Printable View
If you follow the link he posted in his original request, it leads to an SB named "Jazmine" Apparently someone from here messaged her and let her know someone was asking about her; at least that's how I interpret his post.
[QUOTE=PaulRew;4096457]The only mention of the word Jazmen on this entire thread is this one so what exactly are you talking about?[/QUOTE]
Correct, kind of ruined my night because she didn't come see me because I was asking about her.
[QUOTE=SAVet2019;4096763]If you follow the link he posted in his original request, it leads to an SB named "Jazmine" Apparently someone from here messaged her and let her know someone was asking about her; at least that's how I interpret his post.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MovieDude39;4097753]Correct, kind of ruined my night because she didn't come see me because I was asking about her.[/QUOTE]I PMed you about her, she didn't come see you because she's borderline mental. She pulled the same shit with me. You should be lucky you don't want her knowing where you live and shit. I could go on about my nightmare but don't think she didn't come because of that.
Sorry I had put that last post in the wrong place--I moved to the Boston Bareback board.
Saw this one about a month ago.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1be11951-03e0-4cd0-8d0c-cadc083c6c10[/URL]
Nice, clean curvy body. CFS, BBBJ. Met at my hotel in Nashua, was ok but not the type of girl I am after on SA, so no repeat for me, even at 300.
Thanks for your posting on her today, I've been talking to her and was tempted but now I'll definitely cross her off my list.
[QUOTE=Javazer;4098688]Saw this one about a month ago.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1be11951-03e0-4cd0-8d0c-cadc083c6c10[/URL]
Nice, clean curvy body. CFS, BBBJ. Met at my hotel in Nashua, was ok but not the type of girl I am after on SA, so no repeat for me, even at 300.[/QUOTE].
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/b5f9d9f0-79dc-4ef8-bad5-a5fac327931d[/URL]
Texted back and forth relentlessly with this one. Stated she was new to SA and sugar baby lifestyle. Agreed on an arrangement that worked for both of us. Agreed to meet for dinner and drinks to see if we connect first. Texts me 3 hours before the meet up said she is asking friends for cash for gas. I sort of knew better but went ahead and sent her 20 bucks via cash app. My thought was it is only 20 bucks so worth the risk. An hour before the date she texts me again saying her friend told her that a lot of guys scam the girls and just uses them for dates. So she made an offer where if we both liked each other I would pay her for the meet up date. If we didn't connect, I wouldn't have to pay her. I was like how does that work? I am the one taking all the risk here. Worst case for you is you get a free dinner. I told her I don't pay for meetups, sorry. Last I heard from her. The only silver lining is that I didn't have to buy her dinner so I am only out 20 bucks.
I am seeing an uptick of these scams where a) They conveniently tell you right before meeting they want cash for the initial meetup. Like the timing is going to get you to agree. b) They need gas money.
Seems like the more popular SA has become, the worse it has gotten. Finding a lot more scammers, GPS, rise in prices, backpage hoes, etc. Think I'm going to stick with my current arrangement for awhile. God I miss craigslist talent section. It was like shooting fish in a barrel.
[QUOTE=Spike77;4099342][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/b5f9d9f0-79dc-4ef8-bad5-a5fac327931d[/URL]
I am seeing an uptick of these scams where a) They conveniently tell you right before meeting they want cash for the initial meetup. Like the timing is going to get you to agree. b) They need gas money.
Seems like the more popular SA has become, the worse it has gotten. Finding a lot more scammers, GPS, rise in prices, backpage hoes, etc. [/QUOTE]This is so true, well said.
[QUOTE=Spike77;4099342][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/b5f9d9f0-79dc-4ef8-bad5-a5fac327931d[/URL]
Texted back and forth relentlessly with this one. Stated she was new to SA and sugar baby lifestyle. Agreed on an arrangement that worked for both of us. Agreed to meet for dinner and drinks to see if we connect first. Texts me 3 hours before the meet up said she is asking friends for cash for gas. I sort of knew better but went ahead and sent her 20 bucks via cash app. My thought was it is only 20 bucks so worth the risk. An hour before the date she texts me again saying her friend told her that a lot of guys scam the girls and just uses them for dates. So she made an offer where if we both liked each other I would pay her for the meet up date. If we didn't connect, I wouldn't have to pay her. I was like how does that work? I am the one taking all the risk here. Worst case for you is you get a free dinner. I told her I don't pay for meetups, sorry. Last I heard from her. The only silver lining is that I didn't have to buy her dinner so I am only out 20 bucks.
