Escort Reports

[QUOTE=MikeTsai;4934199]Hi all,

Trying to get into GFEInvestment, provided Peach Cafe and KGA referral, but op is saying they he won't consider referrals from these two orgs because they don't usually do referrals with GFEInvesmt. Any of you guys know the org that GFEinvestment would take as referral? Not quite ready to give out work email for some GFE yet.[/QUOTE]What other orgs can you provide references from? Try those. Orgs don't coop referrals like they used to it seems, which is really too bad. They're safer when they work together.

[QUOTE=MauiDiver;4934472]What other orgs can you provide references from? Try those. Orgs don't coop referrals like they used to it seems, which is really too bad. They're safer when they work together.[/QUOTE]I provided Bunnyhouse and SMTBeauties, but these two are not operating in full capacity now, so not sure if they would be able to help. If there are other orgs that GFE may take reference with, I'm thinking going with those other orgs first to build up reference. Gosh, way more complicated than hoped. GFE lineup better make it worthwhile.

[QUOTE=MauiDiver;4934472]What other orgs can you provide references from? Try those. Orgs don't coop referrals like they used to it seems, which is really too bad. They're safer when they work together.[/QUOTE]The only two orgs I cannot get into is gfeinvestments (the non viola ladies) and peach. Cafe. No idea why they excommunicated me. As I have seen both in the past before.

[QUOTE=Jizzm3;4925923]Not sure if its an off day or maybe its because I was the last appointment but yuna was a disappointment. Her pics are very close to her, she does look a bit older definitely into her 30's, lucky if she's in her late 20's. She has a petite body, not really spinner because it was super boney and not hard at all. Comparatively speaking, kat is what I would call a hard body versus Yuna, who was bone and baby fat. I could have sworn her tits were mm but hard to tell, it kind of seemed like she had implants and took them out.

At the start it was fun and games and I could tell the semblance of her aggressive attitude, but after the 1st and only pop, she pretty much slept for 30 minutes. Her BBBJ was very decent I would give her that but otherwise I would say she is very experience and is pretty much a clock watcher, good enough to trick a newbie. I didn't want to be rude but I did not push her, but because of that I would not recommend her to anyone, and I would definitely not repeat. Her hygiene is highly questionable and shower was lackluster at best. Poor and unenthusiastic attempt at communication. I would not even put her as the benchmark of average. Theres a lot of be desired after the appointment, I would say she is a shell of herself if reports on her in the past were accurate, but her service is just not there and that's unfortunate because her looks will probably fail her soon[/QUOTE]That's pretty crazy. Sorry to hear this. She's been pretty polarizing as of lately.

Yuna has been here for three years with little break (the break she took this year from January to March was like the longest break she took ever) and I feel like her s / a has been dropping. And I haven't seen her since January.

I've had some sessions where she'd be grumpy. However, I was never skimmed on service with her. She'd always look for extra pops. And she never slacked off like that. That's crazy. Shed always work hard on me.

And I'm a night owl so night is when I'd see her. Her last appointment is actually 11 for regulars.

I think I should stop recommending her with how volatile her service is getting. That's a shame.

[QUOTE=MikeTsai;4935108]I provided Bunnyhouse and SMTBeauties, but these two are not operating in full capacity now, so not sure if they would be able to help. If there are other orgs that GFE may take reference with, I'm thinking going with those other orgs first to build up reference. Gosh, way more complicated than hoped. GFE lineup better make it worthwhile.[/QUOTE]Best of luck to you. I wonder if the PO would tell you which orgs they cooperate with for references. Might be worth asking.

I haven't seen anybody at GFE in a while but have been trying to see Hailey. She looks and sounds fabulous but I haven't been able to get a time that works for me yet. She was booked solid yesterday when I checked.

Correction, Yuna has been here for two years, not three.

About GFEI org and if you keep having trouble. Give them either corg references that reply or orgs that are higher up. Don't give them references that have loose screening themselves. Good luck.

