KAngels Discussion

Lets stick to the ladies. After all, we are mongers and we don't want to be disappointed and feel that we are forced to pay for lesser quality than we were expecting.

Though I agree with what JKS said about the orgs. Much of what he said is true for my experience with the local 3 orgs in the past few months. I walked out on GLS once when the girl was much older than pic and booker said that is no good. Now the girl lost an hour of her service. I stuck to my guns and said well, you bait and switch me so I'm not seeing her. I do hope to come back for a different girl but if you ban me then so be it.

Ee all have different tastes in women. I like them young and pretty over top notched service while you may take the better service with someone older. That diversity is in fact the reason why these orgs still survives. It's not going to get any better until another org comes into town with better standards. Where the demand is high, they can sacrifice quality. Reason why SoCal has much better girls is because there are so many competitions. Their rate is obviously even better than Bellevue area.

[QUOTE=Nekoiak;5792134]Let's please can we keep it about intelligence on the ladies. I'm interested in Taylor as her pics looks fantastic. Nina too but more Taylor planning on seeing her in the next few days. I'll report back.[/QUOTE]Let him speak guys! He's just trying to share intel with us, and what he's saying is not negative, it's actually positive message. I have been thinking about the problems, too. In Seattle, we don't have pretty Asian working girls. Bellevue K-girls are so ugly and poor stats. We need better girls than now, but the current Orgs have failed to show improvement. I agree with this guy 100% that we need new agencies to make some progress in terms of improving the quality!.

[QUOTE=Kclitorislover;5792374]Let him speak guys! He's just trying to share intel with us, and what he's saying is not negative, it's actually positive message. I have been thinking about the problems, too. In Seattle, we don't have pretty Asian working girls. Bellevue K-girls are so ugly and poor stats. We need better girls than now, but the current Orgs have failed to show improvement. I agree with this guy 100% that we need new agencies to make some progress in terms of improving the quality!.[/QUOTE]Hey JK oops sorry I mean Kclit lover with one whole post that somehow agrees with JK why are you quote responding to my post? No it's not a positive message and I for one enjoyed my time with Audrey and Joy. Maybe they were ugly to you but not to me.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]

[QUOTE=Boowoo;5792305]Lets stick to the ladies. After all, we are mongers and we don't want to be disappointed and feel that we are forced to pay for lesser quality than we were expecting.

Though I agree with what JKS said about the orgs. Much of what he said is true for my experience with the local 3 orgs in the past few months. I walked out on GLS once when the girl was much older than pic and booker said that is no good. Now the girl lost an hour of her service. I stuck to my guns and said well, you bait and switch me so I'm not seeing her. I do hope to come back for a different girl but if you ban me then so be it.

Ee all have different tastes in women. I like them young and pretty over top notched service while you may take the better service with someone older. That diversity is in fact the reason why these orgs still survives. It's not going to get any better until another org comes into town with better standards. Where the demand is high, they can sacrifice quality. Reason why SoCal has much better girls is because there are so many competitions. Their rate is obviously even better than Bellevue area.[/QUOTE]Exactly thanks man.

[QUOTE=GoneFishing888;5792606]Hey JK / Sam / Kclit here is the thing. Audrey was CFS and left about a week and a half ago February 10/11. She was most certainly from S. Korea.

Mina / Nina has many reviews on TER and unless she is fooling a lot of the mongers in SOCal she is also most certainly Korean.

Taylor was here about 3 months ago or so but I guess they were different pictures.

So here's the thing JK / Sam / Kclit if you don't like it then don't use it. It's that simple. But to come on here and put up petty BS that doesn't have anything to do with the ladies that are willing to come to Seattle and work is just lame and you are hijacking a board for mongers to review providers. Do better and stop trolling.[/QUOTE]Yes, Audrey and Chloe and Julie and few others were from South Korea. But they are gone now. Don't waste your affections on those girls already gone! I feel such a pity for your heart that expresses the memories of Audrey. But did you know that she really didn't like the situation that she has to work with openly BBFS providers? If you really care for the girls like her, you must seriously consider about their management also! For example, the girls has been complaining about the old booker since she excessively behaved as if she's their boss, and it really made them stressful. Just like that, the fact that the "management team" decided to change their branding to BBFS and North Korean & Chinese Korean specialty shop is making the girls to reconsider about returning to Bellevue, let alone the younger generation. I agree with JK's frustration that this agency has failed, and has been failing, in terms of quality maintenance. We need new agency!

