Printable View
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5478507]I feel the very same way about the Republican party.[/QUOTE]My take has on he American Political System has become: "Would you like your participatory fascism with, or without gay marriage?"
2nd place- the Left and Right wings of the Corporate Party.
The good Dr.
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5478333]I haven't read the link because the OP starts by implying that "[I]Biden, Harris, AOC, Warren, Schumer, Pelosi, et al.[/I]" are all the same on the leftist spectrum. It makes me lose interest in the remainder of his point because he's already shown he's either clueless or disingenuous. I believe Muncher2323 had the same reaction; he just posted it.
Oh yeah. Fox news skips out on reporting a lot of shit they don't want you to be aware of, so there's that.[/QUOTE]Rogerover is so right it's almost not fair. Intellectualism is no longer part of what used to be the Republican Party, you know, the one with all the country club bankers. Now it's just a bunch of ignorant racists who barely finished high school. Sad, sad, sad.
[QUOTE=BengalMan;5478990]Rogerover is so right it's almost not fair. Intellectualism is no longer part of what used to be the Republican Party, you know, the one with all the country club bankers. Now it's just a bunch of ignorant racists who barely finished high school. Sad, sad, sad.[/QUOTE]So instead of actually reading & debating on facts or events, you stoop down to insulting the intelligence of the 60 million or so people who vote different than you. The name calling is middle school shit. This is exactly what is wrong with us in general. Instead of learning from each other's points of view or possibly agreeing to disagree, you resort to childish name calling.
On a side note. It's probably for the best you get to hide behind your keyboard. If you had said this to my face, chewing solid food would no longer be in your future plans.
[QUOTE=WoodFordR69;5479162]So instead of actually reading & debating on facts or events, you stoop down to insulting the intelligence of the 60 million or so people who vote different than you. The name calling is middle school shit. This is exactly what is wrong with us in general. Instead of learning from each other's points of view or possibly agreeing to disagree, you resort to childish name calling.
On a side note. It's probably for the best you get to hide behind your keyboard. If you had said this to my face, chewing solid food would no longer be in your future plans.[/QUOTE]Is this behavior from the far left new or surprising to you?
Everyone who doesn't agree with them is a fascist.
[QUOTE=MarblesKyle;5479286]Is this behavior from the far left new or surprising to you?
Everyone who doesn't agree with them is a fascist.[/QUOTE]It's not new, nor am I surprised. More disappointed. But I have to remind myself that the goals of the new democrat party are so indefensible, they have to resort to childish behavior. Debating the facts or using logic just can't work for them.
Castigating someone for name-calling while simultaneously threatening violence and bodily harm.
Y'all are a hoot!
[QUOTE=WoodFordR69;5479162]So instead of actually reading & debating on facts or events, you stoop down to insulting the intelligence of the 60 million or so people who vote different than you. The name calling is middle school shit. This is exactly what is wrong with us in general. Instead of learning from each other's points of view or possibly agreeing to disagree, you resort to childish name calling.
On a side note. It's probably for the best you get to hide behind your keyboard. If you had said this to my face, chewing solid food would no longer be in your future plans.[/QUOTE]
Anyone remember WordUp? Wonder what happened to that poster.
[QUOTE=WoodFordR69;5479162]So instead of actually reading & debating on facts or events, you stoop down to insulting the intelligence of the 60 million or so people who vote different than you. The name calling is middle school shit. This is exactly what is wrong with us in general. Instead of learning from each other's points of view or possibly agreeing to disagree, you resort to childish name calling.
On a side note. It's probably for the best you get to hide behind your keyboard. If you had said this to my face, chewing solid food would no longer be in your future plans.[/QUOTE]Woodford Reserve,
I'm a Republican like my entire life. The old republicans. Before they jumped on the crazy train. It's not name calling, it's calling it as it is. Conspiracies, lies, nonsense, Bigfoot, ufo's, lunacy-are-us bullshit that yea, 69 million fell into. Just because it's a big number doesn't mean it's not completely out of touch with reality. We need our old Republican Party back. Conservative, facts, intelligence. Because neither of the three exists In Today's party.