[QUOTE=MikeTsai;4934199]Hi all,Trying to get into GFEInvestment, provided Peach Cafe and KGA referral, but op is saying they he won't consider referrals from these two orgs because they don't usually do referrals with GFEInvesmt. Any of you guys know the org that GFEinvestment would take as referral? Not quite ready to give out work email for some GFE yet.[/QUOTE]Took awhile for me to get in with them, but I used LA and LSC and got in. I never even tried any of them yet, the whole reason I wanted to get in with them was for Vivi LOL.

Posting here as it's the most used in the bay. Is adult look ok to use? Want to book her but I've never really used adult look. Has anyone on here tried her? Is it legit? [URL]https://www.adultlook.com/p/3097501[/URL].

Appreciate your help.

[QUOTE=JonBeezyz;4938490]Posting here as it's the most used in the bay. Is adult look ok to use? Want to book her but I've never really used adult look. Has anyone on here tried her? Is it legit? [URL]https://www.adultlook.com/p/3097501[/URL].

Appreciate your help.[/QUOTE]You never responded to my pm.

[QUOTE=Jizzm3;4938799]You never responded to my pm.[/QUOTE]I just responded to you Pm. I have been to mellow creek a couple of times and it's ok.

[QUOTE=JonBeezyz;4938490]Posting here as it's the most used in the bay. Is adult look ok to use? Want to book her but I've never really used adult look. Has anyone on here tried her? Is it legit? [URL]https://www.adultlook.com/p/3097501[/URL].

Appreciate your help.[/QUOTE]That's Christine M. So pics are fake.

[QUOTE=E20746;4938906]That's Christine M. So pics are fake.[/QUOTE]And that is why I post on here. Thanks for the help. I wonder who is really behind that account. I was even given an address (apartment complex).

[QUOTE=JonBeezyz;4939015]I wonder who is really behind that account. I was even given an address (apartment complex).[/QUOTE]Who is really behind that account? Probably an org that hires Chinese females to provide sexual services in exchange for money and uses fake pictures in their ads -- like most of the others.

If you look at the ads on AdultLook, many of them also appear on AdultSearch and probably other similar sites. You can always google the phone number to find other listings. So, no idea what the female would have looked like had you gone to that apartment complex, but it's probably as legit an ad as the other similar ones.

And I have visited a provider who has an ad up on AdultLook, but it was for Thai massage, not Chinese AMP. But she was a real person providing real services, no scam. YMMV!

[QUOTE=Jizzm3;4935179]The only two orgs I cannot get into is gfeinvestments (the non viola ladies) and peach. Cafe. No idea why they excommunicated me. As I have seen both in the past before.[/QUOTE]It seems that GFEI is focused on GFE only girls as well, correct?

She must have had a bad appt before yours, she's been nothing less than 8/10 performance the two times I've seen her. But YMMV.

[QUOTE=Jizzm3;4925923]Not sure if its an off day or maybe its because I was the last appointment but yuna was a disappointment. Her pics are very close to her, she does look a bit older definitely into her 30's, lucky if she's in her late 20's. She has a petite body, not really spinner because it was super boney and not hard at all. Comparatively speaking, kat is what I would call a hard body versus Yuna, who was bone and baby fat. I could have sworn her tits were mm but hard to tell, it kind of seemed like she had implants and took them out.

At the start it was fun and games and I could tell the semblance of her aggressive attitude, but after the 1st and only pop, she pretty much slept for 30 minutes. Her BBBJ was very decent I would give her that but otherwise I would say she is very experience and is pretty much a clock watcher, good enough to trick a newbie. I didn't want to be rude but I did not push her, but because of that I would not recommend her to anyone, and I would definitely not repeat. Her hygiene is highly questionable and shower was lackluster at best. Poor and unenthusiastic attempt at communication. I would not even put her as the benchmark of average. Theres a lot of be desired after the appointment, I would say she is a shell of herself if reports on her in the past were accurate, but her service is just not there and that's unfortunate because her looks will probably fail her soon.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MrStaypuft;4941528]It seems that GFEI is focused on GFE only girls as well, correct?[/QUOTE]Yes, but they seem to have high quality ladies.

[QUOTE=Jizzm3;4935179]The only two orgs I cannot get into is gfeinvestments (the non viola ladies) and peach. Cafe. No idea why they excommunicated me. As I have seen both in the past before.[/QUOTE]I understand GFE, but peach too? You must of done something real bad for them not to let you in. LOL. No offense.

