[QUOTE=Sasha Rose]I'm sorry - Maybe I felt like a was being personally attacked for no reason at all.[/QUOTE][url]http://www.*********.net/messageboards/boston/msgs/posts/82155.html[/url]
Printable View
[QUOTE=Sasha Rose]I'm sorry - Maybe I felt like a was being personally attacked for no reason at all.[/QUOTE][url]http://www.*********.net/messageboards/boston/msgs/posts/82155.html[/url]
I got the bug and finally TOFTT and stopped in a the Belmont Moon MPs.
The first one is called New Moon, on 197 belmont. I've been there twice because at first there were hints of extras, but now I'm sure that will never happen. Small place. Partitions don't go to ceiling (always a bad sign). Older ladies.- 40's. Some roaming. Decent massage; definitely not noteworthy. And strictly, strictly DIY, which isn't what I'm looking for at an AMP, so won't repeat. Damage: .4 with.2 tip for half hour.
Don't confuse New Moon with Blue moon, which is just up the street at 12 belmont. Went there once. Nice rooms. Young girls. Very very limited roaming. Got a reluctant HE from this one. So reluctant it was a turn off. Don't know if I'd repeat. Much better at the old reliables FY and WW. Damge: .4 with.4 tip for half hour.
[QUOTE=Leggeddog]SW = Streetwalker
Remember it's YOU that has to prove your credibilty to us.[/QUOTE]Sasha,
I don't know you or MJ.
What I do know is this:
1. You have a nice web site
2. You appear to be very attractive
3. You apparently have no real fans here
4. The ONLY way to change #3 is to "prove your credibility to us". No amount of posts or responses will change minds. The only way is for a respected member of this board to come out with the thumbs up for you.
BTW: For anyone interested, I do NOT request to be the "guy" as I am practicing a strict Asian diet!
PWH
You're mean- I'm not a "streetwalker" (as I offer nude massage only) And I have yet to see any new reviews. So I'm not really sure what you're talking about.
Sounds to me like you're not really sure what you're talking about either, better stick to trolling craigslist where mean perverts, who tend to speak on things they actually have no concrete knowledge of, belong.
Thanks for your I'll-written reply.
[QUOTE=Perfect Man]First it was TER where they riipped you a new asshole , then it was TBD where you insulted a few well known hobbyiest and after everyone there just plain ignored you and even called you "BORING"
Stick to CL where SW belong.
PS: oh and your new reviews SUCK the same way they did when you worked for MJ.[/QUOTE]
Well- I mean, someone wrote something nice on ********* the other day- but of course, the meanies ignored it. And honestly, as far as I can tell, any publicity is good publicity, because I'm doing more than fine.
[QUOTE=Pw Herman]Sasha,
I don't know you or MJ.
What I do know is this:
1. You have a nice web site
2. You appear to be very attractive
3. You apparently have no real fans here
4. The ONLY way to change #3 is to "prove your credibility to us". No amount of posts or responses will change minds. The only way is for a respected member of this board to come out with the thumbs up for you.
BTW: For anyone interested, I do NOT request to be the "guy" as I am practicing a strict Asian diet!
PWH[/QUOTE]
The "MOD" also put it back up- when I asked. And I am independent - I do not answer to anyone... I simply have a few individuals who answer to me. Is that too complicated for someone like you to understand. You're reasoning doesn't exactly make sense, it's a non-sequitor of sorts- as in 'it does not follow'... You people must really love me to talk about me so much, I'm flattered.
[QUOTE=Perfect Man]Its funny you say your independent but last week you posted on TBD how you were adding 2 new girls to your stable.
The Mod took that post down. I wonder why?[/QUOTE]
What a waste of forum space!
All the time I watched the board before I started to post and now the time I have been posting. I have been cautious of members posting that seemed more like adds from providers in disguise.
It is nice that SR is up front, however this is more a support board for the consumer. IMHO providers should stick to the advertising side of the www like Craigslist and the Phoenix.
[QUOTE=Sasha Rose]The "MOD" also put it back up- when I asked. And I am independent - I do not answer to anyone... I simply have a few individuals who answer to me. Is that too complicated for someone like you to understand. You're reasoning doesn't exactly make sense, it's a non-sequitor of sorts- as in 'it does not follow'... You people must really love me to talk about me so much, I'm flattered.[/QUOTE]Since you asked here;s your latest review on TER
appearance: 6 - Nice performance: 5 - Average
attitude: Nice atmosphere: Decent
date visited: Jun 2009
Needed a massage, so I contacted The Best Masseuse via e-mail. I had remembered her pics from when she was known as Rose though she's not using that name anymore. Despite some of the posts, I didn't find any drama in the process. Easy to contact and set up the appointment. When I arrived, she was waiting in jeans and a t-shirt. The shirt showed her ample cleavage, but she's carrying a few extra pounds from her pics.
