[QUOTE=SamuelAdams;6491515]Ad is showing as 5:40 pm posted, your post is at 5:50 , no comments.[/QUOTE]Your point being, chief?
Girl's been posting for years, and posts frequently. Thus my commentary about her potentially being high volume.
Printable View
[QUOTE=SamuelAdams;6491515]Ad is showing as 5:40 pm posted, your post is at 5:50 , no comments.[/QUOTE]Your point being, chief?
Girl's been posting for years, and posts frequently. Thus my commentary about her potentially being high volume.
Her name is Kay you are correct. My personal experience was she was worth the visit and she actually looked better in person than the photos. Search my user profile you won't have to go far back to my my posted review.
[QUOTE=TheRagen;6491784]So I normally trust anyone I see with a lot of reviews but something about this lady's reviews set off my alarms. I have never seen her talked about here and I tried searching her name and I found nothing at least under "Italian stallion. " I believe she used to go by Kay too but there have been a lot of those so it is hard to figure out which is which. Anyone have anything about this one?
[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/review_list/6362288997[/URL]
I find her attractive but I currently expect her to be absolutely off the deep end.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RomanBath;6491562]Well she does post multiple times a day now, hence the high volume remark. If you really suspect someone is shilling, check out their post history. FWIW I posted about her last July, when she was going by Sara. I said she was a mixed baghotter than her pictures, GFE, a joy to communicate with, and no obvious bad drug habit. Cons were that I got a CBJ that was lousy, then she rushed to FS, then said my time was about up til I suggested she look at my last text saying "I'm here" to know that I still had a lot of my hour left. Plus no DATY or really anything else was offered, she tried a fetish of mine (for extra) but couldn't deliver. But maybe she has improved in some of those areas. I rarely see anyone twice just because I love variety. But thinking I may try her again.[/QUOTE]I would not be too concern with this persons concerns as he is accumulating posts with this type of comments- I don't see any substancial or meaningful posts. Always looking for info.
I concur with your assessment about Henny saw her a few months ago and the whole experience was about cookie cutter experience and next.
[QUOTE=SamuelAdams;6490214]Hi any senior members have experience with [URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/140300282[/URL] ?? Only one guy in this forum is saying he has met her looks to me like a promoter or self account, any suggestions??DM me Thanks.[/QUOTE]Set up to see her and then report back. You have never contributed amd then try to question other folks here? Go out of here.
[QUOTE=SamuelAdams;6490214]Hi any senior members have experience with [URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/140300282[/URL] ?? Only one guy in this forum is saying he has met her looks to me like a promoter or self account, any suggestions??DM me Thanks.[/QUOTE]I counted four posters who've said that she's real.
[QUOTE=Illini25;6492016]Most are verified provider only site (s). One such 'site' is white list on TER, but it's used mostly for referral purposes. Though you may want to see the comments and might get a laugh, there is also serious information being exchanged involving attacks, unacceptable hygiene, ncns, no pay etc. I've never seen it, but have been told by several providers about it.[/QUOTE]Agree. I've been told, not shown, about a provider community on the social media platform "Discord". I was kind of impressed by the level of scrutiny and validation she had to provide in order to be able to join the discord group. Be recommended by someone already in, send copy of actual govt I'd card, copies of her ads, and some reviews, etc. It's mostly younger providers, and travelers. Their conversations are mostly around passing on info about guys who are rough / abusive, ripoffs, window shoppers who never book after "a thousands text", stalkers, and repeated ncns. Pretty normal stuff. Violence, secretly videoing, and stalking will almost always get you dinged, as well as money scams (envelope or stacks of bills, with just the outside stuff being real and rest blank paper). Threats will probably get a mention as well.
Very popular platform for the young crowd, as my college age kid uses it as their standard format for group discussions they want private.
Hit this ad up today to setup an appointment they messaged me back and said they were full today but could get me in tomorrow I told them that was fine. Age on ad said 22.
They then proceeded to message me back and tell me that I had to use a condom because they were 16 and asked if that was ok. I replied no thanks I thought you were adults and her final response before I blocked the number was I'm 16 but experienced.
I've been hobbying for 15+ years and never had the feeling that I was talking to LE. Today I feel like I was 99% sure talking to LE. Be safe out there fellas.