[QUOTE=Jizzm3;4941675]Yes, but they seem to have high quality ladies.[/QUOTE]That is not entirely correct. This org represents at least 4 smaller orgs, and some have RAs that offer PSE.

DB.

[QUOTE=HappyEnday;4941692]I understand GFE, but peach too? You must of done something real bad for them not to let you in. LOL. No offense.[/QUOTE]Thats what I'm wondering and scratching my head about too.

[QUOTE=Datyb;4942003]That is not entirely correct. This org represents at least 4 smaller orgs, and some have RAs that offer PSE.

DB.[/QUOTE]What other orgs do they map to? Might have to check those out.

[QUOTE=MrStaypuft;4942699]What other orgs do they map to? Might have to check those out.[/QUOTE]I don't believe it's anyone aside from what's one the gfeinvestment site. Granted they have like 4 handles on switter which gives the appearance of multiple orgs.

[QUOTE=StraightOmar;4943148]I don't believe it's anyone aside from what's one the gfeinvestment site. Granted they have like 4 handles on switter which gives the appearance of multiple orgs.[/QUOTE]All the RAs are on the site. But, my friend, there are at least 4 small orgs that make up that site.

DB.

Been pushing off doing reviews for quite a while now but thought its about time I wrote reviews for the girls I've seen. Especially after having bothered people about their reviews on different girls before I went to see them. (thanks for those who've helped answer questions).

Before I start though, I'm someone who looks for young, pretty, and engaged (enjoys doing it or at least doesn't seem like she's faking the sounds, enjoys getting serviced, etc.) more than their skills, so might have different opinions of who I recommend but in terms of looks I think I have a high standard. (although looks are always a subjective thing though. I usually prefer the taller, toned natural body types and cute faces even though I'm still ok with them as long as theyre young, pretty and sensual / engaged. Anyways.

BGC. Jennie, Nova.

Jennie was pretty hot I'd say. Cute face, and REALLY nice body (the type of body you know was toned and shaped with exercise but not rock hard / buff). In terms of experience she was great. She was engaged, had quite the service, and was quite skilled.

Overall I would repeat. F 7. 5/ B 9/ seemed around late 20's, early 30's / Service and skills around 8. 5.

Nova is definitely one of the main GND types. She's got a decent body (not chubby, not SUPER skinny, just right kind. Natural) and cute face. The only one I've repeated since I've come to the bay area because of great chemistry with me. She definitely seemed to enjoy the time and although she doesn't seem super skilled, I enjoyed the time with her. She definitely has the GFE and cute flirty vibes. (think I did read on some reviews that she can get a little disengaged or use her phone but never happened with me).

Overall I have and will repeat again. F 8/ B 8/ Definitely in 20's / Service was great but in terms of skills prob around 7. 5.

SA. Clover, Tiana.

Clover was kinda hard to say. She was definitely quite skilled? And sensual? But seemed to prevent me from leading and doing certain things. She didn't even let me LFK (idk maybe its a covid precaution?) so it was a weird experience for me. She's got a really nice body if you like the skinny / taller girls (that thigh gap and nice body figure was a turn on for me LOL) Not athletic type but still very attractive. Cute face as well. Her age is a little hard to tell though but I'd say late 20's, early 30's? She's really good at BJ and seems to be sensitive with her breast / nips. Also really tight. Anyways, overall I really did like her for the most part but because of how she didn't let me LFK or DATY and something just felt off. Definitely someone I wouldve repeated but because of these things I'm not sure right now.

Overall. F 7. 5/ B 9 (if you like the taller skinnier girls)/ hard to tell but prob in late 20's / early 30's / Skills seemed good with the BBBJ I got but kinda hard to tell with just that and service like I said was weird so I'd give her a 4 or 5 on this just from how I felt the disconnect.

Tiana is definitely more of the slightly older but more geared toward excellent service type. As I really look into age / appearance I probably wouldn't repeat but honestly other than probably being in her 30's for sure she wasn't bad I'd say. I don't actually remember too much about the experience as its been quite a bit now, but I don't remember anything offputting or bad. Just know if your type is similar to mine, she's probably not your type either. If she is your type, she's probably someone you should try.

