And now for something completely different.
I thought seeing Redd from the westside in a UDF was interesting. Well it appears there is a girl from ListcCrawler that lives right down the street from me. I was out for my doctor prescribed walk and caught one of her very distinctive features I remembered from her ad. I knew she is one of a couple girls in the same area as me, but after passing her and looking at her pictures in the ad, I know it's her. Now here's the fun part. I have no interest in seeing her, she is just not my type. Might be for the better though.
Stay safe Brothers.
Sharing my submissive **** friend
Hey guys, if anyone can host in northern Kentucky I have a treat for you. Submissive 19 year old **** and she obeys my every command. If you are hosting and decent looking then hit me up!
My mind is blown with idiotic replies I'm getting
[QUOTE=DickHerDown;5069439]Hey guys, if anyone can host in northern Kentucky I have a treat for you. Submissive 19 year old **** and she obeys my every command. If you are hosting and decent looking then hit me up![/QUOTE]Guys, you don't have to be a genius to figure this out. I've already had 5 idiots message me things like, "what's up with this?" Or "can I have her number?" I clearly posted what I was looking for in my previous post. A decent looking guy hosting in nky area who wants to tag team this girl with me. Please no more fucking idiots inbox me about this.
Has the poor selection reduced your spending on the hobby?
I was considering pulling the trigger on 'Carmen'. According to some of you, she has some past issues with substance abuse, and she has bad teeth. But she's not old enough to be a grandmother, she doesn't look rough as hell, and she's not heavier than my 175 lbs. All hard to come by in the current market:
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/carmen-482[/URL]
I checked back at her ad today, and she's basically increased her price by $100. (To $400 incall, or $380 outcall).
This girl is about $100 overpriced.
So is Ryan, who used to work for Steve:
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/ryannxoxo[/URL]
And then there's this girl, who is $200 overpriced at $500:
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/elizabethmarie4299[/URL]
I don't know about the rest of you, but I may just hold on to my money for a while and wait for things to improve. I'm not interested in seeing the nasty girls who are old and overweight, but I'm not willing to pay $400 to $500 for a merely decent girl, either.
How many of you are simply holding on to cash right now, vs seeing old / overweight providers, or overpaying for ones that are moderately young / thin / attractive?
This is why I keep using EE
[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5071570]I was considering pulling the trigger on 'Carmen'. According to some of you, she has some past issues with substance abuse, and she has bad teeth. But she's not old enough to be a grandmother, she doesn't look rough as hell, and she's not heavier than my 175 lbs. All hard to come by in the current market:
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/carmen-482[/URL]
I checked back at her ad today, and she's basically increased her price by $100. (To $400 incall, or $380 outcall).
This girl is about $100 overpriced.
So is Ryan, who used to work for Steve:
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/ryannxoxo[/URL]
And then there's this girl, who is $200 overpriced at $500:
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/elizabethmarie4299[/URL]
I don't know about the rest of you, but I may just hold on to my money for a while and wait for things to improve. I'm not interested in seeing the nasty girls who are old and overweight, but I'm not willing to pay $400 to $500 for a merely decent girl, either.[/QUOTE]I've stopped trying to see anyone other than an occasional visit with one of Steve's girls. They are among the better looking girls available & not at the crazy Tryst prices. The best part is there is never any of the ghosting crap like I've seen you guys report with so many of the independents.
The purpose of age / weight disclaimers
[QUOTE=JimJaimes;5074593]I would submit that late forties is young. I know, not as young as boning some chick who for me could pass as my granddaughter, but you're not there yet. You will be. Time is not on your side. I too go for the younger ladies, but I'm not here to diss the "older" ladies or the folks who prefer them.[/QUOTE]I'm in my early 50's. Many of my friends became grandparents in their late 40's. My own maternal grandparents were 47 when I was born. That isn't elderly, but it isn't "young", either.
While tastes vary, there is also the notion of "conventionally attractive". We're both old enough to remember when Playboy was a thing. Most of the Playboy centerfolds were thin and no older than 30. That's "conventionally attractive".
Two summers ago, a lot of guys were raving about Pretty Cameron. There weren't many photos of her. I made an appointment on faith, because she was close by, and so many guys seemed to love her.
When I showed up, I was greeted by a very nice person, who was also a mannish lesbian, with the overhanging beergut one might associate with a middle-age truck driver.
