[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4780933]How do you know Jamie is in her 30's not 20's? Are you Asian? Did you ask her? I'm curious but really don't care since I would fuck her anytime.[/QUOTE]I don't think she's in her 30's. She told me she was 26 and I believe her.
Printable View
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4780933]How do you know Jamie is in her 30's not 20's? Are you Asian? Did you ask her? I'm curious but really don't care since I would fuck her anytime.[/QUOTE]I don't think she's in her 30's. She told me she was 26 and I believe her.
[QUOTE=CrunchEazy;4781078]I don't think she's in her 30's. She told me she was 26 and I believe her.[/QUOTE]95% of kgirls in USA are at least 30. Most experienced kgirl members will know there are very few 20 why / o providers. That doesn't mean they are any less attractive / beautiful.
M.
[URL]https://myalbum.com/album/urXyEZhQJVKE[/URL] (Chanel is back). (Love off).
Sunny.
Lyn.
Newtopasian.
LA Sera, Ruby.
Sexyfunkgirls.
Viki.
[QUOTE=CrunchEazy;4781078]I don't think she's in her 30's. She told me she was 26 and I believe her.[/QUOTE]That is what she told me too and I agree with you.
She does have a c section!
Thing with Jamie is just that. Feels transactional and / or mechanical. Yes she will peforrm, make out with you, take a load in her pussy or mouth etc, but she doesn't have that seductress attitude like Hugging up on you, trying to Dfk you like you're the last guy on Earth. She's just more like a fuck buddy that has a hot body and a cute face. Her facial expressions are quite blank unless you can get her to laugh or be inside her 6+ inches in deep, then you'll see that "bored" look on her face change real quick. Selling points for her are her hot body and youth. But don't except an Oscar winning performance with Jamie, she'll let you drop a load in her and take it with a smile but don't expect her eyes to give you a hint that she's on a natural high, she looks like she's bored to most clients. Seen her 5+ times and it's pretty much the same. Some days more cheerful but pretty much same experience every time.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;4780054]To whom may concern, my review is merely what I experienced and how I feel, mine and yours can be different as at the end, I clearly stated it might just be her off day at the end.
My example with megan is just an example, nothing regarding to age comparing but the attitude. Who ever monger in the hobby long enough knows what I'm talking about.
Once again, it is always YMMV and it is your choice to believe or not.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CrunchEazy;4781078]I don't think she's in her 30's. She told me she was 26 and I believe her[/QUOTE]If her lips were moving don't believe it. CrunchEazy is pretty spot on with that 95% number. It was blowjob Min who alerted me to that. I thought she was in her 20's when I met her and she told me she was 34 or 35 if I remember correctly and said almost all the allegedly 20 somethings were in their thirties.
Been lurking for a week and saw a bunch of reviews on Jamie from KTE. Are we all getting the same Jamie? Because the Jamie I had did not have a banging body. A little stubby tbh. Also, her nose was not symmetrical. Noticed it when she was riding. Can anyone else confirm?
Just wondering if I got bait and switched. Everyone's review of Jamie is that she has a banging body. She was a bit stout in my opinion. Also, a notable feature was the asymmetry of her nostrils. Did anyone else notice that or did I just get bait and switched?
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4781394]She does have a c section![/QUOTE]Are you sure? I thought Chanel with m didn't have a c section scar. Can anyone chime in please.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4781343]That is what she told me too and I agree with you.[/QUOTE]She told me the same thing 26.
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4781394]She does have a c section![/QUOTE]Huh. I have never noticed that.
So LA, I have to apologize for my dear NorCal. It seems we have more and more girls that want profit from your kind gestures of BBFS up charge. I am here to help you fight against that, and just in general, keep the talent good here in LA. Nothing against girls like Jamie, as her body merits that charge for those with deep pockets. And Jamie has been charging this since coming to LA long before COVID, so I won't fight against her. No beef. But I'm speaking about the many I've had the pleasure of BBFS for the NorCal price of less. I was doing the girl rounds and caught this orgs return: [URL]http://january.escorts.biz/companions/[/URL].
