Anyone mind sharing info via PM? From Hawaii and would share info if you're ever in Hawaii.
Printable View
Anyone mind sharing info via PM? From Hawaii and would share info if you're ever in Hawaii.
[QUOTE=BenderOver;3878610]M recommended that I try Haven and a quick search here showed BBFS so I signed up for a session. BBFS no cip. More pse than GFE.
L face is a 7 but not really my type. Not so memorable that I could describe her at all now. But she wasn't unattractive. Just not smoking hot or noticebly cute. Body was fantastic. Someone said she had little A cups that resembled mosquito bites and that's not currently. Implants are well done, soft to the touch, and medium density so nice weight. Nipples were good size. She had blue veins bulging in her tits that oddly looked hot, like pregnant breasts. She's not Prego.
A 9 super accommodating attitude. That Korean service attitude where you are the king. Very pse attitude also. Wanted to get you off like porn was her inspiration.
S BBBJ upon stripping, BBBJ and rim preview in shower, more BBBJ and awesome rim job that had me squirming on the bed. Wanted to put on the cover but I asked for a brief bare camel slide, during the camel slide easily slid in bare, she gave a take tsk tsk look and then proceeded to crazy fuck the living shit out of me bare for the next half hr..[/QUOTE]Saw your post right before I had already scheduled an appt with her and started having some doubts. When I saw her in person I was pleasantly surprised. Her body was a pretty nice spinner body as you mentioned and to me her face was actually decently attractive. Considering bb services she's young with a nice spinner body and decently attractive face so I put her on my repeat list pretty easily. Wish you didn't mention the ass tag haha it made me look for it during doggy. No CIP but possibly its a YMMV thing. I asked if next time would be OK but she has zero English skills so I'm not sure but I'll try again and see. Also I concur with the boobs. I think she got a boob job since she had a pretty nice rack that was fun to play with.
[QUOTE=AverageGuy82;3872680]I'm not one to dabble much in the Korean scene. Trying to get my foot in the door but there are so many that don't actually reply at all. I was able to get a reply with the Stelia agency. I pretty sure they have been spoken about several times but I'm not sure if they are worth seeing or not. Any help would be greatly appreciated.[/QUOTE]They are great, never a bad experience. They don't rotate often, that's my only gripe.
[QUOTE=Saylavee14;3879774]They are great, never a bad experience. They don't rotate often, that's my only gripe.[/QUOTE]Not good, not bad. Truly middle of the road.
[QUOTE=RickZey;3807362]Let me clarify my post. Her girls price ranges are now between 270 to 300. Her supposedly famous and in demand kgirls are now 300. Rebecca Cari and Hera. The oldies as you said. Lol. These 3 been working since 2012. Anyway, rest are 270.[/QUOTE]How does Cari and Hera compare with Rebecca? With Rebecca possibly leaving LA I need to find a new regular.
[QUOTE=JohnPot;3879209]Thanks bud, for the details on KOI and GUCCI. We need detail like that to make decision.[/QUOTE]Definitely no BB from my experience and a very controlled kissing. No passion, just going through the motion. But from looks dept. , found her looking good than any Palace girls, presently.
[QUOTE=Jack926;3880205]Not good, not bad. Truly middle of the road.[/QUOTE]Thanks. I'll have to set something up with them and then try out the other agencies. I'm tired of dealing with these so called Indy ladies.
Namu BBFS. At first she said no CIP but she changed her mind in the middle and ended up CIP.
Julie no BBFS and she was adamant about it.
[QUOTE=JimThome;3879757]Saw your post right before I had already scheduled an appt with her and started having some doubts. When I saw her in person I was pleasantly surprised. Her body was a pretty nice spinner body as you mentioned and to me her face was actually decently attractive. Considering bb services she's young with a nice spinner body and decently attractive face so I put her on my repeat list pretty easily. Wish you didn't mention the ass tag haha it made me look for it during doggy. No CIP but possibly its a YMMV thing. I asked if next time would be OK but she has zero English skills so I'm not sure but I'll try again and see. Also I concur with the boobs. I think she got a boob job since she had a pretty nice rack that was fun to play with.[/QUOTE]Which haven is this one? I can't keep track who is M's girls or who is with what booker.
