-
[QUOTE=DrWalk10;2785927]She sounds like a very nice new prospect but I personally can't justify. 8 for just mouth unless there is FS. But it sounds like you had fun![/QUOTE]It sure sounds to me from his report that there WAS FS, unless "hit it from behind" means something completely different from what I understand it to mean.
-
Nicki
[QUOTE=Prometheus77;2786457]It sure sounds to me from his report that there WAS FS, unless "hit it from behind" means something completely different from what I understand it to mean.[/QUOTE]What that means.
Oh I'm sry LOL! I'm not from this country. Nice to know what that means LOL.
-
Wtf
[QUOTE=DrWalk10;2785927]She sounds like a very nice new prospect but I personally can't justify. 8 for just mouth unless there is FS. But it sounds like you had fun![/QUOTE]"very nice new prospect"! You are aware that her roommate was robbing guys at gunpoint right?
Any and all reviews of this ho should have an asterisk.
[URL]http://wpri.com/2015/08/25/roommates-arrested-for-robbery-and-conspiracy/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=LatinHunt;2787461]"very nice new prospect"! You are aware that her roommate was robbing guys at gunpoint right?
Any and all reviews of this ho should have an asterisk.
[/QUOTE]A) There may be more to that whole "armed robbery" story than meets the eye. Even with the experience that I had, I saw no indication of any sort of weapon present. She also told me some things about that story that put a slightly different spin on it. Was she telling the truth? Who knows, but it sure appears that they were never actually charged with a felony, and certainly not convicted. The media doesn't always (as in "almost never") get all the facts in their stories.
B) The recent reports of this young lady would certainly seem to indicate a desire to provide legit services on her part. Now, her roommate may be a different story, and I would guess that's probably why she doesn't appear to be doing incalls.
The point is that her current activities are more relevant than something that she may have done a year ago. And linking to that news article (which contains actual personal information) is very much against board rules, according to my understanding.
-
[QUOTE=Prometheus77;2787780]A) There may be more to that whole "armed robbery" story than meets the eye. Even with the experience that I had, I saw no indication of any sort of weapon present. She also told me some things about that story that put a slightly different spin on it. Was she telling the truth? Who knows, but it sure appears that they were never actually charged with a felony, and certainly not convicted. The media doesn't always (as in "almost never") get all the facts in their stories.
B) The recent reports of this young lady would certainly seem to indicate a desire to provide legit services on her part. Now, her roommate may be a different story, and I would guess that's probably why she doesn't appear to be doing incalls.
The point is that her current activities are more relevant than something that she may have done a year ago. And linking to that news article (which contains actual personal information) is very much against board rules, according to my understanding.[/QUOTE]Everything is fine until it isn't. I wouldn't trust this little ho with a bowl of cereal. Members here who are gung ho about seeing her should be aware of what happened.
There are lots of holes in your argument endorsing her. You actually don't know what happened to her roommate. He could be in lock up now. You also shouldn't believe what a 19 year old says or what a prostitute says, and she's both. Listen, street kids, are street kids, are street kids. They don't change they just adapt. My philosophy, where there's smoke there's fire. IMO this provider should be avoided at all costs and members who are gung ho about seeing her should be aware of what she was doing. Good luck.
-
Skyla in Providence
I recently paid Miss Skyla a visit in Providence. She is black, fairly pretty, 5'5" or 6", heavy-set with little resemblance to the trim, fit girl in the pictures.
She wore just a bra and a short dress that was pulled down making a short skirt, (if that makes any sense). Massage was done on a bed, and was actually pretty good. She had some skill in that area, but used way too much oil. Friendly and talkative.
Typical APM finish, though from her other ads, much more is on the menu. Got the full hour. Damage was $150, or for those of you who use code, I think it's $. 5 . It was an enjoyable hour; but not sure if I'll repeat.
