Asian Providers

She may not tour SD like so many other missed opportunties. Worth the drive IMO at 320 bb + 40 msog in thru LG; CG has her at 340 all in. If you like that pic, she's your girl. Take my review below with a grain of salt, as that was over a year ago. And it's well documented that her headgame has improved since then.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6040339]First and last pics of her in the black lingerie with cat ears are good photos of her. She literally wore that outfit and heels. If you like her face there, then you'd like her irl. 34 C natty rack with some droop; you definitely hold a pencil underneath. Average fitness. Decent butt. If she toned her core she'd be a killer. Likes to use her tongue in her headgame. Can't DT but will try if it pleases you.

Enjoys daty and 69. I slurped up her juices and spit it back on her pussy which she enjoyed. Had to take the main event slow as she's tight. No blocking, but she did initially control my depth in mish with her hand on my thigh. Not ideal, but who doesn't enjoy DFKing a hot kgirl while they whimper and squeal as their pussy acclimates to being stretched out?

Once I opened her up, it was open season on her snatch. Do be mindful of wearing her out too quickly. I put her in K9, and her pussy progressively pointed to the sky, while her face lowered down on the bed. That sight alone is one for the spank bank. I mounted her in this bulldog k9 variation and jackhammered away mercilessly at her cervix. She's a pleaser so she never put up a fuss, but you could tell she was beat. I dismounted and had her suck off my freshly-glazed glizzy. The look on her face, staring down at my cock, trying to catch her breath and make sense of what happened. Simply priceless.

Having her mount me for a cg finish made it apparent she was nearing the end of her rope, despite the fact I was her first appointment. Either she lost interest in me, she was in physical pain, or some tragic combination of the two. Fortunately for both of us, she dug deep to withstand my final salacious salvo, and joined me in a mutual release.[/QUOTE]

Thank you for the rec. Is CG on hx?

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6617393]She may not tour SD like so many other missed opportunties. Worth the drive IMO at 320 bb + 40 msog in thru LG; CG has her at 340 all in. If you like that pic, she's your girl. Take my review below with a grain of salt, as that was over a year ago. And it's well documented that her headgame has improved since then.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BrainLara;6617728]Thank you for the rec. Is CG on hx?[/QUOTE]Their HX is 'Candygirls,' but it's not active. Still, you can find their phone number on their profile page. With that, it's easy to find their website.

[QUOTE=BrainLara;6617728]Thank you for the rec. Is CG on hx?[/QUOTE]They can be found in multiple areas:

[URL]https://www.cakdolls.cr/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/KStarGirls[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/IndyAzn[/URL] #orange_county.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/FarEastCuties[/URL] #san_diego.

Thank you gents.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Candygirls[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Kpussycat[/URL]

[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/[/URL]

The 20 bucks saving through CG could help cover in part the cost of gas in getting there and back LOL.

[QUOTE=SirBishop;6618143]They can be found in multiple areas:

[URL]https://www.cakdolls.cr/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/KStarGirls[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/IndyAzn[/URL] #orange_county.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/FarEastCuties[/URL] #san_diego.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6617793]Their HX is 'Candygirls,' but it's not active. Still, you can find their phone number on their profile page. With that, it's easy to find their website.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6615134][URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.[/QUOTE]Pro Tip: Get great service? Bang that review out while it's fresh in your mind and be king for a day next time you see her.

Get crappy service? Got a beef? Use a different screen name than you gave her. Wait a few days so if she's stiffed a few more folks, and the smoking gun isn't pointing back to you. It's called plausible deniability. If it's really bad, wait longer. But make the report. Reviews make this forum useful.

[QUOTE=Nick4;6618681]Pro Tip: Get great service? Bang that review out while it's fresh in your mind and be king for a day next time you see her.

Get crappy service? Got a beef? Use a different screen name than you gave her. Wait a few days so if she's stiffed a few more folks, and the smoking gun isn't pointing back to you. It's called plausible deniability. If it's really bad, wait longer. But make the report. Reviews make this forum useful.[/QUOTE]You're just attempting to circumvent the problem. The problem being that the booker / owner threatens and retaliates against honest negative reviews, which should be a customers right anywhere online no matter what he buys. He places $ and pr above customers.

And waiting a few days "so she stiffed a few more folks" is simply allowing your fellow mongers to get fucked too, and not in the bad way. Literally making her money. If a negative review is posted the very first day, it's a big deal because it will save many people $.