[QUOTE=JimThome;3879757]Saw your post right before I had already scheduled an appt with her and started having some doubts. When I saw her in person I was pleasantly surprised. Her body was a pretty nice spinner body as you mentioned and to me her face was actually decently attractive. Considering bb services she's young with a nice spinner body and decently attractive face so I put her on my repeat list pretty easily. Wish you didn't mention the ass tag haha it made me look for it during doggy. No CIP but possibly its a YMMV thing. I asked if next time would be OK but she has zero English skills so I'm not sure but I'll try again and see. Also I concur with the boobs. I think she got a boob job since she had a pretty nice rack that was fun to play with.[/QUOTE]CIP is YMMV because I got it easily on the first try, she didn't seem to mind it at all but I can take a guess as to why. I think it might be because I was her last client for the day and she was going to wash out anyway. Because of my graveyard schedule I'm practically always a providers last client, which has it's share of downsides but a on rare occasion it has some upsides.
I am relatively new to this place. It's been slow here here with reviews but just wanting people's opinions on this place. It seems too easy for bookers to post up fake reviews and mislead you into thinking the girl is actually good or not.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;3880949]I am relatively new to this place. It's been slow here here with reviews but just wanting people's opinions on this place. It seems too easy for bookers to post up fake reviews and mislead you into thinking the girl is actually good or not.[/QUOTE]I have read couple reviews as well as seeing the girl myself. I would say 50/50 fake and real reviews. Not to mention the fact that they stole TER reviews as well. This is just erotic monkey took advantage of the situation and cash out fortune.
I get what you're saying and what you're saying could be possible and sure it's easy for anyone to do but realistically, I highly doubt they (the Bookers) will waste their time with trying to come up with a review for on the their girls and in the hopes of bringing traffic. But for the most part, Bookers tend to upload escort profiles and not do anything else to it at that point. I'm not a Booker but I can assure you every one of my reviews (under the same moniker) are legit. I get where you can become skeptical about it, but in my experience, I haven't come across a review that seems fake to me at least. Some are obvious though, that's for sure.
[QUOTE=TheAbc;3880949]I am relatively new to this place. It's been slow here here with reviews but just wanting people's opinions on this place. It seems too easy for bookers to post up fake reviews and mislead you into thinking the girl is actually good or not.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SkyTheLimit;3880527]Namu BBFS. At first she said no CIP but she changed her mind in the middle and ended up CIP.
Julie no BBFS and she was adamant about it.[/QUOTE]I have a question about Namu before I try her, how does she look compared to current photos? I read a review recently on them that said she's nowhere near as skinny and tight as her photos indicate. He said she was about 10 yrs older than her pics. Skinny is my fetish so this is a deal breaker for me. Thanks.
Hey, been lurking the forum recently researching the Kgirl scene but I've mongered for a couple years now, what are everyones thoughts on Ktownescorts? I was recently verified by them and am currently interested in seeing Nana or Diamond, but I'm struggling to find reports on any of the girls there besides Julie, who I guess used to be Lily. Also does anyone know if the Nana there is the same one that others have mentioned at a different agency?
Oh and as a random side note / sign of good faith since this account is new, if anyone has questions about the scene in Tokyo I spent some time there and can help.
Go see Gyubeche if Skinny is your thing.
[QUOTE=GoodBoy88;3881698]I have a question about Namu before I try her, how does she look compared to current photos? I read a review recently on them that said she's nowhere near as skinny and tight as her photos indicate. He said she was about 10 yrs older than her pics. Skinny is my fetish so this is a deal breaker for me. Thanks.[/QUOTE]
Since there have been a few inquiries about Eroticmonkey on the forum, I thought I would give my two cents. There is a lot to say, but I think it is worth taking the time to say it.
I have been using Eroticmonkey both as a reviewer and a lurker since quite a bit before that other, superior alternative went dark. It has changed and grown quite a bit since the draconian laws were passed, and it definitely has its pros and its cons.
