Printable View
[QUOTE=PhatDaty;1732422]*Comically angry rant that deftly avoids addressing the point I presented, accuses me of scouring the board in order to defame him when I literally scrolled down a single post, chock full of the same homosexual and reading jokes that 3rd graders make, topped off with an assurance that he, as a regular on a message board for guys that have sex with women, does indeed have sex with women*[/QUOTE]Methinks I hit a nerve in there somewhere
[QUOTE=Sinful Dreams;1732545]So I am speaking at the college on Monday in regards to the Legalization of Prostitution and Human Trafficking at a Moral Ethics class. I am SO nervous, and I am just going to be me, but does anyone have any pointers or advice?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Admin2; 1732595]Talk about yourself without actually admitting to breaking any laws. Speak of enpowerment for women to control their own bodies. Thoroughly condemn trafficking. Be honest and sincere if you're not a good liar.
Don't show too much boobage, don't give them the soundbite, don't give them the cheap picture for a cheap story.
Practice your speech, think of the most embarrassing questions you may have to answer and be ready for them.
Remember to breath.[/QUOTE]Well said. To me, not giving them the soundbyte would be the biggest thing. I would guess by the sound of it that it's a philosophy class, which I imagine would be mostly populated with people who are largely sympathetic to your side, but prepare for the clowns as well, because there's bound to be one or two (assuming you're taking questions). Breathe, don't over-caffinate, be yourself.
[QUOTE=Vilnius;1732887]PhatDaty's angry rant deftly avoids addressing the point I presented, accuses me of scouring the board in order to defame him when I literally scrolled down a single post, chock full of the same homosexual and reading jokes that 3rd graders make, topped off with an assurance that he, as a regular on a message board for guys that have sex with women, does indeed have sex with women. Methinks I hit a nerve in there somewhere[/QUOTE]Are you still humping away at this?
Well, you can continue this mental masturbation to your fiendish heart's desire, but beware of psychological priapism. Cerebral erections lasting four or more hours can be dangerous to your soul.
[QUOTE=BahamaMama;1733836]For what it's worth it was 5am. I had given up seeing someone a couple hours before. Maybe her and I were both out of are element. Maybe she was more attracted to you, who knows. It is a YMMV kinda thing. Peace.[/QUOTE]I don't necessarily have a problem with it, but you come across as being overly self-assured about hobbying for someone that only has seven posts and one review. You posts indicate that this was your first time, and your saying, "I turn the TV off." Just sayin'. I am curious. Are you new to the hobby, or just to the forum?
[QUOTE=BahamaMama;1733844]I don't necessarily have a problem with it, but you come across as being overly self-assured about hobbying for someone that only has seven posts and one review. You posts indicate that this was your first time, and your saying, "I turn the TV off." Just sayin'. I am curious. Are you new to the hobby, or just to the forum?[/QUOTE]LOL Not that it has ANYTHING to do with the topic? Yes, I am new to the forum. What does "self-assured" have anything to do with it? If someone is goign to be paid to provide a service then why would I want it to be sub par? Would you not ask a waitress to stop watching the TV while she takes your order or serves you your food? :) In regards to your other post, who knows why it happened to you and I honestly never brought up WHY because it's not important. I simply wanted there to be a responsive post about your experience so people could see right off the bat that it might have been just a bad night. I was just partaking in the point of this forum. Sharing experiences. It really sounded like you were trashing her pretty hard for what sounded like a misunderstanding. She shouldn't have taken the appointment if she was "feeling sick" but then again if she was watching TV before the show even started why wouldn't you have just said thanks but no thanks? LOL Move along good sir, I have no desire to get involved in a pointless debate like I've seen other people on this forum get in to.
[QUOTE=MagnumT; 1733960]New here.
Been reading a ton and really appreciate all the insight that has been offered.
This ad is clearly fake.
[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/private_-_attention_-23/10960685[/url]
Reverse image pulls up Raven Riley from 2004.[/QUOTE]Thank you Captain Obvious. There are so many obvious fake adds on Backpage if we listed them all there would be no room in his thread for useful information. Was there not enough characters available for you to put Johnson as your last name because MagmunT. Johnson would be an awesome screen name.
