Printable View
[QUOTE=ILuvWomen2; 1762592]Call me a sucker for a woman with glasses. Layla's new pics are sexy and have me contemplating seeing how they look in person.
If she reads this- Layla, the pink rimmed glasses with the pink blouse and the sexy pink lips= a very very sexy woman![/QUOTE]Yes she also caught my eye with the glasses too! We've been watching too many movies. Although they do cause my imagination to go wild.
[/QUOTE]MBI launched an investigation and said it found advertisements from (Leslie) on Backpage. Com, a website authorities say is used heavily for sex trade.
Court records show investigators found 45 reviews of "Leslie" online and [B]used those to find people they suspected to be (Leslie) customers[/B].
Court records show at least two men told investigators they paid (Leslie) for sexual acts after finding her ads on Backpage. Com.[/QUOTE]
TomStone68.........First and foremost do not use names of real people here please, it's bad enough she got in trouble. I find it odd how the part with the highlights is almost done as a scare tactic to members here. I've emailed admin / reported your post....... and ask that you be banned for breaking the rules here that say not to post names.
After seeing the pics she used, she reminds me of Kay who used to advertise here. I once read a review, where about 4 years ago there was a dream where she was using a hotel in Altamonte-ish area's. Back then there was an ad on BP that advertised a 30 yr old college co-ed with a knock out body (fake pics). In the review the person left because of the fake pics. (although she did have a great body).
Fast forward a bit. And many good reviews on places including here reporting that her service improved! The updated review says she visited a friend in a hotel and they had a good time together with no issues.
After stepping up her game it sucks she got into an issue. I'm glad I only read and report dreams and not actual events on this site. Lawyer up and shut-up when needed.
[QUOTE=TomStone68; 1764862][url]http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2013-05-16/news/os-sex-offender-prostitution-orlando-20130516_1_prostitution-backpage-com-website-authorities[/url]
MBI launched an investigation and said it found advertisements from Cowart on Backpage. Com, a website authorities say is used heavily for sex trade.
Court records show investigators found 45 reviews of "Leslie" online and [B]used those to find people they suspected to be Cowart's customers[/B].
Court records show at least two men told investigators they paid Cowart for sexual acts after finding her ads on Backpage. Com.[/QUOTE]My suggestion to providers / clients is to download a version of linux like puppy or damn small linux and use the live version which installs nothing on nor alters your hard disk. You simply let it boot into the system. Even the national security administration has their own version for this purpose. I suspect the sentinel was correct that too much traffic in her apartment tipped off mbi. Then they either conducted surveillance of the physical location or some how surreptitiously installed a key-logger onto her pc or phone.
[QUOTE=CptMorgan;1765044][/QUOTE]TomStone68.First and foremost do not use names of real people here please, it's bad enough she got in trouble. I find it odd how the part with the highlights is almost done as a scare tactic to members here. I've emailed admin / reported your post. and ask that you be banned for breaking the rules here that say not to post names.[/QUOTE]I'm sorry you misunderstood the intent of my post. The highlight was to generate a discussion about information in that article related to hobbyists, which I would think is relevant to this board. I think it is significant that LE used information garnered from hobbyists in building their case. How did they get that information? I think it is important to understand that.
Also, what I had there was a direct quote from the article, but, I can see now that I could have formatted it better to make that clear. You do what you feel you have to do brother, as I'm sure the Admins will do what they need to. I think we all have the same intent in our hearts, which is to keep all of us, both providers and hobbyists, safe.
[QUOTE=ConstantBlue;1765051]My suggestion to providers / clients is to download a version of linux like puppy or damn small linux and use the live version which installs nothing on nor alters your hard disk. You simply let it boot into the system. Even the national security administration has their own version for this purpose. I suspect the sentinel was correct that too much traffic in her apartment tipped off mbi. Then they either conducted surveillance of the physical location or some how surreptitiously installed a key-logger onto her pc or phone.[/QUOTE]Alternately, run Chrome in incognito mode (CTRL+SHIFT+N)
But yeah, bootable USB / CD is better. Best if you can use it from an innocuous wifi location as well.
But if someone wants to hunt you down, they'll find you and capture the traffic.
Many strategies, including a "man in the middle' attack or even capture traffic in promiscuous mode.
[QUOTE=JustACbtGuy; 1766107]Alternately, run Chrome in incognito mode (CTRL+SHIFT+N)
But yeah, bootable USB / CD is better. Best if you can use it from an innocuous wifi location as well.
But if someone wants to hunt you down, they'll find you and capture the traffic.
Many strategies, including a "man in the middle' attack or even capture traffic in promiscuous mode.[/QUOTE]I forgot that part, a free wifi spot, plus set up and use tor. I doubt you would ever be popped if you start from scratch and create a new handle.