Let's start with the cons. I can understand where the skepticism is coming from. To start, in the early days of E. M. , many, if not most of the reviews were literally stolen verbatim from that other site. Moreover, it was free, and had (and still has) very little screening and relatively low standards regarding what types of reviews can be posted. For example, it allows reviews of providers who advertise on classified sites. The other site did not allow that simply because the fake ads, phishing scams, bait and switch ads are so prevalent on those types of sites. This creates a situation where the posters of fake and malicious ads can easily post false and misleading reviews of their own scandalous and / or fake providers. Thus, you have to be very careful and scrupulous when reading E. M. Reviews and determining whether or not you will pursue a particular provider who is reviewed there. Nonetheless, it is very easy to filter out the BS--google numbers and providers, look at the profiles and reviews of the reviewers themselves. If a provider has only one or two reviews, and those reviewers themselves have ONLY reviewed that particular provider, it is a major red flag and you should pass. However, if that provider has a large amount of reviews left by reviewers who have written about many different providers, you are most likely safe. Another thing you can do is PM other reviewers. Most are willing to communicate with you. Of course, a response does not guarantee anything, but a lack of a response regarding a provider who is already iffy is further indication that you should avoid that provider. Lastly, reviews of well-known and extensively reviewed providers are almost always legit and reliable on E. M. If the girl has double digit reviews and you have seen her discussed here, those reviews are generally valid.
Now to the cons of the new them system. It is no longer free. However, like the now defunct site, it allows free access to reviewers. The downside, however, is that each review only provides seven days of free access, which is significantly less generous than the other site. This creates its own problems. Many mongers do not have the time and / or money to hobby once a week, but you damn well know they are lurking and are always looking for that next girl to book. Couple this with the fact that there are no time restrictions on reviews (the other site, for example, requested that your reviews be written no more than three months after the appointment), and it creates a temptation for people to either post fake reviews to gain access, or to review providers who are retired or have disappeared. I have seen reviews that say things like "this is a review of a session that look place before so and so retired / left the area. " Obviously, these reviews are of no use to anyone and have only been written to give the reviewer access to the site. E. M really needs to reconsider this and give members longer access for each review.
Finally, the pros. E. M is rapidly filling the void left by that other site, and is supplying for its demand. That being said, the members and reliable posters of the other site are now flooding E. M. With their reviews an insights. They have no alternative. The result is that E. M. Has exploded since the laws were passed and it is rapidly becoming a more vast and reliable source of legitimate information. The regular influx of k girl reviews is a testament to that. I can tell you, E. M. Was not like that BEFORE the other site went dark.
Ironically, E. M's low standards for reviews, namely the allowance of reviews of providers who advertise via classified sites, creates a VERY large pro. BP girls and other girls of that sort were not very well-reviwed on the other site--that was E. M's niche. Therefore, E. M. Has become an excellent tool to track down BP and CL girls who have vanished since those sites went dark! Many of them are still active, and you can find their contact info on E. M. !
All that being said, I believe E. M. To be a great source of information that will keep growing and getting better, at least until the other site comes back (if it does). It has its downsides, but those can be avoided if you do you research and know what you are doing.
I haven't seen any of their girls since that website went up. But their contact number ending with 1690. I remember that number since CV days and have note for that number that they always use fake pics and copy other agency's girls name.
[QUOTE=Jl0991;3881825]Hey, been lurking the forum recently researching the Kgirl scene but I've mongered for a couple years now, what are everyones thoughts on Ktownescorts? I was recently verified by them and am currently interested in seeing Nana or Diamond, but I'm struggling to find reports on any of the girls there besides Julie, who I guess used to be Lily. Also does anyone know if the Nana there is the same one that others have mentioned at a different agency?
Oh and as a random side note / sign of good faith since this account is new, if anyone has questions about the scene in Tokyo I spent some time there and can help.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Opus109;3882108]Since there have been a few inquiries about Eroticmonkey on the forum, I thought I would give my two cents. There is a lot to say, but I think it is worth taking the time to say it.
I have been using Eroticmonkey both as a reviewer and a lurker since quite a bit before that other, superior alternative went dark. It has changed and grown quite a bit since the draconian laws were passed, and it definitely has its pros and its cons.