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.com/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141272559[/URL]
[QUOTE=TheRagen;6491784]So I normally trust anyone I see with a lot of reviews but something about this lady's reviews set off my alarms. I have never seen her talked about here and I tried searching her name and I found nothing at least under "Italian stallion. " I believe she used to go by Kay too but there have been a lot of those so it is hard to figure out which is which. Anyone have anything about this one?
[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/review_list/6362288997[/URL]
I find her attractive but I currently expect her to be absolutely off the deep end.[/QUOTE]Man this chick used to be stacked great c or d cups with a fat ass and super pretty. Now she is super thin no tits skinny ass face and is always talking about wanting to get revenge on her bf. Does she not realize how unattractive that Is LOL who wants to worry about your bf the whole damn time def got a screw loose.
[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;6492951] Today I feel like I was 99% sure talking to LE. Be safe out there fellas.
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.com/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141272559[/URL][/QUOTE]The ad alone sets off my spidey sense. The convo you reported would make me feel EXACTLY as you do!
[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;6492951]Hit this ad up today to setup an appointment they messaged me back and said they were full today but could get me in tomorrow I told them that was fine. Age on ad said 22.
They then proceeded to message me back and tell me that I had to use a condom because they were 16 and asked if that was ok. I replied no thanks I thought you were adults and her final response before I blocked the number was I'm 16 but experienced.
I've been hobbying for 15+ years and never had the feeling that I was talking to LE. Today I feel like I was 99% sure talking to LE. Be safe out there fellas.
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.com/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141272559[/URL][/QUOTE]It's a sting operation "I hope", otherwise they're being trafficked and LE needs to find them ASAP...As the saying goes "16 Will Get You 20" and any sick fuck who's either pimping or trying to see underage girls needs their nuts nailed to their forehead.
She is easily 50-75 heavier than her pics and very rough and callous. She also requires a deposit because she realizes once you get there you've already paid a substantial amount toward her fee. I could not get out fast enough. Lesson learned.
[URL]https://preferred411.com/Provider_Page_Client2.cfm?Cid=409373[/URL]
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/sensualsophie[/URL]
Pics are much younger and skinnier days.
[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;6492951]Hit this ad up today to setup an appointment they messaged me back and said they were full today but could get me in tomorrow I told them that was fine. Age on ad said 22.
They then proceeded to message me back and tell me that I had to use a condom because they were 16 and asked if that was ok. I replied no thanks I thought you were adults and her final response before I blocked the number was I'm 16 but experienced.
I've been hobbying for 15+ years and never had the feeling that I was talking to LE. Today I feel like I was 99% sure talking to LE. Be safe out there fellas.
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.com/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141272559[/URL][/QUOTE]Agreed. I've never used that site based on feedback.
When has any provider ever randomly offered age without asking? It seems an odd thing to offer especially knowing being under 18 will chase off 99.9999 percent of business. That comment about being underage seems to have a very very specific purpose.
The ad says, "don't waste your time on something worn out in the ciity" to entice clients into an area not known for this type of thing.
The dialect of "freaks in sheets lookin" doesn't AT ALL match "we book fast and only have a few days. " either two different people wrote this or someone is pretending..
It's either a scam or something very very very bad. The ad seems to be written by multiple people in my opinion. I hope it's a scam and nothing with abuse. The pics look tgtbt also,to me. Whatever is going on there isn’t good.
[QUOTE=Lucky697;6493676]She is easily 50-75 heavier than her pics and very rough and callous. She also requires a deposit because she realizes once you get there you've already paid a substantial amount toward her fee. I could not get out fast enough. Lesson learned.
[URL]https://preferred411.com/Provider_Page_Client2.cfm?Cid=409373[/URL]
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/sensualsophie[/URL]
Pics are much younger and skinnier days.[/QUOTE]Sorry to hear about your bad experience. But thanks for the warning. I was about to pull the trigger. Boobies looked very enticing in the ad pictures!
[QUOTE=BlahBl;6493822]Agreed. I've never used that site based on feedback.
When has any provider ever randomly offered age without asking? It seems an odd thing to offer especially knowing being under 18 will chase off 99.9999 percent of business. That comment about being underage seems to have a very very specific purpose.
