KAngels Discussion

[QUOTE=Twister100;5180285]Looks like Diana is back and I recall someone said Diana = Ivy.[/QUOTE]Saw Diana for the basic last time she was here. Felt the service was average at best, but not the worst I've had there. Nothing spectacular and wasn't the worst I've had there. Only person there that told me second round isn't included but let me anyways. Maybe she was having an off day and was tired. Saw Misty when she was still here and I thought she was much better with the exception of no kissing. I wanted to see her again before she left. She was cute. She seemed to have an upbeat personality and made me believe she enjoyed my company. With that said, I know Wong Hing rated her little on the low side, so perhaps YMMV. Have to say my ATF was Rose. Have a feeling she's not coming back to our area though.

[QUOTE=RexHughes;5180164]From back channels: One who saw Tiana, thinks Jina (who just got posted yesterday) is a re brand of Tiana.

He saw Angel = Jo, and thinks Lumi is her.

He saw Tiana, and said "she has a very distinct face," and that Jina looks like Tiana.

He basically thinks more than a few of these girls are remaining in Seattle, getting re branded with new names and new pictures.

I personally, if pictures matched, would go for Melody. There is something sexy about her pictures.[/QUOTE]I've met Tiana twice and Jina's pics look nothing like her. But that doesn't mean the girl behind the door isn't Tiana. Hopefully someone can confirm soon.

Melody's pics are real. That's her. Dolled up a bit, but the closeup of her face is the closest match.

[QUOTE=RexHughes;5180300]Some of these KAngels got decent reviews or feedback.

Why the need to rebrand them?

Is it because of the guys thinking "There is always excitement about seeing somebody 'new?

So, you book Angel and Suzy, then later book Jo and Melody "thinking" ahead of time that you're seeing a totally brand new girl?[/QUOTE]I don't get it either. The name game bullshit is actually making me see them less rather than more.

[QUOTE=Orgain;5180645]Saw Diana for the basic last time she was here. Felt the service was average at best, but not the worst I've had there. Nothing spectacular and wasn't the worst I've had there. Only person there that told me second round isn't included but let me anyways. Maybe she was having an off day and was tired. Saw Misty when she was still here and I thought she was much better with the exception of no kissing. I wanted to see her again before she left. She was cute. She seemed to have an upbeat personality and made me believe she enjoyed my company. With that said, I know Wong Hing rated her little on the low side, so perhaps YMMV. Have to say my ATF was Rose. Have a feeling she's not coming back to our area though.[/QUOTE]When I saw Misty the second time, we had a nice DFK session between pops. The last time I talked to her, she said she was moving back to her motherland and won't be coming back to the states.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5180994]I don't get it either. The name game bullshit is actually making me see them less rather than more.[/QUOTE]Exactly! And their rates are still ridiculous! Wonder if and when that place in Tacoma might re-open, with more reasonable rates?

And to add, my experience with Diana this time was also average probably for the same reasons mentioned by others.

[QUOTE=FrontierMan;5180432]Diana is not Ivy. I've seen them both before and saw Diana again today.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Ashun;5181170]When I saw Misty the second time, we had a nice DFK session between pops. The last time I talked to her, she said she was moving back to her motherland and won't be coming back to the states.[/QUOTE]Wish I had the time to see her a second time! I tried, but my schedule didn't work out. She mentioned to me she was going back for good as well.

I only feel like one time I got someone else that wasn't who I asked for, was my first time there. Think the person I got was actually Cindy (if I remember correctly). Was my least positive experience out of all the ones I've seen. Probably the only person that from the very beginning, I felt like she was just going through the motions and taking her time because she was done. Might as well been sighing during the entire session. Glad I decided to go back again to try again with another. Had plenty of positive experiences since then, but how positive it was obviously varied. Don't know if skipping the +100 option disappoints some of them sometimes.

Are there any current or recent KAngels who specifically don't offer BBFS PSE, even for a 100 tip?

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5167412]I'll update this later when not on mobile. I'm writing this from my car sitting outside Nina's apt complex.

