[QUOTE=Smoke & Mirrors]Most corrupt governments turns a blind eye to mps. ONLY when complaints roll in is when they take action. It seems that most politicians use escorts and mps anyway so why would they go after them? MPs are the easiest targets but are hard to enforce law on because of RED TAPE. If you are afraid change your hobby. There is a chance before the elections that LE visits will be made to make (lawmakers aka crooks) look like they are doing something to assist the taxpayers. ;)
Kilos of drugs, and weapons roll up and down the I-95 corridor and many others all day long but LE rarely gets a big catch. America has it's priorities in check can't you tell?. :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
These are all valid points, but I was not looking for philosophy or political points of view. I simply want to know if LE has been active in the RI MPs, and it seems they have not.
It does seem to me that it would be hard to bust a man for using the services of a prostitute in a MP, because the women are not likely to be decoys there (they would have to get past the mamasan somehow) and all the men have to do is wait to be asked what they want. If the police raid the place, they might take you in, but what are they going to charge you with? Loitering in a place of prostitution is not a crime.
The election day issue is a good reminder that for the extra cautious, it probably would be safer to seek the services of the RI AMPs in November.