The Rat Trap

[QUOTE=VerySlowly;2196834]I love people who really analyze and think through the process instead of following the pack, unfortunately you are not one of them. Look up lemming and pedant or pedantic in the dictionary.

You remind me of people who convict someone based on what the newscasters report. I'm sure you are a former troll that had to change his handle, there are so many now I can't keep track, there are even guys posting patting themselves on the back, patting their old handle with several new handles. Yukk.

VS.[/QUOTE]Ok white knight. You senior members flock to suck each others dick all the time. Been going on for years. You guys literally team up on everyone that doesn't agree with you. This guy was obviously 100% wrong in not telling us the pics were fake. Yet here you are defending that? Amazing. Maybe you will get some brownie points somewhere? With someone?

Also if you could read I blatantly said in a post not just one page before this I was a troll who was banned. I have nothing to hide fuck you.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2196915][BLUE]Note this is in blue:

Situation; A guy says a chick did a thing. She responds and says she didn't. He responds and says I know you do because you did it with me. She then copies in a PM where he specifically says they didn't do what he's saying they did in the forum.

First Problem; PM's are private and normally can't be posted.

Second Problem; As a rule chicks can't defend on the forum. (But they can on a thread like this)

My issue; It's a pretty big deal what they are talking about and she has proof positive (his own words) that it happened the way she said not what he said. I'm assuming, I would verify by looking in her inbox if she asked me to.

By simple yes let her or no don't let her. Let me know what you guys think about moving the post here with the screen shot of the PM.

Not saying I'm going to do what you guys vote for, but I'd like to get a sense of the room on this issue.

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]I mean if its a health issue by all means it should be posted. If its some bullshit drama like she let me do this to her bootihole then I don't think its really that important.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2196915][BLUE]Note this is in blue:

Situation; A guy says a chick did a thing. She responds and says she didn't. He responds and says I know you do because you did it with me. She then copies in a PM where he specifically says they didn't do what he's saying they did in the forum.

First Problem; PM's are private and normally can't be posted.

Second Problem; As a rule chicks can't defend on the forum. (But they can on a thread like this)

My issue; It's a pretty big deal what they are talking about and she has proof positive (his own words) that it happened the way she said not what he said. I'm assuming, I would verify by looking in her inbox if she asked me to.

By simple yes let her or no don't let her. Let me know what you guys think about moving the post here with the screen shot of the PM.

Not saying I'm going to do what you guys vote for, but I'd like to get a sense of the room on this issue.

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]Always vote for the truth.

Is what I agree with, right my love?

Meds out.

A very senior monger posting personal info on the board about another monger is uncool even if it in the rat trap. That is one thing that is bad about the rat trap, the rats are coming out again. I liked it better when the rat was hiding in his hole, especially if the info is not correct and is just a cheap shot.

[QUOTE=JerseyGirl;2196941][B][red]But first let me take a selfie.[/red][/B][/QUOTE]Jersey Girl I've never met you but I like your personality, That's a couple funny ones you posted on here now. I guess some day I should cum see what your all about. Got a couple fires a got a put out first though.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2196915][BLUE]Note this is in blue:

Situation; A guy says a chick did a thing. She responds and says she didn't. He responds and says I know you do because you did it with me. She then copies in a PM where he specifically says they didn't do what he's saying they did in the forum.

First Problem; PM's are private and normally can't be posted.

Second Problem; As a rule chicks can't defend on the forum. (But they can on a thread like this)

My issue; It's a pretty big deal what they are talking about and she has proof positive (his own words) that it happened the way she said not what he said. I'm assuming, I would verify by looking in her inbox if she asked me to.

By simple yes let her or no don't let her. Let me know what you guys think about moving the post here with the screen shot of the PM.

Not saying I'm going to do what you guys vote for, but I'd like to get a sense of the room on this issue.

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]But not out of some ridiculous notion like defending a provider's honor. Let's not get it twisted, these ladies charge money to fuck, lick, rim, and blow. Not much honor involved. It's a business. That said, post the PM in question, especially if it's from a SM. It'll serve as a warning to other bullshitters, and will let the mongers decide if the poster should be believed about anything.

Definitely yes A2. We need accountibility on this issue.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2196915][BLUE]Note this is in blue:

Situation; A guy says a chick did a thing. She responds and says she didn't. He responds and says I know you do because you did it with me. She then copies in a PM where he specifically says they didn't do what he's saying they did in the forum.

First Problem; PM's are private and normally can't be posted.

Second Problem; As a rule chicks can't defend on the forum. (But they can on a thread like this)

My issue; It's a pretty big deal what they are talking about and she has proof positive (his own words) that it happened the way she said not what he said. I'm assuming, I would verify by looking in her inbox if she asked me to.

