Printable View
[QUOTE=FishMan72;4380236]Very interested.[/QUOTE]I may not be able to pull this off tomorrow. It isn't her fault. It is mine as I picked up a horrible cold and won't be able to play. I will let you know as soon as I can out a day together for her to host.
[URL]http://huntington.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/marie/269607579678[/URL]
One of my utr's. She asked me to give her a good reference. Don't hesitate. I don't know what her donations are though, probably not outrageous. I've shared her info before on here through pm's. I would go see her today but I'm not able.
Let me know if you see her!!!!
Couldn't search for a name, but was wondering if anyone has seen this woman in Red House:
[URL]http://huntington.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_e/cute-nude-milf-girlmeet-for-ad/372467589215[/URL]
[QUOTE=NiceBlueEyes;4383250]Couldn't search for a name, but was wondering if anyone has seen this woman in Red House:
[URL]http://huntington.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_e/cute-nude-milf-girlmeet-for-ad/372467589215[/URL][/QUOTE]I haven't seen her but I talked to her for awhile a couple of weeks ago, at that time she said she lived on the West Side of Charleston and had a one month old baby and her husband knew what she was doing and supported it.
She said he would be there so I backed out, don't want or need any husband drama like that.
[QUOTE=SamzAdams;4382368][URL]http://huntington.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/marie/269607579678[/URL]
One of my utr's. She asked me to give her a good reference. Don't hesitate. I don't know what her donations are though, probably not outrageous. I've shared her info before on here through pm's. I would go see her today but I'm not able.
Let me know if you see her!!!![/QUOTE]QV - . 9.
HHr - 1. 2.
He - 1. 6.
Used to be on SA and is now on WYP under the name Nich0 le1992 (or something like that). She seems super hot almost TGTBT. Her communication is a little hot and cold (she stopped communicating with me at one point after I contacted her via SA, but she has been texting a lot this week), which gives me some pause, but I wouldn't say it is a red flag or anything. The women I meet up with definitely have different communication styles than I am used to. Heh.
Anyone visited with her? I'm probably meeting up with her later this week and can TOFTT but would rather not go into it cold if I don't have to.
Looking for something a little different anyone have this a try yet?
[URL]http://huntington.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/thick-blonde-looking-for-fun/185944097251[/URL]
[QUOTE=NiceBlueEyes;4387645]Used to be on SA and is now on WYP under the name Nich0 le1992 (or something like that). She seems super hot almost TGTBT. Her communication is a little hot and cold (she stopped communicating with me at one point after I contacted her via SA, but she has been texting a lot this week), which gives me some pause, but I wouldn't say it is a red flag or anything. The women I meet up with definitely have different communication styles than I am used to. Heh.
Anyone visited with her? I'm probably meeting up with her later this week and can TOFTT but would rather not go into it cold if I don't have to.[/QUOTE]She will disappear after you do not send her $ upfront. Total waste of time. At least that was my experience.
I communicated with her too through Secret Benefits--she's on 3 sugar daddy sites probably because they are free for her. She gave me a number and seemed urgent to meet. I texted her then 2 hours later got a text from her but through a different number. That was the first red flag for me. Then she became impatient, texting me on both numbers seeing if I wanted an arrangement. Told her I was busy. Woke up the next morning to 3 more texts. I am not pursuing this because too many red flags. Another one was when I first texted her I kept the message vague. She didn't even ask how I got the number, which site, etc.
Scman is Senior member with reliable intel so that supports my decision to avoid.
Peace and be safe.
M-19.
[QUOTE=Scman011;4388008]She will disappear after you do not send her $ upfront. Total waste of time. At least that was my experience.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=NiceBlueEyes;4387645]Used to be on SA and is now on WYP under the name Nich0 le1992 (or something like that). She seems super hot almost TGTBT. Her communication is a little hot and cold (she stopped communicating with me at one point after I contacted her via SA, but she has been texting a lot this week), which gives me some pause, but I wouldn't say it is a red flag or anything. The women I meet up with definitely have different communication styles than I am used to. Heh.
Anyone visited with her? I'm probably meeting up with her later this week and can TOFTT but would rather not go into it cold if I don't have to.[/QUOTE]I have been texting with her this week as well. Seems way to over eager. If you TOFTT I'd be interested because she's is hot.
OK, I should have listened to you all. She was a scammer and I got scammed for the first time. She looks exactly like her photos. Maybe 10 extra pounds, but not much. Her house on Hal Greer Blvd near Marshall is very, very spartan and dirty. She said she lives upstairs, but the place looked barely lived in, if at all.
