Escort Reports

I remember the article now. It was posted here. Jen and Nina was Identified, but Im pretty sure GEL's name is Tina. So I really didn't know. Im sticking with either Jenna or my ATF!

Thanks

I was able to meet up with Samantha over the weekend. She was staying in a room in the west end. I emailed her thinking I'd be able to meet up Missy but instead was told that Samantha was the older one. I went ahead and met up with Samantha. I paid $.20. Its b.y.o.c. with her. Her looks are 6 maybe 7 on a good day/ Not but since I;ve easily had worse. Service was 7 and attitude was a pleasent 7 or 8. Started with bbbj then covered mish then ended with bbbj no cim but it went all over every where else which was pretty funny and cool. She said she'd be at the room for awhile but I don't know if I'll repeat but not because it wasn't enjoyable more so because times are tough right now. Hopefully my report provides the info some need.

[QUOTE=Drewsky66]Oh Wow, I didn't know that. Thanks for the info, I won't be repeating. I should read the paper more often.I will have to try and find that article. I do remember GEL joking around about being busted with her other friend Jackie. Damn!

Thanks again Dodgeboy[/QUOTE]

Her friend's name was Liz and they were busted together. You might try channel 6's website or just look back through old links on this site. Both are very sweet girls but, in my mind anyway, they've both got big scarlet letters now for having been busted and potentially working with LE. Ironic about the scarlet letter, eh?

Let's be careful out there!

Just an f.y.i. -- there is a thread running on the StreetWalker board on these two

These two are one of those that straddle the line.

Missy is definitely a WSW who usually has a room, but charges .8 for 1/2 and 1/2. Not rushed, so a little more than the real SW, but cheaper than most escorts.

Samantha (older sister) is back in business, trying to up market herself; trying for $$ (see other forum) and marketing herself hard.
So -- she is hard up for cash -- and desperately needs to make it fast. Usually you drop your prices and go with volume (ala. Gretchen).

I suspect she can be pushed down to .8 like her sister !!!

Also interested to know what her body is like?

Regards

GW


[QUOTE=Tnielsen40]I was able to meet up with Samantha over the weekend. She was staying in a room in the west end. I emailed her thinking I'd be able to meet up Missy but instead was told that Samantha was the older one. I went ahead and met up with Samantha. I paid $.20. Its b.y.o.c. with her. Her looks are 6 maybe 7 on a good day/ Not but since I;ve easily had worse. Service was 7 and attitude was a pleasent 7 or 8. Started with bbbj then covered mish then ended with bbbj no cim but it went all over every where else which was pretty funny and cool. She said she'd be at the room for awhile but I don't know if I'll repeat but not because it wasn't enjoyable more so because times are tough right now. Hopefully my report provides the info some need.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Dodgeboy27]Her friend's name was Liz and they were busted together. You might try channel 6's website or just look back through old links on this site. Both are very sweet girls but, in my mind anyway, they've both got big scarlet letters now for having been busted and potentially working with LE. Ironic about the scarlet letter, eh?

Let's be careful out there![/QUOTE]If a girl is busted and works with the cops, wouldn't it be easy for the cops to keep her picture OUT of the paper so she could work better for them?

[QUOTE=Socks Manly]If a girl is busted and works with the cops, wouldn't it be easy for the cops to keep her picture OUT of the paper so she could work better for them?[/QUOTE]

Maybe, but arrests are public record and get released to the news agencies as they happen. Pictures sell papers and the police cannot, by law, keep the pictures from being released. Also, the women are not necessarily going to agree to work with LE right away but the arrests get reported pretty quickly so by the time the women flip the arrests have been reported. It's not like hobbyists are going to check most of the time. Also, in GEL's case she probably wouldn't flip because she's not that kinda girl - the other ones who got busted can't necessarily claim that. I'm not the guy who's gonna gamble my well-being on an escort's confidentiality. Once she's busted, she ceases to exist in my world. YMMV. Stay safe.

[url]http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/_xxx_blondie_is_back_xxx_n_better_then_ever_xxx_22/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=1080129[/url]

I saw this chick a while back. Very clinical, lots of rules, covered everything, in and out the door. Usually works with another chick who operates the same way. We might not have clicked and YMMV. Still, I made a note to point her out next time she came to town.