Overall. F 6. 5-7/ B 7-7. 5/ in 30's for sure / Service and skills prob closer to 8. 5.

KA. Yuffie.

Yuffie is full on the service / experience than apperance type. She was chubby / thick (belly fat can be seen, etc.) so definitely wans't my type but she's super sensual and really engaged. She's super sensitive and if you want to see / experience waterworks like the ones you see in porn, she's the person to see. Although I don't think I'll repeat just because she wasn't my type and I would classify her as a MILF, I think it was an experience I don't regret.

Overall. F 5. 5?6?/ B 4?5?/ in 30's / service and skills 9.

AEC. Jeni, Melody.

Jeni was definitely on the prettier and young side, similar to my type. BUT she was either on her off game or just had terrible service. She definitely felt like she was going through the motions and not engaged. Even afterwards, she just asked me to take the shower by myself. I would not repeat myself but maybe it was her offday? Idk YMMV.

Overall. F 8/ B 7. 5/ in 20's / Service was 3.

Melody is also one of the service types. Definitely in 30's. She's quite a funny chatter and keeps the atmosphere lively and comfortable. She's also definitely not my type though so again if your type is similar to mine I wouldn't recommend her. But for those who like service or likes to chat and stuff, she's great.

Overall. F 6?6. 5/ B 6. 5/ in 30's / service and skills prob 8.

LSC. Ellie.

Ellie is also in that hard to tell area. Seemed like late 20's, early 30's. She's the perfect example of skinny spinner type. She's got GREAT service though and super energetic. She's someone I am thinking of maybe repeating but maybe after I've tried the others that I've been eyeing. In terms of experience, she was one of the best as well. She did seem a little awkward in the beginning but it was more of the shy awkward and was kinda cute. She warmed up over the time I was there. Also one of the few girls that was able to pull 2 shots out of me (I'm more of the type that likes to pleasure them and enjoy it together once instead of rushing twice. Also the second time is just harder for me (maybe TMI LOL but) so I don't even try but she somehow got me going and was able to do it.

Overall I'd repeat and really recommend to those who like skinny spinners or for those who is all about service. F 7. 5-8/ B 7 (9 if you're into skinny spinner types)/ Service and Skills 9.

GFEI. Allison.

Allison was also defintiely young. In 20's. Fit and toned body but the type of body that's a bit thick (no belly fat and not fat but you can tell she's thick), she's got really nice thick lips for kissing. She's got great service and also allows you to lead if you want. Pretty sensual and engaged. Only thing was that she wasn't really my type either (on the shorter side and slightly thick).

Overall. F 6. 5/ B 7/ in 20's / Service and skills 8?8. 5?

PC. Lavender, Creed, Loro Piana, Pegasus, orange blossom, NG 34 (this was really long ago so I don't remember much other than the general feeling I got).

I think NG 34 or Orange Blossom was the youngest out of everyone here. The others were definitely milfs as far as I can remember. Out of them apperancewise Lavender was tall, decent figure and face. Pegasus had a cute face, Orange Blossom had really good service and was kinda cute, and same with NG 34. But basically all of them are pretty photoshopped so don't trust the pictures for them. To my memory Creed had good service but was thick and wasn't my type, Loro Piana and Pegasus were also very skilled but because they were milfs I wasn't really into them. Honestly this was all too long ago so don't trust me on PC reviews as its been like 1 or two years since I saw them.

People I'm looking to see or thinking about right now are Viola& - Lucy, and MAYBE Zuri (her pictures doenst look like my type of attractiveness but maybe they don't do her justice? BGC Jean if she ever comes back, BGC zoe, GFEI Adel, Hailey maybe? And Catalyst, NG49,89 at PC also seem attractive but idk with how PC is super photoshopped I don't think ill go see anyone with them unless I'm sure theyre my type.

Lmk if you have any more questions about them and I'll be happy to answer them (prob log on here around once or twice a week).

[QUOTE=PickyChooser;4944630]Been pushing off doing reviews for quite a while now but thought its about time I wrote reviews for the girls I've seen. Especially after having bothered people about their reviews on different girls before I went to see them. (thanks for those who've helped answer questions).

