KAngels Discussion

[QUOTE=Twister100;5691251]Just looks older or she's also gained 5 years worth of weight?[/QUOTE]I think the pictures are pretty close to her body habitus. I wouldn't describe her as skinny nor would I say she is chubby.

[QUOTE=SeattleDoctor;5692244]I think the pictures are pretty close to her body habitus. I wouldn't describe her as skinny nor would I say she is chubby.[/QUOTE]I saw her last night. I'd say the pics are accurate but touched up like you would expect. I always look at the description. 5&#824X;, 32 B-24-34,105 lbs All are accurate. I'd put her at mid 30's with the body type that's just a bit past skinny and toned but still petite and in ok shape. She makes up for any potential lack in being a tight bodied 20 year old in pure enthusiasm. She was actually into the session and was trying to drain me dry. She got 2 and wanted a 3rd which is practically unheard of. DFK throughout the whole session.

Saw Erica she's great opened door wearing black pantys and bra. Little dfk then off to shower she joined little play more dfk she tiny nice body and petite. After shower off to bedroom we embraced and kissed more then I layed her on side of the bed and had daty and dato I was rock hard so slide right in BBFS finished 1st round cip. We did more dfk sucking on her nipples and more 69. Finally mounted her with legs spread pounded till 2nd pop cute how she looked down watching my dick pound away. Off to shower to clean up her tiny body had me hard again lifted her onto bathroom sink counter and finished with last pounding. She's a lot of fun definitely better than the old granny's up in Lynnwood.

Thinking of seeing her. Anyone has details? Age, height, bust, etc.

I missed my chance to see Cherry so I wanted to see Coco again but she was booked until late yesterday. Erica was available so I decided to give her a go. She's definitely on the older side, maybe late 30's. Great body though, not scrawny and nowhere near plump. Just right. I would say the photo are her with the typical Asian styled filters on them. She didn't ask me to shower and I didn't feel the need to as I just did before coming over. Lots of kissing. She likes to use her tongue. She helped me undress and dropped down for BBBJ and good DT. I then put her on the edge of the bed to reciprocate. After she squeezed my head with her thighs a couple of times, I came up and went for standing mish until CIP. After a quick cleaning, she massages the area around my groin which felt good and then initiated round 2 with more DT. Hoped on for CG and swapped to multiple different positions. The 2nd shot wasn't coming as easily but she was determined and didn't complain or stop me as I kept going at it. We got hot and sweaty during round 2. She didn't shy away from P2 M to help keep me up. We used the whole time for activities. After a quick shower as we both needed it.

A couple things to note: I don't know if they normally share the same apartment unit but Erica was in the same unit as Coco as she was with another monger in the other room, so paths may cross. I was able to hear one person leave after seeing Coco and another come in not too long after. They may have also heard Erica and myself. Also Erica had this crazed look when we were doing mish where she would stick her tongue out and move it about and stare right into my eyes. It was a little bit distracting.

[QUOTE=JTung;5693862]Thinking of seeing her. Anyone has details? Age, height, bust, etc.[/QUOTE]Saw her today. She is hot, slim body, nice proportionate ass and bolt ons. She gave an amazing deep throat BBBJ and her kitty is tight as fuck. She is A+ performer, and finished me off with CIM.

Unfortunately she is leaving tomorrow for Orange County. Hope you saw her.

Can anyone comment on whether photos accurately portray her body? Breasts, ass, slimness. And how would you rate face /10 (7 being meh and 10 being perfect)?

Has anyone had a chance to see Heidi or Audrey at GSL?

[QUOTE=Rok122;5698947]Has anyone had a chance to see Heidi or Audrey at GSL?[/QUOTE]They use real pictures, moderately photoshopped. Their new PO is kind, bright, and professional. Audrey and Heidi are top of the class; they are unique, extremely sexy, pretty, passionate, competitive to Connie (GSL), Chloe (Lolipop), and Suzie (GSL).

