Escort Reports

[QUOTE=RocketManP;6976738]30 year old, no way. She's way older. Face is meh.

Kitty is bald and looks nice. Good bod for a cmilf. Service oriented and fun all around. Imo service wise a top tier cmilf / cgilf offering and a great bod for a cmilf org.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the reply. Any time you have to put a qualifier on it, "Great bod for a Cmilf" I know that I'll be disappointed. I'm looking for that Petite 25 year old, who still looks like she could be a college freshman cheerleader on the top of the pyramid. .

I know, Good Luck Finding That!

Maybe I missed it, but can't believe no one's talked about or reviewed this hottie that's been in San Jose now for the past 4 months. Definitely my ATF in the South Bay. Came from So Cal with legend status behind her. Do yourself a favor and go see her. Thank me later. Reviews speak for themselves. Pictures are real too!

[URL]https://www.eros.com/california/san_jose/files/7471049.htm?cat=1[/URL]

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/anna-4083065652-394867[/URL]

[QUOTE=DigiPromoGuy;6977799]Maybe I missed it, but can't believe no one's talked about or reviewed this hottie that's been in San Jose now for the past 4 months. Definitely my ATF in the South Bay. Came from So Cal with legend status behind her. Do yourself a favor and go see her. Thank me later. Reviews speak for themselves. Pictures are real too!

[URL]https://www.eros.com/california/san_jose/files/7471049.htm?cat=1[/URL]

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/anna-4083065652-394867[/URL][/QUOTE]Can you share more info?

Services offered (I. E. BBFS / CIM).

Cost.

Agency response time and ease of screening.

Looks (ad says Vietnamese with a Latina body) how accurate is that?

[QUOTE=DigiPromoGuy;6977799]Maybe I missed it, but can't believe no one's talked about or reviewed this hottie that's been in San Jose now for the past 4 months. Definitely my ATF in the South Bay. Came from So Cal with legend status behind her. Do yourself a favor and go see her. Thank me later. Reviews speak for themselves. Pictures are real too!

[URL]https://www.eros.com/california/san_jose/files/7471049.htm?cat=1[/URL]

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/anna-4083065652-394867[/URL][/QUOTE]For those without access to review info, what's the menu and damage like?

I always feel that asian indies get value compared to the k-orgs where k-org presence is heavy.

[QUOTE=GrindingBomb;6978201]Can you share more info?

Services offered (I. E. BBFS / CIM).

Cost.

Agency response time and ease of screening.

Looks (ad says Vietnamese with a Latina body) how accurate is that?[/QUOTE]Very accurate description. Pictures are her. No BBFS, but game for everything else. Her rating on TER is higher than most if not all K-Orgs as an indi and the same cost.

[QUOTE=NuttyLoon;6978596]For those without access to review info, what's the menu and damage like?

I always feel that asian indies get value compared to the k-orgs where k-org presence is heavy.[/QUOTE]Everything's on the menu just like KOrgs with exception of BBFS. Body of a Latina trapped in a Viet body. Damage similar to KOrgs, with ratings on TER that's actually higher. Averages 8. 5-8. 7 out of 10 in both looks and performance. I frequent KOrgs in both SoCal and SJ. She's definitely my ATF, but you'll have to judge for yourself.

[QUOTE=DigiPromoGuy;6978755]Very accurate description. Pictures are her. No BBFS, but game for everything else. Her rating on TER is higher than most if not all K-Orgs as an indi and the same cost.[/QUOTE]Thanks for sharing. I've been wanting to try an indi asian. I know it's YMMV but are her services comparable in enthusiasm as some of the good agency girls? I'm guessing yes since you have repeated LOL.

We all know PD = price disaster. It's a shit show site. But since providers are limited in the bay area for some reason, and you must use it, here's a helpful list to avoid. Either I personally have seen these broads or my homies have.

[URL]https://privatedelights.ch/USA/California/San-Jose/Yorlenyjime[/URL]

Yorleny / Michell, whatever her name is. This girl is not GFE. Her service sucked. Not worth 2 bills for hhr. Not repeating / recommending.

[URL]https://privatedelights.ch/USA/California/San-Jose/sophiadoll[/URL]

She looked better in pics. Service also sucked. She wouldn't let you nut in the cave. GFTO. 300 for hhr for this shit? Please.

[URL]https://privatedelights.ch/USA/California/San-Jose/KhloeSullys96[/URL]

A waste of time, flaky AF. We screened with her a several times, facetime, agreed on time and rates and everything. Then she just flakes. Don't bother.

[URL]https://privatedelights.ch/USA/California/San-Jose/nicoleee1[/URL]

This girl smells like cigarettes. Got a lotta pimple on her face, looked way better in pics. Her service was rushed. She stack dates. Probably got a pimp because there's a car parked right out her place with lights on the entire night. Not repeating / recommending.

[URL]https://privatedelights.ch/USA/California/San-Jose/AlianaKisss[/URL]

My homie went to see this girl. They agreed for qk GFE 250. When he got there, she got an attitude, said she's not doing GFE for that rate. TF. Waste of time and his gas. He left. He also told me this broad got a pot belly. There's also multiple bad report on this girl on Mr. Number. Avoid.

[URL]https://privatedelights.ch/profile/Magicalmacey[/URL]

Another GPS time waster. Takes forever to reply. Then once you get the screening, she asked to jump through a million hoops. One of which is asking you to take a picture of your work I'd (potential blackmail material) and send it to her. Her voice and attitude was bitching on the phone too. Not a chance we spending a dime on this GPS broad.