Waiting, using generic language in reviews using multiple aliases. This is just hiding from their threat. Why is there a threat at all? Let customers say what they're honest about without fear of being expelled from the org.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;6618830]You're just attempting to circumvent the problem. The problem being that the booker / owner threatens and retaliates against honest negative reviews, which should be a customers right anywhere online no matter what he buys. He places $ and pr above customers.

And waiting a few days "so she stiffed a few more folks" is simply allowing your fellow mongers to get fucked too, and not in the bad way. Literally making her money. If a negative review is posted the very first day, it's a big deal because it will save many people $.

Waiting, using generic language in reviews using multiple aliases. This is just hiding from their threat. Why is there a threat at all? Let customers say what they're honest about without fear of being expelled from the org.[/QUOTE]A k-org proverb to share:

A ocean without wind is calm and beautiful, with high wind brings turbulent watah.

Don't be the wind in a bookers ocean.

[QUOTE=RocketManP;6616660]Oh boo hoo their biz depends on the reviews. Well duh. They're gaining tons of biz from positive reviews too. Funny how they want to use reviews to only benefit them, but if they are detrimental they can't take it.

Guess what, freedom of expression your biz. Mongers have a right to evaluate a product publicly with bookers / girls taking a bad review like they can take a dick.

Imagine if instead of removing expired product from shelves, a store would implement a policy that you can't shop there anymore if you point out the said expired product.

This is a scumbag technique and it's not new for this shop. They included it in their introductory email back when they were called differently and for their OC branch too.[/QUOTE]Sorry just to clarify, not defending them doing this as it's definitely an affront to letting mongers discuss and I'm not cool with that. I guess it was just more of a comment about how this behavior is emergent from the review environment itself. I agree it sucks but I stick to the rules since I don't really want to be blacklisted LOL.

[QUOTE=BigCoomer;6619394]Sorry just to clarify, not defending them doing this as it's definitely an affront to letting mongers discuss and I'm not cool with that. I guess it was just more of a comment about how this behavior is emergent from the review environment itself. I agree it sucks but I stick to the rules since I don't really want to be blacklisted LOL.[/QUOTE]Are they talking about reviews on here or T ER or here or both or anywhere? I don't remember if I needed to give them my T ER to get verified with them. I got in almost 10 years ago and don't even remember. How would they find this out unless you say specifics, something along the lines of "I texted early morning on Saturday on xyz's first day when she first started and I was late 15 minutes and booker was cool" then yea they would be able to look at previous text messages and reference it. Assuming they save all our text messages. I don't want to be banned either and not sure how they would even know. Can they obtain the email addresses linked to T ER or elsewhere. But I guess I'll stick with the rules as well. I'm paranoid like that. Most of my experiences have been good anyways but I definitely wrote a couple of 7's and below reviews in the past.

Totally agree with your post title.

[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6615134][URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.[/QUOTE].

[QUOTE=HornyToad007;6619534]Are they talking about reviews on here or T ER or here or both or anywhere? I don't remember if I needed to give them my T ER to get verified with them. I got in almost 10 years ago and don't even remember. How would they find this out unless you say specifics, something along the lines of "I texted early morning on Saturday on xyz's first day when she first started and I was late 15 minutes and booker was cool" then yea they would be able to look at previous text messages and reference it. Assuming they save all our text messages. I don't want to be banned either and not sure how they would even know. Can they obtain the email addresses linked to T ER or elsewhere. But I guess I'll stick with the rules as well. I'm paranoid like that. Most of my experiences have been good anyways but I definitely wrote a couple of 7's and below reviews in the past.[/QUOTE]Just want to point out from a leverage standpoint that if a business is providing a product that customers consider to be subpar and the business claims it hurts revinues and that you need to stop sharing that their product is subpar otherwise your money is no longer good. Got to ask yourself if said business can really afford to say no to already paying customers? As paying customers don't forget that your spending power is worth.

[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6615134][URL]https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/approved-students/ask-the-expert[/URL]

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.[/QUOTE]I never tell booker or providers about my user I'd or handle for review site.

Here it is, I saved it in archive:

[URL]https://archive.ph/VfFlw[/URL]

I tried posting a review on TER and it seems they are blocking SDAG's webpage as an acceptable URL for reviews. Is anyone else having this issue? Can't use Humaniplex either cause they said in the past that that website can't be used since it requires a password to view it so not sure if anyone else has a different website for SDAG? Or are they just completely blocked from being reviewed on TER? Wonder if this has anything to do with SDAG trying to control reviews.