Printable View
[QUOTE=James Doe69;1248646]Yeah Brandy is famous for shity service and a large upsell. She's not even that cute. White Portland trash at an upscale escorts rate IMHO[/QUOTE]I too have noted that Brandy Miller was posting again. This girl should be avoided at all cost. The absolute worst service that I have ever had. In fact she is a ripoff.
Couple years ago I went to see her at some old motor court type place over in IN. I met her & she wanted a ride up the street to get something at a local liquor store. She was checking me out first. She made me so damn nervous with all her questions & checks I though how can I get out of this. Plus she is OK attractive, but nothing special. She went in the store & I left. She called me pretty mad, but I just didn't feel comfortable & all I have read here since makes me know I made the right decision. There are way too many good girls around here to fool with flakey upsell ones & no one should see those that have a bad rep.
[QUOTE=OneSwiss;1249038]I too have noted that Brandy Miller was posting again. This girl should be avoided at all cost. The absolute worst service that I have ever had. In fact she is a ripoff.[/QUOTE]
Well just seen on the news that 1501 over in jeff got busted today and five ladys were booked. If you go to there site they took all the pics of the ladys off there site and the owner was on the news saying he did not know about the bust or anything about what they did. Looks like the massage parlors are going to hang low now after this bust so everyone be safe.
Just saw a local news story about 5 women busted for prostitution at 1501 in Jeffersonville. Lesson here should be that when experienced mongers warn you to beware of a particular situation, as they have here, you are wise to listen!
PS. According to the story, LE has a client list as well. Circle your wagons guys.
[url]http://www.wave3.com/story/15206227/police-jeffersonville-prostitution-bust-nets-client-list[/url]
[QUOTE=ChipJeep; 1249591]Just saw a local news story about 5 women busted for prostitution at 1501 in Jeffersonville. Lesson here should be that when experienced mongers warn you to beware of a particular situation, as they have here, you are wise to listen!
PS. According to the story, LE has a client list as well. Circle your wagons guys.[/QUOTE]Geez. For the love of god people. Get a burn phone and don't use your real name. Hello! McFly?
I do find it worth noting that LE went arrested a bunch of girls in the middle of the day. But no clients (you know there had to be at least 1 guy there there). As for the client list. Uncle may play like he's got something in his hands but my guess is he does not even have a pair of 2s.
[QUOTE=Bigtlvr; 1250025]Geez. For the love of god people. Get a burn phone and don't use your real name. Hello! McFly?
I do find it worth noting that LE went arrested a bunch of girls in the middle of the day. But no clients (you know there had to be at least 1 guy there there). As for the client list. Uncle may play like he's got something in his hands but my guess is he does not even have a pair of 2s.[/QUOTE]Even if they have a list all they can prove is that someone with a phone number called.
[QUOTE=Coloice;1250150]Even if they have a list all they can prove is that you were there, nothing else.[/QUOTE]Nope, they can't even prove you were there. The article said they,"confinscated a SO-CALLED client list." They don't even know if it IS a client list. All they know is that it is a list of names and numbers. That's it. It doesn't PROVE you were there, it doesn't PROVE you did anything. And I seriously doubt LE has the time or the money to investigate a list of names. Even if they did investigate it, all that would entail is them calling a few on the list and the "client" asking how they got his name, they have never been there. Even if they were to get phone records which would have to be supeanaed, it still doesn't prove anyone was there. Maybe someone called for info and the business wrote down your name and number from caller ID for advertisint purposes (although stupid, it doesn't mean they didn't do it). And still it wouldn't really matter because it was the girls who got caught in prostitution and not anyone else. They were with undercover and caught in the act. It makes no difference who was there before them. We've all read on here even that many of the girls upsell and the client declines, big deal! They aren't going to waste the time, the paperwork, etc on getting phone records, particularly if it won't strengthen the case. It doesn't matter in this case, there were five girls CAUGHT in the act, that is enough evidence there to nail the owner and the girls, but trying to prove which person on a list was actually there, which client particpated in what, that is impossible and won't make a difference either way. I am not claiming to KNOW anything for certain, but this is all my educated guess on the matter!
I do also believe there is a statue of limitations in the state of Indiana on this kind of thing.
LE can threaten to bring their suspicions up with a client's SO or workplace. Whether true or not, it could be enough to scare some individuals into admitting things they shouldn't.
Remember guys, if this happens to you, just STFU! They can likely prove nothing unless you incriminate your self.
Check this link out for some GREAT info.
[url]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4097602514885833865&hl=en[/url]#
Seems from your overtly knowledgeable and generous comments about phone lists, that the main reason to use an alias and a burn phone is to protect oneself from blackmail and indiscreet or blackmailing comments on the part of providers and their managers. And, to control the possibility that family members might stumble across or purposely find phone records attached to our names. Right? Additionally, I try to use small independent providers as much as possible, and increasingly I stick to a few favorites. And, I really avoid larger operations in residential or upscale and visible office park settings. Would you agree with this general strategy?
