Does anyone got a review on Bona? She lookin mad thicc. [URL]https://topangels.ch/topangel/bona2/[/URL]
Printable View
Does anyone got a review on Bona? She lookin mad thicc. [URL]https://topangels.ch/topangel/bona2/[/URL]
[QUOTE=MrTacoo;7383323]Does anyone got a review on Bona? She lookin mad thicc. [URL]https://topangels.ch/topangel/bona2/[/URL][/QUOTE]
Yes, someone reviewed her under her other name. For some reason, different bookers use different names for the same girl. It suddenly became even more common recently. It's arguably worse than rebranding and the only thing that seems to work is to ignore it. It is very frustrating and unhelpful, so I'm out.
[QUOTE=Chuminh;7382358]FA verified me through another Korg.
I told them I was cleared on booker grey & CAKDOLL.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for this info, screening may have changed in recent times. I hope people screened with CAKD OC or BG reach out to FA to get screened. Happy customers stick with korgs and reuse the bookers who helped them. CAKD OC is a very important korg to screen with, they host a fair share of hot girls. CAKD SD is the same way, I even spelled it out limiting the list to just SD:
[QUOTE=Download X;7381870]I want to point out that CAKD (SD) has a high share of the best looking girls. Here is a ranked list of all high-tier girls that have visited SD this year in order: Isabella (BLUE), Winter (CAKD), Aoi J (CAKD), Nara (CAKD), Nakamura (BLUE), Claudia (BLUE), Kaori (BLUE), Purple K (CAKD), Kiko (BLUE), Allie (SKP), Minami (CAKD), and Haven (XOXO). Haven is my cutoff for "low A-Tier" aka the top 12% for looks. [/QUOTE]
But it's not like every girl is hot, it's just a higher percentage. Every korg has their advantage. FA and BLUE are known for being the cheapest, and they host the very first (and thereby hottest) girl on that list. I "only like Asians" but consider Isabella better looking than every single S-Tier kgirl I've seen so far. Agencies like SKP (which most bookers book for) focus on bb special. So there is an advantage for every korg.
[B]Akari-J[/B] will be back, she is a high service jgirl who is a bit mature (pre-MILF) and fun.
[QUOTE=Download X;7348275][B]Akari[/B] - 30s, service over looks, naughty and fun. High service jgirl.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31130-Korean-Agency-BB&p=7347652&viewfull=1#post7347652[/URL] Akari J[/QUOTE]
I don't usually post about a girl unless I have clear intel on her. I know about Akari J from others who saw her too. It lines up closely with what Tccolim wrote and other clues I've seen, so it's why I left my notes and included his review. Akari J has both looks and service, but is more a priority for service hunters. Anyone might enjoy her though.
One tip I have is that HYA hunters tend to review HYA in a way that makes sense to other HYA hunters, and service hunters do the same for other service hunters. It's why if a service hunter says a girl is high service, it's close a sure thing that she is. But when even a service hunter says a girl is exceptionally good looking and is won over, it also tends to be true since they rarely say anything. This is what I mean about reading reviews with a critical eye and also looking at a reviewer's past reviews to understand their standards. Some reviewers have lower standards and that's okay - they have every right to like who they like. But you just have to be aware of that and know they might like different girls than you. For various reasons, I only follow some reviewers.
About looks. It is always a bit funny to see people argue [I]what order[/I] the S-Tier and A-Tier girls should be ranked in, when we're basically all agreeing that they are all hot. It is fun to rank them still, but there is a huge gap between A-Tier and C or D girls who are the most common. It is really rare for someone to put a C or D tier next to an A tier in "looks only", so clearly despite varying tastes we all share common basic standards. C and D tier girls may be fun and worth seeing for their other specialties sometimes. For example, there are many B or C tier girls I will see because they have perfect tits or perfect ass, and I just focus my eyes on that the whole time. Or butterfaces with a golden pussy, where keeping her in doggy it turns into perfection. We make the most of things, and we all want some variety sometimes too.
There is a high proportion of new girls lately. Mapmakers will be needed to sort them out. But there are also some returning girls, whom you can search for reviews on them from months back.