Throw me into the camp saying Coco at kangels was a good time.

F-7.5-8.

B-8/8.5.

S-8/9.

Nice body and she's very accommodating to anything. Great BBBJ and really tight.

Worth a repeat for me. For those who want a little convo her English isn't good so knowing a bit of Korean or speaking it would help in that respect.

[QUOTE=JsppsgFun4;5793238]Throw me into the camp saying Coco at kangels was a good time.

F-7.5-8.

B-8/8.5.

S-8/9.

Nice body and she's very accommodating to anything. Great BBBJ and really tight.

Worth a repeat for me. For those who want a little convo her English isn't good so knowing a bit of Korean or speaking it would help in that respect.[/QUOTE]How would you rate Audrey?

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]

L[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]

Anyone ever have luck persuading a Kgirl to let you tape some of the action? If yes, any pointers in how to ask or convince them? Even if it's just to watch during the session and show them you'll delete after watching with them.

[QUOTE=BigSubwoofer;5794257]Anyone ever have luck persuading a Kgirl to let you tape some of the action? If yes, any pointers in how to ask or convince them? Even if it's just to watch during the session and show them you'll delete after watching with them.[/QUOTE]Nope they usually hate being video taped I think its related to their cultural value and legal system in south Korea FYI creating hardcore porn videos in south Korea is a serious sex crime however they are creating some porns under the genre of live BJ show, my recommendation is try to contact Korean bjs that's the best way.

[QUOTE=BigSubwoofer;5794257]Anyone ever have luck persuading a Kgirl to let you tape some of the action? If yes, any pointers in how to ask or convince them? Even if it's just to watch during the session and show them you'll delete after watching with them.[/QUOTE]I forgot to add one important point that when you decide to participate their live BJ show its actually going to be the kbj gals that has copy right of the video and they will control entire process.

[QUOTE=WonkaMyWilly;5791456]Cosmo used to work with Vegas Asian, though I don't see the resemblance to Minnie. Pics are 5 years off. Her face isn't my type. Her body is my type, but heavier than the pics suggest. She's curvy for a spinner. Has a nice ass, and breasts have been tastefully augmented. Service was great. She gets wet. Shower fun, DATO, DATY, BBBJ, P2 P, MSOG, ACG, CG, Mish, Doggy. Probably will repeat after trying the others first out of curiosity. Didn't ask if she was from the best Korea.[/QUOTE]I still think Cosmo is Minnie as you can see this picture but what happened to Velvet?? Just to make sure I added double question marks did Loligangs most honorable management team abandon Velvet just like how they have been trashing other gals gosh, I really don't like these respectful two ladies.

[QUOTE=BigSubwoofer;5794257]Anyone ever have luck persuading a Kgirl to let you tape some of the action? If yes, any pointers in how to ask or convince them? Even if it's just to watch during the session and show them you'll delete after watching with them.[/QUOTE]Unless you visit the same girl over and over like couple times a week for multiple weeks, and shower lots of dough on her then don't even expect that. I felt very connected with Molly and even after a few sessions, she wouldn't even let me have her IG. I asked for a picture of her fully clothed and she still wouldn't even agree.

Sounds like Audrey was a super star? Too bad I didn't get to see her. I spent it all on Molly because schedule showed Audrey here until March. Then BAM and she was gone right when Molly left.

I'm guessing because the management team tried to force the BBFS on her and she refused? Because Molly was cfs at first for a few days then BBFS was offered.

On a different note, some of these cfs girls will BBFS you maybe if they like you. If you remember Julie with lolipop, she was advertised as cfs but she BBFS me without upcharge. I was just rubbing her clit with my boy and she shoved him in bare. I immediately pulled out and grabbed the cover. She said you want condom?.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because it contributed nothing of value and in fact constituted a complete waste of bandwidth.

The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange if information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Let's stick to the subject.[/blue]

Her reviews are really good and so seeing her this weekend. Is she really that good and are her pictures on the website actually herself? Or is there a little bit or a lot of photoshop involved?.

[QUOTE=BigSubwoofer;5794257]Anyone ever have luck persuading a Kgirl to let you tape some of the action? If yes, any pointers in how to ask or convince them? Even if it's just to watch during the session and show them you'll delete after watching with them.[/QUOTE]Yes.

