Streetwalker Reports

Blind squirrels get lucky. Scooped up a BSW on Hudson between Cleveland and 71 this week.

Fairly dark skin with a banging ass body. Super clean but highly highly paranoid.

Took her to the spot for Bbj and then doggie with raincoat. Standard donation. Name might be Rhonda or Donna. Couldn't quite read the tat above that bubble ass. Of course no phone, it was lost. Aren't they all? Will repeat. Had to stop complaining and come out of my comfort zone. Nice to hang with if you can deal with the paranoia. It was borderline funny how on alert she was until I fed her and got comfortable.

[QUOTE=YAskWhy;5447877]Blind squirrels get lucky. Scooped up a BSW on Hudson between Cleveland and 71 this week.

Fairly dark skin with a banging ass body. Super clean but highly highly paranoid.

Took her to the spot for Bbj and then doggie with raincoat. Standard donation. Name might be Rhonda or Donna. Couldn't quite read the tat above that bubble ass. Of course no phone, it was lost. Aren't they all? Will repeat. Had to stop complaining and come out of my comfort zone. Nice to hang with if you can deal with the paranoia. It was borderline funny how on alert she was until I fed her and got comfortable.[/QUOTE]Awesome. I just seen her out at Cleveland & Minnesota. I was shocked to see she was an actual female. Damn near stopped in the middle of Cleveland to get a good look. She's the reason I logged on to check this site LOL. Dark skin with a decent booty. She was bad.

I don't hunt much anymore. I feel like I've seen the best Hudson / Cleveland has to offer throughout the years. The real bad bitches in the area are more on the UTR side anyway.

[QUOTE=Hermes1964;5446960]I didn't know her or have ever seen her out there. One of her family members said she was shot in the head. I don't know if that's true or not. She doesn't deserve that.[/QUOTE]OMG! Her mugshots.

FYI Summer will try to do drugs in your vehicle. Also can be flaky personality-wise. Usually walks W of Hague. Blonde w / a lot of tattoos. Upside is she's better looking than most of the girls who do this. YMMV.

Just a heads up:. LE has been running SW stings on guys on a monthly basis. Other posts show some signs to look for but one of the things in particular that should be mentioned is that they like to use S Wheatland. Also, in the area W of Hague S Huron was a popular spot for them. They have also been known to use the bottoms; Yale / Dana in particular.

I imagine they like to run them more at day than at night and probably shut them down before midnight for safety reasons.

Be prepared for this on a monthly basis. Might be wise to cruise the backstreets and look around before attempting any pickups.

Starting to look kind of rough. Lifestyle is getting to her, as it always does.

Ran into a Chrissy W of Hague. Couldn't get a very good look at her since she was all covered up since it was raining so drove off.

Also, that new light at Ogden is annoying. Easier for cops to come up on you. Hurts the flow of traffic. Wonder if they did that on purpose?

[QUOTE=MrElectrolyte;5450266]Just a heads up:. LE has been running SW stings on guys on a monthly basis. Other posts show some signs to look for but one of the things in particular that should be mentioned is that they like to use S Wheatland. Also, in the area W of Hague S Huron was a popular spot for them. They have also been known to use the bottoms; Yale / Dana in particular.

I imagine they like to run them more at day than at night and probably shut them down before midnight for safety reasons.

Be prepared for this on a monthly basis. Might be wise to cruise the backstreets and look around before attempting any pickups.[/QUOTE]Decoys will not get in your car.

[QUOTE=RickMann;5450559]Decoys will not get in your car.[/QUOTE]Not sure if this is entirely true. I've heard of cases where decoys do get in your car. Obviously you get arrested right after and they prefer to make a deal thru your window but decoys are armed police officers not defenseless women. And the cops are always right around the corner.

[QUOTE=MrElectrolyte;5450717]Not sure if this is entirely true. I've heard of cases where decoys do get in your car. Obviously you get arrested right after and they prefer to make a deal thru your window but decoys are armed police officers not defenseless women. And the cops are always right around the corner.[/QUOTE]It used to be that decoys would stay within a few yards of a position where they could be observed. Today, they can go blocks as long as it 's in the open. They use cell phones. It used to be that decoys had heavy purses with a police radio. Now, they can fit in with the rest of the girls.