I am seeing an uptick of these scams where a) They conveniently tell you right before meeting they want cash for the initial meetup. Like the timing is going to get you to agree. b) They need gas money.
Seems like the more popular SA has become, the worse it has gotten. Finding a lot more scammers, GPS, rise in prices, backpage hoes, etc. Think I'm going to stick with my current arrangement for awhile. God I miss craigslist talent section. It was like shooting fish in a barrel.[/QUOTE]The gas money scam is so common, I must get that at least once a week, its funny though how these girls in the pics are in nice dresses, hair and nails done, wearing heels etc but then can't find 10-20 bucks for gas. I mean its like they think we are stupid and can't figure out there scam but its a good one though, I mean if you get 20 guys to think a hot young chick is interested in them for sex and its a 20 dollar gamble to find out that's 400 bucks.
[QUOTE=PaulRew;4099372]This is so true, well said.[/QUOTE]Here's another. She started the contact on SB. Said she definitely stays in Boston. Last night she says she's in a bind. At her mother's house in NH. Needs $30 for train fare to get to Boston. If send her the $ she'll give the best time ever. Took a pass.
Hi guys,
So two days in and my account is suspended. WTF. What are the chances of getting it back? Most of the chatting took place via my email or text.
Most chicks were looking for 300-500. Which was crazy.
[QUOTE=Gabbos;4100457]Hi guys,
So two days in and my account is suspended. WTF. What are the chances of getting it back? Most of the chatting took place via my email or text.
Most chicks were looking for 300-500. Which was crazy.[/QUOTE]Here's what was listed when I tried logging in from other computer. Is this the same message others got?
Your account is currently under review by a team of fraud specialists. We have detected some unusual activity on this account. Your permissions have been altered while the investigation lasts.
During this time you will not be able to contact other users or pay for any services. If you feel that this is a mistake, or if you have any information to add regarding this process, please contact us at customer support.
[QUOTE=Gabbos;4100457]Hi guys,
So two days in and my account is suspended. WTF. What are the chances of getting it back? Most of the chatting took place via my email or text.
Most chicks were looking for 300-500. Which was crazy.[/QUOTE]Check your email for the explanation if it's for suspicious activity you might be able to get back in. Just email their support and state that you do not believe you violated any of their terms.
Someone must have info on this cutie.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1dc5a75e-d08f-460b-83cf-69e578faa7c0[/URL]
[QUOTE=Gabbos;4100457]Hi guys,
So two days in and my account is suspended. WTF. What are the chances of getting it back? Most of the chatting took place via my email or text.
Most chicks were looking for 300-500. Which was crazy.[/QUOTE]I think the fact that they put 300 or 500 got you banned They did it You did not do it so I don't understand I am banned also.
This was last year and we txted back and forth over a couple of weeks but could never get her to agree to a date. She seemed nice enough and nothing crazy in her messages. But she just would not confirm a meeting. Very strange so I let it go. Never heard back from her.
[QUOTE=PaulRew;4100886]Someone must have info on this cutie.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1dc5a75e-d08f-460b-83cf-69e578faa7c0[/URL][/QUOTE]
Does anyone know of any? Much appreciated!
She just texted me saying what we post here is gross. I don't recall any negative feedback on her but I just decided not to take her up on her offer because we left it at 200 + hotel. The good news is she reads the posts so what more can you ask for. She is concerned about her customers feedback. I wish more of the girls took the business as serious as her. Hopefully she views the reports as constructive feekback.
Anyone seen her before?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/9715b245-5fd5-c3e3-c416-e995a29853b4[/URL]
[QUOTE=Joe1223;4101901]She just texted me saying what we post here is gross. I don't recall any negative feedback on her but I just decided not to take her up on her offer because we left it at 200 + hotel. The good news is she reads the posts so what more can you ask for. She is concerned about her customers feedback. I wish more of the girls took the business as serious as her. Hopefully she views the reports as constructive feekback.[/QUOTE]Well, you talking about what she does as "the business" can get her kicked off of SA if it gets back. I think we all should be a little more careful here.
[QUOTE=Spill;4102318]Well, you talking about what she does as "the business" can get her kicked off of SA if it gets back. I think we all should be a little more careful here.[/QUOTE]Well I certainly wasn't the only reporting on her but if you can't review on here for fear of being kicked off then they should start posting on a different site. Honestly I really think she had me confused with someone else because the follow up texts did not make sense and I never saw the lady. I don't think SA is actually auditing this site but who knows maybe it's a slow day at the captain obvious "dating" site.