[QUOTE=WoodFordR69;5479440]It's not new, nor am I surprised. More disappointed. But I have to remind myself that the goals of the new democrat party are so indefensible, they have to resort to childish behavior. Debating the facts or using logic just can't work for them.[/QUOTE]How do you debate with morons who think an election was stolen? Seriously.
[QUOTE=BengalMan;5479935]Woodford Reserve,
I'm a Republican like my entire life. The old republicans. Before they jumped on the crazy train. It's not name calling, it's calling it as it is. Conspiracies, lies, nonsense, Bigfoot, ufo's, lunacy-are-us bullshit that yea, 69 million fell into. Just because it's a big number doesn't mean it's not completely out of touch with reality. We need our old Republican Party back. Conservative, facts, intelligence. Because neither of the three exists In Today's party.[/QUOTE]This. And as a conservative democrat I support this.
[QUOTE=BengalMan;5479935]Woodford Reserve,
I'm a Republican like my entire life. The old republicans. Before they jumped on the crazy train. It's not name calling, it's calling it as it is. Conspiracies, lies, nonsense, Bigfoot, ufo's, lunacy-are-us bullshit that yea, 69 million fell into. Just because it's a big number doesn't mean it's not completely out of touch with reality. We need our old Republican Party back. Conservative, facts, intelligence. Because neither of the three exists In Today's party.[/QUOTE]I agree that most of the vocal members of the party need some time in a padded room. Same for most of the vocal leaders on the left. It is name calling. My point was this: lumping all who voted in 1 direction into the bucket of uneducated racists is utter bullshit. I personally thing Trump was an ass. He just happened to agree with me on more things than did Hillary. Same with Joe. If I had to pick a guy to have a beer with between Trump or Joe, I'd pick Joe. It just so happens I like Trump's opinion on the 2nd amendment, Taxes, National Defense, & lots of other issues. I had to vote for an ass that was in my mind the lesser of two evils based on policies. Unlike some on both sides of the aisle, I'm educated & intelligent enough to separate the issues from the person in the office.
Hell, I'd rather leave the wing nuts behind & introduce the decent folks on the right to the Libertarian (NOT Liberal) way of thinking. Hopefully we could take a bunch of the more centrist Dems with us as well. Small government, local control of education, low taxes, etc.
Dead republicans, dead democrats, dead pussy, the bengals kicking off preseason next week. LOL.
Exactly. And they wonder why they're not taken seriously.
[QUOTE=VinnieKramer;5479531]Castigating someone for name-calling while simultaneously threatening violence and bodily harm.
Y'all are a hoot![/QUOTE]
[URL]https://youtu.be/crfWULraP68[/URL]
[QUOTE=WoodFordR69;5479985]I agree that most of the vocal members of the party need some time in a padded room. Same for most of the vocal leaders on the left. It is name calling. My point was this: lumping all who voted in 1 direction into the bucket of uneducated racists is utter bullshit. I personally thing Trump was an ass. He just happened to agree with me on more things than did Hillary. Same with Joe. If I had to pick a guy to have a beer with between Trump or Joe, I'd pick Joe. It just so happens I like Trump's opinion on the 2nd amendment, Taxes, National Defense, & lots of other issues. I had to vote for an ass that was in my mind the lesser of two evils based on policies. Unlike some on both sides of the aisle, I'm educated & intelligent enough to separate the issues from the person in the office.
Hell, I'd rather leave the wing nuts behind & introduce the decent folks on the right to the Libertarian (NOT Liberal) way of thinking. Hopefully we could take a bunch of the more centrist Dems with us as well. Small government, local control of education, low taxes, etc.[/QUOTE]My sentiments exactly. Trump wasn't my first (or even tenth) choice but was compelled to vote for him for exactly the reasons you mentioned.
We need a Democrat who is not only pro-2nd Amendment but also won't pander to the religious far right or steal our hard-earned money in order to pay able-bodied people not to work. Oh wait, we already had one. JFK.
And look what happened to him!
[QUOTE=LondonW2;5480210]My sentiments exactly. Trump wasn't my first (or even tenth) choice but was compelled to vote for him for exactly the reasons you mentioned.
We need a Democrat who is not only pro-2nd Amendment but also won't pander to the religious far right or steal our hard-earned money in order to pay able-bodied people not to work. Oh wait, we already had one. JFK.[/QUOTE]
Friends of mine use the same ridiculousness with me as some on here have used "don't like trump but liked his policies". Complete foolishness and ignorance.
