General Reports

[QUOTE=JohnnyAD;3281602]I'm not sure why I haven't thought of this before and don't know if this is the place to post. Maybe because the idea of pimping myself out just seems too ironic. Anyway, I'm a professional photographer and as I glance through Backpage, USAAC, and even some of the VIP type ads I notice myself scrolling past women that are most likely attractive, erotic, and a great time, but I can't bring myself to click on an ad with a diaper, Pringles, underwear, and cleaning supplies in the background.

Call me old fashioned, but there is something about putting your best features forward. So, ladies and your regulars. Do you have interest in services like this? I'm not very expensive at all, discreet, and can deliver quality. PM me or write here with questions or comments![/QUOTE]Johnny,

Not including yourself, there are at least 3 top quality photographers on this forum alone. There is also at least 1 other guy who advertises on CL that does it for free. Doing some ladies, he just gets into. The ladies who want that done, generally alreayd have them done and periodically have them redone. The ones that you mention with the "props" in the pictures don't care. They just want their next fix and know guys will see them no matter what. For me personally, I want them taking their own pics because it frequently gives some insight into what you would be going to see.

Indy Guy.

Thanks or the feedback and info. I do get your opinion on the props, I suppose that it helps prospective clients filter through the options and by helping them hide it, it makes it more difficult. Well, the offer still stands for anyone interested and who am I kidding, I'd probably do it for the fun of it at no cost as well. .

[QUOTE=IndyGuy123;3281630]Johnny,

Not including yourself, there are at least 3 top quality photographers on this forum alone. There is also at least 1 other guy who advertises on CL that does it for free. Doing some ladies, he just gets into. The ladies who want that done, generally alreayd have them done and periodically have them redone. The ones that you mention with the "props" in the pictures don't care. They just want their next fix and know guys will see them no matter what. For me personally, I want them taking their own pics because it frequently gives some insight into what you would be going to see.

Indy Guy.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JohnnyAD;3281649]Thanks or the feedback and info. I do get your opinion on the props, I suppose that it helps prospective clients filter through the options and by helping them hide it, it makes it more difficult. Well, the offer still stands for anyone interested and who am I kidding, I'd probably do it for the fun of it at no cost as well. .[/QUOTE]Don't take this the wrong way. It's a general discussion rather than a direct criticism.

In the sex industry, from strippers to porn stars, escorts to webcam girls, there are a ton of men offering their services, at discounted rates or free. Some are professionals, many are not. The goal for most is to get closer access. After all, who wouldn't want to spend a few hours hanging out with naked women without paying?

However, it's usually a bad deal for both the sex worker and the professional offering services.

Let's look at the professional, the photographer, web designer, methnic, whatever. If you are offering your livelihood, it's costing you money. Even if you're just offering your hobby, it can cost you money.

My example, about 17 years ago, I had 2 hobbies, computers and photography, plus a business, professional mover. I became friends with a stripper who was running her own website, selling subscriptions, pictures and videos. We spent a lot of time discussing technology, her way forward, improvements to her website and I did a little bit of work for her. In the meantime, my friendship with her got me friendly with several other strippers.

Then the friend dumped her entire website on me, complete redesign, new host, added features, etc. I put in a few hundred hours of work before she decided she was scrubbing her web presence. She had picked a different post-stripper future that required a squeaky clean image.

In the meantime, another stripper wanted a website. I took a bunch of pictures, cost about $150 for film and developing, spent my time digitizing and retouching, registered a domain, paid for hosting and started working on a layout. She then changed her mind.

On the plus side, I was paid by several strippers to move them, no discount, plus a couple of good tips.

The other downside is the business risk. There have been cases where, for any number of reasons, the sex worker caused problems.

From the sex worker side, there are 3 problems, freebies, pimps and stalkers.

It's a porn cliche, photographer, plumber or pizza boy, they always get laid. That's what many expect. You go in, do your job and she offers sex in lieu of cash. Except it seldom works that way. The guy gets pissed because he expected to get laid for his "free" work, and the woman gets pissed because the guy offered free work and now wants payment.

