LA LA Land Bullshit and Fight Club

I am definitely laughing at the notion of mongers having "game. " Sure, you can develop, mold, and nurture a good relationship with a provider. She may like you, be attracted to you, enjoy your company, give you extra time, see you OTC, etc. If that happens, it is a combination of luck, chemistry, and simply treating a provider well. I wouldn't call it "game" unless you end up in a situation where you are seeing a provider for free, on a regular basis, with NSA. Unless that happens, the entire relationship is a business exchange, regardless of the particulars outside of that exchange. As long as an economic exchange for a service is the foundation of the relationship, there is no "game" involved.

In my mind, game is landing NSA pussy from civies. Now, you may argue that civies cost money, too (meals, drinks, etc), and that is true. But unless you are finding them through sugar daddy sites (which still counts are mongering), an economic exchange is not generally the foundation of the relationship.

[QUOTE=FiatVoluptas;5700331]I am definitely laughing at the notion of mongers having "game. " Sure, you can develop, mold, and nurture a good relationship with a provider. She may like you, be attracted to you, enjoy your company, give you extra time, see you OTC, etc. If that happens, it is a combination of luck, chemistry, and simply treating a provider well. I wouldn't call it "game" unless you end up in a situation where you are seeing a provider for free, on a regular basis, with NSA. Unless that happens, the entire relationship is a business exchange, regardless of the particulars outside of that exchange. As long as an economic exchange for a service is the foundation of the relationship, there is no "game" involved.

In my mind, game is landing NSA pussy from civies. Now, you may argue that civies cost money, too (meals, drinks, etc), and that is true. But unless you are finding them through sugar daddy sites (which still counts are mongering), an economic exchange is not generally the foundation of the relationship.[/QUOTE]If I pay 40 G for a car, and you can figure out a way to get the deal for 30 G, I'd say you've got game. Something is going on. Why do you think it is different w / girls. My personal pref is only sugar dating, not massage parlors or escorts, but again it is a situation where there are a wide range of deals that people make, for a wide variety of reasons.

[QUOTE=FarFarAway;5700776]If I pay 40 G for a car, and you can figure out a way to get the deal for 30 G, I'd say you've got game. Something is going on. Why do you think it is different w / girls. My personal pref is only sugar dating, not massage parlors or escorts, but again it is a situation where there are a wide range of deals that people make, for a wide variety of reasons.[/QUOTE]I see what you mean, but my interpretation of "game" in terms of women is wooing a girl into wanting to sleep with you because she's into you, not haggling a discount out of her when it's already understood form the beginning that you're paying for her pussy. But, that's just me. Sugar dating is a bit of a grey area that I don't have much experience with.

Theoretically, when would we see the benefits of all the money coming to town for the big game? In my head there should be some benefit to us simple mongers.

[QUOTE=FiatVoluptas;5700331]I am definitely laughing at the notion of mongers having "game."[/QUOTE]Nobody with "game" is on this site. I don't see a "free pussy" thread anywhere.

If any of us have any "game" we certainly aren't using any of it mongering chicks for pussy.

And, the argument that it's cheaper somehow than drinks and dinner is bullshit.

I'll give old married guys half credit because they can't risk being caught trying to pick up chicks somewhere, but we still aren't getting laid because of any "game" we may still have.

[QUOTE=Stickens;5708100]Theoretically, when would we see the benefits of all the money coming to town for the big game? In my head there should be some benefit to us simple mongers.[/QUOTE]It does not seem that the presence of two NFL teams has turned inglehood into beverly hills south. I doubt the superbowl is going to bring much fanfare here. It is just a weekend, and remember, due to omicron (one of the symptoms is that when you put water on your face you feel wet), there may be a certain pall over the matter.

Unless you sell bacon wrapped hot dogs and elotes outside sofi, not sure how the superbowl will affect anyone.

[QUOTE=JustnBeaver;5692868]Truth be told.

Hey guys,

I have devoloped AI Logistics programs for the likes of Billionaires. Humaniplex is a loser centralized program to grift off of the production, while the grifters have no real life skills. In all actuality, I developed software to do everything Humaniplex 5 LOSERS do, for free. Or, In decentralized land there are always programs like Reddit where a seeker can get the coochie without the grifters. Like, I have a Brooklyn Bridge to sell you, stupid.

It is an age old theme that YOU are stupid enough to pay a loser who fucks drug addicts and masturbates to their terrible videos, no art.

Jedi69.

And you probably will pay. You cannot figure the basics, like meeting a dtfg..[/QUOTE]Sometimes it is hard to tell if someone is mentally ill with poor English, or just a bot.

[QUOTE=BikiniFan;5708149]Nobody with "game" is on this site. I don't see a "free pussy" thread anywhere.

If any of us have any "game" we certainly aren't using any of it mongering chicks for pussy.

And, the argument that it's cheaper somehow than drinks and dinner is bullshit.

I'll give old married guys half credit because they can't risk being caught trying to pick up chicks somewhere, but we still aren't getting laid because of any "game" we may still have.[/QUOTE]I get your point, but that's not always it. I love the transactional sex. I have no interest in emotional attachment or listening to yet another woman's bullshit. I travel a lot and have had many opportunities over the years to start something with a civvie, but then what, I got to have this whole second life thing that's as big a pain as my real one? Not a lot of women looking for one night stands. I browse the listings, find someone that looks hot, and go fuck them. The couple hundred bucks is inconsequential, particularly compared to the baggage of sex with some girl I met in a bar.