While I don't think SA monitors external sites, they do accept "reports" of escorting activities evidenced by postings on external sites. If someone wants to get an SB profile booted from SA, they could try by filing a report with a link to posts on this site.
[QUOTE=Joe1223;4102434]Well I certainly wasn't the only reporting on her but if you can't review on here for fear of being kicked off then they should start posting on a different site. Honestly I really think she had me confused with someone else because the follow up texts did not make sense and I never saw the lady. I don't think SA is actually auditing this site but who knows maybe it's a slow day at the captain obvious "dating" site.[/QUOTE]
"I don't think SA is actually auditing this site". Of course, they're not. No possible way that they could.
You get banned on SA partly due to complaints, but mainly if you use certain words, such as incall, donation, and perhaps standard prostitution abbreviations, BBBJ, daty, etc. They most likely have algorithms which kick out messages or profiles with key words. They cannot monitor a site like this. There are just too many of them. IMHO.
Cutie's w / booty reaction is just "normal" female to male reaction, "You're gross".
[QUOTE=Joe1223;4102434]Well I certainly wasn't the only reporting on her but if you can't review on here for fear of being kicked off then they should start posting on a different site. Honestly I really think she had me confused with someone else because the follow up texts did not make sense and I never saw the lady. I don't think SA is actually auditing this site but who knows maybe it's a slow day at the captain obvious "dating" site.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PaulRew;4091797]Sorry but I blocked her profile but a giant titted girl from Chelmsford or there abouts. Had a date all set (see my post before this one) and things were great. I should have sensed something when she was down for EVERYTHING I asked, basically does not know the word "no". We agree to a price and a time and a place and then she drops the bomb: I need 50% sent thru Cashapp or alternative method.
No way, but I increase my offer and tell her she can have the envelope as soon as she enters the room. No go, " I've been burnt before this will make me comfortable" Yeah, 50% sent to her leaves no incentive to get off the couch and get drilled sideways for the other 50%.
Told her to fuck off.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/1776b...9-3e70e80215f3[/URL][/QUOTE]New profile (including a pic with her GIANT ass LOL).
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/6e3c6bff-0456-4674-9b57-aaa82cedabbe[/URL]
[QUOTE=Longjblues;4103146]"I don't think SA is actually auditing this site". Of course, they're not. No possible way that they could.
You get banned on SA partly due to complaints, but mainly if you use certain words, such as incall, donation, and perhaps standard prostitution abbreviations, BBBJ, daty, etc. They most likely have algorithms which kick out messages or profiles with key words. They cannot monitor a site like this. There are just too many of them. IMHO.
Cutie's w / booty reaction is just "normal" female to male reaction, "You're gross".[/QUOTE]Even if they monitor this site, no way for them to tie between the two accounts.
[QUOTE=PaulRew;4103194]New profile (including a pic with her GIANT ass LOL).
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/6e3c6bff-0456-4674-9b57-aaa82cedabbe[/URL][/QUOTE]Talked to here a few weeks back where she had Lowell as location and crossed her off real quick, my head said keep moving on.
Have a handful of M&G lined up for next week, had to cut tie with a couple of on going I had, very busy after the New Year.
Please use common sense about sharing / using info on sites or with SB's. You don't want the few good options left to be shutdown, do you?
J.
[QUOTE=Lozo43;4102199]Anyone seen her before?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/9715b245-5fd5-c3e3-c416-e995a29853b4[/URL][/QUOTE]She's in Revere. 250 First meet the 200 after, no time limit. Decent face nice body. Text her and she' send you a few pics. Good Luck.
[QUOTE=Longjblues;4103146]"I don't think SA is actually auditing this site". Of course, they're not. No possible way that they could.
You get banned on SA partly due to complaints, but mainly if you use certain words, such as incall, donation, and perhaps standard prostitution abbreviations, BBBJ, daty, etc. They most likely have algorithms which kick out messages or profiles with key words. They cannot monitor a site like this. There are just too many of them. IMHO.
Cutie's w / booty reaction is just "normal" female to male reaction, "You're gross".[/QUOTE]No one thinks SA is monitoring this site. At least they shouldn't. But information can "get back" to them and if it scares them enough about FOSTA, they will tighten things up even further to save their ca $h cow. The discussion on The othER board has an unwritten rule about TMI regarding SA.
