[QUOTE=TheWiseacre;5266437]There are some small ways that the government has tried to claim the tax dollars lost. One example is a massage license, which you used to be able to get online for like $3,000. Now, you need 500 hours of clinical massage training, you need continuing education credits, and it's like $12,000 for a course. This is yet another reason why you see a lot of 40+ year old providers and owners in the area. Because a lot of those licensed providers got theirs back when it was a lot easier to get.
.......
I will add that saying they live here "tax free" is a bit of a misnomer. AMP providers pay property tax (if they own a home or rent), usage taxes (sales taxes, etc.) and a myriad of other taxes like all the rest of us. Do they pay little or no income tax? I would assume that most vastly underpay income taxes if they file at all. BUT that does limit their ability to collect social security etc.[/QUOTE]I don't mind them earning "tax free" dollars. It's the IRS fault, for not looking into this because lack of resources. The solution is, and WiseAcre is correct on his assessment, the local, state city govt should collect on those license fees and provide health checks. Some cities make the local strippers hold a cabaret license in order for them to work.
If a MP gets 60-120 HJ to FS / patron. One average 3 customers / day (180 - 360) 5-7 days (I've know them to work 7 days, no vaca, damn workaholic asians 900-1800,1260-2520) so the range is 900-2520, that's 46,800 - 131,040 + tax free dollars. And that's on the low side.
The downside is, they have probably 10-20 years in the business.
Most "high-end, GPS" escorts only want to work on "low volume" basis and will charge for it.
