Printable View
Newbies -- this is easily answered. Simply ask yourself WWRRW (What Would Romin' Roman Write)?
See great example two posts earlier than this message (or just scan the boards for his TM signature RR!
Great post -- not too much details. Intel and style!
Always be nice to the ladies!
PA.
[QUOTE=BigSkyConferen;2164907]You had another chick. Coco's gone-gone. She isn't planning on coming back. THe same phone number doesn't mean you get the same provider. In fact, it's a safe bet the chick you mentioned will be gone soon, too. Lots of the girls are just "trying this out" and the phone person / mamasan takes a cut for answering phone, arranging, translating, and providing a place of operations.[/QUOTE]Yea I believe he was mistaken and likely had Keke. I actually just came on to post that this review either happened a week or two ago or was a different girl since I'm sure there are quite a few people here who will excitedly try to book a time with her (CoCo) (guilty). MMS made it sound as though she may come back at some point. She said she'd call me and let me know if and when she is back. I can relay it here if she comes back AND she actually lets me know.
[URL]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/two-is-better-than-one-upscale-location-35/15122651[/URL]
I was bored at work and since all I do is stare into a monitor and oversee contractors, I figured I go out for a quicky, whatever I could find at 3 in the morning on a Wednesday night. I went and called Vanessa from the ad above, at the time I didn't have any real preference except that it couldn't be my hand. Vanessa picked up immediately and said to come over, text'd me the address which at the time was up in Ashburn. She also sent me another very long text of a disclaimer saying this is for her time and that whatever happens during that time etc is the decision between us etc, regular disclaimer crap that won't hold up in court. Anyways. I get there and wait outside in the back of the hotel for her to come get me, nothing out of the ordinary but I spotted her scoping me out from the 2nd floor to make sure that I was real. The pictures don't really show how big she really is, she's a large woman with quite the belly. The other pictures of her are when she had to be much much younger, but she really is through and through a white woman with a bit of latina in her and she is large.
She was very nice and comforting, she gave an incredible BBBJ and as far as I can tell was clean as a whistle. She supposedly also does therapeutic massage which might come in handy at a later date, but to be honest I already have a few other go to's for a real good massage and happy ending. The whole session went over 15 min, probably 25 min roundabout. She didn't seem to be clock watcher, and asked what I wanted to do and so on. Basically went like this, BBBJ, covered doggy then finish off in missionary but she does well to spread eagle and let you get in there. There was a little bit of smell in terms of ass but nothing crazy, regular smell when it gets sweaty down in that area, nothing off putting as I have smelled before.
Aspen the other white lady in the ad was also in the room at the same time, but she was sleeping on the other bed. I find it weird to have another person in the room at the same time but these are clearly working girls and don't seem to mind all that much and personally I was comfortable enough given Vanessa's attitude and body language that I didn't mind or pay much attention to it. Aspen however did get up and glance over and watch as I finished. She seemed interested and or inviting, maybe I will come back to have some of her if it's the same quickey price.
Anyways after I finish, they offered a shower and clean up, I still wasn't being rushed out or anything which was nice and even entertained a conversation afterwards so it definitely didn't feel like a get up and go kind of deal. Given the price I would have expect a whole lot worse.
If your into BBW's give it a shot.
[QUOTE=Bossanova86;2165680][URL]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/two-is-better-than-one-upscale-location-35/15122651[/URL]
Aspen[/QUOTE]If the pics of aspen are correct then she's actually Adrianna. Bunker Buster and I have made a review on her in the past year. She's a really sweet girl that is willing to please. She was the definition of GFE when she visited last year. She came here for a short stay but extended it when the business visit proved to be very lucrative. She then left after a string of abusive clients. It sucks because she really does want to please.
Again YMMV since she's running with a friend now and it looks like she has changed her donation rates. I would recommend based off of my experience with her from last year.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=215454
[QUOTE=NovaCane;2165214]Yea I believe he was mistaken and likely had Keke. I actually just came on to post that this review either happened a week or two ago or was a different girl since I'm sure there are quite a few people here who will excitedly try to book a time with her (CoCo) (guilty). MMS made it sound as though she may come back at some point. She said she'd call me and let me know if and when she is back. I can relay it here if she comes back AND she actually lets me know.[/QUOTE]Confirmed as I had a session with Keke yesterday and MMS also stated that she had no idea if / when Coco would be coming back. I'll say one thing, Keke is quite willing to perform as there is no problem with her "stepping up to the mike".