I bailed, and I felt bad about it, because she was such a nice person. I recall thinking: I wish someone on USAG would have mentioned her weight and mannish demeanor.
Likewise, I made an appointment with Sara TT in 2010 (a decade ago) based on the glowing reviews at the time. (Photos of her, and detailed stats, were always in short supply.) I went through with the appointment, but I recall thinking: 'I wish someone had mentioned that she's over 35, and probably closer to 40. '.
In 2020, Sara TT is at least 45, and probably closer to 50. She's no longer even a MILF, but a GILF.
There is nothing wrong with that, if that's your thing. But it is definitely too old for *some* hobbyists. *Many* hobbyists, I would say. (I would almost guarantee that the younger guys on here, those in their 30's, are going to find that old.).
When a woman is outside the realm of "conventionally attractive", I don't think there's anything wrong with noting, "I lot of guys like her, but she's kind of old and / or overweight, etc. " That saves guys with conventional taste from wasting their time / money. It also saves the ladies who are older / heavier potential embarrassment and cancelled appointments. I would not have scheduled with either Sara TT or Pretty Cameron if I'd had full information on Sara's age and Cameron's weight.
Height / weight proportional
[QUOTE=ToddCincy;5074709]I'm in my early 50's. Many of my friends became grandparents in their late 40's. My own maternal grandparents were 47 when I was born. That isn't elderly, but it isn't "young", either.
While tastes vary, there is also the notion of "conventionally attractive". We're both old enough to remember when Playboy was a thing. Most of the Playboy centerfolds were thin and no older than 30. That's "conventionally attractive".
Two summers ago, a lot of guys were raving about Pretty Cameron. There weren't many photos of her. I made an appointment on faith, because she was close by, and so many guys seemed to love her.
When I showed up, I was greeted by a very nice person, who was also a mannish lesbian, with the overhanging beergut one might associate with a middle-age truck driver.
I bailed, and I felt bad about it, because she was such a nice person. I recall thinking: I wish someone on USAG would have mentioned her weight and mannish demeanor.
Likewise, I made an appointment with Sara TT in 2010 (a decade ago) based on the glowing reviews at the time. (Photos of her, and detailed stats, were always in short supply.) I went through with the appointment, but I recall thinking: 'I wish someone had mentioned that she's over 35, and probably closer to 40. '.
In 2020, Sara TT is at least 45, and probably closer to 50. She's no longer even a MILF, but a GILF.
There is nothing wrong with that, if that's your thing. But it is definitely too old for *some* hobbyists. *Many* hobbyists, I would say. (I would almost guarantee that the younger guys on here, those in their 30's, are going to find that old.).
When a woman is outside the realm of "conventionally attractive", I don't think there's anything wrong with noting, "I lot of guys like her, but she's kind of old and / or overweight, etc. " That saves guys with conventional taste from wasting their time / money. It also saves the ladies who are older / heavier potential embarrassment and cancelled appointments. I would not have scheduled with either Sara TT or Pretty Cameron if I'd had full information on Sara's age and Cameron's weight.[/QUOTE]The one thing I like about STG is the height and weight info. I doubt any one not listing her weight is doing so not because height and weight are proportionate or that she's 'too thin'. Unless the list their weight and I generally add 10% to the listing, I just move on.
The "T" and areas to avoid
Hey Gents. I am relatively new to Cincy and am learning my way around the various hoods. I have been to some sketchy locations and have been lucky so far. I am mostly a daytime hobbyist and they seemed manageable. You tell me. I have been told of a handful of locations to avoid and would like feedback. Some say stay out of Dayton completely, the Red Roof Inn and the street its on in Sharonville have been noted as high risk (LE). I am on the eastside which seem solid but few providers except around 275/ Beechmont which has also been mentioned for LE presence. IDK the names of hotels but I am assuming that is what the focus is. At the same time, some higher end providers seem to be in that area (Mary Ann?) maybe in a private residence? I was told to stay away from the "T" and it sounded like even during the daytime but I never got where exactly that is out of the conversation. I know hobby carries some basic risks which obviously I have accepted and try to manage, provider by provider, but I'm looking to reduce my odds of robbery, heavy drugs etc. Any thoughts, comments are appreciated starting with where is the T?
TYIA.