[B]Terra[/B] starts Monday, and there are reviews of her from SD. For a long time I would quote reviews to help people research a girl. Then I switched to dropping a bunch of links to help people read and research, to make people more independent. Now, I will just tell you to search SD for her name. This is the 3-level progression of training so you won't need help from anyone in the future. My hope is people think for themselves and practice good research and decision making. It's the only way.
[QUOTE=Download X;7379539]I was actually recommended Terra by Allie of all people! However, I don't take recommendations except from other certified HYA hunters (this is an important rule for HYA hunters)..the last girl Allie recommended to me was her ex-roommate Krissy, back when they were both still SD. I had already repeated Krissy many times when Allie said this to me so I said "Hrrmm umm" not wanting to admit it. Allie would always encourage me to bang her hot friends, all year round. She is a one of a kind girl.[/QUOTE]
Oh right, now I will copy my tip on [B]Allie[/B]. Earlier this year, I pointed out to SD she would leave someday when SD stopped repeating her, and of course she did. OC is under the same rule btw.
[QUOTE=Download X;7382346]If you want both looks and service together, I already made a short list for OC you can look up. It is quite a short list with Allie and Jenny being no surprise there.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31240-Asian-PLEASER-discussion-forum-(please-post-reviews-in-the-review-forum)&p=7361901&viewfull=1#post7361901[/URL] High looks and service
[B]Once people stop seeing Allie in OC, she is gone from there too.[/B][/QUOTE]
It is up to you. Some day we will not have her in OC either.
Peach is also another good option. I would suggest hh with her. I made the same specific suggestion on a few other kgirls too. It is the best way to have a good time imo.
I really hate ad photos, but they are also necessary in order to match the correct girl in case another girl comes along with the exact same name. Agencies reuse names a lot. Attached is the ad photo for Terra. I would not rely on ad photos for expectations, however.
It is my sincere hope people find the girls they like, be happy, and avoid multiple shipwrecks. Only way.
[QUOTE=BobLove;7382430]Any info on Joanna? Getting rebrand vibes.[/QUOTE]Maybe I'm a bit slow. Which Joanna are we talking about? Got an ad link?
She's quite pricey. I'm hoping someone TOFTT and posts a review to gauge whether the upcharge is worth it.
[QUOTE=NomadPush;7383233]Tried to book today. Booker went silent on me when I ask about availability, she must be booked out.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DownloadX;7383577]Yes, someone reviewed her under her other name. For some reason, different bookers use different names for the same girl. It suddenly became even more common recently. It's arguably worse than rebranding and the only thing that seems to work is to ignore it. It is very frustrating and unhelpful, so I'm out. [/QUOTE]What was her name previously if you mind me asking? I can just look for her reviews around here. Thank you.
Does anyone know where Katie K went after leaving CAKD? Back to home?
[QUOTE=Mrworldwide89;7383634]She's quite pricey. I'm hoping someone TOFTT and posts a review to gauge whether the upcharge is worth it.[/QUOTE]Loveq is pricey so one and done. Good body at least. Not a fan of price especially upcharge its too high for what offered.
Hami a good option she's older but looks great and good service. If I got to pay upcharge I rather pay 100 with cip.
[QUOTE=Gooner3;7383720]Does anyone know where Katie K went after leaving CAKD? Back to home?[/QUOTE]The word on the street is that she went back home to Korea, possibly returning sometime in the winter so we'll just have to see.
[QUOTE=Mrworldwide89;7383634]She's quite pricey. I'm hoping someone TOFTT and posts a review to gauge whether the upcharge is worth it.[/QUOTE]I saw her {420/ hr) with bb option (+150) and enjoyed myself. She is a pretty HYA, bubbly, dfk, and wants to have a good time. English is passable. She is new to the American K-girl routine and that is part of what made it appealing. I will repeat, but need to save up my nickels so I can indulge in the bb option. She has a real tight box.
Yes, someone reviewed her under her other name. For some reason, different bookers use different names for the same girl. It suddenly became even more common recently. It's arguably worse than rebranding and the only thing that seems to work is to ignore it. It is very frustrating and unhelpful, so I'm out.
I think the one has been reviewed is a different provider.