These girls were both most recently of M's shop. Sonia was formerly Paula and recently Aria listed on the KP, still on the page and booker confirmed she is on vacation till next month, aka down in LA. Sonia was in bay area last year too under other names and seem to travel around but gained some weight. Bit of a smoker but she will give you BBBJ. And has for many years. Just I don't merit the up charge for what you'll get. She isn't Jamie, far from it.
The other girl Reina is blurred out but this looks like Jade of M, formerly Evie of Baykisses. Thunder thighs, saggy ass, but small girl otherwise. This girl has had some spells with service. Norcal word of her crying during sessions haha, among many other things. And hot and cold with BBFS. The few (I admit I was one) got BBFS before with her. But she is pretty hard CFS for many. Rumor from another M girl is that she left because she didn't want to keep offering BBFS to get customers since she was not busy like the rest. M has her reputation of offering. I'm not 100% this is Jade in those pics, but her pattern matches girls coming back down to work from NorCal after leaving LA briefly, then changing names. Seems like she is CFS only here, but upcharging for 2 pops. Come on haha. I'll inquire with PO to confirm tomorrow unless someone sees her first. She isn't worth the service unless she decides to change.
I hate to ruin a girl's return really but I just don't justify these upcharges for 2 pops / BBFS. They weren't caliber of M's shop apparently and quite frankly LA. Go back to the Bay, or give it up as you have before many times. Support shops that don't upsell.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4781766]If her lips were moving don't believe it. CrunchEazy is pretty spot on with that 95% number. It was blowjob Min who alerted me to that. I thought she was in her 20's when I met her and she told me she was 34 or 35 if I remember correctly and said almost all the allegedly 20 somethings were in their thirties.[/QUOTE]This is entirely true. Most are in their thirties. There are only a slim handful of 26-28 yr olds, but many are at least 31, if not mid to late 30's. But hey, they're attractive so who cares as long as they do not look late 40's haha. Hobby on.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;4781766]If her lips were moving don't believe it. CrunchEazy is pretty spot on with that 95% number. It was blowjob Min who alerted me to that. I thought she was in her 20's when I met her and she told me she was 34 or 35 if I remember correctly and said almost all the allegedly 20 somethings were in their thirties.[/QUOTE]Min looked early 30's though and Jamie doesn't IMHO. If you are into skinny or real slim girls then she is not for you. However I repeat. I would fuck her anyday. She is young, tan, athletic, firm, shapely with a nice bubble but ass, flat stomach pretty face and and an hourglass shape not a model body but definitely above the average Kgirl. If you like Ruby or Chanel of J then you would like Jamie. Maybe this helps?
[QUOTE=Dwaeji;4774857]She's in OC with CA-KDolls. She lives in LA, so I'm sure she'll be back before long.[/QUOTE]There's a Suzie who just arrived in Seattle, but her photos are in a password protected area. Wondering if she's the same one.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4782460]Min looked early 30's though and Jamie doesn't IMHO. If you are into skinny or real slim girls then she is not for you. However I repeat. I would fuck her anyday. She is young, tan, athletic, firm, shapely with a nice bubble but ass, flat stomach pretty face and and an hourglass shape not a model body but definitely above the average Kgirl. If you like Ruby or Chanel of J then you would like Jamie. Maybe this helps?[/QUOTE]I'm not great at telling ages but when I met Min five years ago to me she could have been 25 or 26. Personally I prefer them more around 30 to 35. Usually much better skills and service.
[QUOTE=BbbjStan;4782124]Are you sure? I thought Chanel with m didn't have a c section scar. Can anyone chime in please.[/QUOTE]I don't know why all the fuss about a C section scar and losing sight of her great body. I'll take her body with a scar over most of the girls without one.