[QUOTE=SuelyBrah;6978925]We all know PD = price disaster. It's a shit show site. But since providers are limited in the bay area for some reason, and you must use it, here's a helpful list to avoid. Either I personally have seen these broads or my homies have.

[URL]https://privatedelights.ch/USA/California/San-Jose/Yorlenyjime[/URL]

Yorleny / Michell, whatever her name is. This girl is not GFE. Her service sucked. Not worth 2 bills for hhr. Not repeating / recommending.

[URL]https://privatedelights.ch/USA/California/San-Jose/sophiadoll[/URL]

She looked better in pics. Service also sucked. She wouldn't let you nut in the cave. GFTO. 300 for hhr for this shit? Please.

[URL]https://privatedelights.ch/USA/California/San-Jose/KhloeSullys96[/URL].[/QUOTE]Great reporting. I appreciate the time you put in to make this list along with the links. If anyone has sampled these ladies, please share your experience as well. I have reached out to some of these girls but have not partaken. Now, I can skip them all. I can't believe these PD providers think they can get away charging too much and offering minimal services on top of bad attitudes.

It's time for us mongers to band together and make an ultimate "no list" so we can just see the good ones. The list should be unforgiving, like I would dock them even for slow response time. Hopefully the lack of business will make these whack PD providers lower their rates and / or improve service. I'm more inclined to help out a local provider that is serious about her business and offering the best service even if the looks aren't as good. There will still be these dumb tech mongers who will pay that much for crappy service and that what will keep these bad providers afloat, so leave it to them. Our advantage in this area is the supply is so plentiful that it exceeds demand and we can finally put pressure on the market to lower rate or offer improve services.

[QUOTE=GrindingBomb;6978796]Thanks for sharing. I've been wanting to try an indi asian. I know it's YMMV but are her services comparable in enthusiasm as some of the good agency girls? I'm guessing yes since you have repeated LOL.[/QUOTE]Better in my opinion. If you're ok with CFS. You won't be disappointed. Too bad she's only in SJ until October before she tours. Down to SoCal I believe which is where I've seen her before. Shower at her incall so I definitely recommend being fresh. One of the wettest most sensual BJs I've had with CIM. She's a pleaser.

[QUOTE=GrindingBomb;6979126]Great reporting. I appreciate the time you put in to make this list along with the links. If anyone has sampled these ladies, please share your experience as well. I have reached out to some of these girls but have not partaken. Now, I can skip them all. I can't believe these PD providers think they can get away charging too much and offering minimal services on top of bad attitudes.

It's time for us mongers to band together and make an ultimate "no list" so we can just see the good ones. The list should be unforgiving, like I would dock them even for slow response time. Hopefully the lack of business will make these whack PD providers lower their rates and / or improve service. I'm more inclined to help out a local provider that is serious about her business and offering the best service even if the looks aren't as good. There will still be these dumb tech mongers who will pay that much for crappy service and that what will keep these bad providers afloat, so leave it to them. Our advantage in this area is the supply is so plentiful that it exceeds demand and we can finally put pressure on the market to lower rate or offer improve services.[/QUOTE]100% spot on. See, these broads band together to create this GPS bandwagon. They think $200 for a qv non GFE is normal. LMFAO. In Europe, they offer 30 min for 80-100 euro. The girls there look way better and are eager to please.

A huge problem with PD is the site is owned and operated by a former broad. They are dishonest about the reviews. When a bro tries to post a negative review, but factual and did actually happened, they will not let it stick on. The girl also got the option to pay remove the guy's reviews. Some bullshit.

Did you end up seeing her? I am interested as well.

[QUOTE=Neo12;6869216]Is that her real pic? If so, will pm you here.[/QUOTE].

[QUOTE=Neo12;6939152]I posted about her a while ago. She's the best at her C-Org. She's the prettiest there. I've been seeing her for a long time. She has a nice figure and isn't an old ugly Asian aunt / grandma from C-Orgs. Pricing is $100 for 5 min. , $120 for 30 min. And $160 for 1 hour. She and the others from her C-Org get moved around to different cities every 2 weeks. They go from San Jose, Milpitas, Santa Clara, Fremont, Mountain View, Pleasanton, San Mateo and South SF. The PO is easy to work with and replies pretty fast in a few minutes. Another pretty one from her C-Org is Sweet Sammy. She had a pretty face and curves. Check the cities on Bedpage to see where she's currently at.[/QUOTE]Thanks for sharing this. I tried both Phoebe and Sammy and you were pretty much spot on. Phoebe is a little older but is a service queen easy 2 pops. Sammy is younger looking and can deepthroat which was a nice surprise. She is not as enthusiastic but still good enough and got me to the finish line twice. You can't go wrong with both. I noticed it says "model" in their ad while the others in the org do not. My hunch is when it says that, those are their prettiest girls.

Having 2 good ones from an org may be rare but have you sampled any other girls from this org? If so, are there any that can give service at the level of Phoebe or Sammy? I doubt the others will be better looking than Phoebe or Sammy.

What's the catch with $0. 7.

[URL]https://adultsearch.com/us/california/san-jose/female-escorts/3245364[/URL]

[QUOTE=HobbyistPdx1;6980634]What's the catch with $0. 7.

[URL]https://adultsearch.com/us/california/san-jose/female-escorts/3245364[/URL][/QUOTE]You just get a dead fish. Like a literal dead fish with the smell and all LOL. J / k, that price sounds like the house fee, extra services will probably be additional. On the ad it states a location "junction of" so its probably a massage parlor brick and mortar store.