Korean Agency BB

M....
BB, Kori. Pv.

Lucia, Lia, NIcole, Chanel, Ivy...... Wla.

Sunny.....
Glow. .....Wla.

Loved your post about Lucia. I had the exact same experience, down to the rimming. LOL. Lucky I was the first of the day and had showered, of course. I felt exactly like you do, she's a great fuck, but not an ATF. Rain was my ATF of the Kgirls and I was really sad when she retired. Seems like you and I have the same tastes in women. Who would you recommend that I try next?

[QUOTE=BenderOver;4182156]Based on Toungsten's posts cheering on Lucia, I figured I had to pay a visit. Maybe I'm missing out on an ATF. Not so much as T's tastes and mine are a little different. I'll try to put up an unbiased report, but Lulu as she calls herself is not really my cup of tea. Still very positive reviews from me.

Recommend absolutely yes. Repeat probably not. She was a little sticky in the body when she opened the door for me. I don't know if she showered prior to seeing me. But BBBJ with rim on me without a shower. I feel bad for the dude AFTER me. I'm looking for a really sexy but pretty girl with an amazing body, great look and attitude. I've seen those before and they're ATF's to me. Alas, Lucia isn't for me. Thanks for all of the reviews Toungsten, as I did not regret going at all. BTW, I did not DATY for obvious reasons.

Bender.[/QUOTE]

I liked her. Hot memory. May be I am naive but I don't think M needs to do B&S.

Photos: She is the girl in the pics.

Looks: Enhanced C cups, nice body, shaved pussy, nice ass, pretty thin, about 5'3", short hair about neck length but she tied it. Got a couple of tattoos. Are we allowed to talk about what tattoos a girl has?

English: Little English but that is my favorite type of girl. Less talking more doing.

Attitude: Just like her pics, looks serious and not cracking a smile but got her to laugh once behind my back. Wished I could see her smile. I thought she is hard to please based on the pics. I was wrong. Love the attitude.

Service: I had a surprisingly great time and would remember her pussy for awhile.

Expense: The usual.

Repeat: I seen a couple better looking girls after I saw her but I only think of repeating with her because of her service. My kind of girl.

[QUOTE=JohnPot;4184951]Hrmm. Nicole I met a couple of weeks ago was like pics. Busty with enhanced C cup and not allow BBFS. So, the Nicole that you saw definitely not the Nicole that you saw. Now I wonder that if M start to bait and switch.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=HentaiMan;4185475]Loved your post about Lucia. I had the exact same experience, down to the rimming. LOL. Lucky I was the first of the day and had showered, of course. I felt exactly like you do, she's a great fuck, but not an ATF. Rain was my ATF of the Kgirls and I was really sad when she retired. Seems like you and I have the same tastes in women. Who would you recommend that I try next?[/QUOTE]I agree it's all about taste and I don't mean the taste of ass. Rain was good. Real good but never one of my favorites. Katie and Lia showed the same passion and energy as Rain and IMHO even more so. For me Lucia comes close to that level of passion and I like her sexy looks and body more and those great natural breasts. If we all preferred the same the line would be so long that we would never get an appointment. Just in case you haven't seen her let's not forget about Bebe. A small decrease in passion but a big increase in looks and is as good as it gets or should get I guess. If I had to rate them I guess I would have to say Katie and Lia for pure animalistic passion, Bebe for looks and charm and Lucia for a great combination of all. Also I haven't seen Nicole yet but I'm getting good reports on her.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4184197]M.

Bb, kori (she's back). Pv.

Ivy, lucia, lia, diamond, chanel, nicole. Wla.

Sunny.

Glow, nuri, lyn. Wla.[/QUOTE]Lyn is back? Great news.

On a separate note, which providers you know in LA provide greek?

[QUOTE=CandyMan71;4184401]Is this the same Becky from M's stable?

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/photos/Sweetgem/111001/[/URL][/QUOTE]She's not with M.

So this is my first time review this agency. (just a warning when dealing with this booker, it's a male jackass booker).

I saw couple of their girls last Sunday and weekdays.

Currently.

Amy-unknown.

Lexi-previously was with m. Bbfscip, but old.

Jinju-was told BBFS, but old.

J-cute skinny girl late 20's with somewhat decent face (was told she's pretty, not really) - never go full hour with her because she only does 1 shot no msog and no big dick allowed.