The ad says, "don't waste your time on something worn out in the ciity" to entice clients into an area not known for this type of thing.
The dialect of "freaks in sheets lookin" doesn't AT ALL match "we book fast and only have a few days. " either two different people wrote this or someone is pretending..
It's either a scam or something very very very bad. The ad seems to be written by multiple people in my opinion. I hope it's a scam and nothing with abuse. The pics look tgtbt also,to me. Whatever is going on there isnt good.[/QUOTE]I really hope this "is" an LE sting operation (damn that sounds weird to say!) because the alternative, if true, is FAR worse and anyone out there who'd even entertain the idea of seeing a 16 year old "victim" has NO business in this hobby and deserves their fate if they attempt to do so...Period.
[QUOTE=Lucky697;6493676]She is easily 50-75 heavier than her pics and very rough and callous. She also requires a deposit because she realizes once you get there you've already paid a substantial amount toward her fee. I could not get out fast enough. Lesson learned.
[URL]https://preferred411.com/Provider_Page_Client2.cfm?Cid=409373[/URL]
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/sensualsophie[/URL]
Pics are much younger and skinnier days.[/QUOTE]She's playing a risky game misrepresenting herself on P411. But also 50% down thru an app. No way.
[QUOTE=Lucky697;6493676]She is easily 50-75 heavier than her pics and very rough and callous. She also requires a deposit because she realizes once you get there you've already paid a substantial amount toward her fee. I could not get out fast enough. Lesson learned.
[URL]https://preferred411.com/Provider_Page_Client2.cfm?Cid=409373[/URL]
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/sensualsophie[/URL]
Pics are much younger and skinnier days.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the info. At first I thought you actually saw the thick thighs Sophie, and I was surprised anyone actually saw her, at least at her advertised rate ($1600 minimum with 50% deposit). I wouldn't expect her to ever show up once she made an easy $800.
[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/spoiledsophie[/URL]
[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;6492951]Hit this ad up today to setup an appointment they messaged me back and said they were full today but could get me in tomorrow I told them that was fine. Age on ad said 22.
They then proceeded to message me back and tell me that I had to use a condom because they were 16 and asked if that was ok. I replied no thanks I thought you were adults and her final response before I blocked the number was I'm 16 but experienced.
I've been hobbying for 15+ years and never had the feeling that I was talking to LE. Today I feel like I was 99% sure talking to LE. Be safe out there fellas.
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.com/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141272559[/URL][/QUOTE]My friend who was busted in a sting in St. Charles finally told me the outcome. Happened on November 10th, he ended up paying a little over $600 bucks to get out of a charge of soliciting a prostitute. In Missouri that charge can carry a fine of $1000 bucks, and a year in jail. Plus he paid for a lawyer.
Was in STL a couple weeks ago and met up with Ty. Very accomodating to see me late. As per previous reports her head game is outstanding. I even showed her a video ahead of time of what I was looking for and she said "I got you". Takes her time, no complaints. Didn't swallow but that's ok.
Of note she has gained a fair amount of weight, probably 40 lbs over the photos. She wore a black dress, pulled down the top, hiked up the skirt and kept the middle covered. She mentioned her weight gain as she was doing this, so definately self conscious. I will repeat.
[URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/edwardsville/female-escorts/caucasian_e/outcall-only-available-nowfs-3/712003703554[/URL]
Your traveling Northern Virginia correspondent. VAM.
[QUOTE=Cybinv1;6494201]My friend who was busted in a sting in St. Charles finally told me the outcome. Happened on November 10th, he ended up paying a little over $600 bucks to get out of a charge of soliciting a prostitute. In Missouri that charge can carry a fine of $1000 bucks, and a year in jail. Plus he paid for a lawyer.[/QUOTE]The real damage is person-by-person pics on news sites, with names, which I think should be privacy infringement. But undoubtedly intentional. None of us supports trafficking. Goes without saying.
