[QUOTE=Francescoo;4873757]Anyone have info on pink m new girl!?[/QUOTE]Yes, this girl commonly worked in the Bay Area as Jooah and LA as well. Was recently Dana in LA at sexyangels. Currently Vera at Mykupcake OC and now becoming Pink of M.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4873757]Anyone have info on pink m new girl!?[/QUOTE]Yes, this girl commonly worked in the Bay Area as Jooah and LA as well. Was recently Dana in LA at sexyangels. Currently Vera at Mykupcake OC and now becoming Pink of M.
[QUOTE=JAdams19;4873675]Made the mistake of booking Connie yesterday. She is around 5'3 and very thin. Face was fine but body was nonexistent. BJ was awful so just decided to get to it. She gets on top and rides but stops going down half way. I flip her over but when I get to work she claims it's too big. I do not consider myself XL so I do not recommend her if you are average size. She seemed very apologetic and was trying her best so I did not make a big deal about it to the booker. Still money down the drain that could have been spent with a girl that can actually take it.[/QUOTE]I haven't seen Connie in a while. Last saw her in the Bay Area but they doesn't sound anything like her. Connie is a legend status girl and always gave me great service unless she has changed. She has a pretty good body, not super toned and not as curvy as pics but still nice. She has some of the best aftermarket tits out there, top 5 for sure imo. Also her BBBJ is damn good. She has this slow BJ routine that is sexy and sensual and she can go for a while. She moans during sex and can take a pounding.
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4873956]This is K BB forum, when you say "lax with the rules" which rules you referring to specifically?[/QUOTE]Some girls don't like Greek play, she'll let you finger her rear hole. The usual price for a kgirl is 260 or 300 for 2 pops. She let me finish 3 times for the 260. Plus in sure I got a little more than an hour. But again your experience may differ. This was not my first visit with her and I'm usually very compliant with bookers and the girls. Plus I brought Ruby some sexy lingerie to wear while I pounded her LOL.
I think she was Vera at Kupcake, Jooah at AOV, and Dana at SA. She was in LV too. I believed I saw her before under other names couple years ago. If she is who I think then the BBFS alone will make it worthwhile. I am too busy with new girls and ATFs.
Probably worth a try if no upcharge like she did at other places: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/vera-9498997702-350890](Her review)[/URL].
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4873757]Anyone have info on pink m new girl!?[/QUOTE]
No, not famous Ava at M. I think she may be TopKGirls Ava based on some pics but not sure. Every time I look at this site I want to see Shu again.
[QUOTE=PaulRew;4873512]Curious if any of you esteemed gents can provide any info on the one currently in Boston.
[URL]https://bostontopten10.com/tessa[/URL][/QUOTE]
Some guys said she allowed BBFS but if a girl goes to an upcharge agency chances are she will upcharge most guys too. Consider Ruby as YMMV.
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4873956]This is K BB forum, when you say "lax with the rules" which rules you referring to specifically?[/QUOTE]
You can always ask the booker.
I saw Rika before the upcharge. I am not sure what she charges now because I avoid girls who upcharge. It sucks when I ran into some girls who tried to upsell me because of the girls who advertised openly LOL. TBH, I may relent for one or two visits if she is my type. There are many girls so the upsell girls would be one and done for me.
[QUOTE=Czar213;4873159]Can someone please pm me how much rose to go bb with Rika from ca kdoll.[/QUOTE]
So Ruby is fit, as opposed to what some other people said before here (about her being thick). Has anyone had footjob or good nuru from an AMP provider before?
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4873916]M.
Mini, Allie, Hazel, Cona, Kiss, Eva.
Pink starts Tuesday WLA.
Hera starts Monday PV.
[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/yEEjZUhsKn6h[/URL]
Sexy Angels.
Luna. WLA.
Ariel. Ktown.
Sexyfunkgirls.
Rebecca, Viki.[/QUOTE]Whos rebecca T? Is that Jennifer or someone dif entirely?
[QUOTE=PaulRew;4873512]Curious if any of you esteemed gents can provide any info on the one currently in Boston.
[URL]https://bostontopten10.com/tessa[/URL][/QUOTE]Go to TER it has the review on her and seems all are happy.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4874112]I think she was Vera at Kupcake, Jooah at AOV, and Dana at SA. She was in LV too. I believed I saw her before under other names couple years ago. If she is who I think then the BBFS alone will make it worthwhile. I am too busy with new girls and ATFs.
