I don't think 1333 is open anymore. I've only been there once. By the time I decifered the post on here and located it I got on soso attempt til they started putting up the closed sign.
Printable View
I don't think 1333 is open anymore. I've only been there once. By the time I decifered the post on here and located it I got on soso attempt til they started putting up the closed sign.
[QUOTE=Fj Cruiser]Visited a couple times in the last 2 months. Each time MMS started by matching me up with a fairly unattractive therapist. Both time's I've asked to see the MMS and have switched to someone much better. Last time was a therapist named Seven, who I remember from CPHC where I think her name was Joey or Choey? Anyway, it pays to request the therapist that you want. Both of my replacements were excellent. House fee is now. 7 and tip is same as it has been. I have always enjoyed this place and plan to return.[/QUOTE]
Ahhh... CHPC. Now those were the days!
Van
[QUOTE=VanDriver]Ahhh... CHPC. Now those were the days!
Van[/QUOTE]I'll second that Van!
CPHC used to be the best, location was easy to get to, usually they weren't busy and the therapists were top notch. I miss looking out the window and smiling. Sun was the only competition I can think of. Maybe Happiness. Hard to say.
Cabbie!
Be safe out there.
Was outside of the 1333 yesterday, and I saw something that cracked me up. There was a cute Asian girl literally hanging out of the top story window, passing a package down to the next floor by a rope! I have no idea why. The sign did say closed in the window, so maybe they have just gone to ground? At any rate, it made me smile and also wonder what the establishment downstairs has been getting up to.
Happiness was always good to me Mama & cookmama liked me. I rember once taken 2-doz live jumbo crabs in, you`ed think I was a king the way they treated me....... those were the days miss those girls :(
[QUOTE=CabDriver52]I'll second that Van!
Happiness. Hard to say.
Cabbie! Be safe out there.[/QUOTE]
This whole situation is DC is really pissing me off right now. The more I think about it, the angrier I get.
Why is the local government spending all this money and LE man power going after an industry that for the most part, is doing no harm? A man needs sex. A woman needs sex. Two consenting adults get together, and one decides that he wants to pay the other for their time. And that's a fucking crime?! How is that any different then spending money buying a woman gifts, spending cash on expensive dates, etc in the hopes of getting laid? If I meet a woman at a bar, we decide to go home together, we fuck, and instead of giving her roses or chocolates, or make her breakfast I give her 'cash' and tell her to go and buy something nice for herself. Have I just committed a crime? WTF?!
This same money they're spending on going after local AMP's should be spent on 'real crimes' like cleaning up all the city drug dealers. Going after the hordes of rapists and murderers we have in the city. You'd think that with the economy the way it is, that the government and local LE would want to prioritize which crimes are more important to reduce and which ones are not, due to the shortage of money. It's almost as if LE takes the easy, safe route; they'll see a guy standing on a corner, knowing he's up to no good but won't say shit to him, but see an average guy like me run a stop sign, and will pull me over and hassle me, simply so they can feel as though they're doing their job, to some extent.
Now I'm all for LE going after the sick bastards that are involved in human trafficking, especially of under aged girls but for the most part these girls are willing workers. A consenting adult who just happens to like the fast money, this job generates. Nevada has the right idea. LE is basically pissing up a rope going after escorts, and AMP's. They cannot stop the worlds oldest profession, no matter how hard they try. It's a shame we have to sneak around when we're potentially doing nothing wrong. Legalize it. Tax it. It then becomes safer for everyone. Then there will be money freed up in the budget to go after real criminals.
Not to rain on any parades...but a retarded number of women in AMP's are actually illegal immigrants from war torn or impoverished countries. Many of the very girls we are familiar with may have been trafficked. That doesn't necessarily mean kidnapped in the night and forced to be here; it could be as insidious as claiming that America is the land of golden opportunity, and then having all kinds of hidden hooks once a girl gets here. In some places of the country, an extremely common story is a girl comes over on a work or student visa, which then expires. The girl barely knows the language, has no friends or family in the states, and not even enough money to get a plane ticket home. They then get sort of stuck in the profession. Let's face it - 80 bucks for yanking on some old or ugly American's pud is a hell of a lot better deal than flipping burgers.