All of this is also like a giant radar gun. There may be 300 drivers on a highway doing 80 mph, but the one guy that gets ticketed slows other drivers down as they pass by. Then word gets out "they" are taking radar in the area and people slow down. We can argue over misplaced priorities but this is why I avoid all of these areas. Can anyone imagine a widower just wanting some consensual, over 18, companionship. Being arrested. Then having the name and pic blasted all over local news sites. I know one such guy, a vet etc. L, his wife passed. He was detained in a nearby county but was let go because the people were reasonable (Westport area). He's no longer here but was a decent guy, just alone. Anyway, the below IL ad is a scam or setup. I'm quite sure people read these boards and are saying, "Lt smithWho wrote that ad. It's been spotted. Who added the blurb about xyz. " I like how the ad has intentional misspellings peppered between perfect grammar.
[QUOTE=DVelvet69;6493882]I really hope this "is" an LE sting operation (damn that sounds weird to say!) because the alternative, if true, is FAR worse and anyone out there who'd even entertain the idea of seeing a 16 year old "victim" has NO business in this hobby and deserves their fate if they attempt to do so...Period.[/QUOTE]If those girls were real, they wouldn't be asking the 125 for both of them (I checked to make sure it isn't real, I would have placed an anon tip for O'Fallon). They, like scammers, want the guy who doesn't see it's too good to be true and fall for it and get busted.
[QUOTE=AceChase;6494956]If those girls were real, they wouldn't be asking the 125 for both of them (I checked to make sure it isn't real, I would have placed an anon tip for O'Fallon). They, like scammers, want the guy who doesn't see it's too good to be true and fall for it and get busted.[/QUOTE]Ya I didn't ask for a price they also never asked me for anything. They pretty much just wanted me to acknowledge that I knew they were 16.
[QUOTE=BlahBl;6494557]The real damage is person-by-person pics on news sites, with names, which I think should be privacy infringement. But undoubtedly intentional. None of us supports trafficking. Goes without saying.
All of this is also like a giant radar gun. There may be 300 drivers on a highway doing 80 mph, but the one guy that gets ticketed slows other drivers down as they pass by. Then word gets out "they" are taking radar in the area and people slow down. We can argue over misplaced priorities but this is why I avoid all of these areas. Can anyone imagine a widower just wanting some consensual, over 18, companionship. Being arrested. Then having the name and pic blasted all over local news sites. I know one such guy, a vet etc. L, his wife passed. He was detained in a nearby county but was let go because the people were reasonable (Westport area). He's no longer here but was a decent guy, just alone. Anyway, the below IL ad is a scam or setup. I'm quite sure people read these boards and are saying, "Lt smithWho wrote that ad. It's been spotted. Who added the blurb about xyz. " I like how the ad has intentional misspellings peppered between perfect grammar.[/QUOTE]They text the same exact way too. Felt like they wanted me to think a younger teen was texting the way they were misspelling words.
[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;6492951]Hit this ad up today to setup an appointment they messaged me back and said they were full today but could get me in tomorrow I told them that was fine. Age on ad said 22.
They then proceeded to message me back and tell me that I had to use a condom because they were 16 and asked if that was ok. I replied no thanks I thought you were adults and her final response before I blocked the number was I'm 16 but experienced.
I've been hobbying for 15+ years and never had the feeling that I was talking to LE. Today I feel like I was 99% sure talking to LE. Be safe out there fellas.
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.com/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141272559[/URL][/QUOTE]The song reference in that add alone was enough to tell me that was a scam add. I would have blocked them without even responding if someone told me that. It's either a sting or a pedo Hunter looking to expose people. Either way if someone gets caught up in that they deserve everything they get.
[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;6495126]Ya I didn't ask for a price they also never asked me for anything. They pretty much just wanted me to acknowledge that I knew they were 16.[/QUOTE]I didn't either, just asked if I wanted to see her and her friend and I said "sure" and replied with her prices. And that was when I was like "ha- yeah ok. Those pics, plus an extra friend, is not that price". Just deleted the text and moved on.
Is this girl real seen her posting forever yet still no comments seems fishy but damn she so my type. If you have dealt with this one let me know how it was! [URL]https://yolo.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141730375[/URL]#.
[QUOTE=DreamStar74;6495628]Is this girl real seen her posting forever yet still no comments seems fishy but damn she so my type. If you have dealt with this one let me know how it was! [URL]https://yolo.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141730375[/URL]#.[/QUOTE]Ad is clearly fake as hell bro.