And I don't believe it had anything to do with how I asked. The times it has happened, I start by playfully taking "imaginary" photos by pantomiming a photo-taking action to see if it makes them giggle. If they smile and throw a peace sign or the little thumb / index finger heart sign for the pretend photo, that's a good thing. A small number of those who giggle might be open to pulling out the real camera. It's happened less than 10 times in my life, but my encrypted USB stick containing those videos is a prized possession LOL. And no, I'm not sharing them or telling you any names. You probably wouldn't believe the names anyway.

[QUOTE=Boowoo;5794658]Sounds like Audrey was a super star? Too bad I didn't get to see her. I spent it all on Molly because schedule showed Audrey here until March. Then BAM and she was gone right when Molly left.

I'm guessing because the management team tried to force the BBFS on her and she refused? Because Molly was cfs at first for a few days then BBFS was offered.

On a different note, some of these cfs girls will BBFS you maybe if they like you. If you remember Julie with lolipop, she was advertised as cfs but she BBFS me without upcharge. I was just rubbing her clit with my boy and she shoved him in bare. I immediately pulled out and grabbed the cover. She said you want condom?.[/QUOTE]Audrey was just "meh" for me. Pretty but uninspired.

[QUOTE=JKStvenson;5794561]I still think Cosmo is Minnie as you can see this picture but what happened to Velvet?? Just to make sure I added double question marks did Loligangs most honorable management team abandon Velvet just like how they have been trashing other gals gosh, I really don't like these respectful two ladies.[/QUOTE]I've seen both Minnie and Cosmo. They're not the same nor do they resemble each other in the flesh. Service from both was great.

Girls will leave town early if there's no business. Given the general lack of reviews for her, I'd have to guess business was slow. They're only here to make money.

[QUOTE=PurpleMist;5794673]Her reviews are really good and so seeing her this weekend. Is she really that good and are her pictures on the website actually herself? Or is there a little bit or a lot of photoshop involved?.[/QUOTE]Ms. Kim is a favorite of mine. There's photoshop on her face, while I can see the resemblance, I've been ignoring her photos. Service is fun and engaging, though nothing particularly exotic. Thin body of a dancer and her enhancements are fantastic. She also speak English well.

[QUOTE=JKStvenson;5794561]I still think Cosmo is Minnie as you can see this picture but what happened to Velvet?? Just to make sure I added double question marks did Loligangs most honorable management team abandon Velvet just like how they have been trashing other gals gosh, I really don't like these respectful two ladies.[/QUOTE]I've seen both Minnie and Cosmo. They're not the same nor do they resemble each other in the flesh. Service from both were great.

Girls will leave town early if there's no business. Given the general lack of reviews for her, I'd have to guess business was slow. They're only here to make money.

[QUOTE=PurpleMist;5794673]Her reviews are really good and so seeing her this weekend. Is she really that good and are her pictures on the website actually herself? Or is there a little bit or a lot of photoshop involved?.[/QUOTE]Ms. Kim is a favorite of mine. There's photoshop on her face, while I can see the resemblance, I've been ignoring her photos. Service is fun and engaging, though nothing particularly exotic. Thin body of a dancer and her enhancements are fantastic. She also speak English well.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5795122]Audrey was just "meh" for me. Pretty but uninspired.[/QUOTE]Agreed. Found her to be more fun if I lead the session.

[QUOTE=Boowoo;5794658]Sounds like Audrey was a super star? Too bad I didn't get to see her. I spent it all on Molly because schedule showed Audrey here until March. Then BAM and she was gone right when Molly left.

I'm guessing because the management team tried to force the BBFS on her and she refused? Because Molly was cfs at first for a few days then BBFS was offered.

On a different note, some of these cfs girls will BBFS you maybe if they like you. If you remember Julie with lolipop, she was advertised as cfs but she BBFS me without upcharge. I was just rubbing her clit with my boy and she shoved him in bare. I immediately pulled out and grabbed the cover. She said you want condom?.[/QUOTE]Wow that is really amazing story I don't blame Julie for sort of allowing BBFS for you I can see that you re an extraordinary man speaking in truth there's no such thing as fully GFE its all up to their will 2 years ago Audrey did allow bb for me but at some point she suddenly pretended as if she wasn't aware of it and then grabbed the hat and let me finish but Audrey still considers herself cfs I respect that she truly believes covering is protection for all of us Audrey is pro her appearance 8 service 9.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5795119]Yes.

