News and Media Reports

[QUOTE=FogHorn1;5098638][URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9001471/Ex-girlfriend-sugar-daddy-lawyer-reveals-lusted-Claudia-Conway.html[/URL]

This is a couple weeks old now and some might know about it, but for those that don't pay attention to those "18-19" y / o who may not be legal. This guy was a scumbag of course, but the point is some of the younger ones on the site are actually under the legal limit.[/QUOTE]I agree with you, but after reading this article I sympathize with the guy here. Remember these girls were on seeking advertising as 18 year olds. Only after the fact the deed was done and he trusted them that they revealed their true age. Obv they wanted more money and he said no. They went to the cops at that point. Seeking is too high of stakes to get railed.

[URL]https://thecovidblog.com/2021/04/19/vaers-two-year-old-baby-in-virginia-dead-six-days-after-second-pfizer-shot/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.bitchute.com/video/dKgLl1BsIXzW/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Mpduration;5315180][URL]https://thecovidblog.com/2021/04/19/vaers-two-year-old-baby-in-virginia-dead-six-days-after-second-pfizer-shot/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.bitchute.com/video/dKgLl1BsIXzW/[/URL][/QUOTE]Friends,

I do not know what Mpduration's agenda may be, but please be aware that he is passing off fake news with these links. Look up Bitchute and thecovid blog, and you will see the disreputable nature of these sites. "Bitchute is a video hosting service known for accomodating far-right individuals and conspiracy theorists, and for hosting hateful content. " (Wikipedia). The "mainstream media" is all over the story of the extremely small risk of clotting from the J&J vaccine. They would be happy to sell the clicks to a story about a baby dying from a COVID vaccine. But it ain't true. Does anyone recall that the FDA has not approved the vaccine (yet) for anyone younger than 16?

I am over 60. I just received my second shot of the Pfizer vaccine. Yes, the allegedly terrible, awful, going-to-screw-me-up mRNA vaccine. I am grateful that the research to develop a vaccine started immediately in January 2020, with financial support from the previous administration, and has now come to fruition and wide distribution with the current administration. Science rocks. I look forward to soon being able to move around without fear of the risks from catching this virus. (Yes, I'd probably survive, but I'm happy not to have to take that risk.).

Mpuration is at the least misguided by the rabbit-hole web sites that he seems to follow. I wonder what he / she is afraid of? Why do you feel threatened by these vaccines, which are truly amazing for their potential to save lives and prevent the pain and suffering and death of hundreds, thousands, millions of people in the US and around the world?

Mpduration: why do you post two links, with no comment? Take ownership if you truly believe it. Own it. Defend it. Prove it.

And if you won't and can't, then keep to yourself, and do not hurt others. Do you have the integrity to do that?

Lucretius.

[QUOTE=Mpduration;5315180][URL]https://thecovidblog.com/2021/04/19/vaers-two-year-old-baby-in-virginia-dead-six-days-after-second-pfizer-shot/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.bitchute.com/video/dKgLl1BsIXzW/[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/two-year-old-virginia-die-vaccine/[/URL]

Under the age of 16 are not eligible for vaccine -- no medical provider is going to inject any of the covid-vaccines into so young a child. The health industry has only just started small scale testing with teen age volunteers.

SEE SNOPES: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/two-year-old-virginia-die-vaccine/

One of the URLs activate a website that attempted to attack my PC / load a computer virus (my system blocked the attempt).

[QUOTE=Mpduration;5315180] /vaers-two-year-old-baby-in-virginia-dead-six-days-after-second-pfizer-shot/[

[]o/dKgLl1BsIXzW/[/][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=PilotAviator;5315433]Under the age of 16 are not eligible for vaccine -- no medical provider is going to inject any of the covid-vaccines into so young a child. The health industry has only just started small scale testing with teen age volunteers.

SEE SNOPES: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/two-year-old-virginia-die-vaccine/

One of the URLs activate a website that attempted to attack my PC / load a computer virus (my system blocked the attempt).[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php[/URL]

[QUOTE=Mpduration;5315554][URL]https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php[/URL][/QUOTE]You probably believe in Qanon as well?