N_R.
[QUOTE=JmSuttr;2165086]99.9% of these Asian ads follow the same formula: fake pics and some stock BS about the girl being from Japan, Singapore or some other exotic location (and maybe offering nuru massage). In truth they are mostly Chinese women of varying looks and quality. Reviews are useless because they rotate girls often (and reuse the names) so you have no idea whether the "Coco" you're seeing is the one in the review. BTW, there are more women named Coco in these places than there are Kowalskis in Chicago!
YMMV is not an accurate description as you're almost certainly not seeing the girl described in the review. The best way to think about it is as a complete crapshoot. You will have no idea who you're going to see until you arrive. She might be homely or she might be gorgeous, but you won't have a clue until the door opens. She might provide barely adequate service or she may be a GFE diamond-in-the-rough. Again, you won't know until the session begins.
So when you get there, if you don't like how she looks, ask if another girl is working or else politely say "no thanks" and leave. Also, always start with the minimum time allowed (usually a hh) since it's usually a one-shot deal and you'll be lucky to get a full hh session. If by some chance you get extremely lucky and find a pretty girl who offers good service, you can always ask to upgrade to the full hr.
All this has been discussed at length in this forum in previous posts.[/QUOTE]Good advice and agree for the most part but I disagree that the reviews are useless. In my opinion they are useful, BUT they have a very short shelf life of usefulness. The few times I've visted someone based off a review I got someone matching the review. In two of the girls instances I requested to visit them numerous times and got the girl I requested each time. And generally got an honest answer of whether they were busy and I could wait or they were gone and whether they'd be back or not.
The problem is 1-2 weeks, heck sometimes even just a few days later they are generally rotated and a month or two later you will likely see a new girl under the same name. So in my experiences they are helpful but only if you catch them shortly after it was posted. So if someone is doing research and it pulls up Rose from February they will definately not be seeing Rose. Or at least THAT Rose. In that instance, it isn't useful.
The only reason I post that is I'd hate someone to be deterred from posting an experience with a great girl whether great attitude or beautiful because posters on this forum MAY benefit from it. I had great experiences, multiple times, with both YoYo and CoCo because of great members on this site. Maybe we should preface reviews of this nature or end these reviews with some kind of note indicating the short usefulness of said info for new members, but I imagine most figure that out pretty quickly.
But either way, thanks for your input. I first started lurking middle of last year and took my time getting into it and for the most part I feel pretty comfortable now largly in part due to your posts along with a handful of others who left very good informative posts along the way.
NC.
[QUOTE=NovaCane;2166071]Good advice and agree for the most part but I disagree that the reviews are useless. In my opinion they are useful, BUT they have a very short shelf life of usefulness. The few times I've visted someone based off a review I got someone matching the review. In two of the girls instances I requested to visit them numerous times and got the girl I requested each time. And generally got an honest answer of whether they were busy and I could wait or they were gone and whether they'd be back or not.
The problem is 1-2 weeks, heck sometimes even just a few days later they are generally rotated and a month or two later you will likely see a new girl under the same name. So in my experiences they are helpful but only if you catch them shortly after it was posted. So if someone is doing research and it pulls up Rose from February they will definately not be seeing Rose. Or at least THAT Rose. In that instance, it isn't useful.
The only reason I post that is I'd hate someone to be deterred from posting an experience with a great girl whether great attitude or beautiful because posters on this forum MAY benefit from it. I had great experiences, multiple times, with both YoYo and CoCo because of great members on this site. Maybe we should preface reviews of this nature or end these reviews with some kind of note indicating the short usefulness of said info for new members, but I imagine most figure that out pretty quickly.
But either way, thanks for your input. I first started lurking middle of last year and took my time getting into it and for the most part I feel pretty comfortable now largly in part due to your posts along with a handful of others who left very good informative posts along the way.
NC.[/QUOTE]1) I will definitely concede that the FCCC operation (and HCCC, etc.) is pretty much in a category by itself. That's because even though the girls rotate they tend to keep the same names which means a review is more likely to have helpful info. Also with FCCC, they're pretty good about telling you if a specific girl isn't working and sometimes they'll tell you she'll be back in a week or two. But IIRC, the link the earlier poster referenced is not one of the FCCC ads. So for the vast majority of those more generic Asian ads (like the BS nuru places), I think reliance on reviews is setting yourself up for disappointment.