Probably worth a try if no upcharge like she did at other places: [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/vera-9498997702-350890](Her review)[/URL].[/QUOTE]M said she starts Tuesday and wasn't sure in bb. More than likely since its M, we'll see.
Debating if I want to go back to Cona or see Dana.
Couple of reviews said her looks on the older side close to 40, also not 32 DD as M's website.
For gents out there, what do you think of her face compare to Cona?
Does she look younger or older?
As for body wise, M's website said 32 DD, compare to Cona real Ds.
Does she seem overall bigger body then Cona or smaller?
Thanks.
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4873757]Anyone have info on pink m new girl!?[/QUOTE]Pink worked in Las Vegas at clubloveline. I don't remember the name she used there but she was worth the price of admission.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;4874569]Debating if I want to go back to Cona or see Dana.
Couple of reviews said her looks on the older side close to 40, also not 32 DD as M's website.
For gents out there, what do you think of her face compare to Cona?
Does she look younger or older?
As for body wise, M's website said 32 DD, compare to Cona real Ds.
Does she seem overall bigger body then Cona or smaller?
Thanks.[/QUOTE]Dana's on "vacation".
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4874615]Dana's on "vacation".[/QUOTE]I think he is referring to Pink who starts with M on Tuesday and worked as Dana at SA.
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4874615]Dana's on "vacation".[/QUOTE]Pink yes, she was Dana from SA I heard and Jooha or something like that from KPC.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;4874079]I haven't seen Connie in a while. Last saw her in the Bay Area but they doesn't sound anything like her. Connie is a legend status girl and always gave me great service unless she has changed. She has a pretty good body, not super toned and not as curvy as pics but still nice. She has some of the best aftermarket tits out there, top 5 for sure imo. Also her BBBJ is damn good. She has this slow BJ routine that is sexy and sensual and she can go for a while. She moans during sex and can take a pounding.[/QUOTE]I doubt it's Connie with J. More likely than not, he's referring to Connie with January. This is why it's always important to state which org or booker she is from.
My list of good girls is quite long but I can't recommend them here. I love to recommend but my taste is different.
Still, there ought to be many more girls on the TDL. I nominate one legend. There can be only one Bunny / Glow! Can you handle BSC AF?
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;4873262]Haha yea. Hazel is my Current Favorite at M's lineup. I have seen Cona yet. I can see why Chanel is popular but just wasn't my style. Hazel, then Allie & Mini in a tie because they are just entirely different experiences and women. I first saw Sweet Allie back in NorCal. Hazel as Alisha as well I would see at GFE but it wasn't the same experience. Like I've said, something about her sexuality but that is only my preference and my own CF. Eva I saw in NorCal and not my type entirely.
SA favorite is Luna hands down. Joonah aka Dana was good but not like Luna and her cuteness. I sadly didn't catch Jenny. But I had seen her at Lovely Angels in SJ.
My recent good experience Was Viki at SFK. Nice DT BBBJ. She has a nice slim body for her age. Likely will look older in the face for most but not as bad as many others. She is a nice winner. Nina seems back so that's another on the list.
I'm currently working on a LA legends BBFS to dos: Pepsi, Yoco (YMMV I hear), Cona (Made the list over Kiss), and Nana.
Feel free to recommend more anyone, even if CFS. I've already tried Jenny O, LA Sera (in NorCal), Jazmin (as baby in NorCal), Connie, Shana, Jude, & White-all in NorCal.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DijiNg06;4874279]Whos rebecca T? Is that Jennifer or someone dif entirely?[/QUOTE]Whoops. It's Jennifer. Glad someone is proofreading my posts.
[QUOTE=LoveAsianGirls;4874619]I think he is referring to Pink who starts with M on Tuesday and worked as Dana at SA.[/QUOTE]I was told that Pink was not Dana. ?
Just got back from seeing Jamie. Most of the posts here about her are accurate.
Young with a nice body. She told me she's born in 95, you guys do the math. She definitely in her 20's, late 20 at most. Boobs have filler, feels like 34 DD. Not DDG or GND more like a Cute girl. Everything from shoulder down is like a Latina. Feels great when you go in from behind. I would say her body is curvy, and all the fats are in the right places. You know when you have a girl spread her legs and you can see the curvature of the butt pressing from behind because she is a little thick. That's a huge turn on. For me at least.