Here is a post from last spring that shares that sentiment:
"That's just one of the reasons I have been so vehemently against SB reviews or anything even close to an SB review system. I am also 1,000% against guys mentioning finding their favorite hooker on the sugar sites. Right now the Sugar World is in a legal "gray area" if too many stupid guys insist on shaking their dicks at LE by openly discussing individual SB's, complete with "allowance" requirements and "activities performed" they sure as fuck are going to ruin it for the rest of us. And THAT is why we can't have nice things. LOL.
So if any of you dumbfucks find your ATF advertising on SA and you want to share that information with the world, do her and the rest of us a huge favor and just STFU!"
Yes, a little extreme, but I think we should be a little more careful.
[QUOTE=Javazer;4103299]
Please use common sense about sharing / using info on sites or with SB's. You don't want the few good options left to be shutdown, do you?
J.[/QUOTE]Not directed to anyone in particular, just in general when mentioning SA, most of them on Seeking have no idea about this board.
J.
How can it get back to "them"? How exactly does it "get back" to "them". Oh, "ten ladies out of all the ladies with profiles on the Massachusetts/NH SA site are reported on an obscure Escort review site as taking money for sex"?? I think you are overly cautious. And besides, the feds would go after SA's sister site, "WhatsYourPrice" first, since that is more clearly a gray area of the law.
Yes, I agree that everyone should be discreet, but certainly reporting on what a lady is requiring for her allowance is fine. The element of SD / SB is that the relationship is more than just a one time thing. The majority of the SA ladies are not "professionals". In fact, I would say that very few are professionals. If they take down SA, they, being the feds, will be required to take down traditional dating sites. Not going to happen.
[QUOTE=Spill;4103542]No one thinks SA is monitoring this site. At least they shouldn't. But information can "get back" to them and if it scares them enough about FOSTA, they will tighten things up even further to save their ca $h cow. The discussion on The othER board has an unwritten rule about TMI regarding SA.
Here is a post from last spring that shares that sentiment:
"That's just one of the reasons I have been so vehemently against SB reviews or anything even close to an SB review system. I am also 1,000% against guys mentioning finding their favorite hooker on the sugar sites. Right now the Sugar World is in a legal "gray area" if too many stupid guys insist on shaking their dicks at LE by openly discussing individual SB's, complete with "allowance" requirements and "activities performed" they sure as fuck are going to ruin it for the rest of us. And THAT is why we can't have nice things. LOL.
So if any of you dumbfucks find your ATF advertising on SA and you want to share that information with the world, do her and the rest of us a huge favor and just STFU!"
Yes, a little extreme, but I think we should be a little more careful.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Longjblues;4103604]How can it get back to "them"? How exactly does it "get back" to "them".
And besides, the feds would go after SA's sister site, "WhatsYourPrice" first, since that is more clearly a gray area of the law.
Yes, I agree that everyone should be discreet, but certainly reporting on what a lady is requiring for her allowance is fine. The element of SD / SB is that the relationship is more than just a one time thing. The majority of the SA ladies are not "professionals". In fact, I would say that very few are professionals. If they take down SA, they, being the feds, will be required to take down traditional dating sites. Not going to happen.[/QUOTE]Moreover, don't forget that it's not sex that you're paying for but for the companionship. Kind of like hiring a Home Health Aid privately you know.
Moving onto a sister topic, considering how much of the stabilizing factor they are in our lives, many providers should be looked at as mental health professionals and in more advanced societies would be covered by health insurance or at least under European health care model should be provider with an elective upgrade, allowing one to upgrade his (or her) mental care coverage to include such services. Also, considering how many families they keep together, how many divorces they keep from happening, in fact how many women and children they keep from turning into single (I. E. Divorced) mothers, they should be able to fall under family counseling, and that too should be covered by an elective mental health rider.
Just saying.
[QUOTE=Longjblues;4103604]How can it get back to "them"? How exactly does it "get back" to "them". Oh, "ten ladies out of all the ladies with profiles on the Massachusetts/NH SA site are reported on an obscure Escort review site as taking money for sex"?? I think you are overly cautious. And besides, the feds would go after SA's sister site, "WhatsYourPrice" first, since that is more clearly a gray area of the law.
Yes, I agree that everyone should be discreet, but certainly reporting on what a lady is requiring for her allowance is fine. The element of SD / SB is that the relationship is more than just a one time thing. The majority of the SA ladies are not "professionals". In fact, I would say that very few are professionals. If they take down SA, they, being the feds, will be required to take down traditional dating sites. Not going to happen.[/QUOTE]I do not know that USASG would be considered an "obscure Escort review site", but that does not matter. The "get back to them" only needs to provide SA with the idea that there is a potential hole and they will tighten things further to avoid FOSTA. I'm not worrying about the feds shutting down SA, I am more worried about SA changing their business model away from how we like it.