On less of a downer note, legalization would bring about price capping, competition, and girls who are in the biz at least a bit more willingly.
I'm just wondering why now. I know they've always tried to crack down on spas, but why now with the heavy handedness.
Who really cares out there other than a few self righteous polliticians who are screwing around anyways with $5,000 escorts and having babies with their mistresses--former presidential candidate, and they are worried about this?
Anybody find themselves spoiled by AMPs? I've visited a few escorts since the crackdown and I find myself disappointed more often then not. Either they look nothing like their picture (never in good ways) or they don't even bother to pretend to be enjoying the experience. And its always right down to business. I find that I really appreciate the build up that the TS and massage provide. It helps establish an at least tentative rapport with the girl. They have always been at least moderately attractive and some surprisingly so. And they are usually friendly, not to mention skilled.
I'm certain this isn't always the case, but at least in my limited experience, you're much more likely to walk away with a smile on your face from an AMP then any escort.
And I agree totally!
JJ
[QUOTE=Freshly Snipes]This whole situation is DC is really pissing me off right now. The more I think about it, the angrier I get.
Why is the local government spending all this money and LE man power going after an industry that for the most part, is doing no harm? A man needs sex. A woman needs sex. Two consenting adults get together, and one decides that he wants to pay the other for their time. And that's a fucking crime?! How is that any different then spending money buying a woman gifts, spending cash on expensive dates, etc in the hopes of getting laid? If I meet a woman at a bar, we decide to go home together, we fuck, and instead of giving her roses or chocolates, or make her breakfast I give her 'cash' and tell her to go and buy something nice for herself. Have I just committed a crime? WTF?!
This same money they're spending on going after local AMP's should be spent on 'real crimes' like cleaning up all the city drug dealers. Going after the hordes of rapists and murderers we have in the city. You'd think that with the economy the way it is, that the government and local LE would want to prioritize which crimes are more important to reduce and which ones are not, due to the shortage of money. It's almost as if LE takes the easy, safe route; they'll see a guy standing on a corner, knowing he's up to no good but won't say shit to him, but see an average guy like me run a stop sign, and will pull me over and hassle me, simply so they can feel as though they're doing their job, to some extent.
Now I'm all for LE going after the sick bastards that are involved in human trafficking, especially of under aged girls but for the most part these girls are willing workers. A consenting adult who just happens to like the fast money, this job generates. Nevada has the right idea. LE is basically pissing up a rope going after escorts, and AMP's. They cannot stop the worlds oldest profession, no matter how hard they try. It's a shame we have to sneak around when we're potentially doing nothing wrong. Legalize it. Tax it. It then becomes safer for everyone. Then there will be money freed up in the budget to go after real criminals.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Freshly Snipes]
Nevada has the right idea. .[/QUOTE]
Henderson NV just passed strick laws setting the hours of massage parlors and other various regulations designed to eliminate extra activities at the spas. Not sure I would use Nevada as an example.
Making sex for money legal would be the death of AMPs. If you could go anywhere and pay for sex and have no worries, the girls would have to register and get tested like they do in Nevada, and these AMP girls 90% or more are not legal and could not register, or get regular tests.
They would not be able to compete and there would be pressure like in NV from the legal workers to rid the profession of the "undocumented untested workers" that are taking their business.
AMP girls would still be hassled by LE for providing unlicensed sex services, not having tests etc... Legalizing it would NOT help the AMPs.
It would help you find quality providers, better looking, more service oriented, just like the spots in NV, ones who are doing because they love it.
For those (most) girls who are here illegally or do not have a work visa and should nto be working, legalizing it does not help them 1 bit.
