Pretty sure emma is bb. No need to toftt. Her face looks a little fucked up though, particularly the photo of her standing.
Printable View
Pretty sure emma is bb. No need to toftt. Her face looks a little fucked up though, particularly the photo of her standing.
[QUOTE=MonkeyMonger;3612190]Wrong forum. I know. However no real place to put this. From Northern California nectar. A+. BB CIP. If you're in San Mateo go see her.[/QUOTE]Not bad. Better looking than average. Wish she would come down here and take a break from all the BB assholes in norcal.
Hey Monkey, can you be a good samaratin and tell the girls to come down to LA after you fuck them?
[QUOTE=Uscusc;3612062]Legendary Irene from 2009 and 2013 is back this week. Anyone know if she BB in the past?[/QUOTE]I saw her in 2011 few times-she does BB very selectively. She BB me and my friends but three other mongers did not get the BB.
[QUOTE=TickingTock;3611115]Hi guys, longtime lurker, kinda new to mongering, and recently moved to the LA area. I've been trying to get into contact with the Palace, specifically Namu at 6567, but haven't been able to get the booker to reply back. Pretty much followed the directions to the T, with 2 references as well. Not sure if it's cause I'm using a massachusetts area code, or are my references not up to par? Any suggestions or tips would be great. I used Jane in Pasadena, who is BB friendly and I'm sure many of you know, and a popular kgirl agency in las vegas. LA quality and prices definitely don't compare with Boston. Korean agencies in Boston start at $$$ and no chance in hell of BB, with many of their girls that tour the nation, so I wouldn't be surprised if at one time or another they've been in LA.[/QUOTE]Better to use local LA area code, 213,310, 424,714, etc. I'd suggest to get a pre-paid phone with local area code. As for references, booking Korean providers, give Korean girls from LA. Palace's girls aren't hard to book.
[QUOTE=TickingTock;3611115]Hi guys, longtime lurker, kinda new to mongering, and recently moved to the LA area. I've been trying to get into contact with the Palace, specifically Namu at 6567, but haven't been able to get the booker to reply back. Pretty much followed the directions to the T, with 2 references as well. Not sure if it's cause I'm using a massachusetts area code, or are my references not up to par? Any suggestions or tips would be great. I used Jane in Pasadena, who is BB friendly and I'm sure many of you know, and a popular kgirl agency in las vegas. LA quality and prices definitely don't compare with Boston. Korean agencies in Boston start at $$$ and no chance in hell of BB, with many of their girls that tour the nation, so I wouldn't be surprised if at one time or another they've been in LA.[/QUOTE]If not a prepaid burner phone, you can get a Google Voice phone number with a local area code for free; it's like having two phone numbers on one phone. At least you can if you have an Android phone. Does Google Voice exist for Apple devices?
[QUOTE=Scinter;3613919]If not a prepaid burner phone, you can get a Google Voice phone number with a local area code for free; it's like having two phone numbers on one phone. At least you can if you have an Android phone. Does Google Voice exist for Apple devices?[/QUOTE]Just remember don't link your personal gmail acct to google phone cause it links all calls and texts to whatever gmail.
Acct you sign up with.
If you do make sure you delete the calls and texts.
[QUOTE=Slideryyz;3613643]Better to use local LA area code, 213,310, 424,714, etc. I'd suggest to get a pre-paid phone with local area code. As for references, booking Korean providers, give Korean girls from LA. Palace's girls aren't hard to book.[/QUOTE]Thanks guys for the tips. I just got google voice with a 626 #, figure that should be good. I sent out a text blast couple days ago, but still haven't heard anything from any bookers / providers. I'm not in a rush, but getting some type of back and forth would help ease the worry. I've been seeing providers in Pasadena from Jane to Laura Angelcheeks and Mia. Been finding them on the oThER site, which is good, but reading the reviews on these Kgirls and not much of a price increase has gotten me feeling like I'm missing out. I'll keep trying, and report back. Thanks again.
[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;3614418]Just remember don't link your personal gmail acct to google phone cause it links all calls and texts to whatever gmail.
Acct you sign up with.
If you do make sure you delete the calls and texts.[/QUOTE]I don't really trust google. Practically no privacy collecting personal info in any possible way. Hardware info might be picked up too. I may be paranoid but not an amature of IT either.
[URL]http://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/SplashMe[/URL]
Pics look like the legend SASHA or Sweet SASHA. Are these actual pictures?. Some of these k bookers notorious for using fake pics in their ads.
[QUOTE=Dakota2016;3616170][URL]http://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/SplashMe[/URL]
Pics look like the legend SASHA or Sweet SASHA. Are these actual pictures?. Some of these k bookers notorious for using fake pics in their ads.[/QUOTE]Yeah that's her, I seen her in SD, never before but looks just like the pics, one of the hottest bodies I seen in a long time. Didn't attempt bb.
[QUOTE=Dakota2016;3616170][URL]http://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/SplashMe[/URL]
Pics look like the legend SASHA or Sweet SASHA. Are these actual pictures?. Some of these k bookers notorious for using fake pics in their ads.[/QUOTE]Yes those are pics of Sasha.
Not sure if you can call her a legend.
That new palace girl Ginger has decent pics and looks "hot" by Palace standards.
Does anyone know if her pics are real? They're a bit unlike the other fake pics of the other palace girls. I don't feel like rotating through my old bb girls, and want to try someone new this month.
[QUOTE=FiveTimesTen;3616605]Yeah that's her, I seen her in SD, never before but looks just like the pics, one of the hottest bodies I seen in a long time. Didn't attempt bb.[/QUOTE]Those are old pics of Sasha. I last saw her 2-3 yrs ago. She was about 10 lbs heavier and face looked older. Fun GFE time, but I didn't get the feeling bb was available. At least not on the first date.
[QUOTE=Dakota2016;3616170][URL]http://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/SplashMe[/URL]
Pics look like the legend SASHA or Sweet SASHA. Are these actual pictures?. Some of these k bookers notorious for using fake pics in their ads.[/QUOTE]That pic is definitely Sweet Sasha, whether that is who answers the door I have no clue. I will add that she seems to spend most of her time in Boston at one of our KGirl agencies. I saw her a few weeks ago and she was amazing and still looks like the pics. I diligently tried for BB and was gently thwarted, although I think a repeat or two it could be possible. One last thing, she was listed on the website in Boston up to a week ago so entirely possible she came West. Maybe she saw this suck ass cold weather coming!
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/sasha---sexy-ivy-272304[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/love-lena---rachel---sasha-134197[/URL]
[QUOTE=Jack926;3611871]New ad by unknown booker. Http: www. C*urlreplacement0}/ centurycity / Es**rts / wla-emma-all-natural-d-wla /1987491.
Any info if she is BB friendly.
Advertise Phone: 21xx40. *.[/QUOTE]I can't seem to get a hold of the Booker. No response whatsoever.