And may your first child be a masculine child!
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5514751]Uh huh. You guys have a coffee maker at home? Plenty of coffee! Why do you go to Starbucks? Got some booze at home? Why do you go to a bar?
If I have some extra cash and want to toss it to a chick making content, it doesn't matter if there's all the porn in the world. I think you guys just don't like the girls having any options except to take your low ball offers for pussy. LOL.[/QUOTE]First I don't like women, now I want to banish them back out onto the cold dark streets where they'll be forced to grovel for my pocket change! What have I done to make you treat me so disrespectfully? You don't even think to call me Godfather. Instead, you come into my house on the day my daughter is to be married and badger me for going to starbucks and bars! LOL.
When backwards becomes forwards
[QUOTE=DNut;5515314]The only time men and women NEED to be "working together in the complementary ways" is when having babies. That's it. In all other ways, and there are a lot more to life than having babies, men can work with men, women can work with women, men / women can work with with those who are transitioning from their gender assigned birth to the gender they choose. Not everyone wants to have babies. Not everyone needs to have children to lead a full and productive life.
And yes, your ideas make you backwards.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BengalMan;5515870]DNut with great words of wisdom. Thanks. ![/QUOTE]Nice try compartmentalizing sexuality and its consequences. And working about as good as all those high calorie foods piled up in grocery stores and fastfood joints that our society is eating itself to death on. Whether you want kids on a conscious level or not, that's what's turning the gears under our hoods and it permeates everything. But you know better than nature. Keep tooting the whistle on that 'progress' train as it goes right off the cliff.
We got it good in some ways
Mums usually flies into town this time of year for end of summer festivities next week. We've all been vaxxed but with the d-strain decided to drive her instead of risk having her on a plane around others. So I took the day off yesterday and went up to Chicago for the first time, and all I can say is fuck off! Between the countless road barrels and truck drivers trying to leap frog each other to go 2 mph faster. I sounded like the dad in Christmas story shouting every damn profanity in random combinations until my chest ached! And the icing on the cake is the chicago area mid morning and mid afternoon traffic, when I thought the traffic would be lightest. Light my ass!
With NYC being so much bigger than chicago, I don't know how the hell people do it. Unless you have the money to get around by chopper or not need to get around, ridiculous amounts of your life are spent just getting to places. I guess if that's all you ever know. I have a new appreciation for Cincy.
You couldn't find a rabbit hole or a pussy hole
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5517780]But I don't think I have a fucking clue about what you're going on about.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DNut;5517830]The idea that there is a correlation between the changing gender sexual dynamics, with food availability and obesity rates are purely in your head. Just because you think both a "modern ideas", doesn't make them modern at all. Case in point, I had attended an exhibit of the works of Peter Rubens. It's from him that we get the word, "Rubenesque", rotund built women from where we get the word, "Rubenesque". The round Rubenesque stature was the height of beauty of it's day. More recently, in the 1990's Kate Moss (and some say in the 1960's Twiggy), barely there models with a waif look built, some say, by anorexia, was the desired look.
Yes, your points are rabbit holes. There is no correlation between gender dynamics and obesity rates, except in your head.[/QUOTE]I never said there was a correlation. Adding clarification markers inside the quote below. It would flow better in conversation than typing on a forum. I should have used something else completely unrelated and smaller in scale that was fucked up for the illustrative comparison. Because that's the only purpose it was serving in my post, it wasn't the main point.
[QUOTE=PearishBA;5517206]Nice try compartmentalizing sexuality and its consequences. >>>>>The next part here is comparing that to something else fucked up >>>>And working about as good as all those high calorie foods piled up in grocery stores and fastfood joints that our society is eating itself to death on. >>>>>The next sentence that follows is not related to that food comparison, it goes back to the original topic about the importance of sexuality and gender roles >>>>>>Whether you want kids on a conscious level or not, that's what's turning the gears under our hoods and it permeates everything. But you know better than nature. Keep tooting the whistle on that 'progress' train as it goes right off the cliff.[/QUOTE]DNut was massively underestimating the central roles of the reproductive drive and complementary gender roles between men and women. Making it a little area of life where we just come together when we want to pop out a baby. I'm saying its far more reaching beyond wanting kids on a conscious level, that its wired into who we are from the hormones on up, to our capacities, how we bond, cooperate, compete, organize, build, today and across generations. And it works optimally when men and women work within their complementary evolutionary biology. Which is not the same thing as saying we need to go back to the stone age. We do make accommodations for the exceptions to go against the grain if that's what they want to do, but the general evolutionary roles should be encouraged.
Topics like this are naturally intersting to me, but on this platform my attention limit is shooting off a few replies back and forth. Time to move on.
Sidekick PaiMei peeps out from under D Nut's skirt
[QUOTE=PaiMei;5518984]Dude PearishBS, you're a blow hard. Nice to see someone finally calling you out on your gibberish. I wouldn't fuck w D Nut if I were you. You're obviously outmanned. You need a real friend so you can see their facial expression when you talk.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the warning. Sounds like you already crossed him and he had to bend you over that keyboard and push your shit in. Little did he know that's how you like though amiright? LOL.
Coming in here trying to sling postgame bullshit for another man. Go suck his dick where we don't have to see it.
Just make love in private not on the forum
[QUOTE=DNut;5519181]So much homophbia. If your past comments regarding gender wasn't enough, this confirms it. You're scared of gay men as well as strong independent women. Thats why you hurl gay scenarios like they were weapons; because you're scared of it happening to you, you think others are as well. What a sad little man.[/QUOTE]I got no problem with PaiMei and D Nut pleasuring each other. I appreciated the warning because I don't roll like that. Just because the rest of us don't want to watch their sweaty gruntfests doesn't make us afraid or evil. To each their own when it comes to sexual attraction, we can't choose who turns us on.
Thats no way to get a 3 some
[QUOTE=DNut;5519813]Still with the homophobic rants? To quote Shakespeare, "The lady doth protest too much, methinks". The subtext being that your protestations are a little too excessive. Perhaps you're too busy trying on those 4 inch pumps in the closet.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BengalMan;5520577]Pearish the thought.[/QUOTE]Imagining me in heels 2 inches longer than your cock. You hound you. Looks like BengalMan may be game though, he'll have nothing to do this postseason as usual. LOL.