[QUOTE=BadInfluence;5709374]I get your point, but that's not always it. I love the transactional sex. I have no interest in emotional attachment or listening to yet another woman's bullshit. I travel a lot and have had many opportunities over the years to start something with a civvie, but then what, I got to have this whole second life thing that's as big a pain as my real one? Not a lot of women looking for one night stands. I browse the listings, find someone that looks hot, and go fuck them. The couple hundred bucks is inconsequential, particularly compared to the baggage of sex with some girl I met in a bar.[/QUOTE]That exactly is my point. Any game you have you aren't completely using because you choose not to, you would prefer to pay a chick for a quick fuck. Nothing wrong with that. I commend you.

[QUOTE=Stickens;5708100]Theoretically, when would we see the benefits of all the money coming to town for the big game? In my head there should be some benefit to us simple mongers.[/QUOTE]The city is going to have more fat cats and ballers than normal that week. Expect some girls coming out of the woodwork to get a piece of the action, and some regulars increasing their rates to cash in on the whales in town.

[QUOTE=SFVsag;5710877]The city is going to have more fat cats and ballers than normal that week. Expect some girls coming out of the woodwork to get a piece of the action, and some regulars increasing their rates to cash in on the whales in town.[/QUOTE]Looks like the NFL cannot tolerate the bullshit laws down here and may move the game to dallas.

[URL]https://nypost.com/2022/01/05/nfl-super-bowl-contingency-would-move-game-to-att-stadium/[/URL]

[QUOTE=PriscillaM;5712458]Looks like the NFL cannot tolerate the bullshit laws down here and may move the game to dallas.

[URL]https://nypost.com/2022/01/05/nfl-super-bowl-contingency-would-move-game-to-att-stadium/[/URL][/QUOTE]I do hope they move the superbowl. If any red state team wins (Tennessee. is likely, DallastV too, and even Wisconsin. Which but for Milwaukee is red AF) and comes here and has its fans told to wear a mask in a hotel or uber or restaurant, there will be riots.

So, I am just curious. Is BBFS way more prevalent than before, or is it just that it is now more openly advertised? I was itching for some K pussy yesterday, and while I have a couple regulars whom I see almost exclusively these days, I was craving something new. I noticed that at almost every agency, most girls are advertised as BBFS, even at traditionally CFS agencies like CA-Kdolls. With all due respect to you BBFS guys, I don't partake and I typically avoid known BBFS girls because I am a DATY fanatic (not tying to eat some dude's baby goo!) and I just feel the corresponding risk is out of my comfort zone. I actually was not able to find a girl I wanted to see who was not labeled BBFS. That, coupled with the fact that almost every agency uses fake pics these days ultimately led me to seeing one of the above-mentioned regulars instead. Anyway, I am just curious about this. No hard feelings or complaints toward the BBFS scene!

P.S. I wish Jazmin from CA-Kdolls would come back. Hottie. She took great care of me!

[QUOTE=FiatVoluptas;5715537]So, I am just curious. Is BBFS way more prevalent than before, or is it just that it is now more openly advertised? I was itching for some K pussy yesterday, and while I have a couple regulars whom I see almost exclusively these days, I was craving something new. I noticed that at almost every agency, most girls are advertised as BBFS, even at traditionally CFS agencies like CA-Kdolls. With all due respect to you BBFS guys, I don't partake and I typically avoid known BBFS girls because I am a DATY fanatic (not tying to eat some dude's baby goo!) and I just feel the corresponding risk is out of my comfort zone. I actually was not able to find a girl I wanted to see who was not labeled BBFS. That, coupled with the fact that almost every agency uses fake pics these days ultimately led me to seeing one of the above-mentioned regulars instead. Anyway, I am just curious about this. No hard feelings or complaints toward the BBFS scene!

P.S. I wish Jazmin from CA-Kdolls would come back. Hottie. She took great care of me![/QUOTE]She's permanent up there, I inquired the booker there if she was just touring, They told me she's there's for very long time until she chooses to leave.

[QUOTE=FiatVoluptas;5715537]So, I am just curious. Is BBFS way more prevalent than before, or is it just that it is now more openly advertised? I was itching for some K pussy yesterday, and while I have a couple regulars whom I see almost exclusively these days, I was craving something new. I noticed that at almost every agency, most girls are advertised as BBFS, even at traditionally CFS agencies like CA-Kdolls. With all due respect to you BBFS guys, I don't partake and I typically avoid known BBFS girls because I am a DATY fanatic (not tying to eat some dude's baby goo!) and I just feel the corresponding risk is out of my comfort zone. I actually was not able to find a girl I wanted to see who was not labeled BBFS. That, coupled with the fact that almost every agency uses fake pics these days ultimately led me to seeing one of the above-mentioned regulars instead. Anyway, I am just curious about this. No hard feelings or complaints toward the BBFS scene!

P.S. I wish Jazmin from CA-Kdolls would come back. Hottie. She took great care of me![/QUOTE]Yes, it's out in the open for the most part. Even C-orgs now offer it as well. Pre 2020, it was UTR and you had to "test" girls to see if you're willing to do it and there was a possibility to get black listed if you happen to get a girl who wanted to be a hoe bag and snitch on you for being "dangerous". I usually got a no and that was the end of that. Some girls would sour up pretty fast if you attempted this. Some were cool and just forgot about it as soon as you tried. IMO, for girls to stay competitive, they had to offer BBFS or lose market share to other girls. This topic has come up several times in the past 2 years. There's this weird cross between guys who see hoes and have this risk intolerance of girls going BBFS. I would say just cover up if you're worried, it'll protect you from the most common STDs and there's not much risk doing so. You can't control on what everyone esle is doing so all you can do is cover up or not go. The other options are to just jerk it at home and there's no risk there which for me, isn't an acceptable solution but it's a free one that satisfies me in a pitch. The last one is to go with the boring normal civie route and go exclusive.