[QUOTE=Nrlmus;4103618]Moreover, don't forget that it's not sex that you're paying for but for the companionship. Kind of like hiring a Home Health Aid privately you know.
Moving onto a sister topic, considering how much of the stabilizing factor they are in our lives, many providers should be looked at as mental health professionals and in more advanced societies would be covered by health insurance or at least under European health care model should be provider with an elective upgrade, allowing one to upgrade his (or her) mental care coverage to include such services. Also, considering how many families they keep together, how many divorces they keep from happening, in fact how many women and children they keep from turning into single (I. E. Divorced) mothers, they should be able to fall under family counseling, and that too should be covered by an elective mental health rider.
Just saying.[/QUOTE]Sounds like a good opportunity for President Pence.
Anyone ever seen her? Or any info to report on?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/7ab8d3f5-5e07-4e33-9e12-7b3b8d0433ed[/URL]
Has anyone here seen her?
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/6db55ced-f2f3-4439-a9c5-8515985ba09a[/URL]
[QUOTE=Nrlmus;4103618]Moving onto a sister topic, considering how much of the stabilizing factor they are in our lives, many providers should be looked at as mental health professionals and in more advanced societies would be covered by health insurance or at least under European health care model should be provider with an elective upgrade, allowing one to upgrade his (or her) mental care coverage to include such services. Also, considering how many families they keep together, how many divorces they keep from happening, in fact how many women and children they keep from turning into single (I. E. Divorced) mothers, they should be able to fall under family counseling, and that too should be covered by an elective mental health rider.
Just saying.[/QUOTE]Can't say that my 5-year SB could have prevented my divorce (though that was the idea at the time), nor was she the reason for it. More like a persistent cognitive dissonance, and a canary-in-the-coal-mine wakeup call to what was an untenable marriage. Even though in the end (inevitably), that SB is out of my life, the divorce was a necessary pain. So I suppose the logic applies, even if the stated outcome doesn't align with my experience.
My current SB is certainly salving the wounds of post-divorce life, that's for sure.
So, we all ***** and moan, with good reason, about all these girls that mention platonic in their profiles. Like most of you I generally move on but was curious if any of you have actually fucked a girl with a profile like that? Of course this post is not coming out of left field as I ran into one that I would give my left nut to fuck, LOL.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/2c53708b-dd75-46dd-8125-daed7caf05f9[/URL]
[QUOTE=Jack617;4105998]So, we all ***** and moan, with good reason, about all these girls that mention platonic in their profiles. Like most of you I generally move on but was curious if any of you have actually fucked a girl with a profile like that? Of course this post is not coming out of left field as I ran into one that I would give my left nut to fuck, LOL.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/2c53708b-dd75-46dd-8125-daed7caf05f9[/URL][/QUOTE]I have yet to even meet one with the platonic declaration. But who knows. The one you posted has a pic of herself in a bra with her boobs hanging out so I don't get it. Why post that pic if you're not going to put out? Maybe get her over to text and ask WTF is the platonic thing with such sultry pics.
[QUOTE=Aardvarks;4106467]I have yet to even meet one with the platonic declaration. But who knows. The one you posted has a pic of herself in a bra with her boobs hanging out so I don't get it. Why post that pic if you're not going to put out? Maybe get her over to text and ask WTF is the platonic thing with such sultry pics.[/QUOTE]I met a woman from CT that is married and said that she only wanted platonic. We ended up meeting for a public lunch and it became clear that more than platonic was available. She wasn't really my thing so I passed, but platonic is certainly not only platonic.
[QUOTE=Jack617;4105998]So, we all ***** and moan, with good reason, about all these girls that mention platonic in their profiles. Like most of you I generally move on but was curious if any of you have actually fucked a girl with a profile like that? Of course this post is not coming out of left field as I ran into one that I would give my left nut to fuck, LOL.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/2c53708b-dd75-46dd-8125-daed7caf05f9[/URL][/QUOTE]I've gotten some discussion of FS from some with the platonic marker checked off, but their allowance wants have been outrageous. But this one has the marker, says strictly platonic in what she is looking for, and says if you're looking for sex look elsewhere I wouldn't waste my time there, 3 strikes.