-
[QUOTE=Orthopodly651;6637743]She isn't BB without up charge or isn't BB period?[/QUOTE]I'm not sure if there's a charge for BB as I wasn't the one lucky / young / handsome / whatever enough get it. It's just simpler for all of us to assume she doesn't do BB period.
-
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6638398]I'm not sure if there's a charge for BB as I wasn't the one lucky / young / handsome / whatever enough get it. It's just simpler for all of us to assume she doesn't do BB period.[/QUOTE]Also if she is doing BB without the booker knowing, she might get in trouble since booker isn't getting a cut. So yes, BC is right, just assume she doesn't do it. Don't want to cause problems for her and end up leaving OC.
-
[QUOTE=Goku17;6637568]I had the day off, went to go see her again. Definitely not BB.[/QUOTE]Agree. No BBFS and DATY with my last visit.
-
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6638398]I'm not sure if there's a charge for BB as I wasn't the one lucky / young / handsome / whatever enough get it. It's just simpler for all of us to assume she doesn't do BB period.[/QUOTE]Maybe you're too young and handsome she didn't want to infect you with stuff LOL.
-
[QUOTE=Goku17;6638465]Also if she is doing BB without the booker knowing, she might get in trouble since booker isn't getting a cut. So yes, BC is right, just assume she doesn't do it. Don't want to cause problems for her and end up leaving OC.[/QUOTE]I doubt it. Booker and house fee are taken off the base rate only. Extras goes straight to the girl. Moreover, there's a lot of previous precedent of girls doing extras and being paid for it with the booker none the wiser.
-
[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6638726]I doubt it. Booker and house fee are taken off the base rate only. Extras goes straight to the girl. Moreover, there's a lot of previous precedent of girls doing extras and being paid for it with the booker none the wiser.[/QUOTE]Ah I see gotcha, I saw somewhere on here a while ago where booker takes 1/3 of transaction. Not sure which agency it was. Or maybe that was just false information.
-
Thai Nana
[QUOTE=DateTime2;6634469]If anyone has experience with the Nana (Thai / Japanese), please share.[/QUOTE]I saw Thai Nana last week, booked through get9 irl. Obviously the photos are fake AI pics that don't resemble the girl, but Nana actually has a very pretty face, perfect natural C tits on a thin frame, and a small well-groomed Bush on her pussy. Bubbly personality, and speaks English well. Service was decent, nice BBBJ with some gentle work on the balls and even some DT. Rimming was advertised but not offered, and I always feel weird being like, "hey, lick my asshole. " She does DFK, but mostly just sticks out a stiff tongue and lets you suck on it, kinda weird kissing technique. First round CG, mish, finished in doggy. Second round I wanted to CIM, but she couldn't get me there with BBBJ because she doesn't use her hands a lot, and I need that to get there especially on the second round. But she got me close and I finished myself off while she licked my balls. Overall, I'd recommend trying her at least once, but I might try someone else next time I'm in town just because there's so much other variety to try.
[URL]https://get9irl.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=2&product_id=849[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Goku17;6638736]Ah I see gotcha, I saw somewhere on here a while ago where booker takes 1/3 of transaction. Not sure which agency it was. Or maybe that was just false information.[/QUOTE]I've offended wondered how the business side of this industry works.
Such as the breakdown of who gets what percentage of the "donation. " Does the agency, the booker, and the girl each get 1/3 of the "donation?"
I saw one girl a few weeks ago and I wanted to see her again. I contacted the booker and they said she was not available anymore because her boss didn't want to share her schedule. So, I had to make an appointment with the same girl but with a different booker. I am guessing when the booker said boss, they meant the agency. When I saw the girl for the second time, I asked her why she wasn't with the booker anymore, and she it was because her boss didn't like how much the booker was taking.
Do the agencies have people working in the USA, or are they all located in South Korea? How do the agencies find the Korean girls to come over to America? Why are so many of the girls from South Korea and not other countries such as China, Japan, Thailand, and Vietnam? Not that I care what county the girls come from. I just find it interesting how most of the girls all come from South Korea.
-
[QUOTE=CoffeeLake1151;6639147]I've offended wondered how the business side of this industry works.
Such as the breakdown of who gets what percentage of the "donation. " Does the agency, the booker, and the girl each get 1/3 of the "donation?"
I saw one girl a few weeks ago and I wanted to see her again. I contacted the booker and they said she was not available anymore because her boss didn't want to share her schedule. So, I had to make an appointment with the same girl but with a different booker. I am guessing when the booker said boss, they meant the agency. When I saw the girl for the second time, I asked her why she wasn't with the booker anymore, and she it was because her boss didn't like how much the booker was taking.
Do the agencies have people working in the USA, or are they all located in South Korea? How do the agencies find the Korean girls to come over to America? Why are so many of the girls from South Korea and not other countries such as China, Japan, Thailand, and Vietnam? Not that I care what county the girls come from. I just find it interesting how most of the girls all come from South Korea.[/QUOTE]Yeah same. It's pretty interesting to note because it would make all the difference between the booker taking a flat fee consistently per booking (ex. $100) as opposed to a % fee (ex. 30%) which would incentivize both booker / provider to advocate for up-charges. I think % fee has more means to get complicated because what if a client changes their mind on services mid-session. The booker / provider would have to really trust each other I guess. Probably depends on how business has been lately too, who knows.
I joined the game late and was hoping to learn more about the logistics so searched way, way back in the forum. But couldn't find any pertinent info LOL. I asked my buddy who got me into it and he said its been a huge operation for quite some time and it sounded like it was monopolized, at least when it started. Obviously it's in the agency's best interest to have their own bookers, which I believe is how it is structured, at least for the more popular / successful ones. I'm sure they're sourced from back home in SK through visas and the occasional local citizen. It's also in the agencies best interest to work with each other. I was told by someone when you get blacklisted from one agency that its all of them? Providers are very prevalent internationally so I'm sure word of mouth has gotten the industry to where it is now too. I've noticed more talent lately though, maybe someone who has been around longer can comment on how things were back then opposed to now. I think Chinese / Vietnamese agencies operate more out of AMP / homes. K-providers probably have it monopolized since they been in it for so long also. Easier to get apt leases imo. Regardless how its done, salute LOL mad props.
-
I suspect you saw her already as Hanako. I have not confirmed Naomi is a rebrand yet.
[QUOTE=MalvinHarris;6635128]What was the damage price wise? Been wanting to see a full Japanese lady, how were her dfk and BBBJ skills?[/QUOTE]
-
FWIW, Naomi is not Hanako.
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;6639791]I suspect you saw her already as Hanako. I have not confirmed Naomi is a rebrand yet.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;6639791]I suspect you saw her already as Hanako. I have not confirmed Naomi is a rebrand yet.[/QUOTE]I believe Hanako rebranded as Ayaka, used exact same pictures. From the descriptions, Naomi does not sound like Hanako.
-
Becky
Any Intel on Becky at topangels? High probability the photo is fake. Could she be a rebrand?
Thanks in advance.
-
Scoop2019 has a new person called Rain? Any reviews?
-
[QUOTE=Donakis;6640994]Any Intel on Becky at topangels? High probability the photo is fake. Could she be a rebrand?
Thanks in advance.[/QUOTE]Recently see her, she is really hot but service is subpar and is a total **** gives attitude makes faces you can tell she hates her job I don't recommend and I will never repeat fair warning, go at your own risk she is really the opposite of the great reputation K-girls have there's a reason why she keeps changing names and moves around. She has a serious case of GPS.