[URL]http://rhodeisland.backpage.com/BodyRubs/sexy-skylasky/5241955[/URL]
-
I am with you Latin
No matter how good and young she might be. Those charges were dropped eventually. I have no insiders information on why, my guess, and that's all it is, the guy they kidnapped didn't want to see his name all over the media. I for one, will stay clear, no matter how good, how young. Better and cleaner fish in the sea, I am more of a striper fisherman, not into shark frenzy. To each their own though.
[QUOTE=LatinHunt;2787967]Everything is fine until it isn't. I wouldn't trust this little ho with a bowl of cereal. Members here who are gung ho about seeing her should be aware of what happened.
There are lots of holes in your argument endorsing her. You actually don't know what happened to her roommate. He could be in lock up now. You also shouldn't believe what a 19 year old says or what a prostitute says, and she's both. Listen, street kids, are street kids, are street kids. They don't change they just adapt. My philosophy, where there's smoke there's fire. IMO this provider should be avoided at all costs and members who are gung ho about seeing her should be aware of what she was doing. Good luck.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=LatinHunt;2787967]Everything is fine until it isn't. I wouldn't trust this little ho with a bowl of cereal. Members here who are gung ho about seeing her should be aware of what happened.
There are lots of holes in your argument endorsing her. You actually don't know what happened to her roommate. He could be in lock up now. You also shouldn't believe what a 19 year old says or what a prostitute says, and she's both. Listen, street kids, are street kids, are street kids. They don't change they just adapt. My philosophy, where there's smoke there's fire. IMO this provider should be avoided at all costs and members who are gung ho about seeing her should be aware of what she was doing. Good luck.[/QUOTE]I have no disagreement as to informing people of things that have been reported in the past, as long as ALL the information (including more recent reports) is included. Posting links to personally identifying information is NOT ok though. Having said that, I'm not naïve. My own personal experience is what I'm mainly going on here. If she were still trying to rip people off, it would have been very easy for her to just let me drive away. She didn't. People can draw their own conclusions from that. Of course no one should put themselves in a situation in which they don't feel safe, so if the past history here causes someone to stay away, I absolutely don't blame them. But I do happen to believe that people can and do change.
-
[QUOTE=Prometheus77;2788263]I have no disagreement as to informing people of things that have been reported in the past, as long as ALL the information (including more recent reports) is included. Posting links to personally identifying information is NOT ok though. Having said that, I'm not nave. My own personal experience is what I'm mainly going on here. If she were still trying to rip people off, it would have been very easy for her to just let me drive away. She didn't. People can draw their own conclusions from that. Of course no one should put themselves in a situation in which they don't feel safe, so if the past history here causes someone to stay away, I absolutely don't blame them. But I do happen to believe that people can and do change.[/QUOTE]I did violate the mug shot rule without realizing it. My bad. I just tried to edit the post but the system won't let me. I've never really paid any attention to the specifics of the posting guidelines. I guess I'm not good at following rules. Anyway, let us know how things go with her in the future. Be careful though, her little tank top buddy isn't going anywhere. She's his bread and butter. My crime buff guess is that they commit more crimes in the area and then make a run for FL, CA or AZ because they're too well known by LEO around here.
-
Nicki
[QUOTE=LatinHunt;2787461]"very nice new prospect"! You are aware that her roommate was robbing guys at gunpoint right?
Any and all reviews of this ho should have an asterisk.
[URL]http://wpri.com/2015/08/25/roommates-arrested-for-robbery-and-conspiracy/[/URL][/QUOTE]Dude don't quote me if I didn't see her or recommend her to yall sir.
-
Hazel BBW
I've had many great experiences with Hazel, the BBW in and. Smithfield. She told me she would be away for the holidays but I haven't seen any ad yet this year. Does anyone know what's up and if she'll be back? Many thanks in advance. Bill.
-
No, technically you did NOT violate the "mugshot" rule unless I missed you actually posting her mugshot here? The mugshot rule has been explained MANY times by Admin and it's for a valid reason. You're allowed to post links etc the same way BP links are posted, the same way links to various stings are posted etc. Those links do not get tracked back to here.
The posting rules are good rules and there for a reason. This is a site to help promote sex between adults. Obviously no minors or even implying minors etc.