Policies? Trump had none, he had catch phrases that were molded to whomever he pandered to. You fools WANTED to hear the whole 2nd amendment, freedoms, liberties, security scams, and he gave them to you. As for actual real policies, they were only executive order whims that he changed frequently and with regularity. He was all over the map, scatterbrained and incoherent. Favored something one day and three months later retracted or refused to back it up with real policy. The guy was a con man just like he always had been.
And one more thing that has become speeding over the cliff of insanity regarding the 2nd Amendment: NO ONE is taking away anyone's 2nd Amendment rights. Read that again: NO ONE. Not Bernie, not AOC, not pelosi, not any official. NONE.
The scam all of you have fallen for is pure Idiocy. Like lemurs over a cliff.
When one person mentions "sensible gun control", the idiots start spouting "they're going to take away our guns!
There is stupid, and then there is "gun" stupidity.
I laugh for years that you idiots think that any "organization" of any jurisdiction has any ability to remove 400 million guns.
Laughing at that ignorance forever.
How are you guys that stupid?
It doesn't matter what political party in this country, no one is taking away 2nd amendment. End of story.
Stop being a stupid pawn.
[QUOTE=BengalMan;5481105]Friends of mine use the same ridiculousness with me as some on here have used "don't like trump but liked his policies". Complete foolishness and ignorance.
Policies? Trump had none, he had catch phrases that were molded to whomever he pandered to. You fools WANTED to hear the whole 2nd amendment, freedoms, liberties, security scams, and he gave them to you. As for actual real policies, they were only executive order whims that he changed frequently and with regularity. He was all over the map, scatterbrained and incoherent. Favored something one day and three months later retracted or refused to back it up with real policy. The guy was a con man just like he always had been.
And one more thing that has become speeding over the cliff of insanity regarding the 2nd Amendment: NO ONE is taking away anyone's 2nd Amendment rights. Read that again: NO ONE. Not Bernie, not AOC, not pelosi, not any official. NONE.
The scam all of you have fallen for is pure Idiocy. Like lemurs over a cliff.
When one person mentions "sensible gun control", the idiots start spouting "they're going to take away our guns!
There is stupid, and then there is "gun" stupidity.
I laugh for years that you idiots think that any "organization" of any jurisdiction has any ability to remove 400 million guns.
Laughing at that ignorance forever.
How are you guys that stupid?
It doesn't matter what political party in this country, no one is taking away 2nd amendment. End of story.
Stop being a stupid pawn.[/QUOTE]I try to stay out of all this political bullshit because I hear it all day long on the radio, TV, etc. , and BOTH sides always go batshit crazy with their beliefs of one side or the other. Having said that, Bengalman, I've got to disagree with you when you say Trump had no policies. His overriding policy was "America First" and it guided most of his actions. No, it wasn't "law" but it was his way of responding to NATO, for example, to get other countries to pay up their debts instead of relying on the good ol' USA to pay all the bills. And it was his way of reducing / eliminating restrictions on business in order to create a better economy and jobs. You libs might say it was all bullshit, but the facts very clearly show that his economy was fantastic, jobs were being created, minorities were gaining in job opportunity and pay, etc, etc. What's Biden's policy, other than to undo everything Trump accomplished? Talk about a bullshit policy!
And to say that the 2nd amendment will NEVER be abolished? Wow, that's quite a statement. Did you ever think the government would shut down the entire economy and tell 350 million people to stay home? You're probably right that it won't be abolished, at least not in our lifetime, but to say "never"? Hmm--that's a pretty bold statement after what the government has shown us their power during the past couple years. Did you ever think the government would tell landlords to just "suck it up" and force them to let their tenants live for free? Did you ever think we'd have a $28 trillion deficit? The government has proven time and time again that it can fuck up anything anytime it wants to, including the 2nd amendment.