She's nice, but not overly friendly. I got comfortable, then she did. Her massage was pretty basic, just lying beside me rubbing mostly my back. Little to no teasing, though she did make sure her breasts were in constant contact.
On the flip, she started some teasing and allowed some mutual touching. Finish was OK. Afterwards, I cleaned up and left.
Overall, it was an OK experience. There are better out there, but I've certainly had worse experiences.
[QUOTE=Sasha Rose]The "MOD" also put it back up- when I asked. And I am independent - I do not answer to anyone... I simply have a few individuals who answer to me. Is that too complicated for someone like you to understand. You're reasoning doesn't exactly make sense, it's a non-sequitor of sorts- as in 'it does not follow'... You people must really love me to talk about me so much, I'm flattered.[/QUOTE]Here's another review
appearance: 6 - Nice performance: 3 - Barely worth the effort
attitude: Nervous atmosphere: Pleasant
date visited: Jul 2009
I went to the web site of the best masseuse in hopes of getting an appointment with Sasha, girl who runs the site. She was not available but one of her friends, Annalise, also on the site, was. Her picture and description was cute so I thought I'd give it a try. Standard two call system got me the room number where I went to knock on the door.
Annalise was cute enough, but not nearly as attractive as the site photo makes her out to be. A bit heavier and she'd just gotten out of the shower so her hair was wet. That looks good on some women. Not so much in this case. She was very nervous and acted like she didn't really know what to say. I asked if I could lay down and she said get comfy so I stripped and laid on the bed. She got naked as well. Nice breasts and a good butt. Then the massage started. Clearly she didn't know how to give a massage. Just laid on her side next to me and rubber my back. Brushed the boys a time or two and since I was bored started to turn over. She said don't you want the full hour? I said okay and laid down for 10 more minute of uninspired back rub. Then she asked me to turn over and started a very unenthusiastic hand job. I asked if thee were any other options and was told no. That's fine - just wish the experience had been better overall. Left a tip while making some small talk and left. I would not repeat.
[QUOTE=Sasha Rose]The "MOD" also put it back up- when I asked. And I am independent - I do not answer to anyone... I simply have a few individuals who answer to me. Is that too complicated for someone like you to understand. You're reasoning doesn't exactly make sense, it's a non-sequitor of sorts- as in 'it does not follow'... You people must really love me to talk about me so much, I'm flattered.[/QUOTE]A rose by any other name is still a Rose.
[QUOTE=AsianLPGAfan]I'm hear the other day. I'm reading about of our mates here who is having prostate surgery and asks a pretty good question to the forum.
WTH is all this Sasha talk since the NBA playoffs?
It is very annoying and distracting.
I don't find the content useful.[/QUOTE]
Enought with the Sasha talk. I will stay clear of her. enought said. I suggest we all move on including Sasha.
Steve
[QUOTE=Kenn Jack]I have seen a provider at NMS in RI named Coco who I believe would be a good candidate for a prostate massage. I suggest calling ahead and asking for her. She is a very petite older Korean woman who gives an excellent massage and a skilled HE with and inserted finger if you so choose. I have had nice roaming and top up with her and enjoyed my sessions there. Treat her well and you will be rewarded.
Jack[/QUOTE]
There is a provider at manadella called "Juley" blonde 40's late who does a prostate massge well. i have not seen her a few years.
Steve
Has anyone noticed the incredible coincidence that has brought Sasha/Rose to the forum? Der Monger posted a question on August 4th about her website, and then out of the blue Sasha/Rose responds to that post on August 5th. From looking at her profile, it seems as if that profile joined the site on August 5th.
What are the odds that Sasha/Rose, purely out of the blue, stumbles onto this site less than 24 hours after a question was asked regarding her site?
The only possibilities that seem evident to me is that...
1. Someone on our board who's in contact with her, dropped the dime about that post or the responses.
2. She's been a silent lurker on this site using it to recruit women.
3. MJ is on the site using a handle that isn't evident to us so that he could find the next wave of chicks that will fall for his line; or...
4. Sasha/Rose is MJ using her name to shill for her.
I don't know which of those it could be or if its a simple explanation that I haven't considered, but it would be interesting to know if Der Monger has received any PM's shilling Sasha/Rose as someone he should see.
[QUOTE=Steven1234]Enought with the Sasha talk. I will stay clear of her. enought said. I suggest we all move on including Sasha.
Steve[/QUOTE]If there is demand from other members I would request to remove all content related.