Service is nice when first started, natural lube, DFK, decent BBBJ, and BLS. 2nd round seems lackluster, more mechanical. I can see why some people mention that on here. She can converse well in English, a little chatty. Jamie is more slow and sensual whereas Luna from SA likes to eat you up the moment you walk in.
I got a quote for $$$ (2 shots), $$ (BBFS) +0. 5 for msog.
I went for the latter option. A little steep, but I think it was worth it. For me at least because I really dig her look and service. I don't really like the location, too much foot traffic, and Parking is a *****. Plus the apartment is really in the open, unlike other places where it's in a far corner.
Repeat? I would!
"can I get a reply M?
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;4873262]Haha yea. Hazel is my Current Favorite at M's lineup. I have seen Cona yet. I can see why Chanel is popular but just wasn't my style. Hazel, then Allie & Mini in a tie because they are just entirely different experiences and women. I first saw Sweet Allie back in NorCal. Hazel as Alisha as well I would see at GFE but it wasn't the same experience. Like I've said, something about her sexuality but that is only my preference and my own CF. Eva I saw in NorCal and not my type entirely.
SA favorite is Luna hands down. Joonah aka Dana was good but not like Luna and her cuteness. I sadly didn't catch Jenny. But I had seen her at Lovely Angels in SJ.
My recent good experience Was Viki at SFK. Nice DT BBBJ. She has a nice slim body for her age. Likely will look older in the face for most but not as bad as many others. She is a nice winner. Nina seems back so that's another on the list.
I'm currently working on a LA legends BBFS to dos: Pepsi, Yoco (YMMV I hear), Cona (Made the list over Kiss), and Nana.
Feel free to recommend more anyone, even if CFS. I've already tried Jenny O, LA Sera (in NorCal), Jazmin (as baby in NorCal), Connie, Shana, Jude, & White-all in NorCal.[/QUOTE]Were you able to get BBFS from la sera and / or Jazmin?
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4874634]I doubt it's Connie with J. More likely than not, he's referring to Connie with January. This is why it's always important to state which org or booker she is from.[/QUOTE]Correct! My apologies first time posting on the forum.
[QUOTE=DijiNg06;4874712]Just got back from seeing Jamie. Most of the posts here about her are accurate.
Young with a nice body. She told me she's born in 95, you guys do the math. She definitely in her 20's, late 20 at most. Boobs have filler, feels like 34 DD. Not DDG or GND more like a Cute girl. Everything from shoulder down is like a Latina. Feels great when you go in from behind. I would say her body is curvy, and all the fats are in the right places. You know when you have a girl spread her legs and you can see the curvature of the butt pressing from behind because she is a little thick. That's a huge turn on. For me at least.
Service is nice when first started, natural lube, DFK, decent BBBJ, and BLS. 2nd round seems lackluster, more mechanical. I can see why some people mention that on here. She can converse well in English, a little chatty. Jamie is more slow and sensual whereas Luna from SA likes to eat you up the moment you walk in.
I got a quote for $$$ (2 shots), $$ (BBFS) +0. 5 for msog.
I went for the latter option. A little steep, but I think it was worth it. For me at least because I really dig her look and service. I don't really like the location, too much foot traffic, and Parking is a *****. Plus the apartment is really in the open, unlike other places where it's in a far corner.
Repeat? I would!
"can I get a reply M?[/QUOTE]Not sure I understand, is that 550 total?
I hate when others use $ and .5 for prices LOL just say the whole damn number. But from my understanding, just from dealing with that agency alone in the past, their BB option is 400. That's with any girl that does BB and advertises / offers it on their site. At KTE she was 360.
[QUOTE=CrunchEazy;4875163]Not sure I understand, is that 550 total?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4874704]I was told that Pink was not Dana. ?[/QUOTE]I looked at the pics and they have some similarity but don't really look like the same girl.
M.
Hazel, Kiss, Eva.
Sexy Angels.
Luna, Ariel.
Sexyfunkgirls.
Jennifer, Viki.
[QUOTE=CrunchEazy;4875163]Not sure I understand, is that 550 total?[/QUOTE]Oops, its 300 for cfs 2.450 for BBFS msog.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4875200]I looked at the pics and they have some similarity but don't really look like the same girl.[/QUOTE]Those pics belong to Jooah who worked in NorCal for sure and is current Vera at Mykupcake. Dana's pics on SA are not of her for sure. She looks like Jooah'a pics in person. I saw her just before they were on their org break for a few days. So unless I got a B&S which I doubt, Pinks is for sure Jooah, and likely Dana. She is listed that way on TER review too. We'll have to wait and see when she starts if it is her to confirm.