[QUOTE=Kenal1;5481242]I try to stay out of all this political bullshit because I hear it all day long on the radio, TV, etc. , and BOTH sides always go batshit crazy with their beliefs of one side or the other. Having said that, Bengalman, I've got to disagree with you when you say Trump had no policies. His overriding policy was "America First" and it guided most of his actions. No, it wasn't "law" but it was his way of responding to NATO, for example, to get other countries to pay up their debts instead of relying on the good ol' USA to pay all the bills. And it was his way of reducing / eliminating restrictions on business in order to create a better economy and jobs. You libs might say it was all bullshit, but the facts very clearly show that his economy was fantastic, jobs were being created, minorities were gaining in job opportunity and pay, etc, etc. What's Biden's policy, other than to undo everything Trump accomplished? Talk about a bullshit policy!
And to say that the 2nd amendment will NEVER be abolished? Wow, that's quite a statement. Did you ever think the government would shut down the entire economy and tell 350 million people to stay home? You're probably right that it won't be abolished, at least not in our lifetime, but to say "never"? Hmm--that's a pretty bold statement after what the government has shown us their power during the past couple years. Did you ever think the government would tell landlords to just "suck it up" and force them to let their tenants live for free? Did you ever think we'd have a $28 trillion deficit? The government has proven time and time again that it can fuck up anything anytime it wants to, including the 2nd amendment.[/QUOTE]Keana.
You couldn't said it better. I also don't agree with anything Bengalman says.
Don't forget the corrupt world health Organization that the United States funded an Trump opted out. Stop the illegals from crossing the border. And gas was $1.30 cheaper not bad for somebody that didn't have any policies.
The funniest thing about Trump is what kept him consistent to the right was all the hate he constantly got from the left and media. If his opponents could have just played the big picture game and kissed and buttered his biscuits more, he would have been doing endless 180's fucking whoever wasn't sucking his dick at the time. LOL.
I mean, it wasn't bullshit, but the idea that any President from any party is has more than a passing responsibility for the economy as it happens while they're in office is fucking hilarious to me. The executive affects so little economically it almost isn't worth mentioning, unless you count starting, and by most measures losing, the dumbest trade war in recent history, arguably ever. And no, 2 A isn't going anywhere. We don't have the ability to take that many guns away from that many people, especially if they aren't willing. It's just shit they say so that you guys ignore / excuse the rest of the things they do, assuming you're not in the group that cheers all the racist dogwhistling Trump did. So no, his policies were anything but policies. Just a bunch of nationalist talking point trash meant to scare white people into circling the wagons and getting angry at brown people instead of getting angry about the leadership of their country, and scare PoC into shutting up and taking what they can get with the status quo, which benefits, you guessed it, political donors and influencers. And so, the cycle continues, regardless of party.
What's Biden's policy, you ask? Not a great deal better up to this point, I grant you that, but the fact that Biden might be equally useless doesn't change the fact that Trump was / is also worthless to the common man.
[QUOTE=Kenal1;5481242]I try to stay out of all this political bullshit because I hear it all day long on the radio, TV, etc. , and BOTH sides always go batshit crazy with their beliefs of one side or the other. Having said that, Bengalman, I've got to disagree with you when you say Trump had no policies. His overriding policy was "America First" and it guided most of his actions. No, it wasn't "law" but it was his way of responding to NATO, for example, to get other countries to pay up their debts instead of relying on the good ol' USA to pay all the bills. And it was his way of reducing / eliminating restrictions on business in order to create a better economy and jobs. You libs might say it was all bullshit, but the facts very clearly show that his economy was fantastic, jobs were being created, minorities were gaining in job opportunity and pay, etc, etc. What's Biden's policy, other than to undo everything Trump accomplished? Talk about a bullshit policy!
And to say that the 2nd amendment will NEVER be abolished? Wow, that's quite a statement. Did you ever think the government would shut down the entire economy and tell 350 million people to stay home? You're probably right that it won't be abolished, at least not in our lifetime, but to say "never"? Hmm--that's a pretty bold statement after what the government has shown us their power during the past couple years. Did you ever think the government would tell landlords to just "suck it up" and force them to let their tenants live for free? Did you ever think we'd have a $28 trillion deficit? The government has proven time and time again that it can fuck up anything anytime it wants to, including the 2nd amendment.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Kenal1;5481242]I try to stay out of all this political bullshit because I hear it all day long on the radio, TV, etc. , and BOTH sides always go batshit crazy with their beliefs of one side or the other. Having said that, Bengalman, I've got to disagree with you when you say Trump had no policies. His overriding policy was "America First" and it guided most of his actions. No, it wasn't "law" but it was his way of responding to NATO, for example, to get other countries to pay up their debts instead of relying on the good ol' USA to pay all the bills. And it was his way of reducing / eliminating restrictions on business in order to create a better economy and jobs. You libs might say it was all bullshit, but the facts very clearly show that his economy was fantastic, jobs were being created, minorities were gaining in job opportunity and pay, etc, etc. What's Biden's policy, other than to undo everything Trump accomplished? Talk about a bullshit policy!
