming booker was angry and pleaded to not give negative reviews or else.

I am a big believer in standing up for monger rights; hence I think it's a huge infringement when booker watch the reviews and gets his little Nancy Drew or Sherlock Holmes on and contacts the monger and tells them to not write certain reviews. It is simply none of their business and reviews are written by mongers for mongers. Instead, the booker attempts to leverage a mongers standing in order for them to not write negative reviews. This defeats the whole fucking purpose of ter and sites like usasg.

It's actually very simple. If I or any other monger thinks a girl deserves a three, and it's a honest review, this means she gets a three. Period. There is no bargaining pleading or threatening, reviews shouldn't be sold or bought. The consequences to a providers biz should not matter. I really don't care what happens to a providers biz. That is not my problem. My pact with the booker starts and ends with scheduling a session and paying for the session while staying within reasonable confines during the session. The last thing I want or need is after posting an anonymous review to have the booker identifying me and texting me nonsense.

It's also not personal at all. The agency is staring to do damage control (pretty laughable) and it seems to try to paint me as the bad guy. I'll criticize any and every agency, escort and SW if they infringe on people's rights and / or attempt to manipulate public feedback of their own product. Critical and negative reviews are already suppressed, the last thing we need is another factor disincetivizing them.

As far as proof? What proof do you want?. Many people have said in this thread about booker contacting them unsolicited lt about their review. Proof that they didn't bl anyone? All the people above complied with the bookers request because they didn't want to be bld. If anything this shows how effective the bookers threats are / were.

[QUOTE=FreeWally;6651226]If you look at the chronology of this and
take the statement as 100% true, it must have happened a while ago. Because I've long gotten requests from the booker to post reviews but no less than a 7 since it hurts the girl's business. I didn't have any problem with the wording on the texts, it was polite and a suggestion, no hint of threat. But some other user on TER does take it that way, and for all I know maybe he got a different message at a different time than me. And he claims there has been retaliation but without hard proof. So I'm not going to speak for anyone else. I don't know either way and neither do 99% of people.

From all the posts I've seen about this, it's resolved. Best to move on and enjoy..[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=RocketManP;6658511]It's actually very simple. If I or any other monger thinks a girl deserves a three, and it's a honest review, this means she gets a three. Period. There is no bargaining pleading or threatening, reviews shouldn't be sold or bought. The consequences to a providers biz should not matter. I really don't care what happens to a providers biz. That is not my problem. My pact with the booker starts and ends with scheduling a session and paying for the session while staying within reasonable confines during the session. The last thing I want or need is after posting an anonymous review to have the booker identifying me and texting me nonsense.[/QUOTE]I completely agree. To avoid confrontation, I just wait 1-3 days before posting reviews.

I was more trying to reply to someone who interpreted the blog as some girl got hurt recently. I don't think that's the case, at least not recently.

I'm not saying this is a "real" or even P.S. Pic, but she definitely doesn't have her face blurred as per usual.

This is it fellas. Dior is the one we've been waiting for. She's a 9/10, maybe even a 10/10. Young (mid 20s), beautiful face, incredible natural C racks, slim and curvy at the right places, perfect skin, and amazing service. Personality is great, english is decent, she's an all arounder. She is a champ at BBBJ, she can keep going and going. The only downside is maybe she doesn't do much DFK. She is not against kissing however, just not DFK.

Photo does a good job of representing her body, but I think the face is photoshopped some. The best face reference I can compare to is she is similar to Haewon from the kpop girl group Nmixx. Not exactly the same, but similar.

I wanted to repeat but unfortunately her stay here was short.

Definitely seeing her again in LA.