Never said it was a great idea
[QUOTE=Digger47;2735862]So I am assuming that you don't believe that LEO could be a trusted senior member as far as this board is concerned? That is the purpose of this board, to share information. If you start doing what you suggest, are you going to do that for BP providers and SW providers and CL providers? I think not. Just a thought.[/QUOTE]It's an idea I had off the top of my head. I never said it was great, that's why I said I'd be interested in hearing what others thought at the end of my post.
[QUOTE=Digger47;2735862]So I am assuming that you don't believe that LEO could be a trusted senior member as far as this board is concerned?[/QUOTE]I'm a paranoid person by nature, but I'm sure I can PM a senior member knowing full well that they're NOT LEO. There's enough posts on here by members that I'm sure I can PM a few with relevant info without worrying that they're undercover. Believe me that thought has crossed my mind though. My idea was more about restricting the flow of info about AMPs so that not just anyone with an account and 0 posts can view it. Afterall, how do you know that LEO would have to post at all in order to get the scoop on what's going on? It'd be much easier to sit back and lurk and still get all the info than it would be write over 100 posts in an effort to make it look like you're "one of the guys. " Its up to newbies to get out there and get some experience, come back here post their findings, share, and build trust to get access to info not privy to everyone. Just be mindful of what you decide to share.
[QUOTE=Digger47;2735862]That is the purpose of this board, to share information. If you start doing what you suggest, are you going to do that for BP providers and SW providers and CL providers? I think not. Just a thought.[/QUOTE]To answer your question: Yes. Yes I would. It's already being done by members on this site. I've done it. Although I wouldn't resort to PM in every case and not with every provider though. If I felt there was pertinent info that should be shared but not publicly, I would utilize PMs in the hopes that that info would get to other trusted members. If you think that any and all information about all providers is being shared in these public subject threads, then I have a bridge in London to sell you.
This doesn't matter as much as you think it does.
[QUOTE=BradBen44;2734706]I agree with there is perhaps to much sharing of details. Was guilty of this myself when posting here early on. Have since kept some of my AMP experiences closer to the cuff. What is the best way to post about happy and handy AMP experiences w / o bringing on the LEO bacon? I assume the bacon boys have a RubMap account too?[/QUOTE]Yes, they have accounts at all these places, and yes, they do use the intel to be a little more efficient.
But the LEO theory on AMPs is pretty much this: if it's an AMP, extras are available. So we'll keep sending under covers in until we get a bust.
We could never say a word about any AMPs here again and LEO would still try to bust them. Even the AMPs that don't provide extras, the ones that lure in guys who think they do, but really don't—cops just figure they got made and keep trying. After all, you're still getting a massage on the govt dime, beats working for a living.
Brad Ben Back to Happy Body Spa
She not so young, not so cute, not so good massage, and she no touch my schlong. I no ask her name. Selena, the owner, still smoking hot! Too bad she not have hot older sisters.
-BB.