Too Much for Too Little. Nothing Personal, but. . .
[QUOTE=Bastardale;2564506][URL]http://www.isensualsaraskye.com[/URL]
[URL]http://boston.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/beautiful-blonde-sensual-therapist-now-taking-appointments-men-women-and-couples/30062968[/URL]
I visited Sara a few weeks ago. She has a condo in the Waltham area. There was no parking at the condo but I was able to find parking nearby without too much fuss.
Sara is fairly new to the business. She required some screening which I provided (although I prefer to skip screening altogether). She works out of her home so she was pretty adamant about the screening. Maybe she changed her policy, but be prepared to be screened.
Sara is the girl in the pictures. She's a pretty blonde woman in her 30's. Her body looks good for her age. I think the pics she uses are real.
I got the sweet and simple package. We started off in the shower together. She cleaned me and I cleaned her. Then we moved to her bed for the massage and ending (which was by hand).
The cost for the session was $200, which is about right. The shower is nice and so was the nude massage. It was a fairly sensual session. She encourages some roaming, which is nice. I'd like to return at some point. I think she'd get better with repeat customers.[/QUOTE]This sounds like she's asking way too much for a little too little. I checked out her website, and the actually massage lasts for 30 minutes. The rest of the time is the shower-before and the shower-after. So it's 200 for 55 minutes of the lady's time.
Okay. Not to be petty. But let's break down her ad:
She's in her 30's. Hard to tell from the pics, but I'm guessing her late 30's, maybe 40's. Nothing wrong with that. A sexy woman in her 30's is still a sexy woman. But I can't imagine myself handing over 200 to get my pud pulled by a 22-year-old, and much less a lady old enough to be the mother of a 22-year-old.
And 200 for a handy with "some roaming"? What does "some roaming" even mean? I get to touch her bare ass and breasts? Sure sounds like no FIV.
Look, nothing personal. I don't know Sara and it sure sounds like she puts a lot of effort into making the session memorable. But this site has reviews of gals offering multiple pops and more roaming for a lot less, and if we all start ponying up 200 for basically a half-hour of limited fun with a cute MILF, what are we going to be paying for a half-hour of all-included fun with a girl in her 20's?
I mean, the body slide is 400 clams for a 30-minute "Nuru gel" (ooooooooooohhhhhh, special!) body slide. I'm sorry, but for 400 of my clams I'd rather be sliding my hotdog into and inside of a lady's clam for a couple of hours, with a couple of cups of coffee served on top of that.
Guys, we got to draw the line somewhere! It was bad enough when certain providers visited our area and promised the world, but then all you got was a little above-the-waist touching during a half-hour handy. At least they were in their twenties, and the "massage" fee was only 80 claims.
This is just my 2 cents. If you've got the dough to drop 200 for a half-hour massage and handy, more power to you.
Adobe.
Stephanie. Thumbs Up But. . .
[QUOTE=MnRoger;2567216]Stephanie has been really consistent with her service and attitude all these years.[/QUOTE]I agree: Stephanie is a gem in terms of her warm and very open-minded attitude. Her massage studio is set up very professionally, and a shower is available before and after. She's a very, very nice lady.
My one reservation: She's a fair amount larger than she looks in the ads she's recently posted on Backpage. The pictures could use some updating, for sure. She's not a SSBBW by any means, but she's also not a petite BBW, either.
She offers a slow and very sensual massage, and, although YMMV, a few more expanded services as well.
Would I see her again? Sure. But it really would be for the sensual HJ more than anything else.
Adobe.