2) Remember reviewers (speaking about the oThER site) self-report when their session supposedly took place. While I am a big proponent and user of that site, a lot of guys write reviews just to gain VIP read access so I always take everything with a giant grain of salt. So even for a review that's just been posted, it's possible the info is dated but the monger just got around to writing it. With indie providers that's not too much of a problem. But with most Asian places it makes a big difference because a delay means the reviewed girl has probably moved on (but her name stayed behind). Once in a while I'll read a review from a reliable hobbyist and the details make it clear the info is fresh. But reviews with that kind of accurate, time-specific info are uncommon.
To sum up, the key to a review's usefulness is how well it helps predict what kind of a session you're likely to experience. That only works if you can be sure the provider you see is actually the one discussed in the review. For FCCC, I think that's a reasonable expectation. But for 99.9% of the generic Asian ads, I think that expectation is much less likely.
Since the expectation side of this hobby is such a big part of the experience, I would much rather recommend going in with the attitude that you're rolling the dice. That way, if you don't like what's on the table when you arrive, you won't have any problem walking away. OTOH, if you hit the GFE jackpot, you'll be congratulating yourself for days!
As always, always do your homework, always use the big head, and always be safe.
From perusing the forums, figured as much that the providers rotate, but since the decision to visit was based off a review from a senior member, and was written a few days ago, figured it was probably the same girl. Should have gotten the name, even if that in and of itself isn't that reliable either. Mistakenly just fell back on using the CoCo name, since the location description and other things matched.
Will be better about details if there's a next time. =(Sorry!
[QUOTE=JmSuttr;2166153]1) I will definitely concede that the FCCC operation (and HCCC, etc.) is pretty much in a category by itself. That's because even though the girls rotate they tend to keep the same names which means a review is more likely to have helpful info. Also with FCCC, they're pretty good about telling you if a specific girl isn't working and sometimes they'll tell you she'll be back in a week or two. But IIRC, the link the earlier poster referenced is not one of the FCCC ads. So for the vast majority of those more generic Asian ads (like the BS nuru places), I think reliance on reviews is setting yourself up for disappointment.
2) Remember reviewers (speaking about the oThER site) self-report when their session supposedly took place. While I am a big proponent and user of that site, a lot of guys write reviews just to gain VIP read access so I always take everything with a giant grain of salt. So even for a review that's just been posted, it's possible the info is dated but the monger just got around to writing it. With indie providers that's not too much of a problem. But with most Asian places it makes a big difference because a delay means the reviewed girl has probably moved on (but her name stayed behind). Once in a while I'll read a review from a reliable hobbyist and the details make it clear the info is fresh. But reviews with that kind of accurate, time-specific info are uncommon.
To sum up, the key to a review's usefulness is how well it helps predict what kind of a session you're likely to experience. That only works if you can be sure the provider you see is actually the one discussed in the review. For FCCC, I think that's a reasonable expectation. But for 99.9% of the generic Asian ads, I think that expectation is much less likely.
Since the expectation side of this hobby is such a big part of the experience, I would much rather recommend going in with the attitude that you're rolling the dice. That way, if you don't like what's on the table when you arrive, you won't have any problem walking away. OTOH, if you hit the GFE jackpot, you'll be congratulating yourself for days!
As always, always do your homework, always use the big head, and always be safe.[/QUOTE]I agree with what JS has to say, the fresher the reports and the more details provided the better for all of us. I did get CoCo's cell number (she actually grabbed my cell and put it in) I did text her over the weekend and she is in Las Vegas now, and does not know when she will be returning to the Tysons area; she did have a positive experience while here, and likes the area. As far as Jessica (the 30-year old Korean / Chinese mix. Who was at hotel in Tysons (low end) - she has returned to Flushing, NY. And tells me (also thru text) she is taking a straight job in a travel agency. Her experience was not so great while in the area, or she is turned off by the business, a loss for us all.
The lesson learned, be nice to the girls so they return and you have a reliable experience and provide the readers of this board with detailed. Relevant - and timely info.
[QUOTE=Sexingit;2165810]If the pics of aspen are correct then she's actually Adrianna. Bunker Buster and I have made a review on her in the past year. She's a really sweet girl that is willing to please. She was the definition of GFE when she visited last year. She came here for a short stay but extended it when the business visit proved to be very lucrative. She then left after a string of abusive clients. It sucks because she really does want to please.