I respect WH's opinions on the Kangels, but I disagree with him on Nina. Well, not completely I agree that her face and body rank very low among the kurrent k-krop. But her service and attitude were terrible. A tie for the worst K-girl visit I've had. Felt like a visit to a $160/ hh Chinese shop. She didn't smile a single time. It's as if seconds before she opened the door someone told her that her dog died. I left after 40 minutes which included pre- and post-showers. It gets worse and I'll update later today, but if you had plans to see her today. I'd pick someone else or some other day.

I'm pissed. I'm actually wondering if I got sub-par service because I don't spring for the +100 PSE option.

Oh well. At least my worst session ever is no longer alone. I now have two.[/QUOTE]Who was the worst?

Did ya'll go through the photo verification thingy? I am hesitant to do this as I have no clue what they will do with the photos, service sounds great but the risk is concerning.

[QUOTE=RexHughes;5181675]Are there any current or recent KAngels who specifically don't offer BBFS PSE, even for a 100 tip?[/QUOTE]Short answer: All the providers on the website today are PSE.

Long answer: When you click on the provider's photo to read their dedicated page, the first paragraph states they are either "GFE" or "PSE / GFE. " Personally I gravitate toward the GFE-only girls but for the +100 guys that's how you can tell.

[QUOTE=RexHughes;5181946]Who was the worst?[/QUOTE]It was with a K-girl that had been a former superstar called Brigitte. I'd seen her in Seattle and Portland a few times and then she disappeared after the big Bellevue bust. I saw her about a year later on the east coast during a work trip and in my naive excitement I booked her for two hours. Total mistake. She had gained a lot of weight and lost a lot of fire. There was no fantasy element. She complained the entire time. I wanted at least two pops but after the first she simply lost interest and just wanted to chat. If she ever pops up back here again I'll pipe up.

[QUOTE=FrontierMan;5181368]And to add, my experience with Diana this time was also average probably for the same reasons mentioned by others.[/QUOTE]Was the reason that you didn't go for the +100 option? I never do and lately have been starting to suspect that not paying the extra results in an experience not worth the basic rate.

They're the only k-girl game in town that has the +100 option and the girls are getting more out of that so if you don't do the extra, you get less service these days unless you are a real regular and the booker warns them ahead of time. Other than my initial B&S incident, I've always had good experience with KAngels whether I opt for +100 or not. I've even had PSE without paying the extra too. It really depends on the girl. Also as far as matching names to girls, don't bother. They keep a separate list for each visitor so your Ivy!= Diana and others having Ivy=Diana experience differs. Phone number switching usually end up with different names for the same girl. I learnt that from the girls themselves.

If you want relatively consistent good service without the +100, go GSL.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5182522]Was the reason that you didn't go for the +100 option? I never do and lately have been starting to suspect that not paying the extra results in an experience not worth the basic rate.[/QUOTE]With all the negative reports, seems like KAngels is definitely going downhill, and certainly not worth the $$. In actuality, they have always been way too expensive.

I hate how the agencies play musical chairs with the girls and their names. Hopefully this forum will help sift through as much BS as possible. For example: check the photos for Diana at Kangels:

[URL]https://kangels.ch/korean-companions-seattle/diana/[/URL]

Check the one where she's wearing the red swimsuit with the large hoop earings. Look familiar? That's the photo used for Brooke on the front page at LunaModels in Tacoma (continually "on vacation" these days):

[URL]https://www.lunamodels.ch/models[/URL]

That photo isn't Brooke (I've met Brooke) and I doubt it's Diana. Tho I think I remember that same photo set being used recently at Kangels for "Foxxy. " I saw Foxxy and wasn't impressed.

New girl Nana used the same name in LA:

[URL]http://www.kgirlclub.com/gallery/143[/URL]

And used to be "Nara" at BunnyClub. The search result on her photo still works but the page at BunnyClub is dead ([URL]https://bunnygirlsclub.com/bunny-nara/[/URL]).

Nina: Looks nothing like photos. I met her recently and my opinion is that she is too old, too much body fat, negative attitude, and terrible service. I suspect the only reason she still gets clients is that some guys will look past her weaknesses just to get BBFS.