The below posts just debunked your "facts", and you still don't get it.

"Did a 2-Year-Old in Virginia Die After Getting COVID-19 Vaccination?

The claim is based solely on a dubious report from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, a database that anyone can submit reports to that is frequently abused by anti-vaccine activists".

Give your brain a rest and stay off a bitchute too.
“Bitchute: Hate speech. Neo-Nazi propaganda. Anti-Semitic QAnon conspiracy theories. Even terrorism. It's all there. And the platform keeps growing.”

The Guardian: Are police the biggest threat to massage parlor workers' safety?.

[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/23/massage-parlor-workers-police-threat-safety[/URL]

[URL]https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html[/URL]

[QUOTE=Mpduration;5319166][URL]https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html[/URL][/QUOTE]Posted on [URL]https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html[/URL].

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events and reactions that occur following vaccination. Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to VAERS. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA's multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as "safety signals. " If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.

Key considerations and limitations of data:

Reports may include incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental and unverified information.

The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.

Data are limited to vaccine adverse event reports received between 1990 and the most recent date for which data are available.

Data data do not represent all known safety information for a vaccine and should be interpreted in the context of other scientific information.

[QUOTE=Miketastic69;4945121]If Kraft wins and survives the appeals in the state Supreme Court, will the other defendants cases automatically receive the same consideration? Or do they need to pursue the same legal avenues each separately? Also, what about the poor saps that plead out or no contest?[/QUOTE]You're pretty much fucked. That's why no matter the case you always keep your mouth shut. I imagine the video surveillance would be thrown out on all of the defendants not just Kraft as it is 100% illegally obtained evidence. It's very difficult to prove illicit services that occur at a massage parlor, even when you're caught mid act as there's ultimately a ton of ways to spin things in your favor under the court of law as long as you adamantly deny you paid money for sexual services. This is why cops will always lie to you and try the "friendly" approach where they say they'll reduce your charges or went press charges at all as long as you admit to them why you went to the massage parlor. Cops aren't your friend, and they want you to admit guilt because of how difficult it is to actually win this case in court.

Funny story that one of my old ATFs told me during her tenure working at an AMP. She once got caught by a police raid mid HJ, totally topless. The client kept his mouth shut and when the police tried to arrest her and take her to court. She told them that her shirt had accidentally come off during the massage and it was simply a case of poor and unfortunate timing when the police came into the room. Because this took place in the dark she said what the officer saw in the room was misinterpreted as the client was just helping her to put her shirt back on.

She won that case and no further charges were ever pursued. Again, it's extremely difficult to PROVE either scenario so always always always deny and keep your mouth shut.

[QUOTE=GripNSip;5319642]Funny story that one of my old ATFs told me during her tenure working at an AMP. She once got caught by a police raid mid HJ, totally topless. The client kept his mouth shut and when the police tried to arrest her and take her to court. She told them that her shirt had accidentally come off during the massage and it was simply a case of poor and unfortunate timing when the police came into the room. Because this took place in the dark she said what the officer saw in the room was misinterpreted as the client was just helping her to put her shirt back on.

She won that case and no further charges were ever pursued. Again, it's extremely difficult to PROVE either scenario so always always always deny and keep your mouth shut.[/QUOTE]That's a ridiculous story to actually stick. LOL!

[URL]https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html[/URL]

Only 13 cases so far. Previous week it was 10.

[QUOTE=Mpduration;5320423][URL]https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html[/URL]Only 13 cases so far. Previous week it was 10.[/QUOTE]With 100 million vaccinated it is a surprise that only 13 cases of reported ED. The early vaccinated is heavily skewed to over 65 and studies have shown that 70% of males over 70 will experience some form of ED.

If the data is correct the vaccine prevents ED. Can I get another dose please?

[URL]https://www.arlnow.com/2021/04/29/federal-grand-jury-charges-arlington-lawyer-with-paying-underage-girls-for-sex/[/URL]

The scary thing is that he "likely knew." What if they told him they were 18? I guess we need to check IDs.