And I don't believe it had anything to do with how I asked. The times it has happened, I start by playfully taking "imaginary" photos by pantomiming a photo-taking action to see if it makes them giggle. If they smile and throw a peace sign or the little thumb / index finger heart sign for the pretend photo, that's a good thing. A small number of those who giggle might be open to pulling out the real camera. It's happened less than 10 times in my life, but my encrypted USB stick containing those videos is a prized possession LOL. And no, I'm not sharing them or telling you any names. You probably wouldn't believe the names anyway.[/QUOTE]Hey Aussie whos your favorite girl?

Okay where is velvet now?? Actually did loligangs girls dump her as trash after viciously snatching her away from jo by giving false hope damn it this is really cold and inhumane.

[QUOTE=WonkaMyWilly;5795228]I've seen both Minnie and Cosmo. They're not the same nor do they resemble each other in the flesh. Service from both were great.

Girls will leave town early if there's no business. Given the general lack of reviews for her, I'd have to guess business was slow. They're only here to make money.

Ms. Kim is a favorite of mine. There's photoshop on her face, while I can see the resemblance, I've been ignoring her photos. Service is fun and engaging, though nothing particularly exotic. Thin body of a dancer and her enhancements are fantastic. She also speak English well.

Agreed. Found her to be more fun if I lead the session.[/QUOTE]Thanks wonkamywilly my real question is if velvet was dumped by loligangs two respectful ccploving witches but you re right yet still it is sad reality I must keep contact mskim but she's too busy no matter what we need better agencies.

[QUOTE=JKStvenson;5795431]Okay where is velvet now?? Actually did loligangs girls dump her as trash after viciously snatching her away from jo by giving false hope damn it this is really cold and inhumane.[/QUOTE]Well, I'm not surprised if Velvet didn't get enough appointments here and left or if management actually dumped her. I've seen her outside. Helped her carried her things to the door. She was a mess. As I said before I didn't let her know I was a monger.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5795119]Yes.

And I don't believe it had anything to do with how I asked. The times it has happened, I start by playfully taking "imaginary" photos by pantomiming a photo-taking action to see if it makes them giggle. If they smile and throw a peace sign or the little thumb / index finger heart sign for the pretend photo, that's a good thing. A small number of those who giggle might be open to pulling out the real camera. It's happened less than 10 times in my life, but my encrypted USB stick containing those videos is a prized possession LOL. And no, I'm not sharing them or telling you any names. You probably wouldn't believe the names anyway.[/QUOTE]Bro's got skills.

See attached reply from SoCal regarding Mina.

[QUOTE=Boowoo;5795869]Well, I'm not surprised if Velvet didn't get enough appointments here and left or if management actually dumped her. I've seen her outside. Helped her carried her things to the door. She was a mess. As I said before I didn't let her know I was a monger.[/QUOTE]Yeah gotcha.

My recommendation for Jo the Angel is that she and her agency should consider relocation to Everett or Renton /SeaTac areas. People up or down there will love the late Sam the angels older lineups. I am saying this seriously, I am so sad and angry about what the loligangs ccploving witches did to Velvet. They should've let her work for Kangels, although Velvet was stupid. Sorry to the mongers but I truly hope to see all of them gone from our town, believe me much better agencies will come and there will be younger and prettier gals.

Taylor was here before at lollipop. I forget if her name was the same then. Real pics were used before, these ones are fake. Had I known it was her, I would have seen someone else as she's not my type. Less than 30 yo, pretty face, no plastic surgery, natural tits with large nipples. Could stand to lose some weight. Shower preview, BBBJ, DATO, DATY, 69, CG, ACG, Doggy. Personable and friendly. Her English isn't the best. Tries to get her point across, some things get lost in translation. Good time all in all.

I was the first to recommend her in LA: [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33078-Hot-Young-Asian-Girls&p=5486498&viewfull=1#post5486498](click here)[/URL]. Mina's reviews: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/mina-2139999448-362026](click here)[/URL] and [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/mina---nina-9494322330-363986](click here)[/URL].

I prefer young girls and looks over service. I was happy enough with Mina. Fake pics so don't expect girl in pics. I would see Mina over the MILFs, including Audrey. I can see why others liked Audrey but she's an MILF to me. Audrey's still pretty enough but there's work done on her face. Audrey's body is still banging. I am not really interested in MILFs.

[QUOTE=Boowoo;5795891]See attached reply from SoCal regarding Mina.[/QUOTE]

Lolipop Julie was doing BBFS with upcharge before she came to Lolipop. I might have seen Molly before. Did Molly have short hair and sneaked condom on you for CBJ during 69? That girl was YMMV and it seemed Molly went back to CFS in San Diego.

