Massage Parlor Reports

My last Lily report mentioned how impressed I was with a certain provider. I mentioned her by name in the hope that my brothers on this forum would also enjoy her particular zest and zeal in providing for the comfort of her customers. In fact, many of you, via back channels, wrote in either agreement or appreciation of the report.

The point of this little post is that when I went back a few weeks later (after her "vacation" to New York should have long since been over), the Mamasan told me that "'S' doesn't work here any more."

I now find myself wondering if I (and this forum) may have had some part in this. If we openly name providers that give exceptional service, does reading such reports raise the waxed eyebrows of management? Should we alternatively simply write "Had a superior experience at __________ - PM me for details"?

Then again, "S" may have been assigned to another spa, found Mr. Goodbar, or simply escaped the trade. We'll never know. But it does make me wonder if we should be less explicit - particularly for the R+T establishments.

Thoughts?

Coincidence, perhaps, but unlikely. The turnover rates at these establishments is rapid. Girls simply come and go and sometimes pop up later on at the same or different locations. In theory, could your post have spooked management into fear of drawing unwanted attention from prying eyes? It is a possibility, however, this is not a new phenomena in the post-loophole closed playing field, this same type of loss of providers has been going on ever since I got in the game, long before the law was changed. In fact, I don't think I have ever seen the same provider more than once at any AMP that I've visited. In my opinion it's a just part of how these places operate.

Uncle Tug





[QUOTE=Chipsahoy]My last Lily report mentioned how impressed I was with a certain provider. I mentioned her by name in the hope that my brothers on this forum would also enjoy her particular zest and zeal in providing for the comfort of her customers. In fact, many of you, via back channels, wrote in either agreement or appreciation of the report.

The point of this little post is that when I went back a few weeks later (after her "vacation" to New York should have long since been over), the Mamasan told me that "'S' doesn't work here any more."

I now find myself wondering if I (and this forum) may have had some part in this. If we openly name providers that give exceptional service, does reading such reports raise the waxed eyebrows of management? Should we alternatively simply write "Had a superior experience at __________ - PM me for details"?

Then again, "S" may have been assigned to another spa, found Mr. Goodbar, or simply escaped the trade. We'll never know. But it does make me wonder if we should be less explicit - particularly for the R+T establishments.

Thoughts?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Tuglover1]Coincidence, perhaps, but unlikely. The turnover rates at these establishments is rapid. Girls simply come and go and sometimes pop up later on at the same or different locations. In theory, could your post have spooked management into fear of drawing unwanted attention from prying eyes? It is a possibility, however, this is not a new phenomena in the post-loophole closed playing field, this same type of loss of providers has been going on ever since I got in the game, long before the law was changed. In fact, I don't think I have ever seen the same provider more than once at any AMP that I've visited. In my opinion it's a just part of how these places operate.

Uncle Tug[/QUOTE]Only place I have seen with the longest regs' seems to be Pleasant.

I remember seeing Kate awhile at DT then she moved to CH when their original spot closed.

I liked her I wish she was still in town.

[QUOTE=Chipsahoy]My last Lily report mentioned how impressed I was with a certain provider. I mentioned her by name in the hope that my brothers on this forum would also enjoy her particular zest and zeal in providing for the comfort of her customers. In fact, many of you, via back channels, wrote in either agreement or appreciation of the report.

The point of this little post is that when I went back a few weeks later (after her "vacation" to New York should have long since been over), the Mamasan told me that "'S' doesn't work here any more. "

I now find myself wondering if I (and this forum) may have had some part in this. If we openly name providers that give exceptional service, does reading such reports raise the waxed eyebrows of management? Should we alternatively simply write "Had a superior experience at __________. PM me for details"?

Then again, "S" may have been assigned to another spa, found Mr. Goodbar, or simply escaped the trade. We'll never know. But it does make me wonder if we should be less explicit. Particularly for the R+T establishments.

Thoughts?[/QUOTE]I've had the same thoughts. In fact I've talked to providers about this and most have asked me not to mention their name. I know it makes the review a little less informative, but better that than getting someone fired. As you say "particularly for the R+T establishments".

[QUOTE=Tuglover1]Coincidence, perhaps, but unlikely. The turnover rates at these establishments is rapid. Girls simply come and go and sometimes pop up later on at the same or different locations. In theory, could your post have spooked management into fear of drawing unwanted attention from prying eyes? It is a possibility, however, this is not a new phenomena in the post-loophole closed playing field, this same type of loss of providers has been going on ever since I got in the game, long before the law was changed. In fact, I don't think I have ever seen the same provider more than once at any AMP that I've visited. In my opinion it's a just part of how these places operate.

Uncle Tug[/QUOTE]Turnover rate is rapid at most AMPs, but Lilly's tends to keep the girls a long time, almost too long sometimes. I know of one who told me she has been there almost 5 yrs. (much too long).

Only the A card or greencard holders stay for 2-3 months at a time. Those who don't have legal paperwork shuffle from amp to amp or stay in Asian only brothels for obvious reasons. If they get busted its only a fine and a court date. No papers it's most likely deportation. A decent amp girl can make 4-6+ K a week even if she's close to 50 :eek:. No wonder the risk is worth the reward to them. Back home in China or ? they would make $100-150 a month if they were lucky. The human trafficking hype is total BS. Big $$$$$$$ is the fuel of this Locomotive Engine.