Diana: Re-using Foxy photos, but no clue whether it's the same girl. I met Foxy and don't remember much, which tells me I wouldn't recommend or repeat.

Ellie: I have zero good intel.

Lumi: I have not met Lumi, but reviews for her are all over the map. From "allows facial" (not sure I believe that) to "meh. ".

Jina: I have no intel on her either, but I doubt previous comments that she is Tiana. I've seen Tiana a few times and the booker knows I like her. So when I asked if Jina was Tiana, it would be in his best interest to tell me (and he often tells me who the double-named girls are). He said she is not the same girl.

Nana: I have zero good intel.

Booker says that all the above girls are unique and haven't used previous names here. I believe him that there are actually six girls currently working here (I believe they have 3 apartments) but I'm not yet convinced that none are re-cycled names.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5182846]Nina: Looks nothing like photos. I met her recently and my opinion is that she is too old, too much body fat, negative attitude, and terrible service. I suspect the only reason she still gets clients is that some guys will look past her weaknesses just to get BBFS.

Diana: Re-using Foxy photos, but no clue whether it's the same girl. I met Foxy and don't remember much, which tells me I wouldn't recommend or repeat.

Ellie: I have zero good intel.

Lumi: I have not met Lumi, but reviews for her are all over the map. From "allows facial" (not sure I believe that) to "meh. ".

Jina: I have no intel on her either, but I doubt previous comments that she is Tiana. I've seen Tiana a few times and the booker knows I like her. So when I asked if Jina was Tiana, it would be in his best interest to tell me (and he often tells me who the double-named girls are). He said she is not the same girl.

Nana: I have zero good intel.

Booker says that all the above girls are unique and haven't used previous names here. I believe him that there are actually six girls currently working here (I believe they have 3 apartments) but I'm not yet convinced that none are re-cycled names.[/QUOTE]Looks like Nina is gone and has been replaced with Micky and Lumi is available for duals with Nana. Curious if anyone has ever done duals with KAngels.

Nina used to be Superstar Christin.

Ellie used to be Lyla.

Saw them 10 years ago. Both still look sexy, but look 10 years older.

[QUOTE=Twister100;5183163]Looks like Nina is gone and has been replaced with Micky and Lumi is available for duals with Nana. Curious if anyone has ever done duals with KAngels.[/QUOTE]Micky used to go by Hannah on Kangels back in 2019. At least those pictures were used for "Hannah". If it's the same girl, Hannah gave a nice DFK, BBBJ, BLS & 69 session but didn't provide PSE at the time.

[URL]https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/grand-o-pening-young-hot-hannah-is-hot-for-u-visit-www-kangels-ch-206-450-7789/20262647[/URL]

As for Duos, I asked and the rates seems extremely high. $7 for both girls. $9 for both girls and they interact with each other. $10 for bb with both.

[QUOTE=Twister100;5183163]Looks like Nina is gone and has been replaced with Micky and Lumi is available for duals with Nana. Curious if anyone has ever done duals with KAngels.[/QUOTE]I haven't done a duo with Kangels, but I've done two Korean duos and one Thai duo. The K-girls were back in the $300/ hr Bellevue days so it was $600 for both girls for the hour. But I'd seen all four K-girls individually before the duos so I knew they were all attractive to me. The Koreans never interacted beyond touching each other, and FS was covered in both cases, but when I close my eyes and think of the hottest sex of my life, both Korean dates are always near the top. Looking down at two sets of Korean eyes locked onto mine -- one girl with my balls in her mouth while the other deep throats me, then switching, then switching again, until I came so hard in one of their mouths I almost passed out. I've got goosebumps thinking about it years later.

The Thai duo was meh. It was one teaching the other how to do a FS body rub session. Ended up just basically fucking the experienced one while the new one watched.

So if you can assure yourself a good one, it might be worth the coin just to have that memory.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5182846]
Diana: Re-using Foxy photos, but no clue whether it's the same girl. I met Foxy and don't remember much, which tells me I wouldn't recommend or repeat.
[/QUOTE]I texted the original "Foxy" to check in and she's still in LA. Probably a different girl, just agency recycling of lineup aliases. Foxy and I had an after-hours FWB after our first appointment and she would totally hit me up for breakfast if she was in town.