It used to be that you had to talk for them for a few seconds and mention payment for sex. Now, if you hand signal them, say to an alley, you can go to jail. If you talk to them they can make a case at the arraignment that were interested.

It takes about 4 cops to act as security at the pick point where the girls are. This is expensive.

I've never heard of a decoy getting into a car with a suspected John. That could go south very easily.

[QUOTE=BackRub;5451658]It used to be that decoys would stay within a few yards of a position where they could be observed. Today, they can go blocks as long as it 's in the open. They use cell phones. It used to be that decoys had heavy purses with a police radio. Now, they can fit in with the rest of the girls.

It used to be that you had to talk for them for a few seconds and mention payment for sex. Now, if you hand signal them, say to an alley, you can go to jail. If you talk to them they can make a case at the arraignment that were interested.

It takes about 4 cops to act as security at the pick point where the girls are. This is expensive.

I've never heard of a decoy getting into a car with a suspected John. That could go south very easily.[/QUOTE]Interesting points. SW stings are clearly something to be concerned about. As a matter of fact, they should probably be more concerning than online stings. The good news is that cops don't like to do them for very long as they are extremely concerned about safety, obviously for good reason. Hotel rooms are alot safer than the street.

You're going to have less time to think during a SW sting, unlike an online sting, so it'll be easier to get caught. That's the danger. That's why it might be wise to cruise side streets before you go down the main through a fare.

The Columbus creampie Cassanova is back! I saved my load for three weeks. At 9 pm on Saturday I had hit Hudson. One ugly women. Then Sully. At Yale and Sully I found a"Danielle". Not her real name. Since she asked nicely I'm withholding that info. Age 30. I admit, this pic is filtered. Oh well she still looked good in person. Poor BBBJ followed by Bbfscip. Cost was 42 since I was feeling generous. Great attitude.

[QUOTE=BackRub;5451658]It used to be that decoys would stay within a few yards of a position where they could be observed. Today, they can go blocks as long as it 's in the open. They use cell phones. It used to be that decoys had heavy purses with a police radio. Now, they can fit in with the rest of the girls.

It used to be that you had to talk for them for a few seconds and mention payment for sex. Now, if you hand signal them, say to an alley, you can go to jail. If you talk to them they can make a case at the arraignment that were interested.

It takes about 4 cops to act as security at the pick point where the girls are. This is expensive.

I've never heard of a decoy getting into a car with a suspected John. That could go south very easily.[/QUOTE]I was driving around tonight on Sully and saw a WSW in red and white checkered pants by Sunoco. Maybe around 10:30 pm. I turned to pick her off a side street. She started walking towards me but then suddenly stopped and walked away. She was maybe 20 feet from me. I rolled down my window and asked if she wanted a ride. First thing she asked was if I had $5. She did not sound like most SW that I have talked to. Weird, but she sounded educated. I rolled my window up and kept going. On the next street over, there were 3 SUVs all parked in a row with their lights on. Couldn't see inside them. One was a nice Jeep. I turn back onto Sully to drive by and she has now crossed the street but standing in only the well lit area. I came back through about 5 minutes later and she, plus the SUVs were all gone. Didn't see anyone pulled over around that area. With all the busts going on, gave me a bad feeling. I have never heard of a decoy getting Into a vehicle. If they don't jump right in, I leave them.

Stay Safe.

S9.

[QUOTE=BackRub;5451658]It used to be that decoys would stay within a few yards of a position where they could be observed. Today, they can go blocks as long as it 's in the open. They use cell phones. It used to be that decoys had heavy purses with a police radio. Now, they can fit in with the rest of the girls.

It used to be that you had to talk for them for a few seconds and mention payment for sex. Now, if you hand signal them, say to an alley, you can go to jail. If you talk to them they can make a case at the arraignment that were interested.