Let's start with the cons. I can understand where the skepticism is coming from. To start, in the early days of E. M. , many, if not most of the reviews were literally stolen verbatim from that other site. Moreover, it was free, and had (and still has) very little screening and relatively low standards regarding what types of reviews can be posted. For example, it allows reviews of providers who advertise on classified sites. The other site did not allow that simply because the fake ads, phishing scams, bait and switch ads are so prevalent on those types of sites. This creates a situation where the posters of fake and malicious ads can easily post false and misleading reviews of their own scandalous and / or fake providers. Thus, you have to be very careful and scrupulous when reading E. M. Reviews and determining whether or not you will pursue a particular provider who is reviewed there. Nonetheless, it is very easy to filter out the BS--google numbers and providers, look at the profiles and reviews of the reviewers themselves. If a provider has only one or two reviews, and those reviewers themselves have ONLY reviewed that particular provider, it is a major red flag and you should pass. However, if that provider has a large amount of reviews left by reviewers who have written about many different providers, you are most likely safe. Another thing you can do is PM other reviewers. Most are willing to communicate with you. Of course, a response does not guarantee anything, but a lack of a response regarding a provider who is already iffy is further indication that you should avoid that provider. Lastly, reviews of well-known and extensively reviewed providers are almost always legit and reliable on E. M. If the girl has double digit reviews and you have seen her discussed here, those reviews are generally valid.
Now to the cons of the new them system. It is no longer free. However, like the now defunct site, it allows free access to reviewers. The downside, however, is that each review only provides seven days of free access, which is significantly less generous than the other site. This creates its own problems. Many mongers do not have the time and / or money to hobby once a week, but you damn well know they are lurking and are always looking for that next girl to book. Couple this with the fact that there are no time restrictions on reviews (the other site, for example, requested that your reviews be written no more than three months after the appointment), and it creates a temptation for people to either post fake reviews to gain access, or to review providers who are retired or have disappeared. I have seen reviews that say things like "this is a review of a session that look place before so and so retired / left the area. " Obviously, these reviews are of no use to anyone and have only been written to give the reviewer access to the site. E. M really needs to reconsider this and give members longer access for each review.
Finally, the pros. E. M is rapidly filling the void left by that other site, and is supplying for its demand. That being said, the members and reliable posters of the other site are now flooding E. M. With their reviews an insights. They have no alternative. The result is that E. M. Has exploded since the laws were passed and it is rapidly becoming a more vast and reliable source of legitimate information. The regular influx of k girl reviews is a testament to that. I can tell you, E. M. Was not like that BEFORE the other site went dark.
Ironically, E. M's low standards for reviews, namely the allowance of reviews of providers who advertise via classified sites, creates a VERY large pro. BP girls and other girls of that sort were not very well-reviwed on the other site--that was E. M's niche. Therefore, E. M. Has become an excellent tool to track down BP and CL girls who have vanished since those sites went dark! Many of them are still active, and you can find their contact info on E. M. !
All that being said, I believe E. M. To be a great source of information that will keep growing and getting better, at least until the other site comes back (if it does). It has its downsides, but those can be avoided if you do you research and know what you are doing.[/QUOTE][URL]https://sangabrielvalley.adlist24.com/womenmen/a181025[/URL]
For now I think this site is better. If anyone else has something better.
[QUOTE=Jl0991;3881825]Also does anyone know if the Nana there is the same one that others have mentioned at a different agency?
[/QUOTE]There have been a couple of Nana I have read about on this forum. I don't think this ktownesc* Nana is either of those. And don't know if her services will meet expectations of the readers of this thread either.
Otoh the other Nana's are definitely worth a visit.
[QUOTE=GoodBoy88;3880666]CIP is YMMV because I got it easily on the first try, she didn't seem to mind it at all but I can take a guess as to why. I think it might be because I was her last client for the day and she was going to wash out anyway. Because of my graveyard schedule I'm practically always a providers last client, which has it's share of downsides but a on rare occasion it has some upsides.[/QUOTE]Looks like she got boobs done. That's a missed opportunity to me as I prefer natural small ones (I know, that is a rarity in kworld). I'm still tempted to visit since the service comments are so good. Couple of quick questions. Is she limiting play with boobs because of discomfort / pain? How tall is she?
