Massage Parlor Reports

To the unrealistic request in regard to protecting a concerned provider from Pleasant ...

If you twist your requests / comments around, why not just stop submitting reports altogether except within those few US counties where these activities are legal and therefore open? Why not just speak so cryptically that the information is virtually useless except for the few seniors that are lucky enough to get a PM response from the reporting member?

Yes, posts need to be considerate and yes, degrees of caution should be exhibited from a spa business perspective, but one would need to be an idiot to think such a "secret society" could protect the will of LE.


[QUOTE=Muffythediver]I fully agree!

Do you guys who dont want to post really think by not posting that is going to "Keep your AMP or girl safe"? Please! LE knows more then you will ever know about these places, they are not stupid and also I am sure they have made many visits both for gathering info for legal activity and also for personal pleasure! Your inept attempt at trying to keep them off the map means nothing. If there number is up for what ever reason they will go down with or without your secrecy. So stop the childish secret keeping tactic, it wont work if the order comes down for LE to make a hit.[/QUOTE]

With over 100 posts per year, 2 per week with 40-60% activity related (guess), I can only say "thank you" ;) ....

[QUOTE=Bubba261]Been a member for about 8 years here....

Bubba also is slang for a President who is sexually obsessed (ergo the source of my nickname!) and a guy who made a living from shrimping.

I only started getting looks and implications that I was leo about 2 years ago when I started shaving my head every two weeks.

Have fun![/QUOTE]

Arriving late afternoon I thought I'd have my pick of the girls but unlike past visits at other AMPs, a line up was not possible. I asked the girl who answered the door (she would have been just fine too) if I could see the other girls. She lead me to my room and sent the next girl over who opened the door and smiled as if to ask "Me okay?" She was, but I wanted to see the entire menu at once and in particular, I wanted an all natural girl. Next girl came in, she was not as hot as the first two. She is the one I asked about "seeing all the girls at once" and answered, "not possible". Then comes Wendy. Okay, she's hot, young and enhanced, I don't really like forcing the parade to my room so I say "yes".......great choice actually. Very cute K girl, maybe 100 lbs tops, nicely done enhanced C's, full butt, slender waist, sexy make-up, sexy outfit......whats to complain about! 2 minutes in sauna (hot) then a long excellent table shower with conversation, Wendy speaks English fluently. Back to the sauna to dry off. So far all of the "waits" are quite short and not the usual "I wonder WTF they are doing while I sit here twiddling my thumbs" kinda wait. Into the room and I get a full, skilled massage, 40% standing on the table and me, 20% kneeling or standing on the floor. She ID'd my kinks and worked them hard, I thought to myself, she' gonna stop any minute but she didn't. The massage was comparable in skill and length to the best at Lily's. Okay, next I answer the question I've anticipated with "everything" and the rest is a blissful history. CBJ, DATY, RCG, CG, 69 and a finale, doggie style standing. She's in heels bracing herself against the wall, me pounding hard and saying to myself..."Life is good!" BTW, she lead the tour, I simply followed....no complaints...Ask for her at the door if you like my description, she'll be around maybe a month more.

9 and 10's all around.

ARG

refresh my memory but was not Bali one of the original test case busts when all this was started and the loop hole opened and still open after the new law was in place.