It takes about 4 cops to act as security at the pick point where the girls are. This is expensive.

I've never heard of a decoy getting into a car with a suspected John. That could go south very easily.[/QUOTE]I would think LE still need some evidence of your intent to pay, so the decoys would probably have some mention of $$, like " can you help me with a few dollars?" or the like. It just boggles my mind to think that a man can go to jail for just waving your hand toward an alley. I am not saying you are exaggerating; I just feel bad for those mongers who were arrested like that. Though I would not be surprised if you are right. If people get arrested for not wearing a seat belt or for jaywalking or for not registering a dog, then I can believe you.

If you go to ohio. Arrests. Org and check out those arrested on 7/17/2021 in Franklin co, you will see Tamara B arrested for just not wearing the car belt, and I also saw before many individuals arrested for jaywalking or nor registering their dogs or their car lights were out or other similar innocuous things. WTF!! What kind of police state we are in!! They need to be defunded so they divert their efforts to the violent crimes. And how Andrew Hills was killed for nothing! WTF!

I was talking with a SW and asked her how LE usually arrest walkers, and she said they do it through undercover cars and girls need to get into their cars and LEO record the conversation and arrest only after the price is agreed on.

[QUOTE=BackRub;5451658]It used to be that you had to talk for them for a few seconds and mention payment for sex. Now, if you hand signal them, say to an alley, you can go to jail. If you talk to them they can make a case at the arraignment that were interested..[/QUOTE]You are correct. The Ohio laws on prostitution actually spell this out in the Action Code 2907.241 (A)(1) :

(A) No person, with purpose to solicit another to engage in sexual activity for hire and while in or near a public place, shall do any of the following:

(1) Beckon to, stop, or attempt to stop another.

(2) Engage or attempt to engage another in conversation.

(3) Stop or attempt to stop the operator of a vehicle or approach a stationary vehicle.

(4) If the offender is the operator of or a passenger in a vehicle, stop, attempt to stop, beckon to, attempt to beckon to, or entice another to approach or enter the vehicle of which the offender is the operator or in which the offender is the passenger.

Attached is the proof of this law in action, a snapshot from the official document of a real person (a SW) taken from the FCMCCLERK website.

Early Sunday cruising the loop, passed by ice cream store, seeing two hot legs but one dark face. And drove to Wedgewood, to find Sarah as I remembered her. Driving back to store by Hague, hot legs were gone - & I wondered if it was indeed Sarah, just freed from her 7/4 arrest. . .

Drove another hour, seeing thick-thighed WSW, fair brown haired gal near Larcomb, walking past a few mongers. She asked me a nr, and I gave a nr, plus service elements that I gave tips for. But she walked on, to a store, she said. Passed by a few times more, but she went with another monger. Almost went home for the day. But up near Demorest, saw WSW, with newly dyed red hair. Kay. Same Kay who gave good oral prior, who actually likes the job. So got to a spot and she did her thing. Upon release, she doesn't catch. WTF?? Says she wasn't feeling well this morning. Damn fine time to let me know. Wiped jizz off myself and clothes. Basic donation & she didn't ask for more. Good thing, as for that service, basic was almost too much!

Passing on 1st gal. Getting 3rd. Had me thinking my paranoia was too high, or my expectations. That got lowered and then I got the poorer service.

Some times it is wise to get off the prowl when it is not happening, but the addict in me kept me looping, for the memory of good time pick ups here.

And on life goes. . .

[QUOTE=SupFude9;5451815]I was driving around tonight on Sully and saw a WSW in red and white checkered pants by Sunoco. Maybe around 10:30 pm. I turned to pick her off a side street. She started walking towards me but then suddenly stopped and walked away. She was maybe 20 feet from me. I rolled down my window and asked if she wanted a ride. First thing she asked was if I had $5. She did not sound like most SW that I have talked to. Weird, but she sounded educated. I rolled my window up and kept going. On the next street over, there were 3 SUVs all parked in a row with their lights on. Couldn't see inside them. One was a nice Jeep. I turn back onto Sully to drive by and she has now crossed the street but standing in only the well lit area. I came back through about 5 minutes later and she, plus the SUVs were all gone. Didn't see anyone pulled over around that area. With all the busts going on, gave me a bad feeling. I have never heard of a decoy getting Into a vehicle. If they don't jump right in, I leave them.