Thanks.
[QUOTE=DHorn420;3882102]Go see Gyubeche if Skinny is your thing.[/QUOTE]Didn't realize gyu offer BBFS. She fits my other criteria to a t (short, slim, small boobs).
[QUOTE=SaltyDog;3882414][URL]https://sangabrielvalley.adlist24.com/womenmen/a181025[/URL]
For now I think this site is better. If anyone else has something better.[/QUOTE]Adlist24 is an advertising site, whereas Eroticmonkey is a review site, so I'm not sure what you mean. Maybe you are referring to the CL and BP girls. Only a tiny fraction of them are on adlist24 so far.
[QUOTE=GoodBoy88;3881698]I have a question about Namu before I try her, how does she look compared to current photos? I read a review recently on them that said she's nowhere near as skinny and tight as her photos indicate. He said she was about 10 yrs older than her pics. Skinny is my fetish so this is a deal breaker for me. Thanks.[/QUOTE]Yeah she's about 10 yrs older than her pics. Pics are very outdated and she's not skinny.
Anyone has agency number or link to ad for these two Heri and Cari?
I tried the numbers I found on them but number is no longer in service.
Any info is appreciated. Feel free to pm.
Heri / Uhee:
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/heri-escort-los-angeles-72090[/URL]#erotic.
Cari:
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/cari-escort-los-angeles-92415-5[/URL]
Miss X is back at the palace.
Same can someone pm their booker number. The erotic monkey doesn't # give you a respond at all.
[QUOTE=SkyTheLimit;3883175]Anyone has agency number or link to ad for these two Heri and Cari?
I tried the numbers I found on them but number is no longer in service.
Any info is appreciated. Feel free to pm.
Heri / Uhee:
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/heri-escort-los-angeles-72090[/URL]#erotic.
Cari:
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/cari-escort-los-angeles-92415-5[/URL][/QUOTE]
She doesn't offer BBFS.
[QUOTE=JohnRichard;3882796]Didn't realize gyu offer BBFS. She fits my other criteria to a t (short, slim, small boobs).[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SkyTheLimit;3883175]Anyone has agency number or link to ad for these two Heri and Cari?
I tried the numbers I found on them but number is no longer in service.
Any info is appreciated. Feel free to pm.
Heri / Uhee:
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/heri-escort-los-angeles-72090[/URL]#erotic.
Cari:
[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/cari-escort-los-angeles-92415-5[/URL][/QUOTE]Heri is currently booking with Asian Pretty on HX. She was my ATF a couple of years ago. Important to mention, Heri is not BB, but her tounge bath and rimming was to die for.
Last time I saw her was about a yr ago. She got fat and service was burned out, lackluster, so I stop seeing her. Don't know if she slim down now.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/AsianPretty[/URL]
Haven got boobs done? Is there new pics some where? Last guy laser said she's A cup and her pics on them show flat chess.
[QUOTE=JohnRichard;3882790]Looks like she got boobs done. That's a missed opportunity to me as I prefer natural small ones (I know, that is a rarity in kworld). I'm still tempted to visit since the service comments are so good. Couple of quick questions. Is she limiting play with boobs because of discomfort / pain? How tall is she?
Thanks.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=JohnPot;3883406]Heri is currently booking with Asian Pretty on HX. She was my ATF a couple of years ago. Important to mention, Heri is not BB, but her tounge bath and rimming was to die for.
Last time I saw her was about a yr ago. She got fat and service was burned out, lackluster, so I stop seeing her. Don't know if she slim down now.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/AsianPretty[/URL][/QUOTE]I looked up the bookers number and the reviews say its bait and switch.
Can anyone confirm?
[QUOTE=Bulak;3880433]Definitely no BB from my experience and a very controlled kissing. No passion, just going through the motion. But from looks dept. , found her looking good than any Palace girls, presently.[/QUOTE]Thanks. What girls have you seen, and what is their BBFS CIP status? Please share.
Thanks!
[QUOTE=SkyTheLimit;3883521]I looked up the bookers number and the reviews say its bait and switch.
