Printable View
[QUOTE=StevenHyde;4938055]You will have to jump over to the massage thread in order to read reviews, but I think that many here will agree that Ember and Reanne are close to the top of the list of providers that get into each other as well as into you. That said, you will be looking at 600 for the full experience. Well worth it in my opinion. You will feel like a God for the rest of the week LOL. Be sure to let us know what you decide to do and how it goes.[/QUOTE]Thanks, will look into them.
[QUOTE=StevenHyde;4938055]You will have to jump over to the massage thread in order to read reviews, but I think that many here will agree that Ember and Reanne are close to the top of the list of providers that get into each other as well as into you. That said, you will be looking at 600 for the full experience. Well worth it in my opinion. You will feel like a God for the rest of the week LOL. Be sure to let us know what you decide to do and how it goes.[/QUOTE]I wold agree with Steven that these two are great for a threesome. I think they have been actual girlfriends for a number of years and they definitely get into it.
Wondering if anyone was willing to share their experience with either Pretty xxx-0278, she's by the airport, or Harli xxx-7853, looks like she is outcall only. Looking for info before I make a call. Thank you.
[QUOTE=RogueOne1977;4937431]You sound like a narcissists who thinks everything they say is correct and won't believe anything other than your own narrative. You can clearly see that those facial features are the same as Maneater. If you can't then I doubt you have seen her in person. She has a very distinctive jawline and eyes. Also. Drugs can drastically alter your appearance even if you are smoking hot. Here is a perfect example of what meth can do to you. Watch this video and Google Jenni Lee. Night and day difference. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fW5B6ZrHkCE[/URL].[/QUOTE]Please drop it dude. This forum is for reviews of escorts. I think we've beat this one to death. If you need me to concede fine, Rebecca Scott is Maneater. Case closed. Can we get on with reviews of hot escorts now?
[QUOTE=StevenHyde;4937824]I don't think believing one's own narrative is listed as a trait of narcissism LOL. It's called having an opinion, and having the balls to stand behind it. Easy does it with the pseudo-psychoanalysis. Blow your load in hottie today, and you'll forget all about it LOL. Or at least that's what I'm going to do. I'll let you know how it goes.[/QUOTE]For the record, I did see her and she showed me the playboy magazines and the glamour shots. I posted a review a few months back about it. If you read it I state that she was indeed great and really tried hard to get me off. She was very interested in pleasing me and I appreciated that about her. She's also very attractive with nice bolt ons and she has a thin somewhat muscular physique. She told me she used to be into bodybuilding and took steroids for a little while. I mean damn dude, why are you making this personal? She's a nice escort, but you act like I'm attacking you by stating my opinion. Do you have some ulterior motive to making everyone believe that she's a playboy model?
[QUOTE=Mack81;4938870]For the record, I did see her and she showed me the playboy magazines and the glamour shots. I posted a review a few months back about it. If you read it I state that she was indeed great and really tried hard to get me off. She was very interested in pleasing me and I appreciated that about her. She's also very attractive with nice bolt ons and she has a thin somewhat muscular physique. She told me she used to be into bodybuilding and took steroids for a little while. I mean damn dude, why are you making this personal? She's a nice escort, but you act like I'm attacking you by stating my opinion. Do you have some ulterior motive to making everyone believe that she's a playboy model?[/QUOTE]Umm. I'm not the individual you're referring to "making this personal" but your stubborn denial of the testimonies of 4+ senior members of this group, AND passive aggressive statements of 'agree to disagree' in one comment followed by the assertion of someone trying to "making everyone believe" does beg the question, what's YOUR ulterior motive in denying what everyone else sees clearly? Do you doubt the moon landing? The spherical earth?
I understand a general attitude of skepticism with all providers but, dude! This actually checks out!
All that said, this is the closest Ive ever come to the stupid shit forum. Ending up there is not on my bucket list, but if it happens in defense of the plain truth, so be it. As my grandfather used to say; Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts!
I went back to see Bree again today. The first time I saw her I was happy enough because she is a little cutie and even though she wasn't really into it she did give me an okay BBBJ and let me do doggy till I popped. But this time I left very frustrated. She kept blocking me by putting her legs together and wouldn't let me get it inside her. I've had girls use that move to keep me from going deep but she was not even letting me in. I asked her to put her legs back and she said that she couldn't. I told her that it wasn't working and doggy would be better, but she refused. She told me I was too big and that she was too tight. She said that she would give me another BBBJ so I could finish, which didn't work because I was pissed. I didn't make an appointment and pay for a BBBJ. I paid for FS and got told I was too big after she had taken my money. I didn't make a big deal about it because who knows if they have security in the house and what they might do, but I will never repeat. I like spinners, but if she can't take a dick she's in the wrong business. For the record, I'm only a little bigger than average, it's at least that's what the consensus seems to be.
[QUOTE=RegisJ1;4939268]Umm. I'm not the individual you're referring to "making this personal" but your stubborn denial of the testimonies of 4+ senior members of this group, AND passive aggressive statements of 'agree to disagree' in one comment followed by the assertion of someone trying to "making everyone believe" does beg the question, what's YOUR ulterior motive in denying what everyone else sees clearly? Do you doubt the moon landing? The spherical earth?