[QUOTE=SneakyHotBoy;4782093]Just wondering if I got bait and switched. Everyone's review of Jamie is that she has a banging body. She was a bit stout in my opinion. Also, a notable feature was the asymmetry of her nostrils. Did anyone else notice that or did I just get bait and switched?[/QUOTE]No, that's Jamie. Her looks are highly overrated / exaggerated. Compared with the top 10 of kgirls in looks (not even comparing with kpop stars or kmodels), she's not even close.
Just left 2 loads in her the other day. Both time in the shower! In the bedroom she gave me the best massage I have ever had, sports therapy massage therapists included! I was amazed at how much strength Viki had in that tiny frame! She found a knot in my shoulder and went to work like I never had done before! I guess in my middle age, I enjoy a good romp and rub down combo.
She's cute, bubbly personality, nice enhanced titties, firm bottom. Pics are accurate.
The only men point is that her voice is a little deep. O. O.
But she is fun in the shower, lots of DFK.
Who else gives a good roll and a strong, talented rub down? Viki is one for sure. Yoco is good too. Anyone else?
[QUOTE=HeavySetD;4781565]Thing with Jamie is just that. Feels transactional and / or mechanical. Yes she will peforrm, make out with you, take a load in her pussy or mouth etc, but she doesn't have that seductress attitude like Hugging up on you, trying to Dfk you like you're the last guy on Earth. She's just more like a fuck buddy that has a hot body and a cute face. Her facial expressions are quite blank unless you can get her to laugh or be inside her 6+ inches in deep, then you'll see that "bored" look on her face change real quick. Selling points for her are her hot body and youth. But don't except an Oscar winning performance with Jamie, she'll let you drop a load in her and take it with a smile but don't expect her eyes to give you a hint that she's on a natural high, she looks like she's bored to most clients. Seen her 5+ times and it's pretty much the same. Some days more cheerful but pretty much same experience every time.[/QUOTE]You are right on with your comments in IMO as well. It's a job and many put up a barrier emotionally to separate business from pleasure.
[QUOTE=BbbjStan;4782124]Are you sure? I thought Chanel with m didn't have a c section scar. Can anyone chime in please.[/QUOTE]Chanel from SA. Doesn't have a C-section scar. Chanel from M. Sorry, I don't know? However Toungsten probably does?
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4782712]Chanel from SA. Doesn't have a C-section scar. Chanel from M. Sorry, I don't know? However Toungsten probably does?[/QUOTE]I will verify.
[QUOTE=Francescoo;4781394]She does have a c section![/QUOTE]Does this c section issue on a hoe really matter? Shouldn't guys here be more inquisitive and curious about whether the snapper between the girls legs take bare dick and baby batter injections rather than petty over a scar?
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4782712]Chanel from SA. Doesn't have a C-section scar. Chanel from M. Sorry, I don't know? However Toungsten probably does?[/QUOTE]I've seen both, and recently. Youthful and near flawless bodies.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4782712]Chanel from SA. Doesn't have a C-section scar. Chanel from M. Sorry, I don't know? However Toungsten probably does?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BbbjStan;4782124]Are you sure? I thought Chanel with m didn't have a c section scar. Can anyone chime in please.[/QUOTE]Chanel with M does have a c-section scar. I mentioned it in a review post over a year ago [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?10894-Los-Angeles-County-Asian-Providers&p=4133681&viewfull=1#post4133681]here[/URL].
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;4782312]So LA, I have to apologize for my dear NorCal. It seems we have more and more girls that want profit from your kind gestures of BBFS up charge. I am here to help you fight against that, and just in general, keep the talent good here in LA. Nothing against girls like Jamie, as her body merits that charge for those with deep pockets. And Jamie has been charging this since coming to LA long before COVID, so I won't fight against her. No beef. But I'm speaking about the many I've had the pleasure of BBFS for the NorCal price of less. I was doing the girl rounds and caught this orgs return: [URL]http://january.escorts.biz/companions/[/URL].