[QUOTE=JasonShinamoto;5699970]They use real pictures, moderately photoshopped. Their new PO is kind, bright, and professional. Audrey and Heidi are top of the class; they are unique, extremely sexy, pretty, passionate, competitive to Connie (GSL), Chloe (Lolipop), and Suzie (GSL).[/QUOTE]Do the GSL providers offer BBFS? Thanks.

[QUOTE=BirdWatching;5700229]Do the GSL providers offer BBFS? Thanks.[/QUOTE]Go on their website, and right below each photo (Where you will guarantee look at at least once), will say "BBFS available" or "CFS only".

[QUOTE=BirdWatching;5700229]Do the GSL providers offer BBFS? Thanks.[/QUOTE]It's mentioned on the website "BBFS Available".

[QUOTE=JasonShinamoto;5699970]They use real pictures, moderately photoshopped. Their new PO is kind, bright, and professional. Audrey and Heidi are top of the class; they are unique, extremely sexy, pretty, passionate, competitive to Connie (GSL), Chloe (Lolipop), and Suzie (GSL).[/QUOTE]Thank you for confirming Audrey and Heidi's quality, Jason. I'm also a big fan of GSL and Lolipop and their PO.

JTung, Hopefully you got a chance to see Jia before she left. This is Jia's second visit to Seattle. You can find stellar reviews of her on TER. She legend status in Southern California as Ace / Diva / Amora, the Bay Area as Vixen, and Vegas as Ada. Don't let the name changes fool you or think she's hiding bad reviews. Her name has changed many times, but you'll find the reviews to be consistently good.

[QUOTE=JasonShinamoto;5699970]They use real pictures, moderately photoshopped. Their new PO is kind, bright, and professional. Audrey and Heidi are top of the class; they are unique, extremely sexy, pretty, passionate, competitive to Connie (GSL), Chloe (Lolipop), and Suzie (GSL).[/QUOTE]I've only seen Coco at Kangels. How would you compare Audrey and Heidi to Coco on: face, spinner / slimness, age and ass?

[QUOTE=Rok122;5698505]Can anyone comment on whether photos accurately portray her body? Breasts, ass, slimness. And how would you rate face /10 (7 being meh and 10 being perfect)?[/QUOTE]It's amazing how much information can be found by using the search box (or advanced search area). Coco has been mentioned several times. Please learn to use search first. Will help you in the long run. Short answer, she's good.

[QUOTE=BirdWatching;5700229]Do the GSL providers offer BBFS? Thanks.[/QUOTE]All the genuine Kgirls from S. Korea are independents, and I love them for their strong expressive individualism.

Had seen two girls. Both BBFS. I don't remember the name of the first girl but she was great. The pictures are not 100% accurate but close enough. Had a good time.

Second time was with Audrey. I see why she's in high demand. She was more energetic and definitely help me get more into it for sure. I'd definitely wait for her to come back again.

Pretty sure I got the full hour I paid for. I'm also willing to see other girls too. I don't think you'll regret it.

[QUOTE=PurpleMist;5703129]Had seen two girls. Both BBFS. I don't remember the name of the first girl but she was great. The pictures are not 100% accurate but close enough. Had a good time.

Second time was with Audrey. I see why she's in high demand. She was more energetic and definitely help me get more into it for sure. I'd definitely wait for her to come back again.

Pretty sure I got the full hour I paid for. I'm also willing to see other girls too. I don't think you'll regret it.[/QUOTE]It says on their website that Audrey is CFS only. Did you really get BBFS?

Can one of why'all give me the link for GSL's website? I've gone back about 10 pages and have also tried using the search function both with no luck. PM is fine if that's preferred.