Can anyone confirm?[/QUOTE]Not Heri, she's still with her original booker. Also, still no BB.
[QUOTE=JohnPot;3883417]Haven got boobs done? Is there new pics some where? Last guy laser said she's A cup and her pics on them show flat chess.[/QUOTE]Benderover's comment suggests she has bigger than A cups.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26373-Korean-Agency-BB&p=3878610&viewfull=1[/URL]#post3878610.
HTH.
[QUOTE=DrDisney;3883933]Not Heri, she's still with her original booker. Also, still no BB.[/QUOTE]Do you have contact info of her original booker?
Number I found online is disconnected.
Appreciate it!
[QUOTE=DrDisney;3883933]Not Heri, she's still with her original booker. Also, still no BB.[/QUOTE]I'm not sure about Asian Pretty on HX. I only give the info because their HX profile has Heri picture on it. I know Heri is independent and being book by multiple Booker's. One of her Booker is Jenny. If you have booker Jenny number, you can booker Heri through booker J. Let us know how she look nowadays. Hope she slim down now.
[QUOTE=SkyTheLimit;3884302]Do you have contact info of her original booker?
Number I found online is disconnected.
Appreciate it![/QUOTE]Contact Julie.
[QUOTE=Jack926;3880205]Not good, not bad. Truly middle of the road.[/QUOTE]Back in the days, Stelia was the best. Also known as Helen's or KFC. As far as Stelia herself goes, great but now it's just an old name reused for the entire operation and it's a shadow of its former self. No more rotation of hot fresh kbabes. Some I trained into going BB. Even one beauty I was able to do bb Greek. Now, it's only sugar and celly. Both are cover freaks so no BBFS or grk. Every once in while a newbie shows up for a couple of weeks but nobody worth keeping. Celly does have great tongue bath and beautiful natural tits. Best ever when she arches back riding you. But like I said, only go for the BBBJ, rim, cfs, BBBJCIM. As far as these go, excellent everything. Best.
I miss Gina back in the days. Beauty who I got to train BBFS and she only did that with me. I know this for a fact due to something that happened but I can't share. Been trying to do the same since but only failure. Dang.
[QUOTE=SkyTheLimit;3883521]I looked up the bookers number and the reviews say its bait and switch.
Can anyone confirm?[/QUOTE]I can confirm that it's bait-and-switch.
This is the same booker organization as asiancutieococ, asiancosta, asiancutiesd, asiancutiepetite, asiantorrance, asianblahblahblah. They created all these accounts on HX when BP was shutdown.
They only have Chinese MILFs. No Koreans. No Japanese. No one under 45.
If you contact them, you will get a link with a picture of some 21 why / o internet model with a menu that is a lie. The booker will say anything to get you into the door because she knows most guys, once in the room, won't walk. Don't be a sucker. Walk away.
If you want to see a Chinese MILF in her 40's or 50's, or 60's, you might as well use FunAsianClub. At least they are honest about pics, age, and service.
Boycott asiancuties, and BeautifulAsians (Libertine's fake girl) until they start using real pics and they are honest about service.
[QUOTE=EdwardAppleby;3884723]I can confirm that it's bait-and-switch.
This is the same booker organization as asiancutieococ, asiancosta, asiancutiesd, asiancutiepetite, asiantorrance, asianblahblahblah. They created all these accounts on HX when BP was shutdown.
They only have Chinese MILFs. No Koreans. No Japanese. No one under 45.
If you contact them, you will get a link with a picture of some 21 why / o internet model with a menu that is a lie. The booker will say anything to get you into the door because she knows most guys, once in the room, won't walk. Don't be a sucker. Walk away.
If you want to see a Chinese MILF in her 40's or 50's, or 60's, you might as well use FunAsianClub. At least they are honest about pics, age, and service.
Boycott asiancuties, and BeautifulAsians (Libertine's fake girl) until they start using real pics and they are honest about service.[/QUOTE]Yes I can confirm the same, I got caught by that Bait & Switch not once, but twice and didn't put with it either time. Those are some pretty seasoned ladies. They aren't even close to close to the girls in the pics, they could be their grandmothers.