These girls were both most recently of M's shop. Sonia was formerly Paula and recently Aria listed on the KP, still on the page and booker confirmed she is on vacation till next month, aka down in LA. Sonia was in bay area last year too under other names and seem to travel around but gained some weight. Bit of a smoker but she will give you BBBJ. And has for many years. Just I don't merit the up charge for what you'll get. She isn't Jamie, far from it.[/QUOTE]We up here don't have kgirl upcharges for BBFS or any other services. Some (like three) providers here cost an extra 20 or 30, but they're all well established and the up charge is based on their status, not service. Which is the right strategy imo.
But then, I try to avoid BBFS (yes, I know I'm writing this in a bb topic).
Recently Jana aka Jane from sexyangels aka Hera from M appeared in the bay at ebk under yet another new name. Worst kgirl service / attitude I've ever had.
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4783028]Chanel with M does have a c-section scar. I mentioned it in a review post over a year ago [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?10894-Los-Angeles-County-Asian-Providers&p=4133681&viewfull=1#post4133681]here[/URL].[/QUOTE]Is this what all the fuss is about?
[URL]https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sparrowmassage.com%2Fcsection-scar-massage&psig=AOvVaw230Pcbd_6wRSZX6vs_5CQo&ust=1589402855872000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCJi6v7yZr-kCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAD[/URL]
[QUOTE=PumpNDump;4782767]Does this c section issue on a hoe really matter? Shouldn't guys here be more inquisitive and curious about whether the snapper between the girls legs take bare dick and baby batter injections rather than petty over a scar?[/QUOTE]It's a pretty important detail to me and it's a bit of a downer when I see that c-section scar or loose stomach skin. The lightest way I can put it is that I just don't have as much fun if I know I'm banging someone's mom haha. On the other hand, banging girls with tight bodies all around is like eating the freshest of fruit to me. It's almost all I need to get off even with a condom if it's the first date as long as they ain't too fat or ugly or old. Add bbfscip to a young good looking tight body and I'll repeat with her every week.
[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4782712]Chanel from SA. Doesn't have a C-section scar. Chanel from M. Sorry, I don't know? However Toungsten probably does?[/QUOTE]Chanel SA is starting to interest me I'll look up her reviews and put her on my TDL. I also wonder what happened to Jane SA / Hera M. I thought she was pretty good too maybe she's back in NorCal or something. Anybody know?
Anyone partake? Is this really Evie / LA Jade? I saw her once in San Mateo, she was alright but those teeth will make you lose your boner. It brings her down to 5/10. Looks young in the face but you can tell she is older with a petite mom bod. CFS no BBFS allowed on my visit.
[QUOTE=JimThome;4783194]It's a pretty important detail to me and it's a bit of a downer when I see that c-section scar or loose stomach skin. The lightest way I can put it is that I just don't have as much fun if I know I'm banging someone's mom haha. On the other hand, banging girls with tight bodies all around is like eating the freshest of fruit to me. It's almost all I need to get off even with a condom if it's the first date as long as they ain't too fat or ugly or old. Add bbfscip to a young good looking tight body and I'll repeat with her every week.[/QUOTE]I've shared this sentiment couple of time in the past. I'm spending my hard earn money so I expect a certain service and visual that will turn me on and get me off. C sect is not a total turn off for me but it should be disclosed in reviews so that people can take that info and judge it however they want. For some it may be a tipping point of not wanting to see that provider. I'm torn between a young, tight body, no c sect vs an experienced, full of energy, c sect woman. For me if she got a c sect but makes it up with a tone body and with / without tattoo that hides it and great service and attitude, I think she's worth the time and money. C sect and saggy tits or skins should always be disclosed.