I've been out of town and haven't had much time for the hobby, but I did see a girl yesterday who turned out to be pretty nice. It won't help any of you in the short term, because she's taken off her ad, and I know she does this very rarely, just to help out with expenses. But, for the future, here are the details.

Her ad was under Adult Gigs and it said "Afternoon Rendezvous." She's 40, reddish blonde hair and a little chunky (I usually prefer spinners). She works out of her apartment, and says she's really picky. She's not real GFE, but did seem to get into it. If you write her and get a response that says "Irish Eyes," that's her. Please don't write me for her info, because I know she only wants to see guys when she posts - but if you see a post like that and hear from Irish Eyes, that's her and she's legit.

Also, I have to agree on Destiny. I saw her about a year ago, and it was way too clinical for me.

I've been a little interested in Ashley and Tasha. I think I saw Tasha a year or so ago when she was operating under a different name - used the same pic. I would like to know what their situation is now, though.

One final point - another girl advertizing under Gigs is Amy. I saw her last month and, although she's very GFE, she's also very much a BBW. She's very nice and friendly, but I won't repeat.

Speaking of Destiny, I had an experience with her. This was one of my rare unreviewed CL shots in the dark and found her to be a very capable F/S provider. She is a good looking girl with a kicking body, although a little rough looking There is no GFE at all and DATY was an upsell, which I gladly traded off in time. She was sweet and clean but I was ready to leave after 20 mins. She also had another provider in the bathroom the whole time so that was a little wierd and the room was a mess to boot. I will not go back.

It was probably Lacey or Mia in the bathroom. Both girls travel with Destiny. I had a similar experience with Lacey a while back. Everything is a side order, including multiple pops, and a business-like atmosphere, not rude but certainly not GFE. I believe we get the short end because services are not listed and/or cannot be discussed over the phone so you take your risk to whats included when you try someone new.

[QUOTE=Lancetoss]Speaking of Destiny, I had an experience with her. This was one of my rare unreviewed CL shots in the dark and found her to be a very capable F/S provider. She is a good looking girl with a kicking body, although a little rough looking There is no GFE at all and DATY was an upsell, which I gladly traded off in time. She was sweet and clean but I was ready to leave after 20 mins. She also had another provider in the bathroom the whole time so that was a little wierd and the room was a mess to boot. I will not go back.[/QUOTE]

Saw Cathy again today. Still an unbelievable experience. She's a little freaked out about all the people that have her info now, so unless I already gave you her info, you're out of luck (unless you are a SM2, as WD coined). I'd ask that other SM's/Regular Customers that have her info do the same. I'm all for sharing, but I do not want to do anything to discourage her from including Richmond in her future plans. By far the best girl to come through here in quite some time. She never disappoints, and I'm glad she not based here, b/c I'd be broke...

Stay Safe and Happy Hunting,

JDboy

hooked up with Isabelle from BP. She wanted 200 for an hour, but never had a room. While talking to her she mentioned being on Bells Rd. I was doing the JD loop, so I took a ride to see if i could get a glimps. I found her fighting with a guy at McDs. She looks more like 7-8 months. Face is a 6-7, body is a 7+, attitude was an 8.

Since she looked more like a SW, i told her i only had 80. She said ok. She had a room off Midlo by Chippenham. BBBJ, Cowgirl and Doggie till completion. Overall, not bad. Candy is a better quicky for 35 and has a room. Nice to play with the pregnant body.

be safe.

[url]http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/your_well_kept_secret_24/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=1259835[/url]

This girl is one of my ATF. Tina for $ does a real good bbj. that was my best $ spent.

[QUOTE=Hikeinc2005][url]http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/your_well_kept_secret_24/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=1259835[/url]

This girl is one of my ATF. Tina for $ does a real good bbj. that was my best $ spent.[/QUOTE]

So how about a little more info? We've all seen the ads and you're the first report I recall seeing and it lacks any detail (sounds a bit like a self review actually). What's her location like? Safe, discrete, clean, easy to find? Care to describe her skills a bit more - dt, swallow or spit, GFE, etc. From the pics she looks like she might be sagging a little (but not objectionably). Are the pics accurate? Has she gained weight - as it seems they all do? What sort of hours does she keep? There's so much you could say and so little you did - and if it is a self review, I'm not really opposed to these - just put them in the right section and suggest you'd like to meet some of us and tell us why.