[QUOTE=TomStone68;1765620]TomStone68.First and foremost do not use names of real people here please, it's bad enough she got in trouble. I find it odd how the part with the highlights is almost done as a scare tactic to members here. I've emailed admin / reported your post. and ask that you be banned for breaking the rules here that say not to post names.[/QUOTE]I'm sorry you misunderstood the intent of my post. The highlight was to generate a discussion about information in that article related "__I think it is significant that LE used information garnered from hobbyists in building their case. How did they get that information? I think it is important to understand that. __"
Also, what I had there was a direct quote from the article, but, I can see now that I could have formatted it better to make that clear. You do what you feel you have to do brother, as I'm sure the Admins will do what they need to. I think we all have the same intent in our hearts, which is to keep all of us, both providers and hobbyists, safe.[/QUOTE]On the line above with the quotes I have a comment.
LEO made it seem as though they contacted mongers from a review board. To do that would require an enormous amt of work if it could be done at all.
LEO has created an enormous amount of paranoia with that media report, it was done on purpose-BET ON IT!
What they did was pull over a couple of mongers that left Leslie / Kay's infall, they get a couple who are scared to death, promise them a free pass if they sign a statement saying what she was doing.
This is a common procedure. In Altamonte their goal is to run the girl off and out of their town, so they call and find out which motel she is in, stake out the room, pull over a monger, scare him to death then they call the girl back and describe the monger that just left and tell her to pack up and move on or they will stake out her room keep pulling them over and get a statement and arrest her. Guess what! It works beautifully when the goal is to run her off.
Remember Leslie / Kay has been working this town for about 20 years and has only been popped one other time. Not bad if you consider the cost benefit ratio.
My point in this post is local LEO is not Homeland security or NSA. 99% of the hobby is about misdemeanor offenses so if you follow ALL the rules and use common precautions you will be fine. LETS KEEP THE PARANOIA IN CHECK, nothing has changed only some peoples perceptions which unfortunately become their realities.
VS
[QUOTE=VerySlowly; 1766522]I'm sorry you misunderstood the intent of my post. The highlight was to generate a discussion about information in that article related "__I think it is significant that LE used information garnered from hobbyists in building their case. How did they get that information? I think it is important to understand that. __"
Also, what I had there was a direct quote from the article, but, I can see now that I could have formatted it better to make that clear. You do what you feel you have to do brother, as I'm sure the Admins will do what they need to. I think we all have the same intent in our hearts, which is to keep all of us, both providers and hobbyists, safe.[/QUOTE]On the line above with the quotes I have a comment.
LEO made it seem as though they contacted mongers from a review board. To do that would require an enormous amt of work if it could be done at all.
LEO has created an enormous amount of paranoia with that media report, it was done on purpose-BET ON IT!
What they did was pull over a couple of mongers that left Leslie / Kay's infall, they get a couple who are scared to death, promise them a free pass if they sign a statement saying what she was doing.
This is a common procedure. In Altamonte their goal is to run the girl off and out of their town, so they call and find out which motel she is in, stake out the room, pull over a monger, scare him to death then they call the girl back and describe the monger that just left and tell her to pack up and move on or they will stake out her room keep pulling them over and get a statement and arrest her. Guess what! It works beautifully when the goal is to run her off.
Remember Leslie / Kay has been working this town for about 20 years and has only been popped one other time. Not bad if you consider the cost benefit ratio.
My point in this post is local LEO is not Homeland security or NSA. 99% of the hobby is about misdemeanor offenses so if you follow ALL the rules and use common precautions you will be fine. LETS KEEP THE PARANOIA IN CHECK, nothing has changed only some peoples perceptions which unfortunately become their realities.
VS[/QUOTE]It would take 5 minutes to call an advertiser and set up a meet. Then maybe a 20 minute drive. A few gallons of gasoline. And all the provider has to do is say the wrong thing or make the wrong gesture. We are not talking about years of ferreting out spies or large volume drug traffickers. Plus do you think for one minute any of these providers working out of a house has an occupational license in the city and county? (even if it is for a cover business) let alone a tax I'd number? Simply running an ad with revealing photographs hinting at sex for money is enough for an arrest and search warrant. I think you guys are all missing the big picture. Other than that pervert judd in polk county, le only responds to these types of issues when they either see it on the streets or receive complaints.
Some of the reports here, with parts quoted, are so garbled it is very difficult to determine who said what. Prior to uploading your report, if you click on "Preview Report", you will see what it looks like. It would make understanding a report much easier if the reader could see quotes.
Can we sticky this or something? Well written.
[QUOTE=Exec Talent; 1764527]Open Letter to LE:
Don't you have anything better to do? Guess you have caught all the rapists, murderers, thieves and vandals plaguing Central Florida. Most of us know crime is rampant here because you would rather go after low hanging fruit with high media value.
Open Letter to Consenting Adults:
Be extremely careful. Many recent ads on Backpage obviously have been placed by LE. One of the biggest red flags is 'New to the Business. ' The reason they do that is because you won't be able to find reviews and verify the escort or body rub girl. On the phone there is no reason to discuss anything concerning services provided. Personally, I like a short chat with my prospective companion to see if we click and would enjoy each other's company. I also usually ask if she smokes and is the person in the picture. If I show up and she is not, I say nothing other than sorry; you are not as pictured or described and leave.
