Korean Agency BB

Danbi was in SanDiego but got no review. I recognized her face but its been a few years since I saw her. I thought she was pretty and was into it. I wouldn't expect exact girl in the P.S. Pics. Her reviews [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/danbi-5028886831-393089](click here)[/URL].

Gem was pretty well known GFE girl in OC. First time BB upcharge. She was in my Superior tier for service, attitude, and performance. Tier A in looks just cause I liked the way she looked. She was a classy beautiful and elegant lady when I first saw her some years ago. She took excellent care of me like a loving wife, starting with the blue toast to when I left. Someone said she was "insatiable GFE". I saw the resemblance from her new P.S. Pics. She had more accurate P.S. Pics before. Don't expect girl in the P.S. Pics cause that's AI enhanced / idealized P.S. Version of her. She's also tall at 5'7" pale skin slender body with soft natural Cs. Her reviews [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jane---gem-7022715580-284022](click here)[/URL].

[QUOTE=HighPt7;7151743]Has anyone tried the new girls from Get9, Gem and / or Danbi? If so, how were they?

Thank you all in advance![/QUOTE]

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers&p=7137929&viewfull=1#post7137929[/URL]

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;7152890]Danbi was in SanDiego but got no review.[/QUOTE]

[B]Minji[/B] is back. HYA. Nice young body, good face, petite, dark skin, sharp tan line, my best guess is 25-30, nice MMs. Some resemblance to Yeji's face but darker skin tone and wider nose, softer face line. Looks over service, body over face, knows how to ride but passive otherwise. Bring your own service and take the lead. Little English. Hard to say if you will vibe, typical HYA as far as that.
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=7138862&viewfull=1#post7138862[/URL] Minji PLEASER
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=7136820&viewfull=1#post7136820[/URL] Minji PLEASER
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=7123273&viewfull=1#post7123273[/URL] Minji PLEASER
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=7134393&viewfull=1#post7134393[/URL] Minji PLEASER

I'd put her in "B tier looks" along with: Baby Arin, Leslie K, Baby Ayaka, Bona, Jenny, Gigi, Priva. Obviously if you don't prioritize young, cute, or skinny you'll rate her lower than me. It's roughly 3% S-tier, 5% A-tier 7% B-tier for me and these are just examples. Like Apink, June, Sai, and Sammy are probably B-tier but haven't thought about it enough. Second to last photo attached is Minji's ad, it's not her at all but I include it so you can confirm you have the right ad. Last photo is Yeji, who she resembles but Minji has a slightly thicker nose, darker skin, and smoother lines. In my opinion Minji is better but others might like Yeji more.
[URL]https://get9irl.com/Minji3[/URL]

Notice RJ's review, he described her as having "MM C's with large pepperoni areolas" which is exactly right. He found her face GND and I can see others saying that, Yeji without make up is the same. So it is a matter of taste and why I attached Yeji's most similar photo as a hint. I agree with him that her body is her main asset.

[QUOTE=BrainLara;7152971][URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers&p=7137929&viewfull=1#post7137929[/URL][/QUOTE]

No wonder, I recognize the photo but not the name. I was sure I had seen the photo somewhere. I had just discussed with 5 different people the last 2 days how the very best girls still get rebranded. White/Bona, Ericka/Hazel, Miranee/Ina, and a long list of more. There are some very different reasons for rebrands. Anyways, two reviews from reviewers I've known well for years:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers&p=7137929&highlight=heather#post7137929[/URL] Heather
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers&p=7134429&highlight=heather#post7134429[/URL] Heather

One other review from someone I don't know, hence Trusty was skeptical:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers&p=7134025&highlight=heather#post7134025[/URL] Heather

For my part I had white fever and was balls deep in some young white girls at COI while visiting friends. I even discovered a white version of Bona:
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26373-Korean-Agency-BB&p=7139330&highlight=bona#post7139330[/URL] White Bona
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?4826-Strip-Club-Reports&p=7134125&viewfull=1#post7134125[/URL] COI
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?5030-Strip-Club-Reports&p=7109096&viewfull=1#post7109096[/URL] SD strip clubs have hot girls but low mileage
[URL]http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?5030-Strip-Club-Reports&p=7153038&viewfull=1#post7153038[/URL] Expose taking over Deja Vu

I told a friend about White Bona and how you could bang the girls at COI and he asked "But aren't those just rumors"? No, they aren't.