Stay Safe.

S9.[/QUOTE]Thanks to the funding from Biden in March, cities have money to pump into narc and vice. If you follow FB you can see that right now more johns are going to jail than girls.

I've seen it before: first the round up the girls; then the johns.

They even use the trick of using a girl to vet a decoy as part of her release. I've also seen them put girls in a favorite bar and get the johns that way. They've used the girls phone to round up johns who call. They find the places the girls take their tricks and nail them there. They even use the girl as bate then round up the johns that show up. A girl can get in your car and ride a few blocks cause the cops don't really care if she gets hurt.

When things get hot stick with the smart girls who maintain their phones and stay sober and sharp on the streets. Tell her something she can use to know it's you and not the cops and do the same with her.

Before cell phones, there were phone booths. When things were too hot I would motion to a particular booth and call her from a few blocks away after I saw her inside the booth. I told her that when she saw me she could go to that booth and we would arrange a location.

I had a situation where the cops followed the girl so I arranged meeting her at a mall or store telling her I would pay the taxi fee.

In hard times, only the smart survive.

Besides, it's fun developing all this spy stuff to screw with their heads.

[QUOTE=LDontFkinCare2;5452473]You are correct. The Ohio laws on prostitution actually spell this out in the Action Code 2907.241 (A)(1) :

(A) No person, with purpose to solicit another to engage in sexual activity for hire and while in or near a public place, shall do any of the following:

(1) Beckon to, stop, or attempt to stop another.

(2) Engage or attempt to engage another in conversation.

(3) Stop or attempt to stop the operator of a vehicle or approach a stationary vehicle.

(4) If the offender is the operator of or a passenger in a vehicle, stop, attempt to stop, beckon to, attempt to beckon to, or entice another to approach or enter the vehicle of which the offender is the operator or in which the offender is the passenger.

Attached is the proof of this law in action, a snapshot from the official document of a real person (a SW) taken from the FCMCCLERK website.[/QUOTE]As long as you don't do something stupid and admit you were seeking pussy, this law cannot stick. The problem with this law is that although you will not be convicted, in reality the police can arrest you for anything they deem suspicious. You can be hauled off to jail, need to post bail, get a lawyer, get your mugshot in the paper, etc. You will be dismissed if it goes to court, but you will have to put up with all the drama and expense before getting cleared.

Many women out here tonight. Seen Jasmine B for the first time this year near Family Dollar. Her head was buried in her phone so didn't get her attention. She seemed to look OK. Seen Kari B by the Uncle Max. She's worth the pick up. I have numbers for both Jasmine and Kari, don't know if they still work though. Seen a young pretty brunette with curly hair & her tummy showing standing at Hudson & Homestead. Probably the best looking SW I've seen this year. Hopefully one of you guys scooped her up. Saw Corina J out as well. The rest out were the usual zombies.

Not trying to hate but Nessa are is the definition of high volume. I've seen her get in & out of 3 different cars in the span of 30 minutes. Damn.

[QUOTE=Mmakersmark86;5454747]Many women out here tonight. Seen Jasmine B for the first time this year near Family Dollar. Her head was buried in her phone so didn't get her attention. She seemed to look OK. Seen Kari B by the Uncle Max. She's worth the pick up. I have numbers for both Jasmine and Kari, don't know if they still work though. Seen a young pretty brunette with curly hair & her tummy showing standing at Hudson & Homestead. Probably the best looking SW I've seen this year. Hopefully one of you guys scooped her up. Saw Corina J out as well. The rest out were the usual zombies.

Not trying to hate but Nessa are is the definition of high volume. I've seen her get in & out of 3 different cars in the span of 30 minutes. Damn.[/QUOTE]Excellent update, love the important details so that your post is easy to follow! Guys, take note.