There's always someone who wants to help a sex worker make more money. They're going to help and all they want is a little cut, plus the fringe benefits. My new boss gets offers every week from some guy wanting to manage her career and make her rich.

The biggest threat is the stalker. That's a problem that can be fatal.

If you're a professional and want to explore a different niche, take out some ads, charge fair prices and see if you can survive on the niche market. Probably not, because too many are offering to work for "free. ".

If you're a provider, make your decisions and do your own research. The most expensive things are usually offered for free.

The last few years have been rough on me. Time has caught up in a big way, especially in the sex department. Things just haven't been working like they used to. I've tried the different ED pills with mixed results. They usually work, but I end up with 3 days of bad pain in my legs and back. The pain is bad enough that it just hasn't been worth it.

However, there is a new, different treatment that is just beginning testing. The existing ED drugs are all vaso-dilaters, they cause the veins to open up so blood flow is increased. The new treatment works in the brain. It frees up the dopamine receptors, basically making your brain able and willing to feel pleasure. This means that it is effective on both men and women.

As with every drug, there are problems, although the side-effects seem to be very minor. The biggest problem is the delivery method. No pill. You take it in one of 2 ways.

The first way is through a nasal spray. This is no longer being tested because it caused some high blood pressure problems. It also requires a higher dosage. The other way is a subcutaneous injection. It's injected into the fat layer under the skin.

The dosage is low, typically 1 mg of the drug in. 1 ml of bacteriostatic water. Most people report flushed skin shortly after injection and some experience mild nausea. The effects take awhile to show up, from 4 to 12 hours, although they last from 2 to 5 days.

What are the effects? Remember way back, when a slow dance was enough to pop a tent? It's like that. Combined with one of the ED pills it's reported to produce impressive results.

Of course it will probably be a few more years before it's available from your doctor, at a cost of $50 (plus co-pay) per dose. Until then it's only available to people who identify themselves as involved in a research program (by clicking the box that says "I'm a medical researcher") and who understand it is not to be used on humans (wink-wink), at about $4 a (nope, not used on humans) dose (including shipping and handling, insulin syringes, bacteriostatic water and alcohol swabs).

Do I recommend it? It's probably illegal, although it's not a controlled substance. I wouldn't think of recommending anything illegal, especially here. It's possibly dangerous, although "researchers" have been "testing" it for well over 10 years, with no reported problems.

Update: The company that owns the marketing rights plans to seek approval later this year.

I think the only thing I forgot to mention was the name.

[QUOTE=JohnnyAD;3281602]I'm not sure why I haven't thought of this before and don't know if this is the place to post. Maybe because the idea of pimping myself out just seems too ironic. Anyway, I'm a professional photographer and as I glance through Backpage, USAAC, and even some of the VIP type ads I notice myself scrolling past women that are most likely attractive, erotic, and a great time, but I can't bring myself to click on an ad with a diaper, Pringles, underwear, and cleaning supplies in the background.

Call me old fashioned, but there is something about putting your best features forward. So, ladies and your regulars. Do you have interest in services like this? I'm not very expensive at all, discreet, and can deliver quality. PM me or write here with questions or comments![/QUOTE]I am a professional and do boudior photography for fun and yes I do it for free. My initial motivation was that I hated selfies. I have shot regular ladies and yes working girls. I give them all rights but do ask for permission to use a pic in my ads.

Do I expect anything NO, have I gotten something, occasionally. I just enjoy the creative outlet.

Don.

[QUOTE=Videoxxman;3285739]I am a professional and do boudior photography for fun and yes I do it for free. My initial motivation was that I hated selfies. I have shot regular ladies and yes working girls. I give them all rights but do ask for permission to use a pic in my ads.

Do I expect anything NO, have I gotten something, occasionally. I just enjoy the creative outlet.