Before I start though, I'm someone who looks for young, pretty, and engaged (enjoys doing it or at least doesn't seem like she's faking the sounds, enjoys getting serviced, etc.) more than their skills, so might have different opinions of who I recommend but in terms of looks I think I have a high standard. (although looks are always a subjective thing though. I usually prefer the taller, toned natural body types and cute faces even though I'm still ok with them as long as theyre young, pretty and sensual / engaged. Anyways.

BGC. Jennie, Nova.

Jennie was pretty hot I'd say. Cute face, and REALLY nice body (the type of body you know was toned and shaped with exercise but not rock hard / buff). In terms of experience she was great. She was engaged, had quite the service, and was quite skilled..[/QUOTE]Just want to leave a comment saying thanks for the intel! Much appreciated.

Has anyone tried using a fake ID / DL to get into LSC?

[QUOTE=MBraddock999;4869226]I found this be helpful. Not sure who is hosting it or maintaining it, but, for now seems good:

[URL]https://bayareaasiangirls.wixsite.com/escorts/links-to-girls-site[/URL][/QUOTE]Thanks for this link! Anyone have the password for the guest area's of this site? Would appreciate it.

[QUOTE=PickyChooser;4944630]Been pushing off doing reviews for quite a while now but thought its about time I wrote reviews for the girls I've seen. Especially after having bothered people about their reviews on different girls before I went to see them. (thanks for those who've helped answer questions).

Before I start though, I'm someone who looks for young, pretty, and engaged (enjoys doing it or at least doesn't seem like she's faking the sounds, enjoys getting serviced, etc.) more than their skills, so might have different opinions of who I recommend but in terms of looks I think I have a high standard. (although looks are always a subjective thing though. I usually prefer the taller, toned natural body types and cute faces even though I'm still ok with them as long as theyre young, pretty and sensual / engaged. Anyways.

BGC. Jennie, Nova.

Jennie was pretty hot I'd say. Cute face, and REALLY nice body (the type of body you know was toned and shaped with exercise but not rock hard / buff). In terms of experience she was great. She was engaged, had quite the service, and was quite skilled.

Overall I would repeat. F 7. 5/ B 9/ seemed around late 20's, early 30's / Service and skills around 8. 5.

Nova is definitely one of the main GND types. She's got a decent body (not chubby, not SUPER skinny, just right kind. Natural) and cute face. The only one I've repeated since I've come to the bay area because of great chemistry with me. She definitely seemed to enjoy the time and although she doesn't seem super skilled, I enjoyed the time with her. She definitely has the GFE and cute flirty vibes. (think I did read on some reviews that she can get a little disengaged or use her phone but never happened with me).

Overall I have and will repeat again. F 8/ B 8/ Definitely in 20's / Service was great but in terms of skills prob around 7. 5.

SA. Clover, Tiana.

Clover was kinda hard to say. She was definitely quite skilled? And sensual? But seemed to prevent me from leading and doing certain things. She didn't even let me LFK (idk maybe its a covid precaution?) so it was a weird experience for me. She's got a really nice body if you like the skinny / taller girls (that thigh gap and nice body figure was a turn on for me LOL) Not athletic type but still very attractive. Cute face as well. Her age is a little hard to tell though but I'd say late 20's, early 30's? She's really good at BJ and seems to be sensitive with her breast / nips. Also really tight. Anyways, overall I really did like her for the most part but because of how she didn't let me LFK or DATY and something just felt off. Definitely someone I wouldve repeated but because of these things I'm not sure right now.

Overall. F 7. 5/ B 9 (if you like the taller skinnier girls)/ hard to tell but prob in late 20's / early 30's / Skills seemed good with the BBBJ I got but kinda hard to tell with just that and service like I said was weird so I'd give her a 4 or 5 on this just from how I felt the disconnect.

Tiana is definitely more of the slightly older but more geared toward excellent service type. As I really look into age / appearance I probably wouldn't repeat but honestly other than probably being in her 30's for sure she wasn't bad I'd say. I don't actually remember too much about the experience as its been quite a bit now, but I don't remember anything offputting or bad. Just know if your type is similar to mine, she's probably not your type either. If she is your type, she's probably someone you should try.