[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;6492951]Hit this ad up today to setup an appointment they messaged me back and said they were full today but could get me in tomorrow I told them that was fine. Age on ad said 22.
They then proceeded to message me back and tell me that I had to use a condom because they were 16 [/QUOTE]I know enough has been said about this but what struck me as obvious sting was simple. Why even say you are 16?
The ad could have simply said 'no bb' or 'everything covered', and the appointment was already setup, they didn't need to entice anyone further once he agreed to see them.
Also, anyone under age would usually want to make you believe they were of age. 99% of escorts are 'use condom' anyway, why even mention that too.
IMO LE was just stupid the way this whole thing was setup.
[QUOTE=Slimpicker;6495720]I know enough has been said about this but what struck me as obvious sting was simple. Why even say you are 16?
The ad could have simply said 'no bb' or 'everything covered', and the appointment was already setup, they didn't need to entice anyone further once he agreed to see them.
Also, anyone under age would usually want to make you believe they were of age. 99% of escorts are 'use condom' anyway, why even mention that too.
IMO LE was just stupid the way this whole thing was setup.[/QUOTE]I said similar further down. The misspellings between good grammar. Just the dialect varying between sentences drastically. It seems obvious, now, but might not be as obvious. Initially.
I was wanting to ask all you guys (or gals). If you contacted this ad s number and declined ALL services, behaved well, maybe even said, 'hey, I'm not into that. ' and so on. Or even a similar yet different situation via text:
Do you continue to use and keep the same number in future? I personally wouldn't, unless I had no choice / can't get new number. I realize nothing can happen for texting and declining services. I'd still worry about it whether using a voip number or not. Do these guys have lists they save. I would think so. Nothing has happened but a mere text, I understand.
[QUOTE=BlahBl;6495798]I said similar further down. The misspellings between good grammar. Just the dialect varying between sentences drastically. It seems obvious, now, but might not be as obvious. Initially.
I was wanting to ask all you guys (or gals). If you contacted this ad s number and declined ALL services, behaved well, maybe even said, 'hey, I'm not into that. ' and so on. Or even a similar yet different situation via text:
Do you continue to use and keep the same number in future? I personally wouldn't, unless I had no choice / can't get new number. I realize nothing can happen for texting and declining services. I'd still worry about it whether using a voip number or not. Do these guys have lists they save. I would think so. Nothing has happened but a mere text, I understand.[/QUOTE]Me personally I'm not worried about it at all. I'm not going to change my number. What can they do besides randomly text me and see if I want to meet up which I would never meet with anyone who just randomly text me and will never meet with anyone who says they are underage.
I'm curious as to what you think they can do with a list of phone numbers of men who declined to see someone under age. I could see them saving the number if you still sounded interested in meeting after you heard age but ended up declining. If you just flat out decline they probably move on to the next either way I'm not worried about it and will keep my same number.
[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;6495808]Me personally I'm not worried about it at all. I'm not going to change my number. What can they do besides randomly text me and see if I want to meet up which I would never meet with anyone who just randomly text me and will never meet with anyone who says they are underage.
I'm curious as to what you think they can do with a list of phone numbers of men who declined to see someone under age. I could see them saving the number if you still sounded interested in meeting after you heard age but ended up declining. If you just flat out decline they probably move on to the next either way I'm not worried about it and will keep my same number.[/QUOTE]They can't do anything. I absolutely agree.
I just wonder if they don't save it into some database for future references. So I don't think anything can be done beyond saving number for future. There's likely zero harm in it and I agree. I might be too cautious.
[QUOTE=DreamStar74;6495628]Is this girl real seen her posting forever yet still no comments seems fishy but damn she so my type. If you have dealt with this one let me know how it was! [URL]https://yolo.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141730375[/URL]#.[/QUOTE]Interesting, what about this girl is so your type? The text of the ad would make me immediately move on—the grammar, her foreign appearance, the push to sell video / content, the location as "saint Louis" makes me think she's probably not even here. But why don't you just contact her and get some info? I'm betting she'll want a deposit. The other thing to consider is if she is real, she's also young and foreign, and after watching her videos something about her makes me wonder if she's being trafficked, and I want no part of that, even if she may be over 18.