I went out to Hudson and Sully last night. Hudson was bad. At Marathon, I saw AK, or Adrianna who I creampied before. But now her good looks are gone and she looks just as hideous as her attitude. On Sullivant I saw 15 girls who I previously creampied but none of them look good anymore. It was a big waste of time and gas.

[QUOTE=BusterHymen;5454546]As long as you don't do something stupid and admit you were seeking pussy, this law cannot stick. The problem with this law is that although you will not be convicted, in reality the police can arrest you for anything they deem suspicious. You can be hauled off to jail, need to post bail, get a lawyer, get your mugshot in the paper, etc. You will be dismissed if it goes to court, but you will have to put up with all the drama and expense before getting cleared.[/QUOTE]Buster, how about my tactic idea about meeting escorts at a bar first? You think they would waste those resources? Its been successful for me. I also make a point to meet in a different jurisdiction.

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5455963]Buster, how about my tactic idea about meeting escorts at a bar first? You think they would waste those resources? Its been successful for me. I also make a point to meet in a different jurisdiction.[/QUOTE]Since you posted your comment in the SW thread, are you suggesting that we should meet a SW we saw on the street at a bar first? If so, I see a lot of logistical and practical barriers in doing that. These girls have minimal resources.

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5455963]Buster, how about my tactic idea about meeting escorts at a bar first? You think they would waste those resources? Its been successful for me. I also make a point to meet in a different jurisdiction.[/QUOTE]I think they'll probably just block you and move on.

[QUOTE=KC7676;5456218]Since you posted your comment in the SW thread, are you suggesting that we should meet a SW we saw on the street at a bar first? If so, I see a lot of logistical and practical barriers in doing that. These girls have minimal resources.[/QUOTE]Was more referring to STG escorts etc. I realize Cbus has been very aggressive with their stings lately not really anywhere else in the state has been that aggressive. The good news is though, I did see the majority of the guys who got arrested got disorderly conducts which is the goal, even with their wrongful arrest, they can't get an actual prostitution charge to stick.

[QUOTE=BusterHymen;5454546]As long as you don't do something stupid and admit you were seeking pussy, this law cannot stick. The problem with this law is that although you will not be convicted, in reality the police can arrest you for anything they deem suspicious. You can be hauled off to jail, need to post bail, get a lawyer, get your mugshot in the paper, etc. You will be dismissed if it goes to court, but you will have to put up with all the drama and expense before getting cleared.[/QUOTE]Indeed. Except things are much worse for those charged and booked, even if eventually they will walk free from the court system. Your mugshot will ruin your job prospects and lots of other damaging things will ensue. For cops, you are just a statistic and a potential source of funding for themselves and the system (the more they arrest, the better-off they are); but for the accused individuals, their lives and careers are ruined. Somebody here gave a good example of a girl who worked as a cashier, and after the solicitation charge, she could not find a job and had to see men regularly.

One other nuance. When charges and accusations are filed against someone, courts and judges cannot "prove" anything; they cannot prove innocence. All the judge can do is to find you "not guilty" (note, not innocent, but not guilty) and dismiss the case. That, however, does not necessarily make that someone innocent; it just means there was not enough evidence to convince the jury of the defendant's guilt, and because of the presumption of innocence practice, that someone walks away free. A good example is the Mueller commission work and report. The presumption of innocence stems from what in statistics is known as type I and type ii errors, or a false positive conclusion (an innocent person is convicted) versus a false negative (a guilty person is not convicted. The former is a much worse prospect and hence the presumption of innocence. So the point is that when an accusation is leveled against you, even if untrue, your reputation is tarnished for good, because, even with the not guilty verdict, some skeptics may say--well, he just walked away free because the prosecution did not do their job well enough, but potentially one could have been guilty if the police had dug deeper for evidence.