[QUOTE=Cavetroll]Not to rain on any parades...but a retarded number of women in AMP's are actually illegal immigrants from war torn or impoverished countries. Many of the very girls we are familiar with may have been trafficked. [/QUOTE]
The thing they say about prostitution is that "the woman really does not want to do it". She is forced to by economic circumstances, and that the act is damaging to them because it is abuse.
WTF, THAT IS WHY THEY CALL IT WORK?!?!
I feel trapped, degraded, and abused at my job also. I would not go back if there was no money in it. I feel damaged at times at well.
I pay good hard earned money to get a service. I do not pretend that she really wants to do it (that is why I am paying her rather than vise versa).
[QUOTE=CabDriver52]I'll second that Van!
CPHC used to be the best, location was easy to get to, usually they weren't busy and the therapists were top notch. I miss looking out the window and smiling. Sun was the only competition I can think of. Maybe Happiness. Hard to say.
Cabbie!
Be safe out there.[/QUOTE]
Sun was my first DC spa...damn what a way to start. As a matter of fact, I think I only hit like three or four of the spas before Black Monday and this recent spate of closings.
I always loved going to Sun before a game or the Metro ride to the 'burbs. Remember Pink? And was it CoCo who said "You supaman!".
[QUOTE=Brahmabull]Henderson NV just passed strick laws setting the hours of massage parlors and other various regulations designed to eliminate extra activities at the spas. Not sure I would use Nevada as an example.
Making sex for money legal would be the death of AMPs. If you could go anywhere and pay for sex and have no worries, the girls would have to register and get tested like they do in Nevada, and these AMP girls 90% or more are not legal and could not register, or get regular tests.
They would not be able to compete and there would be pressure like in NV from the legal workers to rid the profession of the "undocumented untested workers" that are taking their business.
AMP girls would still be hassled by LE for providing unlicensed sex services, not having tests etc. Legalizing it would NOT help the AMPs.
It would help you find quality providers, better looking, more service oriented, just like the spots in NV, ones who are doing because they love it.
For those (most) girls who are here illegally or do not have a work visa and should nto be working, legalizing it does not help them 1 bit.[/QUOTE]Well to be honest with you, if legalizing it would be the death of AMP's, then I'm sorry, but so be it. AMP's just seem to be the safest route as far as going about acquiring the services I sometimes need. Escorts and SW are a little riskier for obviously reasons. I'd feel bad for the girls effected by this, sorry if this sounds cold, but I'm not going to AMP's for humanitarian reasons.
The point to my rant was that I'm tired of sneaking around like a damn terrorist, when I'm potentially doing what comes natural to all humans; to most living things.
You know I think the only reason why this hasn't been legalized more wide spread is because no law maker wants to be the one that steps out there and has his name attached to this kinda legislation, and it may be simply because he would have to justify his beliefs to his wife/spouse, family members and voters thus coming off like an immoral perv.
America swears it's ahead of the world on everything, but it's one of the most backward free nations in the world when it comes to sex. I was stationed in Germany, years back, when I was in the military, and you had these 'red light district' establishments all over the place. They were as convenient and numerous as CVS drug stores, or 7-11's, and nobody batted an eye. I believe Amsterdam is the same.
[QUOTE=Cavetroll]Not to rain on any parades...but a retarded number of women in AMP's are actually illegal immigrants from war torn or impoverished countries. Many of the very girls we are familiar with may have been trafficked. That doesn't necessarily mean kidnapped in the night and forced to be here; it could be as insidious as claiming that America is the land of golden opportunity, and then having all kinds of hidden hooks once a girl gets here. In some places of the country, an extremely common story is a girl comes over on a work or student visa, which then expires. The girl barely knows the language, has no friends or family in the states, and not even enough money to get a plane ticket home. They then get sort of stuck in the profession. Let's face it - 80 bucks for yanking on some old or ugly American's pud is a hell of a lot better deal than flipping burgers.
On less of a downer note, legalization would bring about price capping, competition, and girls who are in the biz at least a bit more willingly.[/QUOTE]Umm, no. Which countries do they come from that are war-torn and impoverished? South Korea? They would have had to come from the 50's or earlier to claim that.