Someone complained I post too many photos of sexy white girls, so let me attach some more of White Bona. She was even younger and her ass firmer so DTB.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;7152890]Danbi was in SanDiego but got no review. I recognized her face but its been a few years since I saw her. I thought she was pretty and was into it. I wouldn't expect exact girl in the P.S. Pics. Her reviews [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/danbi-5028886831-393089](click here)[/URL].

Gem was pretty well known GFE girl in OC. First time BB upcharge. She was in my Superior tier for service, attitude, and performance. Tier A in looks just cause I liked the way she looked. She was a classy beautiful and elegant lady when I first saw her some years ago. She took excellent care of me like a loving wife, starting with the blue toast to when I left. Someone said she was "insatiable GFE". I saw the resemblance from her new P.S. Pics. She had more accurate P.S. Pics before. Don't expect girl in the P.S. Pics cause that's AI enhanced / idealized P.S. Version of her. She's also tall at 5'7" pale skin slender body with soft natural Cs. Her reviews [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jane---gem-7022715580-284022](click here)[/URL].[/QUOTE]When you say Gem, are you referring to Jane (see attached pics)? I only know her as Jane.

I've seen "Jane / Gem" in the past. Are you guys sure that is the same Gem that's being listed?

From what I remember, Jane doesn't allow BBFS. She's pretty but her tits are natural and saggy. She's elegant and treats you like royalty. Very gentle. I personally wouldn't repeat. I know she's been on tour in Colorado and Dallas.

Gem, however, looks much more beautiful. I love her pics and if she has fake tits (Booker lists natural but I've seen other girls who are listed as natural but has fake tits) then she's an insta book for me. If anyone has more intel, please share.

Danbi: I saw a review of her from elsewhere and it was decent. However, I tend not to put too much weight into other places since their quality is not as high, no disrespect. It is like looking at food reviews for rural places vs big cities. Just because both are 4. 5 stars, I am hesitant to trust since the bar is lower.

Anyone try this duo? I've had Sophia before numerous times and she's wonderful but haven't really tried Everly or a duo. Thanks.

[QUOTE=Fuzion;7153416]I've seen "Jane / Gem" in the past. Are you guys sure that is the same Gem that's being listed?

From what I remember, Jane doesn't allow BBFS. She's pretty but her tits are natural and saggy. She's elegant and treats you like royalty. Very gentle. I personally wouldn't repeat. I know she's been on tour in Colorado and Dallas.

Gem, however, looks much more beautiful. I love her pics and if she has fake tits (Booker lists natural but I've seen other girls who are listed as natural but has fake tits) then she's an insta book for me. If anyone has more intel, please share.

Danbi: I saw a review of her from elsewhere and it was decent. However, I tend not to put too much weight into other places since their quality is not as high, no disrespect. It is like looking at food reviews for rural places vs big cities. Just because both are 4. 5 stars, I am hesitant to trust since the bar is lower.[/QUOTE]Jane / Gem from what I deciphered from my notes C cup GFE service queen. She has been on my repeat list but only saw her once quite some time ago. And yes no BBFS.

[QUOTE=Randy62;7153454]Jane / Gem from what I deciphered from my notes C cup GFE service queen. She has been on my repeat list but only saw her once quite some time ago. And yes no BBFS.[/QUOTE]It is possible now she opens up her menu to attract more business. When I saw her last year, she gained quite a bit of weight compared to when she first started, and was firmly in the MILF service queen category for me.

[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/copy-of-kissy[/URL]

The ad pics are OG pics of Estee / Mio / Ella, who has been GFE only. The stats matched. Not sure if they just blatantly stole the pics or if she now had to open up her menu to attract more business.

