Becareful out there: Stratford police arrest 6 in internet prostitution sting
From today's CTPost. I'm posting in the General section as it's in between and EVERYONE should read it. (I tweaked the names, but they're public record now).
[URL]http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Stratford-police-arrest-6-in-internet-12320950.php[/URL]
Stratford police arrest 6 in internet prostitution sting.
By Daniel Tepfer Published 4:30 pm, Tuesday, October 31,2017.
STRATFORD. Police conducted an undercover internet prostitution sting arresting two alleged prostitutes and four alleged "Johns. ".
Exxxx Cxxxxxxx, 21, of Henderson, NV, and Yxxxx Xx, 46, of Flushing, and. Why. , were charged Tuesday with prostitution.
While Jxxxx Fxxxxxx, 30, of Trumbull, Gxxxxx Nxxxxx, 38, of Wilton, Axxxxxx Gxxxxxx, 30, of Bridgeport and Cxxxx Sxxxx, 27, of Milford, were charged with patronizing a prostitute.
All were released on written promises to appear in court.
Police said [B] detectives placed advertisements on the websites Backpage, City-vibe and Craigslist stating "Hot Italian Looking 4 fun," with a telephone number.[/B]
In each case police said Fxxxxx, Nxxxxx, Gxxxxxx and Sxxxx answered the ad and agreed to meet with an undercover officer posing as a prostitute in a room at Homewood Suites.
Police said each man was arrested after they handed money to the undercover officer and began undressing to have sex.
In the case of the two women, police said undercover officers answered advertisements on Backpage and agreed to meet each woman in a room at the hotel. The women were arrested after they accepted money to have sex, police said.
Precautions against Arresr
[QUOTE=SlimShady132;3605441]Its like these days its either higher end well reviewed escorts or dating sites like SA.[/QUOTE]I am going to make it my standard and inviolable practice to do an LE check with each and every provider I see. These poor mongers who got arrested are screwed for life! I will explain to each provider that the LE check is for both her safety and mine. Any chick who refuses, I will walk away. What ideas do you have, fellow mongers? Thoughts? Please weigh in. Stay safe guys. Barnes.
The best post wording ever. A Japanese girl's post
🔥Services🔥.
Kiss & lick & Suck.
Blow job no Condom.
Deep throat.
Mutual Oral (69).
GFE.
CIM.
Love on bed.
And you think you have it bad.
We complain about rushed visits, poor service, bad attitudes and lingering smells. Well, it could always be worse!!
[URL]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5066371/Prostitute-shot-man-twice-performing-oral-sex-wrong.html[/URL]#ixzz4 y1 R8 VdGI.
Backpage change in posts?
The latest BP posts only have phone numbers in the post. No descriptions, promises, nada.
Wonder if this is in response to the heat being put on about sexual related ads.
No description, can't prove the ad is sexual in nature.
My thoughts on the numbers
[QUOTE=Prober;3636430]The latest BP posts only have phone numbers in the post. No descriptions, promises, nada.
Wonder if this is in response to the heat being put on about sexual related ads.
No description, can't prove the ad is sexual in nature.[/QUOTE]It started with a group that travels together and tends to post together.
My hypothesis is that they either tried it to see how it would go or they are just lazy and can't be bothered writing a headline to attract people or their hits were down and they figured they might have a better chance saying nothing because we had seen them so many time before we weren't going to bother opening their ads.
Other girls saw it and copied it – either because they thought it must work because so many others are doing it or because they are just lazy and this seemed to be an easier route.
Regardless of the reason, it is annoying and I have decided to stop opening the numbers only ads. First of all it's a huge waste of time when you get someone that is not in your target or is too far away. Secondly, it's hard to avoid opening the same ad again and again, because who remembers individual numbers the first several times.
I think the smarter girls will go back to the regular way.
I don't think the "can't prove sexual nature" holds much water. We all know what the ads are for and LE doesn't take any action unless they have an actual meeting or sting anyway.
That dumb question "are you a cop or affiliated with the law"
Ok so do you mongers get irritated when a provider asks you if your a cop. Usually when they ask me that question via text I don't even respond back to them. No I'm not a cop. Far from it but like most of you I'm sure you know a cop or 2. Anyways with that said I've know for years that cops don't have to tell you they are cops. Thats why I get so irritated when girls ask. When the maffia ask Donnie Brasco of he was a cop did he say yes I have to tell you or its entrapment LMFAO. Anyways to confirm my already know knowledge I asked 2 of my cop friend. 1 is a lieutenant and the other is a sergeant. And they say they absolutely do not have to divulge any information when they are undercover (not sure if it means if they are not undercover they have to answer truthfully. I didn't ask and I didn't care) just thought I passed off this information. Girls are dumb. True story.
Ashley Madison = Waste of money.
[QUOTE=MrBig2016;3725054]I been a member for short time. But in the game for a while now.
I still remember days of Mr. Steel for your reference.
I am thinking about this site AM.
Is it worth $ to try this site out. Yes I know they were hack in 2015.
Any advice would be very helpful. Thanks in Advance.[/QUOTE]You buy tokens to answer ads and email members. I get favorited by "Female members" that appear to be fake, created by the A. M software to get men to buy tokens. Googled this and one researcher estimated that 95% of the female profiles are fake.
Senate passes bill to penalize websites for sex trafficking
[QUOTE=Ilsw203;3768960]I'm getting the same thing, hopefully not though. BP is a nightmare to use.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-congress-sextrafficking/senate-passes-bill-to-penalize-websites-for-sex-trafficking-idUSKBN1GX2ZL[/URL]
CL Personals Just Bit the Dust
From their site:
Personals.
Strictly platonic.
Women seek women.
Women seeking men.
Men seeking women.
Men seeking men.
Misc romance.
Casual encounters.
You'll get this message:
"US Congress just passed HR 1865, "FOSTA", seeking to subject websites to criminal and civil liability when third parties (users) misuse online personals unlawfully.
Any tool or service can be misused. We can't take such risk without jeopardizing all our other services, so we are regretfully taking craigslist personals offline. Hopefully we can bring them back some day. ".
To the millions of spouses, partners, and couples who met through c-are-a-I-g-s-l-I-s-t (CL), we wish you every happiness!
BMD.