[QUOTE=Ultimate90;5703516]It says on their website that Audrey is CFS only. Did you really get BBFS?[/QUOTE]Audrey is CFS only. But, I have seen other CFS only Kgirls suddenly open to BBFS. The problem is, if she's BBFS now, she must immediately delete 'CFS Only' from her ads, so CFS-only-lovers can concentrate on the other CFS-only-girl. However, the ghost of Sam the Angel is still wandering around in the Bellevue area, triggering confusions and troubles.

[QUOTE=Rok122;5700607]I've only seen Coco at Kangels. How would you compare Audrey and Heidi to Coco on: face, spinner / slimness, age and ass?[/QUOTE]They are better.

[QUOTE=StarMan237;5703701]Can one of why'all give me the link for GSL's website?.[/QUOTE]GSL = GANGNAM STYLE LADIES.

Link is [URL]https://bellevueservices.net/[/URL].

HTH.

[QUOTE=CoolStud;5704480]GSL = GANGNAM STYLE LADIES.

Link is [URL]https://bellevueservices.net/[/URL].

HTH.[/QUOTE]

Not really. They're on hiatus until the 17th.

lolipopgirls.net and kangels.ch are the other two agencies available.

Saw erica today. Very friendly lady. Likes to use her tongue a lot. She is very tight down there. Last day to see her is today. She has no clue when she will be back.

She shares apartment with the other k girl. Anyone seen Tera?

Not unsurprising, the pics are not her but the stats are accurate. 5'4", 34 B, slim, fit, great body, pretty face. Late 20's or early 30's. Good English since she's been in LA for about 7 years. Blue toast, shower preview, DFK, rimming, MSOG, decent massage. Only negative was she requested CIM or COB instead of CIP. YMMV with DFK if you're a smoker as she mentioned she didn't like kissing smokers. Here for about another week.

[QUOTE=Twister100;5706634]Not unsurprising, the pics are not her but the stats are accurate. 5'4", 34 B, slim, fit, great body, pretty face. Late 20's or early 30's. Good English since she's been in LA for about 7 years. Blue toast, shower preview, DFK, rimming, MSOG, decent massage. Only negative was she requested CIM or COB instead of CIP. YMMV with DFK if you're a smoker as she mentioned she didn't like kissing smokers. Here for about another week.[/QUOTE]Sounds good. Thanks for the review.

As for no CIP, I guess technically that is still in line with her allowing BBFS (and thus the extra $100). CIP is, of course, better, but CIM at the end would still be OK.

[QUOTE=BobSizemore53;5704550]Not really. They're on hiatus until the 17th.

lolipopgirls.net and kangels.ch are the other two agencies available.[/QUOTE]Yes they are re branding new name and image concept is what I have heard. Excited to see what it is!

Anyone seen these new ones with KAngels?

I feel like they have reused Lexy's photos alot before. But not Chanels.

They are probably fake photos but if Chanel is another Coco that would be nice.

[QUOTE=WalterWhite99;5706809]Sounds good. Thanks for the review.

As for no CIP, I guess technically that is still in line with her allowing BBFS (and thus the extra $100). CIP is, of course, better, but CIM at the end would still be OK.[/QUOTE]I saw Tera yesterday. She wasn't the girl on the pics, but still smoking hot tiny all natural spinner. She was not the friendliest, and was unable to accommodate the size of my equipment. Had cim instead. Then she rushed me out because she had another appointment scheduled right after mine. I wouldn't recommend unless you are smaller. She was incredibly hot though.

(And welcome everyone. This is my first post here).

[QUOTE=Ultimate90;5703516]It says on their website that Audrey is CFS only. Did you really get BBFS?[/QUOTE]Okay, now you making me doubt. But I'm pretty sure it was her. You text that number on their website and whoever is handling the whole thing will give you a list of available girls and their services offered.

And I paid extra $ for the BBFS with Audrey. She seems to be gone now, don't see her on the website.

[QUOTE=PurpleMist;5712751]Okay, now you making me doubt. But I'm pretty sure it was her. You text that number on their website and whoever is handling the whole thing will give you a list of available girls and their services offered.