Overall. F 6. 5-7/ B 7-7. 5/ in 30's for sure / Service and skills prob closer to 8. 5.

KA. Yuffie.

Yuffie is full on the service / experience than apperance type. She was chubby / thick (belly fat can be seen, etc.) so definitely wans't my type but she's super sensual and really engaged. She's super sensitive and if you want to see / experience waterworks like the ones you see in porn, she's the person to see. Although I don't think I'll repeat just because she wasn't my type and I would classify her as a MILF, I think it was an experience I don't regret.

Overall. F 5. 5?6?/ B 4?5?/ in 30's / service and skills 9.

AEC. Jeni, Melody.

Jeni was definitely on the prettier and young side, similar to my type. BUT she was either on her off game or just had terrible service. She definitely felt like she was going through the motions and not engaged. Even afterwards, she just asked me to take the shower by myself. I would not repeat myself but maybe it was her offday? Idk YMMV.

Overall. F 8/ B 7. 5/ in 20's / Service was 3.

Melody is also one of the service types. Definitely in 30's. She's quite a funny chatter and keeps the atmosphere lively and comfortable. She's also definitely not my type though so again if your type is similar to mine I wouldn't recommend her. But for those who like service or likes to chat and stuff, she's great.

Overall. F 6?6. 5/ B 6. 5/ in 30's / service and skills prob 8.

LSC. Ellie.

Ellie is also in that hard to tell area. Seemed like late 20's, early 30's. She's the perfect example of skinny spinner type. She's got GREAT service though and super energetic. She's someone I am thinking of maybe repeating but maybe after I've tried the others that I've been eyeing. In terms of experience, she was one of the best as well. She did seem a little awkward in the beginning but it was more of the shy awkward and was kinda cute. She warmed up over the time I was there. Also one of the few girls that was able to pull 2 shots out of me (I'm more of the type that likes to pleasure them and enjoy it together once instead of rushing twice. Also the second time is just harder for me (maybe TMI LOL but) so I don't even try but she somehow got me going and was able to do it.

Overall I'd repeat and really recommend to those who like skinny spinners or for those who is all about service. F 7. 5-8/ B 7 (9 if you're into skinny spinner types)/ Service and Skills 9.

GFEI. Allison.

Allison was also defintiely young. In 20's. Fit and toned body but the type of body that's a bit thick (no belly fat and not fat but you can tell she's thick), she's got really nice thick lips for kissing. She's got great service and also allows you to lead if you want. Pretty sensual and engaged. Only thing was that she wasn't really my type either (on the shorter side and slightly thick).

Overall. F 6. 5/ B 7/ in 20's / Service and skills 8?8. 5?

PC. Lavender, Creed, Loro Piana, Pegasus, orange blossom, NG 34 (this was really long ago so I don't remember much other than the general feeling I got).

I think NG 34 or Orange Blossom was the youngest out of everyone here. The others were definitely milfs as far as I can remember. Out of them apperancewise Lavender was tall, decent figure and face. Pegasus had a cute face, Orange Blossom had really good service and was kinda cute, and same with NG 34. But basically all of them are pretty photoshopped so don't trust the pictures for them. To my memory Creed had good service but was thick and wasn't my type, Loro Piana and Pegasus were also very skilled but because they were milfs I wasn't really into them. Honestly this was all too long ago so don't trust me on PC reviews as its been like 1 or two years since I saw them.

People I'm looking to see or thinking about right now are Viola& - Lucy, and MAYBE Zuri (her pictures doenst look like my type of attractiveness but maybe they don't do her justice? BGC Jean if she ever comes back, BGC zoe, GFEI Adel, Hailey maybe? And Catalyst, NG49,89 at PC also seem attractive but idk with how PC is super photoshopped I don't think ill go see anyone with them unless I'm sure theyre my type.

Lmk if you have any more questions about them and I'll be happy to answer them (prob log on here around once or twice a week).[/QUOTE]Thanks for the reviews unfortunately Hailey and Adel are out of town or leaving. Although looks like Hailey may be coming back but it's tbd.