[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;6495808]Me personally I'm not worried about it at all. I'm not going to change my number. What can they do besides randomly text me and see if I want to meet up which I would never meet with anyone who just randomly text me and will never meet with anyone who says they are underage.
I'm curious as to what you think they can do with a list of phone numbers of men who declined to see someone under age. I could see them saving the number if you still sounded interested in meeting after you heard age but ended up declining. If you just flat out decline they probably move on to the next either way I'm not worried about it and will keep my same number.[/QUOTE]Legally they can't do anything, nor would they even be inclined try to, unless you were twisted and depraved enough to actually continue trying meet, at which point they should literally do "everything" to find your ass...If it's a sting and they're pretending to be 16 then it's obviously aimed at a very specific type of individual who's a legit threat to society and a "predator", not just some average Joe looking for a little "consensual adult" company.
...I wouldn't be worried at all.
Has anyone seen Sammie? Specifically her pussy? Does she have one? I'm interested, but one of the pics under "more pics" shows a behind shot on all 4's and what looks like a shaved scrotum or something. Take a look and see if I'm wrong. I don't know it listcrawler mixes up photos or what tho, because I've asked girls about other random girls in the "more pics" and they say they have no idea, but I've been assuming the other girls pics mean she is "managed".
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141257232[/URL]#.
Anything on this one? Purple hair is kinda a thing.
[URL]https://listcrawler.eu/last_phone_post/3148064267[/URL]
[QUOTE=RomanBath;6496474]Has anyone seen Sammie? Specifically her pussy? Does she have one? I'm interested, but one of the pics under "more pics" shows a behind shot on all 4's and what looks like a shaved scrotum or something. Take a look and see if I'm wrong. I don't know it listcrawler mixes up photos or what tho, because I've asked girls about other random girls in the "more pics" and they say they have no idea, but I've been assuming the other girls pics mean she is "managed".
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141257232[/URL]#.[/QUOTE]Sparky hasn't seen Sammie, but he's seen Lisa, who said she sometimes works with Sammie. Yes, Sammie is a woman. The pic you refer to is presumably one of her clients, she's into some weird stuff.
Has anyone seen Sammie? Specifically her pussy? Does she have one? I'm interested, but one of the pics under "more pics" shows a behind shot on all 4's and what looks like a shaved scrotum or something. Take a look and see if I'm wrong. I don't know it listcrawler mixes up photos or what tho, because I've asked girls about other random girls in the "more pics" and they say they have no idea, but I've been assuming the other girls pics mean she is "managed".
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141257232[/URL]#.
[QUOTE=RomanBath;6496597]Has anyone seen Sammie? Specifically her pussy? Does she have one? I'm interested, but one of the pics under "more pics" shows a behind shot on all 4's and what looks like a shaved scrotum or something. Take a look and see if I'm wrong. I don't know it listcrawler mixes up photos or what tho, because I've asked girls about other random girls in the "more pics" and they say they have no idea, but I've been assuming the other girls pics mean she is "managed".
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141257232[/URL]#.[/QUOTE]That is a scrotum and the rainbow dildo in one of the other pictures doesn't help the situation. Maybe we will need to start asking providers what was their gender at birth.
[QUOTE=RomanBath;6496597]Has anyone seen Sammie? Specifically her pussy? Does she have one? I'm interested, but one of the pics under "more pics" shows a behind shot on all 4's and what looks like a shaved scrotum or something. Take a look and see if I'm wrong. I don't know it listcrawler mixes up photos or what tho, because I've asked girls about other random girls in the "more pics" and they say they have no idea, but I've been assuming the other girls pics mean she is "managed".
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/141257232[/URL]#.[/QUOTE]That's obviously a photo of one of her clients getting the treatment he paid for.
[QUOTE=KemoSabe;6496645]That is a scrotum and the rainbow dildo in one of the other pictures doesn't help the situation. Maybe we will need to start asking providers what was their gender at birth.[/QUOTE]Pretty sure that is her client LOL.
[QUOTE=MikeyD138;6496808]That's obviously a photo of one of her clients getting the treatment he paid for.[/QUOTE]Ah, I see you're right. Apologies to Sammie. Has anyone seen her though? How are the sexual activities? I’m not interested in the domination stuff.