Escort Reports

[QUOTE=Mack81;4935666]I agree, I think she's lying about being a playboy model. She kinda looks like her, but it's not her. I don't care how much drugs someone does, it wouldn't change your looks that much[/QUOTE]Mack81.I have seen this beautiful lady over 15 times this year. She is my go to. That is her in the pics as she was a former playboy model. She is fit and does not do any drugs to my knowledge. This lady gets bothered more than most of us could handle on a daily basis. 50-100 plus calls and emails daily from the same guys. Please be respectful is you want to have a shot at seeing her. I see her and she does not flake on me from comments below. Please give this gorgeous gal a chance to breath and some might have a chance to see. Bring it if you have a problem with this as I have seen some of the crazy text or emails.

[QUOTE=Mack81;4935666]I agree, I think she's lying about being a playboy model. She kinda looks like her, but it's not her. I don't care how much drugs someone does, it wouldn't change your looks that much.[/QUOTE]Thats 100% Maneater I'd be willing to bet whatever I've seen her about 50 times that's definitely a younger Maneater. I dont think sir Chuck was saying it wasn't her im pretty sure he was just asking if it was her or not

[URL]https://escortindex.com/ad/stlouis/314-896-3/1/353743[/URL]

Has any bro seen this girl lately? I saw her over a year ago and now she is no where to be found. She was the pretties and the best provider I ever saw.

[QUOTE=Lfsman;4934437]Thanks for toftt, was thinking of seeing her since the pictures made her look attractive but was afraid they were old or filtered. Hate when you show up and the pictures are like 5 years old and they put on a ton of weight and have a attitude did she have any redeeming qualities?[/QUOTE]Pics are definitely more than 5 yrs old.

[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;4935835]Thats 100% Maneater I'd be willing to bet whatever I've seen her about 50 times that's definitely a younger Maneater. I dont think sir Chuck was saying it wasn't her im pretty sure he was just asking if it was her or not[/QUOTE]Its her. I have seen recently and use to see her about 5 years ago, before she moved. 5 years she did look a little closer to the pics and she was much more fit than now. She was very much into fitness back then, she still looks great all and all!

[QUOTE=Ventomiglia;4935747]Mack81.I have seen this beautiful lady over 15 times this year. She is my go to. That is her in the pics as she was a former playboy model. She is fit and does not do any drugs to my knowledge. This lady gets bothered more than most of us could handle on a daily basis. 50-100 plus calls and emails daily from the same guys. Please be respectful is you want to have a shot at seeing her. I see her and she does not flake on me from comments below. Please give this gorgeous gal a chance to breath and some might have a chance to see. Bring it if you have a problem with this as I have seen some of the crazy text or emails.[/QUOTE]I didn't mean to piss everyone off about Maneater. Personally I liked her, but I just didn't believe her little playboy ruse. Hey if you want to believe it great, most of this is fantasy anyway. I don't give 100% accurate information to these women and I don't expect anything more from them.

Like I said before, she's older but still pretty hot, gives a great PSE experience and doesn't charge an arm and a leg. I can see why she's busy. I didn't say she does drugs. I just said that drugs won't change a person's appearance that much. If you like her that much, great! Maybe you can get her to be your sugar baby.

[QUOTE=Mack81;4936151]I didn't mean to piss everyone off about Maneater. Personally I liked her, but I just didn't believe her little playboy ruse. Hey if you want to believe it great, most of this is fantasy anyway. I don't give 100% accurate information to these women and I don't expect anything more from them.

Like I said before, she's older but still pretty hot, gives a great PSE experience and doesn't charge an arm and a leg. I can see why she's busy. I didn't say she does drugs. I just said that drugs won't change a person's appearance that much. If you like her that much, great! Maybe you can get her to be your sugar baby.[/QUOTE]Guys sorry but are we saying Rebecca Scott is Maneater?

I was not saying this wasn't her. I was just looking for confirmation that this really was her. I'm definitely very interested in meeting her as her pics are pretty hot and she's been on my to do list for a while now.

[QUOTE=Hobbyist1234;4935835]Thats 100% Maneater I'd be willing to bet whatever I've seen her about 50 times that's definitely a younger Maneater. I dont think sir Chuck was saying it wasn't her im pretty sure he was just asking if it was her or not[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DoodleKatz;4935630]Roll me in fairy dust and call me a unicorn. I somehow posted / created a blog page when I ment to post here. I'll try and delete it. Re post below now with prices.

Sexy Sarah.

Went to see her today. Private residence in an apt complex. She's kind of milfy. Not fat but not spinner. Very pleasant person. Made me feel comfortable. She has a manage table and a bed (2 Sept. Rooms). I opted for the bed. Light teasing rub and then to BBBJ. No CIM. Was 150 for half hour hour option was 250 . I did the hh. Wasn't a bad experience. Overall I thought the BBBJ was a little too handsy.[/QUOTE]How was the FS performance / experience?

[QUOTE=SirChuck;4936245]I was not saying this wasn't her. I was just looking for confirmation that this really was her. I'm definitely very interested in meeting her as her pics are pretty hot and she's been on my to do list for a while now.[/QUOTE]It's her. I've only seen her a couple of times, but looking at Ms. August 99, you can definitely tell it's the same gal, just 21 years older.

As far as any "ruse" (Mack81), she never even mentioned it to me. I only heard about it on here. If it was a ruse, she'd be the one mentioning it, and likely charging more than she does.

Whatever. You don't have to believe it. It's not going to change my opinion of her, anyway. She was already my fave provider before this.

[QUOTE=TimeMaker;4933811]I've seen Bree a few times cute tight young body but she lacks experience to make it a real good session I did Natasha a couple weeks ago small Bbw also ok but lacks excitement they need to get taught by better providers.[/QUOTE]Well gentleman it seems today's LC post comments 'Delmar Loop Area' so it seems this is in fact the new landing space. In addition a confirmed name 'Kitty Kat' & new pics for prior referenced 'Bree's friend w / the dreds'.

[URL]https://independent.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/53388144/[/URL]#.

Still haven't seen anyone TOFTT on 2 grl. Also, has anyone cleared up the venting process? Is there seriously a car make / model / plate request?

Anyone have any reviews of these two?

Heard off hand about 4 hand Massages.

[URL]https://stlouis.rubratings.com/155908[/URL]

[URL]https://stlouis.rubratings.com/146623[/URL]

[QUOTE=Rally7;4936529]It's her. I've only seen her a couple of times, but looking at Ms. August 99, you can definitely tell it's the same gal, just 21 years older.

As far as any "ruse" (Mack81), she never even mentioned it to me. I only heard about it on here. If it was a ruse, she'd be the one mentioning it, and likely charging more than she does.

Whatever. You don't have to believe it. It's not going to change my opinion of her, anyway. She was already my fave provider before this.[/QUOTE]No ruse I've seen 10 times I seen her portfolio after a few dates she is my favorite all time there is no one like her.

Look at your own pictures from 20 plus years to me she look great and performance is off the charts.

If you are lucky enough to see her you are one lucky guy.

Any info on this one?

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/53385840/[/URL]#.

[QUOTE=BukkakeLuvr;4936900]Any info on this one?

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/missouri/stlouis/53385840/[/URL]#.[/QUOTE]Rates I was quoted:

Incall: qv / hh / hr 140/180/220.

Outcall: 220/240/280.

The only value I see would be for the hour but I don't want to spend an hour without any other info about her.