[QUOTE=Jim True Blue; 1250160]Nope, they can't even prove you were there. The article said they,"confinscated a SO-CALLED client list." They don't even know if it IS a client list. All they know is that it is a list of names and numbers. That's it. It doesn't PROVE you were there, it doesn't PROVE you did anything. And I seriously doubt LE has the time or the money to investigate a list of names. Even if they did investigate it, all that would entail is them calling a few on the list and the "client" asking how they got his name, they have never been there. Even if they were to get phone records which would have to be supeanaed, it still doesn't prove anyone was there. Maybe someone called for info and the business wrote down your name and number from caller I'd for advertisint purposes (although stupid, it doesn't mean they didn't do it). And still it wouldn't really matter because it was the girls who got caught in prostitution and not anyone else. They were with undercover and caught in the act. It makes no difference who was there before them. We've all read on here even that many of the girls upsell and the client declines, big deal! They aren't going to waste the time, the paperwork, etc on getting phone records, particularly if it won't strengthen the case. It doesn't matter in this case, there were five girls CAUGHT in the act, that is enough evidence there to nail the owner and the girls, but trying to prove which person on a list was actually there, which client particpated in what, that is impossible and won't make a difference either way. I am not claiming to KNOW anything for certain, but this is all my educated guess on the matter!
I do also believe there is a statue of limitations in the state of Indiana on this kind of thing.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Nobecz;1250262]Seems from your overtly knowledgeable and generous comments about phone lists, that the main reason to use an alias and a burn phone is to protect oneself from blackmail and indiscreet or blackmailing comments on the part of providers and their managers. And, to control the possibility that family members might stumble across or purposely find phone records attached to our names. Right? Additionally, I try to use small independent providers as much as possible, and increasingly I stick to a few favorites. And, I really avoid larger operations in residential or upscale and visible office park settings. Would you agree with this general strategy?[/QUOTE]I check out this "massage board" just for kicks. I graduated from the 'rub & tug' years ago! LMAO
[QUOTE=Jim True Blue; 1250160]Nope, they can't even prove you were there. The article said they,"confinscated a SO-CALLED client list." They don't even know if it IS a client list. All they know is that it is a list of names and numbers. That's it. It doesn't PROVE you were there, it doesn't PROVE you did anything. And I seriously doubt LE has the time or the money to investigate a list of names. Even if they did investigate it, all that would entail is them calling a few on the list and the "client" asking how they got his name, they have never been there. Even if they were to get phone records which would have to be supeanaed, it still doesn't prove anyone was there. Maybe someone called for info and the business wrote down your name and number from caller I'd for advertisint purposes (although stupid, it doesn't mean they didn't do it). And still it wouldn't really matter because it was the girls who got caught in prostitution and not anyone else. They were with undercover and caught in the act. It makes no difference who was there before them. We've all read on here even that many of the girls upsell and the client declines, big deal! They aren't going to waste the time, the paperwork, etc on getting phone records, particularly if it won't strengthen the case. It doesn't matter in this case, there were five girls CAUGHT in the act, that is enough evidence there to nail the owner and the girls, but trying to prove which person on a list was actually there, which client particpated in what, that is impossible and won't make a difference either way. I am not claiming to KNOW anything for certain, but this is all my educated guess on the matter!
I do also believe there is a statue of limitations in the state of Indiana on this kind of thing.[/QUOTE]JTB.
I mispoke, I meant to say prove only that you called or someone from that number called.
[QUOTE=Coloice; 1250347]JTB.
I mispoke, I meant to say prove only that you called or someone from that number called.[/QUOTE]Your name and your number on a list or rather piece of paper doesn't MEAN you called either. It COULD mean that or it could just mean someone has your name and your number for some reason. Who the hell knows who gave it to them or where they pulled it from? I get advertisements with my name and current address on it from local businesses which I have never been in contact with. Point being, something has to be PROVEN to be used against you or you have to admit it. Get it? Seriously, I wouldn't worry about my name and number on a freakin' peice of paper. It is only as credible as the paper it is written on. It proves NOTHING! Remember, it is the media who mentioned a "so-called" client list, not LE. In fact LE didn't appear to say anything about a list at all. Probably because they don't care about it, because they know it is pointless, a waste of time and means nothing. See the difference? News will say anything to cause, exitement or stir. That is their job. Anything to cause stupid drama. If it isn't exciting, it won't capture attention. Hey, I visited there once too and my name is maybe on that list and maybe not. I am not admitting I did anything, in fact when I was solicited, I declined, I just like a nice body rub by a pretty lady, get my drift ;)
Did someone say, 'BURN PHONE?'
What do we always tell the providers when they get pissed at us for telling too much on here? We say,"it's just words written, you have to be caught in the act to be in trouble". Now do we really believe that? If so then the client list means nothing, because it is just words. You shouldn't sweat words, right? If not, then I guess words can hurt. It at the very least can scare the shit out of some of us and lead to issues or fear. DAMN words anyway!
They said the oldest woman was 23, Ill be damned if the blonde with the mole doesn't look at least 30. Hey who knows mugshots might put on 10 yrs.