Most Dangerous Sex Positions??
What do these scientists have to say??
[URL]https://thoughtcatalog.com/amanda-chatel/2015/02/science-says-this-is-the-worst-and-most-dangerous-sex-position-for-your-genitalia/[/URL]
Stop thinking your privacy is protected
By being on this site, you're more apt to get busted by your ITP address easily searchable by law enforcement taking down web sites (hello Eros 2017-2018) which are registered on each one of these types of reviews web sites thAn by any personal information you'd ever give a provider. Do you really believe she's looking to " bust you" via your private info versus making money off of you? Why would any provider try to screw her own business or reputation over your ass? Unless you're not reputable yourself, you have nothing to fear. These boards mislead you into thinking you're safe by posting every little detail (who can verify really whether it's a reputable review, a jealous competitor, an agency trying to smear or bad talk an independent or an old dude who couldn't perform? These types of sites are jokes to anyone except someone looking to get the most bang for the least amount if buck, even if it means risking his d* to a cheap chick who sleeps with 10 men a day. Get real. Get informed. You think your privacy is protected here on this forum MORE than a personal person trying to ensure her time or safety? Wake up.
[blue]Hmmmm, I'm thinking this is a chick that would rather you guys not have a forum so that you stay stupid and pay more.
Just saying.
A2
In any event what the hell is an ITP address? It's not a typo because it was the same in all the other posts you spammed us with that got deleted[/blue]
Screening processes are more variable than providers want us to believe
[QUOTE=HerbB;4213506]Bear with me folks. Just need to vent a bit. .
Let's talk about screening. As you all know, there are typically 3 types of screening processes to see an independent provider or a girl from an agency.
1. Through registration at services like P411, TER, etc. - Problem here is that most of these are closed by now.
2. Provide corporate and / or personal information. Uncle LEO will love this info!
3. At least 2 or more references from other independent providers in good standing.
Now let's talk about number 3 for a moment. How can I have references, if I need references to get these references in the first place?
And even if I have a reference, how would the new provider verify that unless I provided my personal information with both of them?
Let's not bring up the argument that she will remember you and can provide assurance that you are not LE. She won't.
If you saw her let's say 6 month ago, she wouldn't remember you unless you did something outrageous like wearing a pink hat while going down on her.
So the way I see this, this process is flawed and at least for me not working.
One alternative I could think of is, that when you arrive at the provider, before going down to business, you show your credentials like I'd, corporate I'd, your LinkedIn profile (from your phone), etc. And leave nothing behind.
That way she can be certain that you are not LE, and you that none of your personal information falls in the wrong hands.
What do you all think?[/QUOTE]Except for agencies, there are as many screening procedures around as there are individual providers and, IMHO, they needn't be taken at face value. While many providers stick firmly to their screening rules, others are more flexible. There's no way to know for sure until you contact them and try. As with everything else concerning providers, YMMV applies.
As one example, when a provider has plenty of clients, she can afford to be picky and strict with screening. But, when business is slow, that can definitely change things. By how much depends on the provider, how slow things are, and her individual need for cash. Also, many providers like to hear a client's voice and just a phone call can sometimes make the difference.
If I'm interested in a provider who has, at least on paper, a strict screening process, the first thing I do is search for more info and intel on the web, this forum, and sites like E-Monkey and Listcrawler. I'm looking for at least two things: First, any reviews or monger posts indicating any kind of flexibility or variability in her process. Second, whether ads she's posted on different sites say different things about screening. Maybe her Eros or Private Delights ad talks about strict screening but her ad on Listcrawler doesn't.
When I've done enough homework and I think it's worth a shot, I'll call and tell her I saw her ad on whatever site had the least restrictive language regarding screening. Once we have a conversation going, my goal is to make her feel as safe and comfortable with me as possible. Sometimes she doesn't even bring up a screening process and we move right into scheduling a session. Other times she brings it up and I give her my handle for this forum and for TER. Or I might ask if she'd consider an alternative like a brief meeting at Starbucks, etc. It's all about the art of persuasion so there are no hard and fast rules. I'd guess I've had about a 40% to 50% success rate with this approach. Again, it all depends on how badly she needs $ and how well you can persuade her that you're a low-risk client. If nothing works and you hit an impasse, thank her politely and move on.
But, as other members have pointed out, there are plenty of good providers who don't have strict screening. And seeing some of those, at least the more responsible ones, should also give you a base of references to use in the future.