By simple yes let her or no don't let her. Let me know what you guys think about moving the post here with the screen shot of the PM.

Not saying I'm going to do what you guys vote for, but I'd like to get a sense of the room on this issue.

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JerseyGirl;2196941][B][red]But first let me take a selfie.[/red][/B][/QUOTE]Ok A2 let's have the low down.

[QUOTE=ThrowAwayToday;2197146]Ok white knight. You senior members flock to suck each others dick all the time. Been going on for years. You guys literally team up on everyone that doesn't agree with you. This guy was obviously 100% wrong in not telling us the pics were fake. Yet here you are defending that? Amazing. Maybe you will get some brownie points somewhere? With someone?

Also if you could read I blatantly said in a post not just one page before this I was a troll who was banned. I have nothing to hide fuck you.[/QUOTE]Sorry I missed that, probably because I pay very little attention to low post counts even if they brag about mongering for years and years.

But thank you for reminding us YOU ARE A TROLL in which case anything you say, can and will be dismissed as blather.

Take your tongue and put it back up your ass where it belongs!

VS.

There may be some SM's who take issue with the PROLIFIC writer and reviewer. Jag. You can now easily ignore what he has to say by just not clicking on his Sandbox but to slam him here in the Rat Trap without good reason is just unfair. I would expect it out of bat shit crazy Savanna but not from the Longest Posting Fat Boy, VS. I challenge any of you mongers to be a fraction as active AND share the INTEL as Jag likes to do. The dude is an asset to this Orlando Monger community. A2 must also agree with my assessment since he gave Jag his very own thread. I don't see a Very Slowly thread.

[QUOTE=AncientOne;2197331]There may be some SM's who take issue with the PROLIFIC writer and reviewer. Jag. You can now easily ignore what he has to say by just not clicking on his Sandbox but to slam him here in the Rat Trap without good reason is just unfair. I would expect it out of bat shit crazy Savanna but not from the Longest Posting Fat Boy, VS. I challenge any of you mongers to be a fraction as active AND share the INTEL as Jag likes to do. The dude is an asset to this Orlando Monger community. A2 must also agree with my assessment since he gave Jag his very own thread. I don't see a Very Slowly thread.[/QUOTE][B][red]Wait for it, wait for it. [/red] [/B] Let him have it A2.

[QUOTE=AncientOne;2197331]There may be some SM's who take issue with the PROLIFIC writer and reviewer. Jag. You can now easily ignore what he has to say by just not clicking on his Sandbox but to slam him here in the Rat Trap without good reason is just unfair. I would expect it out of bat shit crazy Savanna but not from the Longest Posting Fat Boy, VS. I challenge any of you mongers to be a fraction as active AND share the INTEL as Jag likes to do. The dude is an asset to this Orlando Monger community. A2 must also agree with my assessment since he gave Jag his very own thread. I don't see a Very Slowly thread.[/QUOTE]But if its BS its not very good Intel now us it.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2196915][BLUE]Note this is in blue:

Situation; A guy says a chick did a thing. She responds and says she didn't. He responds and says I know you do because you did it with me. She then copies in a PM where he specifically says they didn't do what he's saying they did in the forum.

First Problem; PM's are private and normally can't be posted.

Second Problem; As a rule chicks can't defend on the forum. (But they can on a thread like this)

My issue; It's a pretty big deal what they are talking about and she has proof positive (his own words) that it happened the way she said not what he said. I'm assuming, I would verify by looking in her inbox if she asked me to.

By simple yes let her or no don't let her. Let me know what you guys think about moving the post here with the screen shot of the PM.

Not saying I'm going to do what you guys vote for, but I'd like to get a sense of the room on this issue.

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE]I'm a little late to the party but I am pretty sure we will never weed out the bullshit on here. Guys will always exagerate. My cock is really huge. I agree with whomever said, if it is a health or safety issue then yes go ahead. Not a fan of the principal of airing PM's as there is an expectation of privacy. What if the message on the PM was a lie just to try to diffuse the issue? What is the context of one PM, do we need to see others? How far does it go? Where does it end? Honor and reputation are earned on this board and in life by our actions, our words and our deeds. One says he did x and the other says no you didn't. Does it matter beyond the actual immediate nature of the context of the message? Does it transcend their conversation and effect the rest of the group? Just because I said I put two fingers in a girls butt when I actually put one, technically makes me a liar but in reality no one really cares. It harms no one, it lessens none of my already sketchy credibility. But if I say I raw dogged analed someone and they say I didn't, then I am liar and potentially super unsafe which may impact the target of my lie. Itt may hurt her business or make others stay away. Do we (as a board, a community, a village), owe it to ourselves, each other, to find out the truth and proclaim who is being honest. I think we do, if it is that kind of serious. If it just involves a finger in the butt then we shouldn't give another minute of thought. -- Dog.