Again YMMV since she's running with a friend now and it looks like she has changed her donation rates. I would recommend based off of my experience with her from last year.
[/QUOTE]The ad linked in the review from the oThER board is wrong, and can lead to confusion. This is Aspen: [URL]http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/two-is-better-than-one-upscale-location-35/15122651[/URL].
And the covered part is entirely optional. She'll go UGFE to completion for the standard donation, which is still 80/15, 100/30.
I spoke with her friend a few days ago. Did not find her friendly, and she plays games with her rates. I have no plan to meet her.
There's been a lot of back-and-forth here about her, so hopefully my report can clear up some of the concerns. First, she's highly disorganized, which is probably related to her love of 420. After running me around for almost an hour with 'phone problems' and having 'to do something at the front desk,' finally got to meet her.
The pix are real, and she's cute. She's gained weight since her pix were taken, because she's 3-4 months pregnant, a fact she's been hiding. I'm not impressed with her frequent 420 indulgence while expecting.
She's friendly, until the action gets underway, at which point it's all business, following her preferred routine. Cover goes on immediately with no assistance first. 1-2 minutes of decent CBJ, then "which position do you want. " I wanted ACG or CG, but she "prefers" RCG, so that's what I got.
I made a minor request, and was hit with "you're trying to get everything in a short visit," and the rush was on, barely 5 minutes in. There is nothing GFE about this experience, unless your GF is impatient and unaffectionate. Once I finished up, she was friendly again.
I remember one person claimed she threatened him, while another (maybe Cowboy?) said she was nice. I'd say both are plausible, with her mood swings and possible 420 paranoia. YMM obviously V here.
As much as I enjoy girls in the expectant way, I don't know if I can bring myself to see her again. Maybe at 7-8 months, just for the novelty, but other than that, I can't recommend her.
[URL]http://escortprofile.xxx/202-308-6725[/URL]
[QUOTE=BunkerBuster;2167450]
I made a minor request, and was hit with "you're trying to get everything in a short visit," and the rush was on, barely 5 minutes in. There is nothing GFE about this experience, unless your GF is impatient and unaffectionate. Once I finished up, she was friendly again.
I remember one person claimed she threatened him, while another (maybe Cowboy?) said she was nice. I'd say both are plausible, with her mood swings and possible 420 paranoia. YMM obviously V here.
As much as I enjoy girls in the expectant way, I don't know if I can bring myself to see her again. Maybe at 7-8 months, just for the novelty, but other than that, I can't recommend her.
[URL]http://escortprofile.xxx/202-308-6725[/URL][/QUOTE]I suppose her falling pregnant was the result of her blowing up a USAG member's phone (the second post down in the thread below).
[URL]http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:TgP_zsnP9uwJ:www.usasexguide.info/forum/printthread.php%3Ft%3D9224%26pp%3D40%26page%3D97[/URL]+&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us.
A link to her decidedly mixed reviews is on her personal site [URL]http://chelseamarie.naughtynsexy.com/[/URL].
[URL]http://washingtondc.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/busty-lusty-bl0nde-sensati0n-pretty-face-h0t-b0dy-abs0lutely-amazing-24/13814186[/URL]
Did a google image search and got an interesting hit on the 3rd photo down in the middle (black tank top, jeans pulled down). It appears that pic was also used in an OKCupid romance scam: [URL]http://www.scamwarners.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=55321&p=128654[/URL].
Not sure if this chick (or whoever is behind the ad) is trying to pull the same kind of scam but fake pics are always a red flag for me unless there's offsetting positive info (reviews, forum reports, etc.). And the specific use of pics that have been flagged as part of an internet scam is particularly troubling, so I'm definitely steering well clear of this one.
*Posted this by mistake in the DC forum but it more properly belongs here since her advertised area is (at least currently) in Northern VA.
I saw her about 3 weeks ago. I had one hell of a Time with her after visiting her tingle I even have her come back to my place for a few hours. Great BBBJ and her snatch is a condom graber. Well worth the time
[QUOTE=Derringer;2160212]Thanks for the info. I went back and forth by text from Thursday to Sunday with Rebecca. She would agree to meet but never give me a time. Then another text later she would act like she didn't even know who I was. Started over with the texting four times before I finally gave up. The only reason I put up with the nonsense so long was because I had some intel she is very, very tight. Can anyone here confirm if she has a super tight snatch?[/QUOTE].
Last week has Keke is not that good anyone know the new girl come yet?