[QUOTE=ARegularGuy]Arriving late afternoon I thought I'd have my pick of the girls but unlike past visits at other AMPs, a line up was not possible. I asked the girl who answered the door (she would have been just fine too) if I could see the other girls. She lead me to my room and sent the next girl over who opened the door and smiled as if to ask "Me okay?" She was, but I wanted to see the entire menu at once and in particular, I wanted an all natural girl. Next girl came in, she was not as hot as the first two. She is the one I asked about "seeing all the girls at once" and answered, "not possible". Then comes Wendy. Okay, she's hot, young and enhanced, I don't really like forcing the parade to my room so I say "yes".......great choice actually. Very cute K girl, maybe 100 lbs tops, nicely done enhanced C's, full butt, slender waist, sexy make-up, sexy outfit......whats to complain about! 2 minutes in sauna (hot) then a long excellent table shower with conversation, Wendy speaks English fluently. Back to the sauna to dry off. So far all of the "waits" are quite short and not the usual "I wonder WTF they are doing while I sit here twiddling my thumbs" kinda wait. Into the room and I get a full, skilled massage, 40% standing on the table and me, 20% kneeling or standing on the floor. She ID'd my kinks and worked them hard, I thought to myself, she' gonna stop any minute but she didn't. The massage was comparable in skill and length to the best at Lily's. Okay, next I answer the question I've anticipated with "everything" and the rest is a blissful history. CBJ, DATY, RCG, CG, 69 and a finale, doggie style standing. She's in heels bracing herself against the wall, me pounding hard and saying to myself..."Life is good!" BTW, she lead the tour, I simply followed....no complaints...Ask for her at the door if you like my description, she'll be around maybe a month more.

9 and 10's all around.

ARG[/QUOTE]

Friday night just after dark. Mika is the new mammasan (replaces Sophia), Beebee or Peejay not sure and Young. I start with getting some help undressing and off to an excellent TS with Mika, washing all the right places. Back to the room and Mika leaves bringing in Young, (recognizes me and smiles). She has a nice petite body and is very receptive to all activities. Some light body rub and off to the races, she reacts and responds nicely to daty. I think her own oral skills are lacking and she also speaks very little English. It was a flawless transition from body rub to FS at the flip with the usual 60 + 140. I left a happy man about 1hr and 15, including some social time on the couch chatting with all three. With a mint in my mouth I was out the door. On a side note Mamma always promises new talent “next week”. For now with my once a month exploring, Young is just fine.

Peace.

Ok

I must admit I have not been in RI that much since the "rule" change. I must agree with alot of the information posted on here. The Cops know what goes on and play the game accordingly. I have a few friends that work in the field, and the access to information they have is pretty in depth. The hobby we all enjoy has its risks and rewards. Using code words is not going to help and although the desire to keep certain establishments "Under the Radar" is admirable in my personal opinion your not going to save the place from the bust if its coming all you can really do is hope your not there when it goes down. From reading the posts on the board it seems another trip to RI might in order with a report to follow.

Thanks

(your fact one):
Nothing any of these businesses advertise/mention in their ads is illegal, period.
Yes, they do appear on LEo's radar once advertised, but do not come under severe scrutiny of LEO/other f*ckers until someone (continually) posts 'illegal' activities occuring at their place of business in a public forum for all to see.
Where they advertise/how many times/what's happened to other people who've advertised with said media outlet is irrelevant/moot.

"but they are advertising an illegal activity in a place known for advertising for paid sex" - completely inaccurate/false

(your fact two):
Implied activities mean nothing; to quote you, "There is no way it can be used in court".

(your fact three):
I agree that 10 word/lack of details posts do no one any good.
If you research my posts, I've stated this many times.
However, with a small amount of 'creative writing', posts can be informative without mention of anything illegal.

(your fact four):
We are far from a small fish; have you been paying attention for the past year?!?
OUR ACTIVITIES, SPECIFICALLY MENTIONING USASG, WERE READ ON THE RI STATEHOUSE FLOOR IN FRONT OF THE NATIONAL MEDIA!!!
While they might be heresay legally, our posts/reviews were instrumental in this process and that is a fact.

I don't give 2 sh*its what your doing illegaly with your buddies; no relevance to this forum.
(That is boasting/bragging, BTW)
And I'm truly shocked to find out that cops are corrupt.
Projo went so far as to tell us that these (future) stings will more than likely be forced to use out-of-state 'officials' because................well, you do the math.

Again, look at my posting history (post LH-closing) which you obviously have not done.
My contributions to this forum (and others) are nothing like what you've accused me of posting.
I've placed a large amount of info on RI/MA AMPs and will continue to do so with the caviot of not mentioning anything 'illegal'.