And to say that the 2nd amendment will NEVER be abolished? Wow, that's quite a statement. Did you ever think the government would shut down the entire economy and tell 350 million people to stay home? You're probably right that it won't be abolished, at least not in our lifetime, but to say "never"? Hmm--that's a pretty bold statement after what the government has shown us their power during the past couple years. Did you ever think the government would tell landlords to just "suck it up" and force them to let their tenants live for free? Did you ever think we'd have a $28 trillion deficit? The government has proven time and time again that it can fuck up anything anytime it wants to, including the 2nd amendment.[/QUOTE]First, economy. The economy under trump was mediocre. Middling. The GDP, which is the true economic measure, was decent. Lower than during Obama, but decent. Big deal. Anything else said is pure fantasy.
Second, NATO. You all have a total and complete misunderstanding of NATO, and you have swallowed the Fox News spin like a oily cock. There are no "bills" in NATO. None. Trump was not in any way shape or form getting them to pay more bills. Lmao! All that happened in the NATO agreement was an unwritten, unenforceable "rule" that each member should spend 2% of their GDP on Defense. That's it. Nothing more than that "guide". The Fox News spin machine proposed it as something more than that. Yes, some members were spending below that target on GDP, and some Significantly Lower than that target. The Obama Admin was pressuring nations to up their Defense budget, and the low-budgeters WERE raising their amounts -SLOWLY- over those last 6 Obama years. Fox News spin won't tell you that. They ALSO won't tell you that a couple years, the United States was not spending 2% GDP on Defense! Surprise!
Third, Libs. I am not a Lib. Been a Republican most of my life.
Fourth, business. Trump was business-friendly because of business tax cuts. That's it. Regulations? Laughable, since regulations he pulled on one area of business ended up hurting others. Tariffs? Another impetuous, uncoordinated, whimsical joke. No rhyme or reason. No strategy. And again, some tariffs in one area hurt other areas of business. Just non-stop bluster and petulance. His tariffs contributed greatly to the supply chain shortage and mess we have now. Businesses like stability. 4 years of Trump was anti-stability.
Fifth, 2nd Amendment. Again, 400 million guns. A government that has problems trying to "figure out" face masks, and you think they are capable of scouring the entire country and confiscate 400 million guns?
Hahahaha! M laughing so damn hard I can't get off the floor!! LOL!
The election is over, we all got to vote, and Trump lost. He needs to accept that, and move on. Have you watched his rallies? I haven't heard that much whining since "Toddler Night" at Chuck E Cheese!
[QUOTE=BengalMan;5481634]First, economy. The economy under trump was mediocre. Middling. The GDP, which is the true economic measure, was decent. Lower than during Obama, but decent. Big deal. Anything else said is pure fantasy.
Second, NATO. You all have a total and complete misunderstanding of NATO, and you have swallowed the Fox News spin like a oily cock. There are no "bills" in NATO. None. Trump was not in any way shape or form getting them to pay more bills. Lmao! All that happened in the NATO agreement was an unwritten, unenforceable "rule" that each member should spend 2% of their GDP on Defense. That's it. Nothing more than that "guide". The Fox News spin machine proposed it as something more than that. Yes, some members were spending below that target on GDP, and some Significantly Lower than that target. The Obama Admin was pressuring nations to up their Defense budget, and the low-budgeters WERE raising their amounts -SLOWLY- over those last 6 Obama years. Fox News spin won't tell you that. They ALSO won't tell you that a couple years, the United States was not spending 2% GDP on Defense! Surprise!
Third, Libs. I am not a Lib. Been a Republican most of my life.