[QUOTE=LDontFkinCare2;5456731]Indeed. Except things are much worse for those charged and booked, even if eventually they will walk free from the court system. Your mugshot will ruin your job prospects and lots of other damaging things will ensue. For cops, you are just a statistic and a potential source of funding for themselves and the system (the more they arrest, the better-off they are); but for the accused individuals, their lives and careers are ruined. Somebody here gave a good example of a girl who worked as a cashier, and after the solicitation charge, she could not find a job and had to see men regularly.

One other nuance. When charges and accusations are filed against someone, courts and judges cannot "prove" anything; they cannot prove innocence. All the judge can do is to find you "not guilty" (note, not innocent, but not guilty) and dismiss the case. That, however, does not necessarily make that someone innocent; it just means there was not enough evidence to convince the jury of the defendant's guilt, and because of the presumption of innocence practice, that someone walks away free. A good example is the Mueller commission work and report. The presumption of innocence stems from what in statistics is known as type I and type ii errors, or a false positive conclusion (an innocent person is convicted) versus a false negative (a guilty person is not convicted. The former is a much worse prospect and hence the presumption of innocence. So the point is that when an accusation is leveled against you, even if untrue, your reputation is tarnished for good, because, even with the not guilty verdict, some skeptics may say--well, he just walked away free because the prosecution did not do their job well enough, but potentially one could have been guilty if the police had dug deeper for evidence.[/QUOTE]In her case she was convicted. The women who get busted generally are found guilty because they are posting on the sites and in general are sloppier with their techniques. Guys that get their charges dropped, I mean innocent is still innocent. You don't have to report it on a job application. If I ever were to be busted I already have my story prepared for future job interviews if I'm asked about it. I've been prepared for that moment for years. The funny part of it though is that the snobs who would even consider rejecting job applications because of a petty soliciting charge don't even realize it but they have a higher chance of getting arrested then guys on this board with years and decades of experience like us. Think about it, everyone gets horny, odds of them falling for a scam ad are much higher because they don't know what they are doing and probably have no experience doing anything illicit. Thats why you see doctors, high ranking people, even lawyers get arrested for misdemeanor soliciting. I hope some day someone with a lot of money walks into one of those stings and sues for defamation. Should make them stop their wrongful arrests and change their tactics for arresting solely for showing up or making a hand gesture.

Couple days ago picked up Megan off Chestershire and mound took her to spot she got completely nude gave BBBJ then bbcip total 20 you guys pay to much she had clear skin arms legs face pussy.

Drove down Sullivant Sunday not looking to pick anyone up but more just to see what was out. Saw a thin brunet near the Sunoco station that was obviously high walking topless. She would make eye contact with cars then act pissed off when they didn't stop. Later in the day saw her again someone apparently gave her a grey t-shirt and she kept pulling it up to flash cars driving by.

[QUOTE=LDontFkinCare2;5456731]Indeed. Except things are much worse for those charged and booked, even if eventually they will walk free from the court system. Your mugshot will ruin your job prospects and lots of other damaging things will ensue. For cops, you are just a statistic and a potential source of funding for themselves and the system (the more they arrest, the better-off they are); but for the accused individuals, their lives and careers are ruined. Somebody here gave a good example of a girl who worked as a cashier, and after the solicitation charge, she could not find a job and had to see men regularly.

One other nuance. When charges and accusations are filed against someone, courts and judges cannot "prove" anything; they cannot prove innocence. All the judge can do is to find you "not guilty" (note, not innocent, but not guilty) and dismiss the case. That, however, does not necessarily make that someone innocent; it just means there was not enough evidence to convince the jury of the defendant's guilt, and because of the presumption of innocence practice, that someone walks away free. A good example is the Mueller commission work and report. The presumption of innocence stems from what in statistics is known as type I and type ii errors, or a false positive conclusion (an innocent person is convicted) versus a false negative (a guilty person is not convicted. The former is a much worse prospect and hence the presumption of innocence. So the point is that when an accusation is leveled against you, even if untrue, your reputation is tarnished for good, because, even with the not guilty verdict, some skeptics may say--well, he just walked away free because the prosecution did not do their job well enough, but potentially one could have been guilty if the police had dug deeper for evidence.[/QUOTE]You're essentially correct on much of what you said, which is why it's so important to avoid stings. In our society getting caught in a sting even if dismissed can have a big impact down the road, particularly for the guys. Police are very much aware of this but don't care in the slightest. And, as has been noted, they really don't care if the arrest is illegal. They will let the court sort that out. But an illegal arrest could seriously impact you in this society.