[QUOTE=RexHughes;5180268]My back road source just reported, that Nana's body is a match to that of "since departed" Nikki.

Let's keep working together, helping each other out, an' putting these puzzle pieces together![/QUOTE]It's not Nikki, it's someone else.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5186652]I haven't done a duo with Kangels, but I've done two Korean duos and one Thai duo. The K-girls were back in the $300/ hr Bellevue days so it was $600 for both girls for the hour. But I'd seen all four K-girls individually before the duos so I knew they were all attractive to me. The Koreans never interacted beyond touching each other, and FS was covered in both cases, but when I close my eyes and think of the hottest sex of my life, both Korean dates are always near the top. Looking down at two sets of Korean eyes locked onto mine -- one girl with my balls in her mouth while the other deep throats me, then switching, then switching again, until I came so hard in one of their mouths I almost passed out. I've got goosebumps thinking about it years later.

The Thai duo was meh. It was one teaching the other how to do a FS body rub session. Ended up just basically fucking the experienced one while the new one watched.

So if you can assure yourself a good one, it might be worth the coin just to have that memory.[/QUOTE]Nice, sounds like you got the duo at the right time.

[QUOTE=DrtyHarry;5180327]Thanks Ashun. Weird. He definitely promoted that agency pretty aggressively. Either way. Hopefully he will be back soon. He provided good intel. But I never met any of them so not sure if the intel was legit. Either way. I wish him the best wherever he is and hope he returns.[/QUOTE]I have my doubts. At times it sounded like he was working for that group. On the LV forum they had issues with agencies writing fake reviews.

I'd love to also share info here on the plentiful (but unfortunately aging) Thai massage ladies that seem to converge in Renton and Bellevue / Redmond areas.

I've just read another report on TER of a Kangel where the reviewer said COF finish.

Would love to hear any first-hand intel here of girls who offer this, and whether or not it required the +PSE donation.

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5186679]It's not Nikki, it's someone else.[/QUOTE]I heard Nikki is very nice and gives great service, but that she is frankly, old.

[QUOTE=RexHughes;5187842]I heard Nikki is very nice and gives great service, but that she is frankly, old.[/QUOTE]You aren't wrong. I heard from someone that her service is good.

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5188268]You aren't wrong. I heard from someone that her service is good.[/QUOTE]But, where do we each draw the line? If her service is great, but she looks like she's pushing 50, literally, then what?

I would see Jasmin of KAngels, if she resembled the pictures and did PSE.

Something looks sexy about her face.

Anyone seen Thai Ruby? If I google her phone (425-531-2655) I get:

[URL]https://seattle.rubratings.com/124451[/URL] and [URL]https://sites.google.com/site/ruby110th/[/URL].

The RR reviews look great, but I'm not sure whether HJ is the only finish available.

[QUOTE=RexHughes;5188361]I would see Jasmin of KAngels, if she resembled the pictures and did PSE.

Something looks sexy about her face.[/QUOTE]But she does do PSE.

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5188619]Anyone seen Thai Ruby? If I google her phone (425-531-2655) I get:

[URL]https://seattle.rubratings.com/124451[/URL] and [URL]https://sites.google.com/site/ruby110th/[/URL].

The RR reviews look great, but I'm not sure whether HJ is the only finish available.[/QUOTE]Have not seen her, but she looks good. And as long as she provides a truly sensual massage, the $120 an hour rate is definitely reasonable. Note, though, the statement near the bottom of that link you provided:

"I Do Not Provide Any Escort Services, Please Do Not Ask or Request. ".

So, thinking that HE / HJ would be the only extra provided. Not sure, though, if more would become available with subsequent visits.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?255165-Ruby-Body-Rub[/URL]

Roughly 5 years ago, my experience was very nice gentle massage but not very erotic HE. No hint of more on offer.