Fourth, business. Trump was business-friendly because of business tax cuts. That's it. Regulations? Laughable, since regulations he pulled on one area of business ended up hurting others. Tariffs? Another impetuous, uncoordinated, whimsical joke. No rhyme or reason. No strategy. And again, some tariffs in one area hurt other areas of business. Just non-stop bluster and petulance. His tariffs contributed greatly to the supply chain shortage and mess we have now. Businesses like stability. 4 years of Trump was anti-stability.
Fifth, 2nd Amendment. Again, 400 million guns. A government that has problems trying to "figure out" face masks, and you think they are capable of scouring the entire country and confiscate 400 million guns?
Hahahaha! M laughing so damn hard I can't get off the floor!! LOL![/QUOTE]Go back and read my post again. I never said the government was going to confiscate 400 million guns. I said it wouldn't surprise me if, at some point, the 2nd amendment was abolished. There's just too many left-leaning liberals in this country that, in my opinion, you can't count anything out, no matter how crazy it may seem.
[QUOTE=Kenal1;5482196]Go back and read my post again. I never said the government was going to confiscate 400 million guns. I said it wouldn't surprise me if, at some point, the 2nd amendment was abolished. There's just too many left-leaning liberals in this country that, in my opinion, you can't count anything out, no matter how crazy it may seem.[/QUOTE]But the immature foolish threat is always stated "the left is going to take our guns".
Just idiotic.
[QUOTE=Kenal1;5482196]Go back and read my post again. I never said the government was going to confiscate 400 million guns. I said it wouldn't surprise me if, at some point, the 2nd amendment was abolished. There's just too many left-leaning liberals in this country that, in my opinion, you can't count anything out, no matter how crazy it may seem.[/QUOTE]It would take a constitutional amendment to revoke the 2nd amendment. That means 2/3 of the house, 2/3 of the senate, the signature of the president, and 2/3 of all states would need to ratify it for that to happen.
How afraid are you of democracy?
[QUOTE=DNut;5483182]
How afraid are you of democracy?[/QUOTE]We did elect a reality tv show star to manage 1/3 of the Constitution a few years ago. LOL.
[QUOTE=PearishBA;5483486]We did elect a reality tv show star to manage 1/3 of the Constitution a few years ago. LOL.[/QUOTE]The Constitution does not get "managed". I think you mean 1 of the 3 branches of the government.
Would the admin here please make a forum for thse assholes that want to talk political bs. We live with this crap everyday, all of you people talk about it, but can't do shit to change it.
This site is suppose to be enjoyable, yet most here are throwing all the negativity out here. Leave the negative bs to the news. We are suppose to be here for sex and enjoyment, not discomfort and everyday opinions on what out politicians should do.
We are the we people we have no power, so all we can do it discretely break the rules they make to make life comfortable for ourselves.
Rules and laws are made to be broken, none of us agree on what is right or wrong, we all have our own opinions. We do have freedoms, that other countries don't have and never will have. So lets get back to the sex talk and leave this political bs to the people in office to sort.
[blue]Dude this is the fight thread, they can talk about that stupidity all they want.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=PeteCastillone;5485227]Perish has a bad attitude. He is always belittling people and thinks he is gods gift to hookers. He called me out on some bullshit. Trying to say I was AMP girl a handler or involved in management. This guy has issues. From what I have read about his post. When he has a chance to get away from his significant other. He goes to play. He is a liar. And talks with too much self bravado. May I quote his reply to my message. He said something to the affect. Of the US Army was nothing and he served in a much tougher branch of the military. If he knew what I spoke of. He would of seen 75th Ranger Regiment. And knew my dress uniform has 3 banners 1 blue that says Special Forces. 2 black that say Ranger and Airborne. If he did serve his country he would know the significance of this right away. Which means he is a liar. He always makes negative remarks about people's experiences. And discrediting them for their posts. There was a situation with Angela at Sakura between he and I. I called her a Ferrari because she is very smart. And knows her worth. Few mongers said they got it on the cheap. But I doubt it. He and I are both close in age. And both are blessed to be more distinguished looking than most. Sorry don't mean to offend my fellow mongers that are dispositioned. In the end we both paid 180 for full service. And he talks like I gave her my damn wallet. With the PIN numbers to my bank cards. This guy is absolutely foolish, narcissistic, egotistical, shallow, ignorant, and pompous. I had enough of his shit. And his disrespect to others. Don't delete or block this post. Move it to the octagon. He is just mad cause his wife or girlfriend had enough of his shit. And won't give him any. So he has to visit AMPs and providers to get his. Because his significant other does not see him as man. But only a little boy. Who can't satisfy her![/QUOTE]Pete or Mimi, stop getting all worked up like these women we're trying to fuck, if you do actually have a cock. Men, especially men that have served, shouldn't behave like this, its embarrasing. Especially on a prostitution forum! LMAO.
