Haha! That's what I'm talking about!
[QUOTE=Dugglc;5209810]Just had one last week. A current provider that I went for a QV with. After the session she said would you come back and give me a good fucking and just hang out. No charge. I'm human too and sometimes just need a good fucking and some company. I said sure, so went back the next day and spent about 4 hours fucking, cuddling, and took her to lunch which she paid for. She even tried her best to get me to go bb, but that was a big NO for me. 99% of the time we are just money to them, but sometimes they like to get laid off the clock where it's not just a business transaction. I think she almost cried after a good fucking and just laying there cuddling and talking for a while. She spent the money from the QV the day before taking me to lunch.[/QUOTE]And sometimes you just click with them and they just contact you out of the blue for a booty call! .
This is my favorite escorts site
In here [URL]https://www.sexysabor.com/[/URL] from Buenos AIres Argentina.
Do you think?
[blue] Bairesgirls is better
[url]https://www.bairesgirls.net/[/url]
Lots of bait and switch on sexysabor
A2[/blue]
Got to pay a certain premium for BBBJ
I'm just scanning through EB and LC for shits and giggles and I saw some providers demanding that you got to pay for the full HR to get the BBBJ option. Is it getting that bad? I'm just glad I got some regulars on rotation that don't do that but I just find it dumb you have to waste $$ on the hr for BBBJ.
It's getting out of control!
[QUOTE=HyperPiper;5264158]I'm just scanning through EB and LC for shits and giggles and I saw some providers demanding that you got to pay for the full HR to get the BBBJ option. Is it getting that bad? I'm just glad I got some regulars on rotation that don't do that but I just find it dumb you have to waste $$ on the hr for BBBJ.[/QUOTE]There was even one ad that said "cash app $20 to get my number" WTF?? Smh. We got to put these hoe's in check!
Positive Review Thread Free-For-All
Gentlemen,
There are currently (as of when I am writing this) a total of 2 Positive reviews on the first 2 pages (that's 30 posts) of the Positive Escort Thread. I didn't count back further. No comments that I can see on those 2 pages are replies to the 2 Positive Reviews. So, all the rest of the 28 posts are a combination of either conversations about People announcing that they are coming to visit and asking for phone numbers, People asking for general information like "any one seen XYZ? Negative reviews placed in the wrong Thread, and General Reports promoting girls appearances or re-appearances and then there are all the replies to the off-topic comments and even some white-knighting, sometimes carrying on for 6 to 8 more posts.
We are fortunate enough in Orlando to have separate threads for Positive Reviews, Negative Reviews, Rip-Off Reports, General Comment, Escort Ad Discussions and more. I don't understand why people can't try to use the threads for their intended purposes and instead just post where ever they want. If you want to find something, you should be able to easily find it grouped together in the proper Thread. If there are Girls that provide shitty service, you generally should be able to see them listed out in the Negative Escort Thread. If there are Girls that are Rip-Off artists or scammers from afar, you should be able to see them listed in the Rip-Off Threads. If you want to know about an Advertising Escort you can't find a review on, you should be able to ASK for info in the Escort Ad Discussion Thread. If you want to announce your 63 city world tour stopover in Orlando, you should announce that event in the General Comments Thread. If you want to find your long lost HS sweetheart, you are MAYBE on the wrong Forum all together. LOL. Can it be perfect? No, of course not, but when ONLY 3% of the posts are actually on topic, it signals that it's getting pretty much out of hand.
I think that the Orlando Group has some of the best intel out there. They have a solid handle on the Provider Situation, there's no reason we can't expect some type of organization on the Forum. Personally, I won't answer the post on an off-topic question openly on the Forum and know many others that have said the same. Off-topic posters lose credibility when they can't follow simple Thread Topics. Those that do choose to reply on the off-topic Thread posts openly, have now opened the Thread up to even more off-topic conversation and shows other members that it's OK to have a free-for-all on the Threads.