This isn't the tall strawberry blonde nichole on the far west of sully, this is tall long brown hair darker skinned WSW nichole. Picked her up east of central and sully. Long ass legs, and a nice ass. Maybe B size tatas Notable short tight jean shorts. Couldn't see them under the tank top short-short. So tight I didn't realize they made spray paint in jeans color. 30 yrs old. Raspy older voice sounding. BBBJ with spit, listened well no complaints, decent technique. Otherwise as usual today early afternoon not much out worth it. Lots of LEO but didn't notice anything questionable. (minus the 1 T-BSW, LOL).

Heads up guys regarding LE:. I have noticed several citations from vice in parks regarding public indecency. I think they might cruise the parks in prostitution areas sometimes hoping to bust WGs / clients. FYI.

What does Megan look like? Not sure if I have met her or not.

[QUOTE=AlwaysBareback;5457628]Couple days ago picked up Megan off Chestershire and mound took her to spot she got completely nude gave BBBJ then bbcip total 20 you guys pay to much she had clear skin arms legs face pussy.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Xmile;5458572]What does Megan look like? Not sure if I have met her or not.[/QUOTE]Well, there are two Megans and a Meghan in that same area, but ABB did not feel like getting into specifics. I could get really specific but I am not allowed to post names or mugshots, lest the report gets deleted. I have blown my load in all three of them.

[QUOTE=MrElectrolyte;5457893]You're essentially correct on much of what you said, which is why it's so important to avoid stings. In our society getting caught in a sting even if dismissed can have a big impact down the road, particularly for the guys. Police are very much aware of this but don't care in the slightest. And, as has been noted, they really don't care if the arrest is illegal. They will let the court sort that out. But an illegal arrest could seriously impact you in this society.[/QUOTE]On most jobs you don't have to report something you werent convicted of. While I still don't want it to happen, it personally wouldn't affect me much as I have no wife and the jobs I obtain are as easy to get as shooting fish in a barrel. But yea, for most guys if you're going for an 80 k a year job I can see it being an issue not to mention explaining it to the wife. Here's the interesting part, when they run the huge operations such as 614 and in Cleveland they don't even post the mugshots on news articles, but the smaller stings in places like Youngstown and Akron you can find them from years ago still by googling their names even if dismissed. Thats why I really would love if someone with money sued them for defamation and illegal arrest. Also depending on what area you get caught in , in this day and age they don't even waste the resources to take you to jail, they process you at the hotel room or wherever the sting is in a separate area for processing and you go home that night, go through the court system and serve no time generally. In other areas theyll book you and youll be out in 30 minutes. that has been going on since before COVID as well.

Legal stuff is a worthwhile topic and I have stuff to add, but it might be better suited for tips, tricks, arguing and bullshit. Let's talk about streetwalkers. Are there any good looking ladies under 25? If so, I have creamy gooey gifts for them.

[QUOTE=RayPugh;5458640]Well, there are two Megans and a Meghan in that same area, but ABB did not feel like getting into specifics. I could get really specific but I am not allowed to post names or mugshots, lest the report gets deleted. I have blown my load in all three of them.[/QUOTE]Brown hair probably 120 lbs pleasant personality said been on block about 2 years.

[QUOTE=AlwaysBareback;5459273]Brown hair probably 120 lbs pleasant personality said been on block about 2 years.[/QUOTE]All three Megan have brown hair, same weight, and they've all been around for five years at least.

[QUOTE=MrElectrolyte;5458417]Heads up guys regarding LE:. I have noticed several citations from vice in parks regarding public indecency. I think they might cruise the parks in prostitution areas sometimes hoping to bust WGs / clients. FYI.[/QUOTE]Sorry meant to say "SWs / clients. ".