Your contribution so far continues to be the same old Sakura song of Mimi is great, Angela was good, and Sunny is terrible. We still got it. And in the future to help you stay on topic just quote yourself and type 'ditto. ' sheesh.
[QUOTE=PearishBA;5485521]Pete or Mimi, stop getting all worked up like these women we're trying to fuck, if you do actually have a cock. Men, especially men that have served, shouldn't behave like this, its embarrasing. Especially on a prostitution forum! LMAO.
Your contribution so far continues to be the same old Sakura song of Mimi is great, Angela was good, and Sunny is terrible. We still got it. And in the future to help you stay on topic just quote yourself and type 'ditto. ' sheesh.[/QUOTE]PearishBA. BA meaning broke ass? ***** ass? Oh wait. Parrish meaning your body is shaped like a pear. BA meaning big ass. With a body and a name like that. Maybe we need to question your masculinity. The reason I go to Sakura. It's close to my house. I can fucking walk there if I want. I live in the neighborhood behind it. So from a logistical standpoint. It is very convenient for me to go here. I don't have to burn Joe Biden's 3.00 a gallon gasoline. To drive around looking for a dead end street. Tried Moon a few times. Was not impressed and was nothing to write home about. You are always being an ass. Talking shit on other peoples reviews and comments. When someone returns fire. You throw your hands up and wave your little white flag.
[QUOTE=PeteCastillone;5485593]PearishBA. BA meaning broke ass? ***** ass? Oh wait. Parrish meaning your body is shaped like a pear. BA meaning big ass. With a body and a name like that. Maybe we need to question your masculinity. The reason I go to Sakura. It's close to my house. I can fucking walk there if I want. I live in the neighborhood behind it. So from a logistical standpoint. It is very convenient for me to go here. I don't have to burn Joe Biden's 3.00 a gallon gasoline. To drive around looking for a dead end street. Tried Moon a few times. Was not impressed and was nothing to write home about. You are always being an ass. Talking shit on other peoples reviews and comments. When someone returns fire. You throw your hands up and wave your little white flag.[/QUOTE]Behind Sakura LOL Try to stay on mission soldier and not give away so many personal details about yourself that the police show up at your door. LOL.
PeteCastillone and PearishBA: I'm in Vegas, now, and I'm betting Daddy Admin2 is going to stop the car and spank all your asses for not doing this in the fight thread. He just hasn't seen it yet. Get ready for spank-ops in 3 2 1.
[QUOTE=PearishBA;5486034]Behind Sakura LOL Try to stay on mission soldier and not give away so many personal details about yourself that the police show up at your door. LOL.[/QUOTE]First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Freedom of Speech! I highly doubt the police would have a case. With what is published on a forum. Because there is no physical evidence of the crime. The only way police would show up at your house. And arrest you for solicitation of prostitution is. If you called a number of listcrawler that was an undercover officer posting the ad. If you are to get arrested because of an AMP. It's going to go down 2 ways. 1. You are the poor unlucky monger. Found with your pants down (literally). When the kick in the door and raid the place. Or 2. There was a previous undercover sting where the businesses was raided. There was no publicity and a deal was made with the person charged with prostitution. For a lesser charge to work with authorities And arrest us mongers as we negotiate sexual favors. And the only way this would go down. If there focus was to arrest the solicitors. In order to clean up the streets. I'm sorry I did not mean to scare you. And have you make a mess of your pretty panties wrapped around your pear shaped booty.