[QUOTE=JungleFun;4783353]I've shared this sentiment couple of time in the past. I'm spending my hard earn money so I expect a certain service and visual that will turn me on and get me off. C sect is not a total turn off for me but it should be disclosed in reviews so that people can take that info and judge it however they want. For some it may be a tipping point of not wanting to see that provider. I'm torn between a young, tight body, no c sect vs an experienced, full of energy, c sect woman. For me if she got a c sect but makes it up with a tone body and with / without tattoo that hides it and great service and attitude, I think she's worth the time and money. C sect and saggy tits or skins should always be disclosed.[/QUOTE]If she Chanel has a C section mark it's barely discernible. At least I never noticed it and I've been around the world with her body many times. In addition she has a body as tight as a rubber band and maybe tighter. One of the finest bodies scar or no scar.
[QUOTE=JimThome;4783232]Chanel SA is starting to interest me I'll look up her reviews and put her on my TDL. I also wonder what happened to Jane SA / Hera M. I thought she was pretty good too maybe she's back in NorCal or something. Anybody know?[/QUOTE]Hey guys, I've seen Chanel from SA recently. How does Jamie from KTE and Luna from SA compare to Chanel in terms of looks and overall experience?
Can someone pm me Ms number? I think I have it but I'm not sure. Either she's not answering back or I might have wrong number.
[QUOTE=DijiNg06;4783381]Can someone pm me Ms number? I think I have it but I'm not sure. Either she's not answering back or I might have wrong number.[/QUOTE]Check her girl's reviews.
[QUOTE=PumpNDump;4782767]Does this c section issue on a hoe really matter? Shouldn't guys here be more inquisitive and curious about whether the snapper between the girls legs take bare dick and baby batter injections rather than petty over a scar?[/QUOTE]You can say the same thing about tattoos, crooked teeth, hairy pussies, etc. It's all about individual preference. One thing that you could easily bust on is another's trip to flaccid town. Aesthetics do matter, to a point, for everyone.
Seriously, a scar? Let it go. This is just a generalization, so we (mongers) are there for one reason and that is too unload are man jizz into the girl and watch it ooze out of her warm muffin or pink taco?
Don't worry about whether she has a scar, mole or crooked teeth. Just open her up and spew and leave.
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4783535]You can say the same thing about tattoos, crooked teeth, hairy pussies, etc. It's all about individual preference. One thing that you could easily bust on is another's trip to flaccid town. Aesthetics do matter, to a point, for everyone.[/QUOTE]I'm glad you added to a point. That's why looks are always YMMV but remember one man's point is another's obsession. That's why Chanel is not lacking for customers. Just read her reviews.
[QUOTE=TerrificEnigma;4783374]Hey guys, I've seen Chanel from SA recently. How does Jamie from KTE and Luna from SA compare to Chanel in terms of looks and overall experience?[/QUOTE]I'll give you my thoughts on Jamie. I saw her last year when she came down from bay area. I was eyeing her for awhile, with mongers up north saying she's young, good looking and BBFS cip friendly. So when she first came to OC I saw her. Mechanical and transactional. Hard no on BBFS. Service was forgetable at best. Now for looks, I can not fathom how you can give her a 8 or more in term of looks. Yes, relative to the current pool of girls she can be an 8. She's a solid 7 maybe 7. 5 as far as the face goes. She's young looking, as in 20's but looks can be deceiving with asian female. Her body is latina-like. I remember her thigh stood out the most. They are slightly bigger / thicker relative to her waist and overall thinness of her arm bones. Thighs are thick but tone and firm, like girls that do alot of acg / racg stance. You know what I'm talking about, when you squeeze them thighs you can feel the firmness from exercising. She got perky tits. Overall she's a 7 for looks and 7 for performance (generous 7).
In case you question my judgement, here's a list of girls I've seen in the past that I think is at least 7 and up (I'm sure I've left out a few due to too much alcohol lately):
Carrie, Moli, Chanel (current M), Flynn, Cona, Emma, Amora, Amanda (big tits), Shannon (really big tits), Kandy (with M under different namei think, up north now), Diana (m), Snow, Clara, Lily (m), Megan. All I can remember for now, back to drinking.