Yes I am 90% sure Sora and Gem are rebrands. Sora used to be my ATF too.

[QUOTE=HornyToad75;7153840][URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/copy-of-kissy[/URL]

The ad pics are OG pics of Estee / Mio / Ella, who has been GFE only. The stats matched. Not sure if they just blatantly stole the pics or if she now had to open up her menu to attract more business.[/QUOTE]

Sorry but you misunderstood the brand. If she's under 400 then she's not part of the Club. If you want legit Super Beautiful Chick then have to fork 600+. For Sexy Beautiful Chick, it's 400+. You may feel like it's Sucked Being Conned if she is not your type tho. Only certified HYAs so far were Freesia, Peony, Daisy, Dahlia, Poppy, Mocha.

[QUOTE=Tobonkornot;7153880]Nike is decidedly not an SB. Whole thing has shaken my brand perception of SBC indefinitely...[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Fuzion;7153416]I've seen "Jane / Gem" in the past. Are you guys sure that is the same Gem that's being listed?

From what I remember, Jane doesn't allow BBFS. She's pretty but her tits are natural and saggy. She's elegant and treats you like royalty. Very gentle. I personally wouldn't repeat. I know she's been on tour in Colorado and Dallas.

Gem, however, looks much more beautiful. I love her pics and if she has fake tits (Booker lists natural but I've seen other girls who are listed as natural but has fake tits) then she's an insta book for me. If anyone has more intel, please share.

Danbi: I saw a review of her from elsewhere and it was decent. However, I tend not to put too much weight into other places since their quality is not as high, no disrespect. It is like looking at food reviews for rural places vs big cities. Just because both are 4. 5 stars, I am hesitant to trust since the bar is lower.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HornyToad75;7153691]It is possible now she opens up her menu to attract more business. When I saw her last year, she gained quite a bit of weight compared to when she first started, and was firmly in the MILF service queen category for me.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;7154260]Yes I am 90% sure Sora and Gem are rebrands. Sora used to be my ATF too.[/QUOTE]So I just got confirmation from someone that saw her today that it is Jane. Funny enough, he wasn't sure when he went inside if it was her either. It was the scar on her hip that confirmed it for him. And yes, BBFSCIP confirmed. I plan to see her too since I remember having a good time with her.

Who seems more engaging / extroverted personality wise? Looking for an extroverted / playful personality gal with pretty face and ideally BBFS.

[QUOTE=Tobonkornot;7153880]Nike is decidedly not an SB. Whole thing has shaken my brand perception of SBC indefinitely.
[/QUOTE]First off, thanks for the review. Nike's been around for a bit now but there was not much info about her, I guess we now know partly why.

From what I can gather, SBC works on a sliding scale price that is commensurate to the girl's youth / looks as assessed presumably by the owner / girl in question. In addition, SBC girls automatically get a sign on bonus to their hourly rates because they can. Stephanie (fka Ppomi, Wooju) went from 340 to 380 and Nike herself started at 320 and is now 340. Lily (Esme K) and Lilia (Choco) similarly increased, while Daisy had the biggest jump. Dahlia is their top shelf product at 650, reviews so far are mixed. Service is not taken into consideration, it's all looks / youth or bust.

It's quite evident that they are focused on the generous gentleman archtype by leveraging the HYA they can bring in. I can understand why they do it and their target audience. It's just a bit jarring to market themselves within the kgirl ecosystem as it already has established price ranges. But I think that's either because they can't reach a large enough clientele without the help of multiple bookers, or they don't want to compete or aren't competent enough to operate in market segments that traditionally has similar price points, namely, PD and P411.

In short, IMO, their girls are pushing cash grabs hard. And some guys do bite.

[QUOTE=Stgermaine;7154365]Who seems more engaging / extroverted personality wise? Looking for an extroverted / playful personality gal with pretty face and ideally BBFS.[/QUOTE]Ericka / Hazel has what you're looking for, engaging and fairly extroverted. But I would still choose Jenny over Ericka / Hazel because she is pretty enough and no upcharge.