Don.[/QUOTE]Hello Don. I see your still around doing pictures. Please get a hold of me for new pictures. Thanks Fancy.

Trade services for services. I need a car asap! Thanks Fancy.

I am sure some of you have some experience with sugar relationships, so I wanted to come to you for wisdom. I am getting ready to engage in my first and we met through a sugar site. Any tips / caution? You can PM if you prefer.

[QUOTE=IndyJones317;3306992]I am sure some of you have some experience with sugar relationships, so I wanted to come to you for wisdom. I am getting ready to engage in my first and we met through a sugar site. Any tips / caution? You can PM if you prefer.[/QUOTE]Tips? Scroll down to the Sugar Daddies Blog.

Been awhile since last post so thought I'd throw a couple reviews out. I've include the last 4 digits as a reference.

Beautiful Hands off CL 1105.
McKenzie is the young lady w the nice rack BTW.
Melissa being the smaller framed one.

First visit was w McKenzie and was just ok.
Nice apartment on NE side, clean and she looked sexy w nice cleavage presented.
Massage went pretty good but was reluctant to press for the menu.
2nd visit was a 4 hand massage but still no progress. Not even a glimmer of a chance.
Maybe a repeat just for Mckezie alone.

Angela CL from Camby 6423.
Gorgeous itallian lady w an awesome rack. Very sexy accent and good style. Not even a sign of anything less than a professional therapeutic massage though.

Megs mobile w Jazz 6641.
NE side hotel.Haven't seen Megan for awhile and thought I'd check in on her. Jazz, if you don't know has the arm tats w the arm bands and loves married men. Massage was 4 hand and I intense. I've seen Meg before so standard finish was implied.
Both ladies were more than accommodating. Topless w plenty of roaming. Menu was open for me but YMMV.

Last is a little place in O'l Benjamin's stomping grounds. Oriental establishment down by Mr Sherman Hemsley's street. Only one visit so far. Massage was ok, cute lady in her early 40's I'm guessing. She was frisky enough to warrant a second visit. I'll report back on this 1 when I know more.

Sorry if I left out any vital info.
Seniors are welcomed to pm for more details.

BTW, I put this in gen reports due to the various sources.

B safe.
Burglar.

Snugglers or cuddlers? Four girls locally are supposedly legit huggers and snuggler but can't get a fix on them at all. Three young ones Tori Nicole and a blond and an older one named Kristen 40. All four look doable but they all claim to be legitimate. Any PM help appreciated Doc.

[QUOTE=IndyJones317;3306992]I am sure some of you have some experience with sugar relationships, so I wanted to come to you for wisdom. I am getting ready to engage in my first and we met through a sugar site. Any tips / caution? You can PM if you prefer.[/QUOTE]Simple, direct and to the point. If it has little pointy ears, beady eyes, and a long tail, it's probably a rat.

[QUOTE=IndyJones317;3306992]I am sure some of you have some experience with sugar relationships, so I wanted to come to you for wisdom. I am getting ready to engage in my first and we met through a sugar site. Any tips / caution? You can PM if you prefer.[/QUOTE]Might want to read the Sugar Baby / Sugar Daddy blog at the bottom of these threads. There are links to other locations with a wealth of information. Here is one link to Richmond VA USASG SB blog that has a wealth of information.

[URL]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?15100-Sugarbaby-Thread-Highlights-Index-and-FAQ&p=2480291&viewfull=1[/URL]

31 year old brunette, very pretty, lots of tasteful ink, very slender, not much up top (just the way I like it) very skilled, very open minded (no greek).

If you're interested and have my email, message me for pics and contact info. (unless I've already shared this with you).

[QUOTE=Bob0324;3334332]31 year old brunette, very pretty, lots of tasteful ink, very slender, not much up top (just the way I like it) very skilled, very open minded (no greek).

If you're interested and have my email, message me for pics and contact info. (unless I've already shared this with you).[/QUOTE]Very interested. I sent a PM. Thanks.