[QUOTE=Chunks92;5458685]On most jobs you don't have to report something you werent convicted of. While I still don't want it to happen, it personally wouldn't affect me much as I have no wife and the jobs I obtain are as easy to get as shooting fish in a barrel. But yea, for most guys if you're going for an 80 k a year job I can see it being an issue not to mention explaining it to the wife. Here's the interesting part, when they run the huge operations such as 614 and in Cleveland they don't even post the mugshots on news articles, but the smaller stings in places like Youngstown and Akron you can find them from years ago still by googling their names even if dismissed. Thats why I really would love if someone with money sued them for defamation and illegal arrest. Also depending on what area you get caught in , in this day and age they don't even waste the resources to take you to jail, they process you at the hotel room or wherever the sting is in a separate area for processing and you go home that night, go through the court system and serve no time generally. In other areas theyll book you and youll be out in 30 minutes. that has been going on since before COVID as well.[/QUOTE]Yeah, interesting points. Just FYI, all mugshots are posted in some way on the internet, at least that I'm aware of. But you're right that in many cases if they bust you in a hotel sting they won't arrest. However, if they bust you in a street sting they alm always will arrest, as far as I'm aware.

You're situation is a good one but for many guys it's not that way. Also, if they cite you they're going to throw the book at you bc they're aware it often gets pled down / dismissed. As far as suing for wrongful arrest is concerned I doubt that will happen. The law is broad enough for the officer to arrest you but for you not to be convicted. It sounds silly, I know, but that's they way it is. "Probable cause" does not equate to "beyond reasonable doubt" in court.

Remember that they only need probable cause to make an arrest.

[QUOTE=MrElectrolyte;5459497]Yeah, interesting points. Just FYI, all mugshots are posted in some way on the internet, at least that I'm aware of. But you're right that in many cases if they bust you in a hotel sting they won't arrest. However, if they bust you in a street sting they alm always will arrest, as far as I'm aware.

You're situation is a good one but for many guys it's not that way. Also, if they cite you they're going to throw the book at you bc they're aware it often gets pled down / dismissed. As far as suing for wrongful arrest is concerned I doubt that will happen. The law is broad enough for the officer to arrest you but for you not to be convicted. It sounds silly, I know, but that's they way it is. "Probable cause" does not equate to "beyond reasonable doubt" in court.

Remember that they only need probable cause to make an arrest.[/QUOTE]One should keep in mind that in determining a probable cause, the notion and practice needed for the police and prosecution to file a complaint against a person and to book the person, the judge would always give preference to the police; that is the police and prosecution's arguments and "evidence" are always privileged over the person accused; put another way, the police are always a favored side in the probable cause determination. In practical terms this means that the judge would almost always agrees with the police' arguments when they file an arrest request and will agree / allow to book the accused.

In the case of the beyond the reasonable doubt idea, the favored side is supposed to be the defendant, the accused, because of the presumption of innocence, the the burden of proof is on the prosecution side. But, what is "beyond the reasonable doubt" actually? There are lots of interpretations of what it means. Some tried to quantify this idea to say that if something has at least the 80% of likelihood of occurrence, then there should not be any doubt about that. In practice, this just means that if an average Joe may conclude that something is likely to occur, then there is no reasonable double. Like for instance, if a guy shows up in the girl's hotel room, what would be the most reasonable motive for meeting with her--aha, probable, f. Cking her, therefore there is no reasonable doubt that the guy intended to engage in procuring prostitution. So the point is that the beyond of reasonable doubt is not that stringent standard as many may think. It surely depends on the type of crime, the murder standards and higher than the solicitation ones.

In terms of the rich guy who would sue the police, wel Mr. Kraft was accused of solicitation, and the masseurs, the prostitutes, ended up being the scapegoat, not the police. See here:

[URL]https://reason.com/2020/12/02/florida-masseuse-ordered-to-pay-31573-after-soliciting-robert-kraft-to-commit-prostitution/[/URL]

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]