[QUOTE=Boowoo;5794658]Sounds like Audrey was a super star? Too bad I didn't get to see her. I spent it all on Molly because schedule showed Audrey here until March. Then BAM and she was gone right when Molly left.

I'm guessing because the management team tried to force the BBFS on her and she refused? Because Molly was cfs at first for a few days then BBFS was offered.

On a different note, some of these cfs girls will BBFS you maybe if they like you. If you remember Julie with lolipop, she was advertised as cfs but she BBFS me without upcharge. I was just rubbing her clit with my boy and she shoved him in bare. I immediately pulled out and grabbed the cover. She said you want condom?.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5796221]Lolipop Julie was doing BBFS with upcharge before she came to Lolipop. I might have seen Molly before. Did Molly have short hair and sneaked condom on you for CBJ during 69? That girl was YMMV and it seemed Molly went back to CFS in San Diego.[/QUOTE]Who cates they are gone more than a week ago and now we only have low quality bbfsnkgals.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5796214]I was the first to recommend her in LA: [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33078-Hot-Young-Asian-Girls&p=5486498&viewfull=1#post5486498](click here)[/URL]. Mina's reviews: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/mina-2139999448-362026](click here)[/URL] and [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/mina---nina-9494322330-363986](click here)[/URL].

I prefer young girls and looks over service. I was happy enough with Mina. Fake pics so don't expect girl in pics. I would see Mina over the MILFs, including Audrey. I can see why others liked Audrey but she's an MILF to me. Audrey's still pretty enough but there's work done on her face. Audrey's body is still banging. I am not really interested in MILFs.[/QUOTE]Ter review confirms Mina / Nina appearance rated 6 to 7 and she's BBFS low quality ccpkangels fans would enjoy her first sam the agel fxxxed it up now crazy ccploving witches messed all up Bellevue kgirl golden era is done now all we get are grade d or e beefs nonetheless crazy bitches snatched an old MILF away from the old MILF shop and then dumped her as trash what the fuck is this guys we must realize that we all got involved in this none other than modern day comfort women market damn it.

[QUOTE=JKStvenson;5796001]My recommendation for Jo the Angel is that she and her agency should consider relocation to Everett or Renton /SeaTac areas. People up or down there will love the late Sam the angels older lineups. I am saying this seriously, I am so sad and angry about what the loligangs ccploving witches did to Velvet. They should've let her work for Kangels, although Velvet was stupid. Sorry to the mongers but I truly hope to see all of them gone from our town, believe me much better agencies will come and there will be younger and prettier gals.[/QUOTE]Sam already tried Renton. I liked the location (same spot as a few of the Thai ladies).

But I don't think it got enough business to stay open. Maybe the Boeing clients don't have the extra budget?

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5796850]Sam already tried Renton. I liked the location (same spot as a few of the Thai ladies).

But I don't think it got enough business to stay open. Maybe the Boeing clients don't have the extra budget?[/QUOTE]Move to the brand new apartments at Alderwood mall or Alderwood Costco and put coco and Lexy there then BBFS mongers will follow them and the hidden mongers in the north region will emerge.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5796221]Lolipop Julie was doing BBFS with upcharge before she came to Lolipop. I might have seen Molly before. Did Molly have short hair and sneaked condom on you for CBJ during 69? That girl was YMMV and it seemed Molly went back to CFS in San Diego.[/QUOTE]I believe all these kgirls and BBFS are all about YMMV. Standard is 100 roses for BBFS but if they like you then they may just BBFS you without you even asking.

Regarding molly, she never did that to me through our multiple sessions. One time I grabbed the hat on the bed and she stopped me and said that no feel good and pulled out a bare skin one from the drawer. She has short hair. Natural small C. Very young like around 21-23 max. About 5'1 or 5'2 and very flexible too. She and I were very connected with eyes and dfk. She just won't let me rub her pussy for more than 5 seconds. She's in SD SoCal now. At least that's the same pic anyways. She said she was going to Cal but Los instead of SD.

[QUOTE=JKStvenson;5796903]Move to the brand new apartments at Alderwood mall or Alderwood Costco and put coco and Lexy there then BBFS mongers will follow them and the hidden mongers in the north region will emerge.[/QUOTE]Bellevue will get business from both north and south. Only 30 minutes from Everett. Bellevue still good choice.