In the situations that I do want to help out a wayward wanderer, I do so via PM where it doesn't pollute the Thread even more and remind them that posting on topic will help them get more responses.
Recently, the AMP Thread was split off to add a new second thread for Non-AMP Thread and at first I thought it would be another thread started that has one or two posts then dies off. Instead, it is thriving and the posters are on topic for the most part and it has made mongering for both of those provider-types (AMP / Non-AMP) easier because it removes the non-essential reporting for that Thread. This is the same type thing I am referring to. If we keep the thread for the intended purpose, it benefits the entire Forum Membership.
Just my take.
Grain 56.
Pulled Over from Another Thread
Pulled over from Escort Ads Discussion Thread:
[QUOTE=Dumb0;5349827]There is a lot of nonsense here on reviews.
Really, only need a few things on here.
What you got
What you gave.
Link.
Lot of people on here writing novels.[/QUOTE]You came out your 15+ month hibernation from the board to share this with the Forum?
I looked over your posts to see what you mean by streamlining the review reports using your suggested rules. Here's what I found:
For 2020: you made 3 posts total, you only gave 1 "review", you listed no price paid. All three 2020 posts you made were done after being silent for an entire year going back to early 2019.
For 2019: you made 4 posts total, you gave only 1 "review", you gave no price paid at all.
For 2018: the remaining 40-odd posts you've made, you gave 5 "reviews", 1 of them was riding on the coattails (agreeing) of another post, 1 "review" was corrected because you gave bad info in the original post, you had 1 "review" where it's the only time where you actually listed a rate you paid but then you also "guessed" at her other rates in the same post because you didn't know. Finally, on 1 date you did report that you "paid too much" whatever that amount is. Only some of your 7 "reviews" gave the required link you suggested.
I will respectfully disagree that the streamlined reporting you suggest is all we need. I think that most Forum Members would rather have a more information than 4 six-word long sentences.
There are numerous nuances to reporting on these providers. Just some of the things many Forum Members want to know about beyond your suggestion of only reporting what you got, what you gave and link: Attitude, appearance, restrictions, barriers, surprises, management, pros, cons, safety, place, size, health, track-marked up, environment condition, her condition, covered, uncovered, upcharges, whining, drug use, delays, ghosting, allowances, phone etiquette, phone usage during date, response time, deposits required, favors, fetishes, roommates, denials of service, filth, ankle bracelets, smell, ease of communication, location, in call, out call, car date, flexibility, attraction, other services provided, openness to bringing a friend into the mix, shaved, Greek, Russian, CG, photos real, bait and switch, where you found, how you found, hesitation / willingness to provide agreed upon services, going above and beyond, clock watcher, 3 minute "are you done yet", no touching, bolt-ons, etc. Etc.
There are literally dozens and dozens of things that MAY be important to list in a review. Since not all Members are as ultra-seasoned at mongering as you apparently are, newer members read the detailed reviews to learn techniques that help them succeed in meeting and negotiating a satisfying experience. More seasoned members can read between the lines at times with the details that helps them be even more successful or look at other ways to benefit them or protect them. Warning signs watch out for to keep them safe. Particular behaviors a certain providers exhibit that could be good or bad. Tricks of the trade.
I could list more but I think the point I am trying to make is that reviews are all different and can or should be different based on what the author is trying to convey. There isn't a particular format that is one size fits all.
Do they need to be written like a Penthouse Forum? Maybe / probably not. Some enjoy reading that, others do not. I've read 3 word reviews that have given me all I need to know and I've read 1,000 word reviews that leave me scratching my head. I do agree that reviews should include what you got, what you gave and a link (if applicable) as you suggested, BUT there is so much more that may be needed, especially with new to the area providers. Even the old stand-by providers can change their ways and those things need to be reported. I think in the end, no one should tell anyone HOW to write their review but people should write reviews with information that is helpful, insightful, honest, filled with relevant information to help others succeed and even provide some levity when relevant.
Just my take.
Grain 56.