Waterdog

Just backing up everything RG said below about this lady. I saw her this morning, and while she's not quite a GFE, she was friendly, easy to talk to, responsive to and appreciate of my efforts, and overall an enjoyable if not outstanding experience. Definitely worth the price of admission - I'll see her again.

And I'll 2nd (or 3rd) everything they said about her. Extremely enjoyable experience was had by all on Friday afternoon. Very talkative, very responsive and can even be made to squirt - huge bonus. I'll be back as well. We talked quite a bit before moving to her room, where she showed me her love of taking it from behind while she sits on your lap - very enjoyable.

Busted a prize nut.

Happy hunting

I wanted to see this one on Friday but got handed a story about needing to have her car repaired (on a friday evening). Her ad on CL claimed $100, but her pics are awfully good. Has anyone seen her? Her email says her name is Tina, but she goes by Madison.

Not seen her -- but she is in a pic that the east end Tasha sent me - claiming it was her sister. Calling herself Ashley!!! I've been thinking about a double with them.

Would certainly like to make sure they are legit and not a sting before sticking my head in the noose !!

I gather Tasha used to go by Mellisa, and certainly was FS a while ago (info from another SM). - but I would like to make sure she has not been turned. They are rather burning up the airways on CL !!!

GW



[QUOTE=Dodgeboy27]I wanted to see this one on Friday but got handed a story about needing to have her car repaired (on a friday evening). Her ad on CL claimed $100, but her pics are awfully good. Has anyone seen her? Her email says her name is Tina, but she goes by Madison.[/QUOTE]

Just found another one !!!

[url]http://richmond.craigslist.org/ads/1265432917.html[/url]

Plus a pic from Tasha's own ad earlier this month.

GW


[QUOTE=Dodgeboy27]I wanted to see this one on Friday but got handed a story about needing to have her car repaired (on a friday evening). Her ad on CL claimed $100, but her pics are awfully good. Has anyone seen her? Her email says her name is Tina, but she goes by Madison.[/QUOTE]

Actually, I've seen Tina once before. I thought I posted about it, but could be mistaken. She's legit, photos are accurate, and she's pretty good at what she does. BBBJ, multiple positions for CFS. She was at a decent hotel when I saw her (maybe a month ago), but she said she occasionally works out of her house, which is in a good area of southside.

She's definitely a value. If you haven't had a chance to check her out, I recommend giving her a call.

Stay Safe and Happy Hunting,

JDboy


[QUOTE=Waterdog53]So how about a little more info? We've all seen the ads and you're the first report I recall seeing and it lacks any detail (sounds a bit like a self review actually). What's her location like? Safe, discrete, clean, easy to find? Care to describe her skills a bit more - dt, swallow or spit, GFE, etc. From the pics she looks like she might be sagging a little (but not objectionably). Are the pics accurate? Has she gained weight - as it seems they all do? What sort of hours does she keep? There's so much you could say and so little you did - and if it is a self review, I'm not really opposed to these - just put them in the right section and suggest you'd like to meet some of us and tell us why.

Waterdog[/QUOTE]

So, there's a lot of talk of who not to see and the questions about the East End Girls (no one is quite ready to take the plunge, although I think if they're LE they wouldn't advertize so DAMN much!

Who is around today that you have seen and would recommend?

Last week these two were running an ad for the two of them together (claiming that they're fraternal twins) for a buck 75, now they're littering the CL board with solo ads for 2 bills for the hour. Using a bunch of different names, getting into flame wars on the board, inconsistent pricing... it makes me nervous. I especially like the look of the one with lighter hair and glasses... but not taking one for the team here, sorry.

[QUOTE=Dodgeboy27]I wanted to see this one on Friday but got handed a story about needing to have her car repaired (on a friday evening). Her ad on CL claimed $100, but her pics are awfully good. Has anyone seen her? Her email says her name is Tina, but she goes by Madison.[/QUOTE]NO SEX at all a lot of dancing some g/g play that all, no fun at all.

Ok - I took one for you guys today. Now I'm $.5 poorer. I saw both of them - Melissa, aka Tasha and maybe aka Madison and Ashley, aka Allison (not sure if I got all the aka's!).