PC is a little to hit or miss to TOFTT, I enjoyed creed aka velvet in LA / OC but I prefer athletic or curvy body types. But I'm down for skinny spinners too.

Has anyone seen them? Could you tell me a bit about your experience if you have? (general age range, body type, natural vs mm, experience / service?

I found them on the [URL]https://fantastic.escortbook.com/[/URL] site but not sure if theyre still around and / or how they are. Thanks for the help!

[QUOTE=PickyChooser;4949186]Has anyone seen them? Could you tell me a bit about your experience if you have? (general age range, body type, natural vs mm, experience / service?

I found them on the [URL]https://fantastic.escortbook.com/[/URL] site but not sure if theyre still around and / or how they are. Thanks for the help![/QUOTE]Bell is long gone. Halsey is slow GFE.

[QUOTE=PickyChooser;4949186]Has anyone seen them? Could you tell me a bit about your experience if you have? (general age range, body type, natural vs mm, experience / service?

I found them on the [URL]https://fantastic.escortbook.com/[/URL] site but not sure if theyre still around and / or how they are. Thanks for the help![/QUOTE]Halsey I would put her age early to mid 30's, face is pretty but older than her photos. Excellent body slim but not skinny, great ass and soft c implants. Tan lines which turns me on. Attitude bossy hot chick that knows how to get you do what she wants by using her body.

Service was a different experience if you like pleasing a lady through DATY and rubbing her then she's your type. She knows her body is fine so she dictates how she wants to be pleased by knowing that you're hypnotized by her body.

BBBJ was a little short, the main event was good but again she dictates the pace slowing it down and allowing it to be faster when she's getting off.

[QUOTE=ChocoNap;4947584]Has anyone tried using a fake ID / DL to get into LSC?[/QUOTE]Nope, I blurred almost everything on my real I'd except the picture of my face and they took it.

[QUOTE=HeavySet;4951650]Nope, I blurred almost everything on my real I'd except the picture of my face and they took it.[/QUOTE]Did you blur your name too? Or leave it exposed?

Just getting started and was wondering if any kgirls in the Bay Area offer bars and if so is there an upcharge. Thanks for any help.

[QUOTE=Somavox;4952426]Did you blur your name too? Or leave it exposed?[/QUOTE]I blacked out everything except photo and full name on my DL and everything on my paystubs except for company name / logo and my full name. They are just interested in connecting your name to two official docs that you possess. The Candy Store is a wonderful place. The barrier to entry is totally worth it IMHO.

I came across some of these listings on Swifter and wondering if they are legit.

[URL]http://sirensong.boldescorts.com/tia38/[/URL]

[URL]http://mel4u.gfeincall.com/photos/[/URL]

[QUOTE=MBraddock999;4953361]I blacked out everything except photo and full name on my DL and everything on my paystubs except for company name / logo and my full name. They are just interested in connecting your name to two official docs that you possess. The Candy Store is a wonderful place. The barrier to entry is totally worth it IMHO.[/QUOTE]Just what I did. Be aware of what they want and why, remove the rest, too many people rush to hysterics.

[QUOTE=WAustin64;4953205]Just getting started and was wondering if any kgirls in the Bay Area offer bars and if so is there an upcharge. Thanks for any help.[/QUOTE]Chocolate bars?

[QUOTE=MBraddock999;4953361]The Candy Store is a wonderful place. The barrier to entry is totally worth it IMHO.[/QUOTE]I completely agree. There are several consistently very good organizations in the Bay Area, but only one gets my top rating. It is LSC.

DB.

[QUOTE=MBraddock999;4953361]I blacked out everything except photo and full name on my DL and everything on my paystubs except for company name / logo and my full name. They are just interested in connecting your name to two official docs that you possess. The Candy Store is a wonderful place. The barrier to entry is totally worth it IMHO.[/QUOTE]Exactly what I did as well.

So I asked BGC if they offered 90-minute sessions. They told me it was $400 (1 hour is $220 as normal). I thought it wasn't worth it. Has anyone else asked for 90 minutes, or even two hours? And what would you guys think is the average price for 90-minute sessions?