I am super, super focused on not ever asking for a quid pro quo (sex for money), so I always put the money on the table first thing, so anything we do is not dependent on the money. So after a few minutes of chatting, she tells me that she "isn't ready" for anything sexual today. So it puts me in the position where I am forced to either ask for a quid pro quo (not knowing if she is a cop) or lose the agreed-upon "allowance. " I opted for the latter, given the potential consequences if she is a cop. I'm sure she isn't actually a cop, but just a scammer. Though, given the fact that the house didn't look lived in, it is by no means 100% that she wasn't working for cops.
Either way, I would steer clear, as the two of you did. Lesson learned.
[QUOTE=Marillion19;4388039]I communicated with her too through Secret Benefits--she's on 3 sugar daddy sites probably because they are free for her. She gave me a number and seemed urgent to meet. I texted her then 2 hours later got a text from her but through a different number. That was the first red flag for me. Then she became impatient, texting me on both numbers seeing if I wanted an arrangement. Told her I was busy. Woke up the next morning to 3 more texts. I am not pursuing this because too many red flags. Another one was when I first texted her I kept the message vague. She didn't even ask how I got the number, which site, etc.
Scman is Senior member with reliable intel so that supports my decision to avoid.
Peace and be safe.
M-19.[/QUOTE]
A lot of new girls hit SA this week. Whew. Must be college students coming back. Chatting with quite a few that seem promising. Anyone having any luck lately?
[QUOTE=NiceBlueEyes;4388399]OK, I should have listened to you all. She was a scammer and I got scammed for the first time. She looks exactly like her photos. Maybe 10 extra pounds, but not much. Her house on Hal Greer Blvd near Marshall is very, very spartan and dirty. She said she lives upstairs, but the place looked barely lived in, if at all.
I am super, super focused on not ever asking for a quid pro quo (sex for money), so I always put the money on the table first thing, so anything we do is not dependent on the money. So after a few minutes of chatting, she tells me that she isn't ready for anything sexual today. So it puts me in the position where I am forced to either ask for a quid pro quo (not knowing if she is a cop) or lose the agreed-upon allowance. I opted for the latter, given the potential consequences if she is a cop. I'm sure she isn't actually a cop, but just a scammer. Though, given the fact that the house didn't look lived in, it is by no means 100% that she wasn't working for cops.
Either way, I would steer clear, as the two of you did. Lesson learned.[/QUOTE]Man, sorry about your luck on that site. I was on there 4-5 years ago and have not been motivated to get back on there because to much BS as you have proven. So basically you pay way to much money for a monthly membership to have ho's bombard you with text messages for weeks on end before most likely getting scammed because that piece of shit site won't allow anyone to arrange $ for sex word for word in there messaging format? FUKK that Garbage ass site! I'd rather just let Nick Carter weed them out for us all! Bahaha lullz.
[QUOTE=NiceBlueEyes;4388399]OK, I should have listened to you all. She was a scammer and I got scammed for the first time. She looks exactly like her photos. Maybe 10 extra pounds, but not much. Her house on Hal Greer Blvd near Marshall is very, very spartan and dirty. She said she lives upstairs, but the place looked barely lived in, if at all.
I am super, super focused on not ever asking for a quid pro quo (sex for money), so I always put the money on the table first thing, so anything we do is not dependent on the money. So after a few minutes of chatting, she tells me that she "isn't ready" for anything sexual today. So it puts me in the position where I am forced to either ask for a quid pro quo (not knowing if she is a cop) or lose the agreed-upon "allowance. " I opted for the latter, given the potential consequences if she is a cop. I'm sure she isn't actually a cop, but just a scammer. Though, given the fact that the house didn't look lived in, it is by no means 100% that she wasn't working for cops.
Either way, I would steer clear, as the two of you did. Lesson learned.[/QUOTE]Damn, sorry to hear this. I definitely understand your caution. Sounds like she does this regularly. That's a problem with these sites when they offer free memberships to the women. Hopefully no one else gets taken.
Peace and be safe.
M-19.
[QUOTE=NickCarter003;4389407]A lot of new girls hit SA this week. Whew. Must be college students coming back. Chatting with quite a few that seem promising. Anyone having any luck lately?[/QUOTE]Check out the recent posts on Nicole and avoid. She's on SA and a few others.
Peace and be safe.
M-19.