[QUOTE=JustMe79;1733971]LOL Not that it has ANYTHING to do with the topic? Yes, I am new to the forum. What does "self-assured" have anything to do with it? If someone is goign to be paid to provide a service then why would I want it to be sub par? Would you not ask a waitress to stop watching the TV while she takes your order or serves you your food? :) In regards to your other post, who knows why it happened to you and I honestly never brought up WHY because it's not important. I simply wanted there to be a responsive post about your experience so people could see right off the bat that it might have been just a bad night. I was just partaking in the point of this forum. Sharing experiences. It really sounded like you were trashing her pretty hard for what sounded like a misunderstanding. She shouldn't have taken the appointment if she was "feeling sick" but then again if she was watching TV before the show even started why wouldn't you have just said thanks but no thanks? LOL Move along good sir, I have no desire to get involved in a pointless debate like I've seen other people on this forum get in to.[/QUOTE]
Refer to my previous post about you being very cocky for having contributing basically nothing to the forum. There is an etiquette to posting on here that you might want to get a handle on. You don't just come out of nowhere with no reputation, and start a "hey you don't know what you talking about" back and forth with a senior that has ten times the amount of posts you do, and about fifty times the amount of reviews. You wrote your review, and I wrote mine. People can read yours, and they can read mine. You don't need to be defending your reviews when someone ends up having a different experience. It is not a debate, it is just intel weighed against one's reputation. In case you didn't know this is exactly the reason why a whole bunch of seasoned hobbyist have bailed from the forum over the last year. Someone with 400 posts would right a review, then somone with 5 posts would pop up and start challanging them on their intel. There was a sense that people didn't know their place on here, and so people with the best info stopped sharing.
[QUOTE=BahamaMama;1734621]Refer to my previous post about you being very cocky for having contributing basically nothing to the forum. There is an etiquette to posting on here that you might want to get a handle on. You don't just come out of nowhere with no reputation, and start a "hey you don't know what you talking about" back and forth with a senior that has ten times the amount of posts you do, and about fifty times the amount of reviews. You wrote your review, and I wrote mine. People can read yours, and they can read mine. You don't need to be defending your reviews when someone ends up having a different experience. It is not a debate, it is just intel weighed against one's reputation. In case you didn't know this is exactly the reason why a whole bunch of seasoned hobbyist have bailed from the forum over the last year. Someone with 400 posts would right a review, then somone with 5 posts would pop up and start challanging them on their intel. There was a sense that people didn't know their place on here, and so people with the best info stopped sharing.[/QUOTE]LOL Maybe the reason people have left the forum is because "veterans" like you like to try and feel superior because of how many reviews and posts they have? This IS a forum. It is here for open conversation in regards to the type of activities that we like. If someone posts a negative review on here why is it wrong to post feedback so that maybe some people won't be negative to her if they decide to try her IF they decide to try her based on your arrogant review? I personally could care less how many posts or reviews you have made. Cockiness has nothing to do with confidence and a "reputation" on a forum has nothing to do with it hence why you are the only one who apparently has an issue. You use completely nonsensical words like "challenge" and ignorant phrases like "know their place". LOL What do you think this is, your kingdom to rule because you post count gives you some meaningless title like "senior".
Look, go your own way. You're wasting everyone's time with this ridiculous banter. LOL Do what you came here to do and don't get sore if someone wants to review your review. I didn't defend my review, I defended the girl. Have a good day there buddy, I hope you can bounce back from this experience. :)
I want to thank all the lovely ladies for attending, and we will have another one next month.
[QUOTE=BahamaMama;1734621]Refer to my previous post about you being very cocky for having contributing basically nothing to the forum. There is an etiquette to posting on here that you might want to get a handle on. You don't just come out of nowhere with no reputation, and start a "hey you don't know what you talking about" back and forth with a senior that has ten times the amount of posts you do, and about fifty times the amount of reviews. You wrote your review, and I wrote mine. People can read yours, and they can read mine. You don't need to be defending your reviews when someone ends up having a different experience. It is not a debate, it is just intel weighed against one's reputation. In case you didn't know this is exactly the reason why a whole bunch of seasoned hobbyist have bailed from the forum over the last year. Someone with 400 posts would right a review, then somone with 5 posts would pop up and start challanging them on their intel. There was a sense that people didn't know their place on here, and so people with the best info stopped sharing.[/QUOTE]I am not particularly chatty so I don't have a number of posts; and these are the posts that I deem senseless to respond to but you have managed to elict a response. First this is not the hood so lets leave that ridiculus mentality elsewhere I. E,"You don't just come out of nowhere with no reputation, and start a "hey you don't know what you talking about" back and forth with a senior" Anyone has a right to post here unless I have misinterpeted the rules set forth. You go on to argue-It is not a debate, it is just intel weighed against one's reputation- You are the one debating.