[QUOTE=RogerOver;5486195]PeteCastillone and PearishBA: I'm in Vegas, now, and I'm betting Daddy Admin2 is going to stop the car and spank all your asses for not doing this in the fight thread. He just hasn't seen it yet. Get ready for spank-ops in 3 2 1.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PeteCastillone;5486226]First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Freedom of Speech! I highly doubt the police would have a case. With what is published on a forum. Because there is no physical evidence of the crime. The only way police would show up at your house. And arrest you for solicitation of prostitution is. If you called a number of listcrawler that was an undercover officer posting the ad. If you are to get arrested because of an AMP. It's going to go down 2 ways. 1. You are the poor unlucky monger. Found with your pants down (literally). When the kick in the door and raid the place. Or 2. There was a previous undercover sting where the businesses was raided. There was no publicity and a deal was made with the person charged with prostitution. For a lesser charge to work with authorities And arrest us mongers as we negotiate sexual favors. And the only way this would go down. If there focus was to arrest the solicitors. In order to clean up the streets. I'm sorry I did not mean to scare you. And have you make a mess of your pretty panties wrapped around your pear shaped booty.[/QUOTE]I call out members when they act like drama queens and when they post questionable information. Your additional posts are just making you look more foolish than I ever could. Feel free to stop humiliating yourself and the Rangers, the sooner the better.
[QUOTE=PearishBA;5486544]I call out members when they act like drama queens and when they post questionable information. Your additional posts are just making you look more foolish than I ever could. Feel free to stop humiliating yourself and the Rangers, the sooner the better.[/QUOTE]No you are a pompous asshole. Bottom line. End of story.
[QUOTE=PearishBA;5486544]I call out members when they act like drama queens and when they post questionable information. Your additional posts are just making you look more foolish than I ever could. Feel free to stop humiliating yourself and the Rangers, the sooner the better.[/QUOTE]Who ever smelt it dealt it. Do on to others as you want done to you. You want to trash everyone here. You met the one person who is. It going to put up with your DRAMA! Your the biggest drama queen here. What does your reply to my latest comment. Have to do with the context. Absolutely nothing. Mrs. Sexual Intellect. AKA Mrs. Fuckingknowitall. Your the one who starts the drama. If you want the forum to be drama less. Shut your cocksucker. So until you have some decency and respect for others. I'm going to jump all over your pear shaped ass. Your not the forum police. No here answers to you. For one simple fact. You are nothing.
[QUOTE=DNut;5483182]It would take a constitutional amendment to revoke the 2nd amendment. That means 2/3 of the house, 2/3 of the senate, the signature of the president, and 2/3 of all states would need to ratify it for that to happen.
How afraid are you of democracy?[/QUOTE]There was a UN treaty that had a lot of "gray area" to it that could have resulted in UN action on our soil to take away guns. Which could circumvent the law. Trump pulled out of it in 2019. Can't remember who signed us into it of hand.
[QUOTE=SexTalkFor1000;5483945]Would the admin here please make a forum for thse assholes that want to talk political bs. We live with this crap everyday, all of you people talk about it, but can't do shit to change it.
This site is suppose to be enjoyable, yet most here are throwing all the negativity out here. Leave the negative bs to the news. We are suppose to be here for sex and enjoyment, not discomfort and everyday opinions on what out politicians should do.
We are the we people we have no power, so all we can do it discretely break the rules they make to make life comfortable for ourselves.
Rules and laws are made to be broken, none of us agree on what is right or wrong, we all have our own opinions. We do have freedoms, that other countries don't have and never will have. So lets get back to the sex talk and leave this political bs to the people in office to sort.
[blue]Dude this is the fight thread, they can talk about that stupidity all they want.
A2[/blue][/QUOTE]There was another site like this who had a forum called "the stump". Its was always about politics but those guys were way nastier than anybody here. Most of the biggest shit stirrers were from around Pittsburgh.
[QUOTE=Twisted69;5486660]There was a UN treaty that had a lot of "gray area" to it that could have resulted in UN action on our soil to take away guns. Which could circumvent the law. Trump pulled out of it in 2019. Can't remember who signed us into it of hand.[/QUOTE]More bullshit. Obama coming for their guns and all.
[B]U.N. Arms Trade Treaty[/B]
[URL]https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/un-arms-trade-treaty/[/URL]