Star-unknown.

Aurora- unknown.

Sky-a vet, probably BBFS.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4185408]M....
BB, Kori. Pv.

Lucia, Lia, NIcole, Chanel, Ivy...... Wla.

Sunny.....
Glow. .....Wla.[/QUOTE]How are ya'll getting unquarantined on Hx? Paying?

M>>>>> Lucia, ivy, Nicole, Diamond, Lia, chanel...... Wla.

[QUOTE=JohnPot;4184951]Hrmm. Nicole I met a couple of weeks ago was like pics. Busty with enhanced C cup and not allow BBFS. So, the Nicole that you saw definitely not the Nicole that you saw. Now I wonder that if M start to bait and switch.[/QUOTE]M has had two Nicoles in the past four months so maybe that's the cause of the confusion. I saw a Nichole in December but she has been gone for awhile, and the most recent Nichole was advertised as Naughty Nichole but everyone just calls her Nichole. Two completely different girls but M has never tried to pass them off as the same person.

I know this booker and have no regrets. With even the worse booker I know, it's all about who they currently have and who I choose to see.

All bookers just want to get me to see a girl. I don't expect anything more than that so I am fine with any booker. Some girls are very YMMV great for some bad for others. Sharing intels with trusted hobbyists will help a lot. The posts on this site were pretty helpful. They confirm what I already expected. I do the unexpected first.

It's not my style to wait for intel and I would still try some girls others complained about looks or service. Saw a great girl after someone on TER rated 6 in looks and 4 in performance who turned into a 10 in looks face body and 9 in performance, or 10 if we count BBFS bonus when a girl was not an easy BB. She left too soon. I didn't understand why nobody else tried to refute her only one review. May be guys avoided her because of that bad review and the rest kept silence to hide her. There were also a couple girls who were hyped a lot but they were just decent for me only because I was not into their looks that much. What I learned from TER was that everything is YMMV.

[QUOTE=AsianBaller1;4186002]So this is my first time review this agency. (just a warning when dealing with this booker, it's a male jackass booker).[/QUOTE]

Some girls told me they said that even if they don't really think so because they don't want to service a guy or see him again. There are guys who deserved the black list but we can be BL on a whim of a girl or a booker even because they don't like what we said. If we messed with the wrong girl we can get BL from the entire org. We think they are dumb for not taking our easy money but don't forget they have plenty of easy money.

[QUOTE=AsianBaller1;4186002]No big dick allowed.[/QUOTE]

This is based on my experience with M and the recent posts in the past month or two. Has something changed really recently? I am starting to see alot of more reliable reports of BBFS than before. I remember during the pre FOSTA / CV days, the chances of finding a BBFS girl was 40% or lower. I would have to cycle through alot of girls before I finally got it. Now, it seems the rate is 90% or something really high, not that I am complaining. I had quite a few duds last year and previous years from M. The service is better or nastier if you are down. I even got someone who I have seen regularly even swallow. Never had that before but I don't usually do CIM. I tried asking this with Asuka when she was still in LA and she didn't want to do it. Not sure if it was not with me or at all but claimed it was for "health reasons", yet she did CIP. I couldn't understand the logic, but I guess it made sense in hooker logic.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;4186822]This is based on my experience with M and the recent posts in the past month or two. Has something changed really recently? I am starting to see alot of more reliable reports of BBFS than before. I remember during the pre FOSTA / CV days, the chances of finding a BBFS girl was 40% or lower. I would have to cycle through alot of girls before I finally got it. Now, it seems the rate is 90% or something really high, not that I am complaining. I had quite a few duds last year and previous years from M. The service is better or nastier if you are down. I even got someone who I have seen regularly even swallow. Never had that before but I don't usually do CIM. I tried asking this with Asuka when she was still in LA and she didn't want to do it. Not sure if it was not with me or at all but claimed it was for "health reasons", yet she did CIP. I couldn't understand the logic, but I guess it made sense in hooker logic.[/QUOTE]It's still the same to me. It just one of the popular board (anti BBFS) got shut down and most of the people came here. That's the result of why there're a lot of reports.

More over, Not many k girls willing to come to LA. The one who stayed probably got used to BBFS or had already established their own customer base. The one who left maybe got scared by us or have no client.

I forgot to add that services got worsened with no review platform. Girls just don't care and they know they can get away with it.