People have different experiences with these providers. Providers allow different clients different treatment. There is a local that lets you know first thing I don't do anything with the butt. There are numerous posts reporting this. My first encounter with her she made her statement I politely declined explaining that was my thing bbbjcimws with fib. Even have had several encounters with penetration with another part of my anatomy.
Several seniors responded "no way newbie" (paraphrased) and where furious over my post. It is funny that I was called out for my lack of experience and inaccuracy in what I reported because I have used the board for almost a decade and if anyone has ever been lied to by me, ANYONE EVER. Well suffice it to say you have a greater chance of finding the winning lotto numbers.
The number of posts does not mean that somone with no previous posts does not have something valuable to contribute. So please lets not discourage them. Thank you.
[QUOTE=JustMe79;1733971]I have no desire to get involved in a pointless debate like I've seen other people on this forum get in to.[/QUOTE]Not sure about the other stuff you and BM are debating (I will tell you he is very experienced and knows what he speaks of, and it is not pointless so you would be wise to listen), but I give the PhatDaty Guarantee that this statement is that of a scoundrel.
Yep, takes one to know one. You enjoy baiting folks. So I will nibble. Want to swim with the sharks?
[QUOTE=JustMe79;1734823]Don't get sore if someone wants to review your review.[/QUOTE]Yeah, uhhhm, we call that quacking a review. Experienced hobby folks really don't like this practice. It is better to let multiple reviews, even when diverse, to simply stand on their own. A discerning monger well look at the big picture and make their own decision. Having different perspectives, expressed in your own review is fine and actually helpful. Telling people how to write their review, or suggesting they were wrong, not so much, unless you were there. Were you there spying on them?
[QUOTE=BahamaMama; 1734621]snip.
You wrote your review, and I wrote mine. People can read yours, and they can read mine. You don't need to be defending your reviews when someone ends up having a different experience. It is not a debate, it is just intel weighed against one's reputation.[/QUOTE]Without weighing in on the discussion you guys are having, I think that, generally speaking, this is what gets lost a lot on here. Starting a fight like that in either direction (noob to Senior or vice-versa) is pretty stupid. To be clear though, I wouldn't consider that to be the same thing as posting a conflicting report. Different guys get different results with same providers all the time (as the post below mentioned) , but for anyone to accuse anyone of lying in report based solely on what happened between them BCD is a waste of time at best unless there's an obvious hole in said story. Now am I more inclined to believe / act on / take to heart a BahamaMama report than a report from someone with 5 posts? Absolutely (hilarious job with the pimp, by the by; I almost shot beer out of my nose when I read that) , but that doesn't mean that the guy with 5 posts is lying, either. Frankly, I consider most posts from anyone with less than 20 or so mostly meaningless, particularly if they conflict with reports from more senior members, but stopping to call them a liar doesn't help anything.
[QUOTE=BahamaMama;1734621]In case you didn't know this is exactly the reason why a whole bunch of seasoned hobbyist have bailed from the forum over the last year. Someone with 400 posts would right a review, then somone with 5 posts would pop up and start challenging them on their intel. There was a sense that people didn't know their place on here, and so people with the best info stopped sharing.[/QUOTE]If that's why they left, it's disappointing that they were so thin-skinned. It's the internet. Someone is always going to be a prick. I'm not saying that most seniors haven't earned respect, but expecting to get that respect from everyone who ever logs into this board is a pipe-dream. If they were that frustrated that a member of the peanut gallery mindlessly heckled them, I'm not sure how they do anything on the internet.
[QUOTE=PhatDaty;1734928]Yeah, uhhhm, we call that quacking a review. Experienced hobby folks really don't like this practice. It is better to let multiple reviews, even when diverse, to simply stand on their own. A discerning monger well look at the big picture and make their own decision. Having different perspectives, expressed in your own review is fine and actually helpful. Telling people how to write their review, or suggesting they were wrong, not so much, unless you were there. Were you there spying on them?[/QUOTE]. He's right about this. It's far better to have the full range of reviews and opinions. There's no such thing as too much intel, even if you have to sift the good from the bad.