The Casino is where the deposits go for most. ;) I've seen many amp girls blowing their FU money faster than they made it. This cycle continues forever just like the seasons.

Paid a visit to NMS and drew Jenny. Very quick shower. Massage started and she said "medium OK?". I like medium so I said yes. The next 45 minutes felt like torture. She pushed and poked wayyy too hard. I like experiencing different techniques so I went with it but I almost had to jump off the table a few times. I got the feeling she had a bad day and was taking it out on me. Amazingly strong hands for such a small gal. I should have asked her to take it easy, but I felt my manhood was being challenged. Finish was rushed. I would not like to repeat with Jenny, but I suppose it was a little funny. Play safe.

[QUOTE=Chipsahoy]My last Lily report mentioned how impressed I was with a certain provider. I mentioned her by name in the hope that my brothers on this forum would also enjoy her particular zest and zeal in providing for the comfort of her customers. In fact, many of you, via back channels, wrote in either agreement or appreciation of the report.

The point of this little post is that when I went back a few weeks later (after her "vacation" to New York should have long since been over), the Mamasan told me that "'S' doesn't work here any more."

I now find myself wondering if I (and this forum) may have had some part in this. If we openly name providers that give exceptional service, does reading such reports raise the waxed eyebrows of management? Should we alternatively simply write "Had a superior experience at __________ - PM me for details"?

Then again, "S" may have been assigned to another spa, found Mr. Goodbar, or simply escaped the trade. We'll never know. But it does make me wonder if we should be less explicit - particularly for the R+T establishments.

Thoughts?[/QUOTE]

Of all the amps in little old Rhody lilly is the one that seems to know waht is going on inside their own place. There has been much speculation as to how (video, audio, listening, reading the forums) but over the last few years it seems like whenever one of their girls is well liked and gets asked for a lot she seems to disappear. maybe it is as simple as when they see good reviews or one is asked for a lot they move them on figuring she is good and they can get more for her elsewhere or doing other things. What is certain hovever is that if they get wind that one of their gorls offers more than a HJ or lets anyone get any skin they are gone in a shot. Like I said..they seem to know and it appears to be more than a simple rotation issue.

The CL ad is below. The picture is probably too good to be true. I used tineye and nothing came up. (The picture for Super Busty Incall Massage -- a different ad then the one I'm asking about here -- does get some hits, and the phone number is suspect, so I'm not pursuing that.)

I don't really care about a fake or "optimistic" picture IF the masseuse is busty and gives a decent massage. Anyone have any experience? I'll probably risk it in the upcoming weeks, but would appreciate any warnings.

BUSTY BEAUTY - w4m (IN - PAWTUCKET)

Date: 2010-05-14, 12:18PM EDT
Reply to: [email]serv-xj5q4-1740605931@craigslist.org[/email] [Errors when replying to ads?]

Hi Gentlemen,
My name is **NATALIE**if you've had a stressful morning at work ,you are welcome to stop by for a quick massage on your lunch break .You can also come by whenever you feel the need to be pampered, massaged or you just need some time and company.You must be curious about my face which is very pretty.Sorry,I can't show it because of friends and family.I will give you a quick desciption.I have long dark curly hair,that I sometimes wear strait.I stand 5'4",145LBS,&a curvey 38DD-32-38.If you'd like call
************************************4*0*1*3*4*7*8*8*6*5**************************************************************
****************************************NATALIE********************************************************************

Made another trip to Lilly's today. First off, just to set the record straight last week someone here heard a rumor that Lilly's was offering FS. Absolutely not. Nothing has changed from last week, last month, nor last year. Lilly's is the same wonderful place it has always been and more than likely will stay that way.

I called in the morning and made an appointment with my fav at Lilly's. Was met at the door by mamason who brought me to the room and collected the house fee of $60. Started to undress and before I was done in came the massuse, Very beautiful and friendly always with a big smile. Off to the TS, I wish I could spend the whole hour there with her. A little teasing there and then to the sauna for a couple of min. Back to the room for the massage. She has the softest hands I've ever felt. More teasing, so much so as I had to stop her before it was too late. Finished up 10 min. early so I had a face massage. Always get the full hour there, never a problem, never talk about money.

Who was your provider at Lilly's.

Just a quick questions about Lily's, there have been great reviews and I will give it a try. I've heard of a couple of places where the girl's stay clothed. is this true about Lily's.

Thanks

Girls never take off anything at Lily's house rules and strictly enforced.

Jack

Thanks for the response about Lily's. If I am looking for just a R+T, (especially after all the talk about STD"S lately), but want the girl to take off her clothes, where should I be looking? I read back in the forum and not all the reports tell if the girl is naked, topless or dressed.

Thanks in advance for the input.

You received a straight answer to your Lily's question from a respected SM (but only have 4 posts with 3 of them questions) .

The info you seek is in the forum - its time to take a look. I will say that what you seek will vary depending on the establishment and will require a nicer gift depending on level of visibility. And, except for Lily's, just ask. All they might do is say no depending on where you go...


[QUOTE=Solobob3552]Thanks for the response about Lily's. If I am looking for just a R+T, (especially after all the talk about STD"S lately), but want the girl to take off her clothes, where should I be looking? I read back in the forum and not all the reports tell if the girl is naked, topless or dressed.

Thanks in advance for the input.[/QUOTE]