[URL]https://seattle.rubratings.com/125478[/URL]

I visit Rose about every 4-6 months. If you visit the Thai AMP providers too often, they get complacent and demanding (ask for food, drinks, rides, etc.) But if you visit them with enough gap in between visits, they bring that "first visit" energy again to try and make you repeat. I don't even know if it's conscious for them, but I've observed it time and time again with these fine ladies.

It's important to know exactly what you're getting with Rose. First, those pics are accurate and current. If you like them short (5' 0") flat tummy, fit, and perfectly curvy in ONLY the right spots, I'd argue that Rose has the best body of any of the current Thai ladies (second place goes to JannyLove). Her face is cute, but I suspect she could easily be "hot" if she wore makeup. Her body looks 24, her face looks 34, and her real age is 44.

She will open the side door at her apt complex to let you in. She will be wearing a bathrobe and flip flops with her hair up. Don't be disappointed. You will be blown away when she takes off the robe. Her "energy" is semi-transactional -- not as bad as some, but she's also not gushing over you and making you the center of the universe like Thai Lisa, for example. $200 is the B2 B rub and $260 is rub plus CBJ and CFS. If BBBJ is available, I don't visit her often enough to unlock it.

Solo shower to start then she starts with you face-down for a decent rub. I see some reviews on RR complain that its just "walking on your back. " That has been how she starts with me (and I like it), but she then moves on to hands and elbows to really get in there. It's definitely top third of the current Thai ladies. She then moves on to a body-rub where she drags her perfect tits across your back, then gets you to lift up your groin so she can reach under and do a reverse HJ. On the flip, she did something this time I'd never experienced: with one hand she strongly massaged my shaft and boys while she bent my leg and gave a strong thigh and inner-thigh massage with the other. Then she throws in a little Russian before getting the cover, applying it with her mouth, and giving a CBJ. It's not slow or sensual, but she does go all the way down while assertively playing with the boys. That seems to be her "trick" -- always doing two things at once. Unfortunately, at this point she will say "you fuck me" because I don't think she likes to be on top. She is open to pretty much any positions, but if you switch her around too much and she senses that you're prolonging the finish too much she will complain. She CAN take it VERY hard if that's your thing, tho. On the scale of loose - normal - snug - tight I'd call her box "snug." Neatly trimmed landing strip. Her doggie is great because her waist is tiny and her ass perfect. But aggressive mish is also great because her tits bounce around a lot and she likes to squeeze them together for you which I always find hot. After getting close like this she gladly stroked me off onto her massive tits while paying lots of attention to the boys.

While you take your solo post-shower, if she likes you she'll serve up some of whatever she was cooking (I hope you like it spicy) and she might ask you for a ride to the nearby bank at Factoria Mall. I get the sense maybe she was robbed once, because she mentioned being scared of that a couple of times.

She's a good solid visit with a decent massage, cute face, and perfect tits, waist, ass, and box. She doesn't advertise on TNA, and she's not close friends with the other Bellevue Thai ladies who do. So they're not helping her get set up there. I'm not helping either because I don't want to become the Thai tech support guy.

If she had a "sweeter" more GFE personality and BBBJ, I'd see her monthly. But holding that tiny waist in doggie is worth seeing her just once and I plan on keeping her in my quarterly-ish rotation.

[QUOTE=RexHughes;5188361]I would see Jasmin of KAngels, if she resembled the pictures and did PSE.

Something looks sexy about her face.[/QUOTE]I agree, anyone toftt?

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5190645]I agree, anyone toftt?[/QUOTE]I've stopped TOFTT with Kangels... at least until I see an uptick in their provider quality. They've wasted more of my money than any other group. The B&S with second-tier aged-out providers happens way too often.

Also, I referred to Rose below as an AMP lady. She's an AAMP lady.

Looks like Jina has a couple reviews on TER. I let my premium lapse, can anyone tell us what they say?

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jina-2064507789-356549[/URL]

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5191812]Looks like Jina has a couple reviews on TER. I let my premium lapse, can anyone tell us what they say?

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/jina-2064507789-356549[/URL][/QUOTE]That site is so full of fake reviews it's not even funny. The fact that they require a website link to providers and don't allow linking to other "review sites" limits the providers that can be reviewed. So I see lots of repeat reviews to just get VIP.