Calling an escort ad is not illegal. Showing up at an escort's location is not illegal. Write down what you are going to ask and say before you call. Plan on walking away (or sending her away in the case of an outcall) if she is not as pictured or described.
Women if at any time you feel uncomfortable or threatened, end the session. Learn to talk very little on the phone and know that legitimate clients would never ask you about sexual services.
We as consenting adults can do things to protect each other and stay safe. Keep your head about you and do them.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ConstantBlue; 1766685]On the line above with the quotes I have a comment.
LEO made it seem as though they contacted mongers from a review board. To do that would require an enormous amt of work if it could be done at all.
LEO has created an enormous amount of paranoia with that media report, it was done on purpose-BET ON IT!
What they did was pull over a couple of mongers that left Leslie / Kay's infall, they get a couple who are scared to death, promise them a free pass if they sign a statement saying what she was doing.
This is a common procedure. In Altamonte their goal is to run the girl off and out of their town, so they call and find out which motel she is in, stake out the room, pull over a monger, scare him to death then they call the girl back and describe the monger that just left and tell her to pack up and move on or they will stake out her room keep pulling them over and get a statement and arrest her. Guess what! It works beautifully when the goal is to run her off.
Remember Leslie / Kay has been working this town for about 20 years and has only been popped one other time. Not bad if you consider the cost benefit ratio.
My point in this post is local LEO is not Homeland security or NSA. 99% of the hobby is about misdemeanor offenses so if you follow ALL the rules and use common precautions you will be fine. LETS KEEP THE PARANOIA IN CHECK, nothing has changed only some peoples perceptions which unfortunately become their realities.
VS[/QUOTE]It would take 5 minutes to call an advertiser and set up a meet. Then maybe a 20 minute drive. A few gallons of gasoline. And all the provider has to do is say the wrong thing or make the wrong gesture. We are not talking about years of ferreting out spies or large volume drug traffickers. Plus do you think for one minute any of these providers working out of a house has an occupational license in the city and county? (even if it is for a cover business) let alone a tax I'd number? Simply running an ad with revealing photographs hinting at sex for money is enough for an arrest and search warrant. I think you guys are all missing the big picture. Other than that pervert judd in polk county, le only responds to these types of issues when they either see it on the streets or receive complaints.[/QUOTE]Yes I had seen this operation. LEO would open a dona stand in the hotel parking lot. They will park their car right at the entrance of the parking lot so that everyone could see. Then they will stop any person that parks their car and ask them to show them the room key. If you don't have the key they will ask for you I'd and do a couple of questions. But is not a big deal LEO got nothing on you.
UFO
[QUOTE=JustACbtGuy;1766107]Alternately, run Chrome in incognito mode (CTRL+SHIFT+N)[/QUOTE]Is chrome better than Firefox privacy wise? McDonald's WiFi has practically no filter.
[QUOTE=U F O;1767395]It would take 5 minutes to call an advertiser and set up a meet. Then maybe a 20 minute drive. A few gallons of gasoline. And all the provider has to do is say the wrong thing or make the wrong gesture. We are not talking about years of ferreting out spies or large volume drug traffickers. Plus do you think for one minute any of these providers working out of a house has an occupational license in the city and county? (even if it is for a cover business) let alone a tax I'd number? Simply running an ad with revealing photographs hinting at sex for money is enough for an arrest and search warrant. I think you guys are all missing the big picture. Other than that pervert judd in polk county, le only responds to these types of issues when they either see it on the streets or receive complaints.[/QUOTE]Yes I had seen this operation. LEO would open a dona stand in the hotel parking lot. They will park their car right at the entrance of the parking lot so that everyone could see. Then they will stop any person that parks their car and ask them to show them the room key. If you don't have the key they will ask for you I'd and do a couple of questions. But is not a big deal LEO got nothing on you.
There is sufficient evidence in my mind (literally irrefutable) that a very large supposedly retired provider, who continues to show up after retiring at least three times and who I believe is extremely jealous of successful providers was the person responsible for the investigation and arrest of our most successful and beloved provider that posts on here.
I have known Leslie / Kay for maybe 16/20 yrs. And so has Vino and have never known her to have any 'neighbor' problems and in fact one woman interviewed said what a good and helpful neighbor she was. So if their are "Crime line" complaints which are anonymous, I am suspect and have a suspicion that the unsuccessful provider had a hand in her arrest as well.
VS
[QUOTE=Hawkeye49;1764868]Yes she also caught my eye with the glasses too! We've been watching too many movies. Although they do cause my imagination to go wild.[/QUOTE]The point has been well taken! Glasses will be available upon request and I will have more pix available soon.
Xoxoxo LayLa
[QUOTE=PeterPiper52;1763282]Same here. It just adds to her already gorgeous face.[/QUOTE]Thank you so much baby. I appreciate all these compliments guys!