The main reason of not posting mugshots and full names etc is that family and friends of that person won't google that person's name and end up here at an adult site etc. If they google and end up at other sites or with the mugshot elsewhere so be it.
That and the site is here to help us get some not scare us away from doing so by putting bad connotations out there.
And if you truly wanted to either edit or remove your post you can click on report it etc and use that process to do so.
[QUOTE=LatinHunt;2788365]I did violate the mug shot rule without realizing it. My bad. I just tried to edit the post but the system won't let me. I've never really paid any attention to the specifics of the posting guidelines. I guess I'm not good at following rules. Anyway, let us know how things go with her in the future. Be careful though, her little tank top buddy isn't going anywhere. She's his bread and butter. My crime buff guess is that they commit more crimes in the area and then make a run for FL, CA or AZ because they're too well known by LEO around here.[/QUOTE]
-
Hazel BBW
[QUOTE=Boston528;2789000]I've had many great experiences with Hazel, the BBW in and. Smithfield. She told me she would be away for the holidays but I haven't seen any ad yet this year. Does anyone know what's up and if she'll be back? Many thanks in advance. Bill.[/QUOTE]She texted the week that she left RI that she would return around Valentines Day. She posts on BP in Raleigh-Durham NC, Hazel 42 F.
-
[QUOTE=HornyAsHell;2789039]No, technically you did NOT violate the "mugshot" rule unless I missed you actually posting her mugshot here? The mugshot rule has been explained MANY times by Admin and it's for a valid reason. You're allowed to post links etc the same way BP links are posted, the same way links to various stings are posted etc. Those links do not get tracked back to here.
The posting rules are good rules and there for a reason. This is a site to help promote sex between adults. Obviously no minors or even implying minors etc.
The main reason of not posting mugshots and full names etc is that family and friends of that person won't google that person's name and end up here at an adult site etc. If they google and end up at other sites or with the mugshot elsewhere so be it.
That and the site is here to help us get some not scare us away from doing so by putting bad connotations out there.
And if you truly wanted to either edit or remove your post you can click on report it etc and use that process to do so.[/QUOTE]Maybe I'm misunderstanding the rules then (if that's the case, I'd gladly accept clarification). The issue wasn't the mugshots, the issue was that the linked story contains the full name of the provider in question. Every time a post is made on this board, there's a message right under the text box clearly stating "NO PERSONALLY IDENTIFYING INFO! If you post anyone's last name or street address your membership will be deleted automatically. ".
I don't see what difference it makes whether that personally identifying info is posted directly in the thread or whether it's contained in a link, and I'm fairly certain that links which point to such information have been deleted in the past. But again, maybe I misunderstood exactly how that rule worked and its purpose. If that's the case, then I apologize to LatinHunt for making him think he had done something wrong.
-
It's just the way the rules are. Both Admin2 and Jackson have stated so in the past.
In regards to names, it is 100% no full names AND no first initial last name AND no first name last initial either.
Same with phone numbers, can't use full phone number UNLESS it's already in an ad on like BP etc which is why they'll often XXX out digits etc.
Links can be just about anything at all, but obviously not for a competing site etc.
Can always pm admin2 and ask if you have any questions etc. That guy does a LOT of work here on the site. Most of us never will know how much he does.
[QUOTE=Prometheus77;2789327]Maybe I'm misunderstanding the rules then (if that's the case, I'd gladly accept clarification). The issue wasn't the mugshots, the issue was that the linked story contains the full name of the provider in question. Every time a post is made on this board, there's a message right under the text box clearly stating "NO PERSONALLY IDENTIFYING INFO! If you post anyone's last name or street address your membership will be deleted automatically. ".
I don't see what difference it makes whether that personally identifying info is posted directly in the thread or whether it's contained in a link, and I'm fairly certain that links which point to such information have been deleted in the past. But again, maybe I misunderstood exactly how that rule worked and its purpose. If that's the case, then I apologize to LatinHunt for making him think he had done something wrong.[/QUOTE]