This Boa appeared after the review was posted.
[URL]https://get9irl.com/Boa[/URL]
I believed the Boa has beed reviewed is this Boa who's moving to LA.
[URL]https://get9irl.com/BoaK[/URL]
[QUOTE=Ggininder;7383783]I think the one has been reviewed is a different provider.
This Boa appeared after the review was posted.
[URL]https://get9irl.com/Boa[/URL]
I believed the Boa has beed reviewed is this Boa who's moving to LA.
[URL]https://get9irl.com/BoaK[/URL][/QUOTE]
That's exactly my point, it confused you just now too. Read again carefully, OP never mentioned Boa and neither did I. OP was talking about TA Bona. TA Bona is Get9 Boa but not Get9 Boa K.
[QUOTE=MrTacoo;7383323]Does anyone got a review on [B]Bona[/B]? She lookin mad thicc. [URL]https://topangels.ch/topangel/bona2/[/URL][/QUOTE]
And that is just one example of how confusing it always is. I won't explain it all, it is a very bad idea and caused chaos in SD. No one ended up seeing well-reviewed girls because no one had any idea who they were! [I]I still don't[/I].
Even when people hinted that girl A was girl B was girl C and that girl A's review meant girl C was good, people were reluctant to see girl C since they couldn't be sure. I wouldn't either.
I ended up about 60% sure about girl B and C, because it hinged on if no reviewer made a mistake in a series of different posts. There were scattered posts about three girls who turned out to actually be the same girl. This kind of breaks my workflow of just gathering different reviews and comparing them, giving more weight to reviewers I knew well. Now I have to instead trust everyone 100% to even get one bit of intel. I don't want to do that, so I ignore those girls and so did many others.
[QUOTE=Ggininder;7383795]TA Bona pics match Get9 Boa pics tho.
I saw Boa K page was in OC and it was just Boa without K.[/QUOTE]
Yes I already know that perfectly well. That's not the problem.
[QUOTE=DownloadX;7383792]That's exactly my point, it confused you just now too. Read again carefully, OP never mentioned Boa even one single time and neither did I. OP was talking about TA Bona. TA Bona is Get9 Boa. But not Get9 Boa K. Once again, neither of us said Boa, you did.
And that is just one example of how confusing it always is. I won't explain it all, it is a very bad idea and caused chaos in SD. No one ended up seeing well-reviewed girls because no one had any idea who they were! [I]I still don't[/I].[/QUOTE]TA Bona pics match Get9 Boa pics tho.
I saw Boa K page was in OC and it was just Boa without K.
I don't know what the fuss is about her. Disappointed.
Pics: not her.
Since she's well reviewed already I'll skip the deets.
Sure, she had nice natural tits but apparently was sensitive so didn't even get to suck on them. Didn't allow DATY. Her body proportions are pretty average, legs same length as torso. Not toned. Face wise, very average. Her BBBJ was sad, was like a cat licking and no suction. Anyway, did one round, was hoping for a second but she seemed disinterested and I wasn't feeling it either. Pretty lousy experience IMO. Wouldn't repeat.
[QUOTE=Ggininder;7383795]TA Bona pics match Get9 Boa pics tho.
I saw Boa K page was in OC and it was just Boa without K.[/QUOTE]Thank you gentlemen for the info but now I'm wondering which one is her real body? Is TA Bona / get9 Boa thin or thicc?
[QUOTE=Caker49;7383906]I don't know what the fuss is about her. Disappointed.
Pics: not her.
Since she's well reviewed already I'll skip the deets.
Sure, she had nice natural tits but apparently was sensitive so didn't even get to suck on them. Didn't allow DATY. Her body proportions are pretty average, legs same length as torso. Not toned. Face wise, very average. Her BBBJ was sad, was like a cat licking and no suction. Anyway, did one round, was hoping for a second but she seemed disinterested and I wasn't feeling it either. Pretty lousy experience IMO. Wouldn't repeat.[/QUOTE]I tend to agree with you. My first visit was a long while back and I would give it a 6. 5 overall. The BJ was a bit lackluster and she didn't allow me to DATY or DATO. I'm always on the hunt for a "Phoebe" type session.