Here's what it is: a less than decent HJ. Here's what it isn't: erotic, stimulating, a massage. Leila gave a great massage followed by a decent HJ. These girls discussed the trip to Wal-Mart to buy new oil as they worked on me and complained that one massage oil was too expensive (does Wal-Mart even have expensive massage oils?). I felt like I needed to mention to them that I was indeed lying there. Melissa has been having babies and is lactating. She's less attractive than last year and speaking of Wal-Mart, has less personality than most of their employees. Allison is pretty cute, but dumb as a post. I think if it had been just us two, I would have had more fun, but only marginally. And, of course, they did one thing which I've never experienced: they set a kitchen timer at the beginning of the session!

They operate out of a house on the east end in a decent neighborhood, but it's obviously a rental and fairly run-down. If you want to be naked with a teenager, pluck down $ for Ashley/Allison and let her do her thing. I think it's safe enough and they are not unpleasant like some providers I've seen, but FS (or even a massage), it ain't!

Anyway, the bubble has been broken.

"Tasha" aka Melissa take you to the brick rancher with the dirty floors? heh

[url]http://richmond.craigslist.org/ads/1261344448.html[/url]

Anyone see this beauty from CL. Looks skinny, hot and busty, from what is shown in the pic. I've seen her post for awhile, but never saw any reviews good or bad. Anyone ever take the plunge?

[QUOTE=Bucknasty2008][url]http://richmond.craigslist.org/ads/1261344448.html[/url]

Anyone see this beauty from CL. Looks skinny, hot and busty, from what is shown in the pic. I've seen her post for awhile, but never saw any reviews good or bad. Anyone ever take the plunge?[/QUOTE]

There are a lot of girls using that number, and the one time I called it I got a serious runaround before I ended up seeing a girl who WASN'T the girl in the picture. She also attempted to upsell once I got there and I ended up leaving. YMMV.

[QUOTE=Bucknasty2008]"Tasha" aka Melissa take you to the brick rancher with the dirty floors? heh[/QUOTE]

You got it, bro!

[QUOTE=Richmond Guy]Ok - I took one for you guys today. Now I'm $.5 poorer. I saw both of them - Melissa, aka Tasha and maybe aka Madison and Ashley, aka Allison (not sure if I got all the aka's!).

Here's what it is: a less than decent HJ. Here's what it isn't: erotic, stimulating, a massage. Leila gave a great massage followed by a decent HJ. These girls discussed the trip to Wal-Mart to buy new oil as they worked on me and complained that one massage oil was too expensive (does Wal-Mart even have expensive massage oils?). I felt like I needed to mention to them that I was indeed lying there. Melissa has been having babies and is lactating. She's less attractive than last year and speaking of Wal-Mart, has less personality than most of their employees. Allison is pretty cute, but dumb as a post. I think if it had been just us two, I would have had more fun, but only marginally. And, of course, they did one thing which I've never experienced: they set a kitchen timer at the beginning of the session!

They operate out of a house on the east end in a decent neighborhood, but it's obviously a rental and fairly run-down. If you want to be naked with a teenager, pluck down $ for Ashley/Allison and let her do her thing. I think it's safe enough and they are not unpleasant like some providers I've seen, but FS (or even a massage), it ain't!

Anyway, the bubble has been broken.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the report and TOFTT.

[QUOTE=Bucknasty2008][url]http://richmond.craigslist.org/ads/1261344448.html[/url]

Anyone see this beauty from CL. Looks skinny, hot and busty, from what is shown in the pic. I've seen her post for awhile, but never saw any reviews good or bad. Anyone ever take the plunge?[/QUOTE]No but I have been interested as well.

That # belongs to an agency that sends poor providers to the area.

I think Tina with the big tits and spinner type girl are two of them.

Has anyone tried this one?

She looks good.

[url]http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/better_than_ever_everything_you_want_and_need_call_for_playtime_19/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=1255846[/url]

All are "represented" by Erotic Promotions(.com) and advertise on CL.

They are all decent looking white girls 19 - 30.

They are out there on CL and therefore may be a risk for unwanted attention

Stopped to see the older sister. BBBJ and mish for 80. will not repeat. Not worth it. Why do i waste my money on such low quality.