[QUOTE=DijiNg06;4875234]Oops, its 300 for cfs 2.450 for BBFS msog.[/QUOTE]Yeah I've seen Jamie and she's nice but not worth that price at all. Even when she was $360 it was high but oh well.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4874704]I was told that Pink was not Dana. ?[/QUOTE]So is Pink from M is Dana from SA or not? LOL.
Is she better then Cona? I mean Cona got tons of good reviews but Dana, not so much, and if Pink is Dana, it's going to be disappointing because I was looking forward to those double Ds as M claim.
[QUOTE=CrunchEazy;4875571]Yeah I've seen Jamie and she's nice but not worth that price at all. Even when she was $360 it was high but oh well.[/QUOTE]Yeah, when she was 360, I think was already over priced and now? Its going to be hell no, LOL. Get with M or SA, good enough.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;4875652]So is Pink from M is Dana from SA or not? LOL.
Is she better then Cona? I mean Cona got tons of good reviews but Dana, not so much, and if Pink is Dana, it's going to be disappointing because I was looking forward to those double Ds as M claim.[/QUOTE]DDs, I didn't not notice that. Jooah, who is the actual provider in those pics has natural Cs. Some slight droop from natural but very pretty tits. Not a tone body but slender. Face was ok. GND. Best feature is tits and tight box. Tho if it is Dana there were complaints of her being sensitive, I didn't get any restrictions from her tho as other said. She used almost the same body stats with all names Jooah / Dana / Vera / Pink 5'3, 103-105 lbs, 32 DD. I would truthfully say 5'3', 108-110 lbs, 34 C.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;4874066]Yes, this girl commonly worked in the Bay Area as Jooah and LA as well. Was recently Dana in LA at sexyangels. Currently Vera at Mykupcake OC and now becoming Pink of M.[/QUOTE]If those are dana / vera's real pics, I'd say she looks pretty damn good by LA Kgirl standards.
Looks very fuckable, and nice tits.
So are those vera pics real?
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;4875652]So is Pink from M is Dana from SA or not? LOL.
Is she better then Cona? I mean Cona got tons of good reviews but Dana, not so much, and if Pink is Dana, it's going to be disappointing because I was looking forward to those double Ds as M claim.[/QUOTE]I don't know Pink is Dana but currently Pink is going by the name Vera on the K-Dolls hx handle in OC.
I guess KPC has new talent. Joy seems cute, does anyone have any info that they might be able to share.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/photos/Kpussycat/124121/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;4875652]So is Pink from M is Dana from SA or not? LOL.
Is she better then Cona? I mean Cona got tons of good reviews but Dana, not so much, and if Pink is Dana, it's going to be disappointing because I was looking forward to those double Ds as M claim.[/QUOTE]I've seen her as Jooah when she first came to socal. It was with Sweet Moments or SAG in OC. She's likely mid-late 40's. The pictures are her but likely 10 years ago. Her tits are natural and possibly Ds. At the time, there was no real LFK or DFK, I thought the experience was average. Her BBBJ was average, her body has aged from the photos and she looks her age. Typical sag of a MILF. She did like the way I was groomed and took care of myself. She said that I had a nice size. I'm average so maybe she doesn't like large ones, I don't know. Overall what I'm trying to get at is that if she liked me and I thought her performance was just average then I can't imagine if she didn't like someone. I will say that her box was nice and tight, unfortunately she wasn't offering PSE when I saw her. I think I would have enjoyed my session much more if she was as young as her photos.
As always, YMMV and it's been 2 months since I've seen her. She may have opened up obviously now with BBFS options. She has bounced around with 3 different agencies.
[QUOTE=HeavySetD;4875197]I hate when others use $ and .5 for prices LOL just say the whole damn number. But from my understanding, just from dealing with that agency alone in the past, their BB option is 400. That's with any girl that does BB and advertises / offers it on their site. At KTE she was 360.[/QUOTE]This to me is just as dumb as when a provider asks for "roses" or "flowers. " Just say the number.
I've read quite a few reviews and for me, the best that I've had was Pepsi for under $$.
I want to try Cona as well, but any other recommendations for best value under $$.
[QUOTE=BigM1;4875923]I've read quite a few reviews and for me, the best that I've had was Pepsi for under $$.
I want to try Cona as well, but any other recommendations for best value under $$.[/QUOTE]Hazel, Allie, Chanel, Yuna, Mini.