I understand a general attitude of skepticism with all providers but, dude! This actually checks out!
All that said, this is the closest Ive ever come to the stupid shit forum. Ending up there is not on my bucket list, but if it happens in defense of the plain truth, so be it. As my grandfather used to say; Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts![/QUOTE]Dude I already agreed with Rogue one. I don't know what else you want me to do. I'm wrong, she's Rebecca Scott. I'm dropping it. Now will the rest of you guys drop it too?
Anyone else commonly let down in person when the pics don't match what's staring at you at the door? Most commonly it's still the same girl but with much more weight put on. Like a lot more. Just deal with it? Walk away? "Forgot the money in the car"? I guess it's too much to ask for accurate pics LOL.
Not sure what the real point of my post is other than being tired of the door opening and seeing someone much larger than advertised. Guess maybe I'm curious how others deal with that and if walking away / back to the car is something a lot of guys do? I haven't walked away yet, but think I might start doing that.
[QUOTE=HuntingHead;4939922]Anyone else commonly let down in person when the pics don't match what's staring at you at the door? Most commonly it's still the same girl but with much more weight put on. Like a lot more. Just deal with it? Walk away? "Forgot the money in the car"? I guess it's too much to ask for accurate pics LOL.
Not sure what the real point of my post is other than being tired of the door opening and seeing someone much larger than advertised. Guess maybe I'm curious how others deal with that and if walking away / back to the car is something a lot of guys do? I haven't walked away yet, but think I might start doing that.[/QUOTE]It's happened to me a couple of times. I don't do incall, cause I'm just paranoid of cops and lazy. LOL But when that happens I just power through. She might have someone in the car with her and you'll catch hell. But I've had the bait and switch which is aggravating too. But like I said, just go with it, turn the lights off and have fun. Cause she might get pissy and post your number on sites and that shit sux too. LOL But if they did that to me for an incall, I'd burn trail fast.
[QUOTE=StevenHyde;4939294]I went back to see Bree again today. The first time I saw her I was happy enough because she is a little cutie and even though she wasn't really into it she did give me an okay BBBJ and let me do doggy till I popped. But this time I left very frustrated. She kept blocking me by putting her legs together and wouldn't let me get it inside her. I've had girls use that move to keep me from going deep but she was not even letting me in. I asked her to put her legs back and she said that she couldn't. I told her that it wasn't working and doggy would be better, but she refused. She told me I was too big and that she was too tight. She said that she would give me another BBBJ so I could finish, which didn't work because I was pissed. I didn't make an appointment and pay for a BBBJ. I paid for FS and got told I was too big after she had taken my money. I didn't make a big deal about it because who knows if they have security in the house and what they might do, but I will never repeat. I like spinners, but if she can't take a dick she's in the wrong business. For the record, I'm only a little bigger than average, it's at least that's what the consensus seems to be.[/QUOTE]Have had that happen before. After I left the girl texted me to apologize, said aunt flo showed up. But she made it up to me on next visit, wasn't Bree. And may not have been the case this time.
[QUOTE=RegisJ1;4939268]Umm. I'm not the individual you're referring to "making this personal" but your stubborn denial of the testimonies of 4+ senior members of this group, AND passive aggressive statements of 'agree to disagree' in one comment followed by the assertion of someone trying to "making everyone believe" does beg the question, what's YOUR ulterior motive in denying what everyone else sees clearly? Do you doubt the moon landing? The spherical earth?
I understand a general attitude of skepticism with all providers but, dude! This actually checks out!
All that said, this is the closest Ive ever come to the stupid forum. Ending up there is not on my bucket list, but if it happens in defense of the plain truth, so be it. As my grandfather used to say; Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts![/QUOTE]Curious? What makes a "senior member" special? What are the qualifications to be a "Senior Member".
[QUOTE=LittleRichard;4940442]Curious? What makes a "senior member" special? What are the qualifications to be a "Senior Member".[/QUOTE]The qualifications are 1) maturity and 2) superiority in all matters, physical, intellectual, and moral.
Just kidding. I think it's just the number of good posts.
[QUOTE=LittleRichard;4940442]Curious? What makes a "senior member" special? What are the qualifications to be a "Senior Member".[/QUOTE]Senior members have more status because they have been in the forum more than six months and have we least thirty posts. It's a good metric for other members to judge their peers, and for the moderator to allow certain priviliges, like posting without a wait period before publication. I think it's a fair and rational system, but you cannot always judge a book by its cover. I know for a fact that several senior members are providers posing as hobbyists in order to spread disinformation, both about themselves and their competition. Likewise, you can't automatically judge mongers by their status. Some senior members don't have much experience, and some regular members have been senior members several times in the past but have started over in order to change their identity. All in all, though, it is a good place to start when judging others, and I'm sure it's helpful for A2 when weeding out trolls.
[blue]Point of information, six months and 25 posts.
Thanks for taking the time to explain to the new guy.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=RegisJ1;4940667]The qualifications are 1) maturity and 2) superiority in all matters, physical, intellectual, and moral.
Just kidding. I think it's just the number of good posts.[/QUOTE]Sorry found it under FAQ "6 month membership- 25 Posts" and somebody said they should believe something posted because "4+ Senior Member said so" LMFAO.