Here's a link - [url]http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/new_juicy_petite_wow_total_must_see_38c_24_32_now_visiting_20/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=[/url]

2 of the 3 pics do not look like her. The last pic has some resemblence. She is african / american (though pics look white), petite, small waste, nice butt (except for stretch marks but it you get past that soon), skinny legs, huge 38 C/Ds, PSE, no GFE, started with shots to show it off, went to CBJ laying down, she spun around rear into it, went to K9, mish, her laying side ways, k9 off side of bed, to finale of her laying flat on the bed, legs together, driving it home. All in high score. $.0 Q, $.4 1/2, went with 1/2. Multiple pops probably OK and although didn't ask about greek, it looked like that was on the menu. California cutie would return.

Apparently Va Guy and I are the same person, cuz I saw Sam yesterday also and completely share his opinion. Was in the mood to see someone and everyone I'd chatted up had disappeared and the girls all look prettier around the time to go home. Hotel room reeked of pot, she was staying there with 2 guys and her little girl, who shuffled out of the room as I was getting there. It was funny that she denied having a sister named Missy for a while and then admitted it. BBBJ, Mish for $.8

Not worth it. Won't return.

[QUOTE=J Straw]Thanks for the report and TOFTT.[/QUOTE]


I think if these girls would just be up front about what they're doing and learn to give a decent massage, they would be successful. But their total disinterest in the client, coupled with the worst massage I've ever had, and changing names every day makes them well below any of our standards.

Hey guys,

NJ sexy girls has an ad on the avenue today. Will post when I get pics. Also I made an appointment with a promising visitor coming from Lancaster Pa next weekend [url]http://butterflydust.rare-playmate.com[/url] with many great reviews. Will give a report after I see her.

Furthermore. Lacey is back in town and I recomend you avoid her. You are better off jerking off to her pic. Plus once she gets your # she texts you EVERYTIME she returns.

Aaw her ad on bkpg in may.

Great photo.

I hope she returns to Richmond.

[url]http://stlouis.backpage.com/online//classifieds/ViewAd?oid=1791958[/url]

New NJ sexy girl.
Tried to post pic but did not work sorry

Maybe I will take the plunge Thurs.

I have not seen these girls, but found the following on USAsexguide as I was thinking about it.

[url]http://www.escorts.com/viewprofile. Asp? M=2451635[/url]

[url]http://richmond.craigslist.org/ads/1268746374.html[/url]

[url]http://richmond.bckpage.com/FemaleEscorts/drop_dead_gorgeous_new_playmate_visiting_7_15_7_20_book_special_incall_now_/classifieds/ViewAd? Oid=1281070[/url]

Payden is apparently one of Londons delusions. She has posted to CL with a 702#, a 309#, a 205#.

The 702 and 309#s were also used by numerous other girls, most of them black. And Paydens recent posts state her pics are real which is a hoot.

Its almost as if London is SO desparate that "bait & swith" is her business model. A couple of weeks ago, I started writing down the various names associated with phone #s as the posts were being removed by flaggers and she would post more & more & more. Pretty much the consistent thing was "homewood" and usually that irritating type like •°PlAyMaTe! ? . Or something.

309-318-7092 Brittney, tiffany, honey luv, Payden, Shawna 702-202-7273 Payden, Farrah, Kennedy, Sasha, Tiffany 205-413-9771 Belle, Unique, Payden 205-563-0291 Destiny, Chandler, Angelica

I think its safe to say you wouldn't have a positive experience by calling any of the numbers above. Or Londons 305 924-2990. Only once in recent weeks has London messed up and posted a fake pic using THIS #. A different hot white girl named Jezabell.

Someone reported that he had called a bunch of numbers one night. Said the first # he called was Laila at 970.581.2162 and then the same woman answered numerous different numbers.

Unique

Is almost certainly associated with a pack of girls and/or pimps.

She has repeatedly shared numbers with Payden (205 413-9771), 917-545-1678, and more recently 305 890-8282.

The same numbers, especially the 413# repeatedly had fake pictures.

The # 309 318-7092 was used by Bianca, Brittney, Honey Luv, Payden, Shawna, Sasha, Natasha all within a short period of time.

Uniques current 305 890-8282 # was shared by Kennedy on ci ty vibe s. Bottom line is the pics and names attached to the ads almost certainly have no association with whoever answers the door. If someone answers the door.

It would seem prudent to avoid anyone with these kind of business practices. You are likely to get a $20 crackwhore only pay lots more for it.

Attached is an ad with Uniques # showing a different girl claiming a number of flat out lies.