And I paid extra $ for the BBFS with Audrey. She seems to be gone now, don't see her on the website.[/QUOTE]There was an Audrey at Kangels and one at Lolipop. You might be thinking of the Audrey at Kangels.

Saw Chanel at Kangels. Not the woman in the photo, but she's pretty and petite (the measurements were right). First time at kangels, so everything I'm comparing to is what I've heard about Coco. Overall, it was nice. Decent BBBJ, and her pussy was tight and I blew twice. We talked in between and I would have liked more interaction. She's a sweet enough girl but she doesn't have the passion people claim Coco has. I'll be seeing her next.

[QUOTE=PurpleMist;5712751]Okay, now you making me doubt. But I'm pretty sure it was her. You text that number on their website and whoever is handling the whole thing will give you a list of available girls and their services offered.

And I paid extra $ for the BBFS with Audrey. She seems to be gone now, don't see her on the website.[/QUOTE]You just confirmed that your Audrey isn't the Audrey at lolipop.

I am pretty new, started last month. I mainly see the Kangels girls (Coco, Summer, Audrey, Erica).

I've noticed this site really likes their Photoshop and a lot of the time I show up and the girl is nothing like the pictures. The only ones I have seen that look the same or better than their pictures are CoCo and SerryDD.

It might be because I am younger but a lot of you folks seem to think girls like Audrey and Summer are babin. What's the deal?

[QUOTE=BackDoordRiver;5713306]Saw Chanel at Kangels. Not the woman in the photo, but she's pretty and petite (the measurements were right). First time at kangels, so everything I'm comparing to is what I've heard about Coco. Overall, it was nice. Decent BBBJ, and her pussy was tight and I blew twice. We talked in between and I would have liked more interaction. She's a sweet enough girl but she doesn't have the passion people claim Coco has. I'll be seeing her next.[/QUOTE]Chanel was previously here as Hi back around October 2021. I'd say mid to late 30's. Petite thin body with natural C cups. Agree she has a tight box and is nice enough but I didn't find her face attractive and she lacked the enthusiasm of Coco and Tera.

[QUOTE=PinkScott;5714023]I am pretty new, started last month. I mainly see the Kangels girls (Coco, Summer, Audrey, Erica).

I've noticed this site really likes their Photoshop and a lot of the time I show up and the girl is nothing like the pictures. The only ones I have seen that look the same or better than their pictures are CoCo and SerryDD.

It might be because I am younger but a lot of you folks seem to think girls like Audrey and Summer are babin. What's the deal?[/QUOTE]Lexi had a review that she wasn't really into it or it was a bad experience. That was on TER, but YMMV.

[QUOTE=PinkScott;5714023]I am pretty new, started last month. I mainly see the Kangels girls (Coco, Summer, Audrey, Erica).

I've noticed this site really likes their Photoshop and a lot of the time I show up and the girl is nothing like the pictures. The only ones I have seen that look the same or better than their pictures are CoCo and SerryDD.

It might be because I am younger but a lot of you folks seem to think girls like Audrey and Summer are babin. What's the deal?[/QUOTE]Lexy's body is accurate. The face has P.S. But is close enough. She's also well reviewed.

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=355105[/URL]

The GSL and Lolipop girls generally look like their photos apart from any P.S. On their face.

Saw Tera this week and honestly I was not impressed. I personally feel that Tera's FBSA are all lower than Coco's.

Have any of you guys saw both Chanel and Coco before? Could you make a FBSA comparison? Or Chanel vs Tera?

[QUOTE=LeoLiang;5719271]Saw Tera this week and honestly I was not impressed. I personally feel that Tera's FBSA are all lower than Coco's.

Have any of you guys saw both Chanel and Coco before? Could you make a FBSA comparison? Or Chanel vs Tera?[/QUOTE]What the heck is "FBSA"?

Anyone know when Coco is coming back?