You/others who share your opinion will continue do what what you want regardless of what I/others say.
However, keep this in mind:
You are, in fact, placing someone in jeopardy while hiding behind anonymity.
If it was your business/freedom on the line, my guess is you would have a different attitude.

More to follow,
J




[QUOTE=HappyDave]My point is.

Fact one, cops want the place they have it, advertising is not illegal but they are advertising an illegal activity in a place known for advertizing for paid sex. Craigslist alone was very highly profiled in a prostitution murder and is still up and running with adds. Theise establishments put themselfs on the radar with there adds.

Fact two, saying saw Jane left happy is just as bad because the cops know what is implied.

Fact three saw Jane left happy does us little good because we do not know the quality of the service offered. A shitty hand job for $200.00 does us no good but is still enough to get Jane busted anyways.

Fact four we are such a small fish in such a big ocean of illegal activity that our little forum is of very little impact. Our posts are total hear say, I could be a member with 600 posts just by re typing what is in here. There is no way it can be used in court.

I myself have been involved with groups of questionable activity to the general public. Our meetings "are" in undisclosed locations to the general public. But, the cops know exactly who and were we are, we located with there suggestion to stay out of view. We mind our own business and they leave us alone.

And O ya some of the group are cops.

I believe in post something of value or why post. Your statement of it being boasting, well saying I had a grate time but wont tell you were is boasting because it says you had a great time but wont tell me where I can have a great time.[/QUOTE]

Let me put this simply and we will ignore all the outside advertising places that sex for money is highly implied and believed to be.

Just to your post, once you have posted on "USA SEX GUIDE" (saw Jane and had a good time). No more is Needed, we all know what this site is for and what a "good time" is.

There are about three or four spas near me, one is simply mentioned on the Boston site all the time as extras can be had or were had. The others are ether never mentioned or it has been mentioned as no extras, with no more than that who will be raided.

One town has had an amp since the 70's and has been on this site many times and never touched. Others come and go often due to raids.

The other town had two, one of them just barely mentioned on the site and gone in less than a year the other never mentioned at all and still going. Both had been checked by leo, one was legit the other was not.

You have to understand that the only UTR is not to be mentioned at all, do not advertise and word of mouth only.

High traffic of johns in noticeable areas drawing complaints is the biggest draw for uncle leo. No complaint, no publicity no action needed.

[QUOTE=Jhonny8770](your fact one):
Nothing any of these businesses advertise/mention in their ads is illegal, period.
Yes, they do appear on LEo's radar once advertised, but do not come under severe scrutiny of LEO/other f*ckers until someone (continually) posts 'illegal' activities occuring at their place of business in a public forum for all to see.
Where they advertise/how many times/what's happened to other people who've advertised with said media outlet is irrelevant/moot.

"but they are advertising an illegal activity in a place known for advertising for paid sex" - completely inaccurate/false

(your fact two):
Implied activities mean nothing; to quote you, "There is no way it can be used in court".

(your fact three):
I agree that 10 word/lack of details posts do no one any good.
If you research my posts, I've stated this many times.
However, with a small amount of 'creative writing', posts can be informative without mention of anything illegal.

(your fact four):
We are far from a small fish; have you been paying attention for the past year?!?
OUR ACTIVITIES, SPECIFICALLY MENTIONING USASG, WERE READ ON THE RI STATEHOUSE FLOOR IN FRONT OF THE NATIONAL MEDIA!!!
While they might be heresay legally, our posts/reviews were instrumental in this process and that is a fact.

I don't give 2 sh*its what your doing illegaly with your buddies; no relevance to this forum.
(That is boasting/bragging, BTW)
And I'm truly shocked to find out that cops are corrupt.
Projo went so far as to tell us that these (future) stings will more than likely be forced to use out-of-state 'officials' because................well, you do the math.

Again, look at my posting history (post LH-closing) which you obviously have not done.
My contributions to this forum (and others) are nothing like what you've accused me of posting.
I've placed a large amount of info on RI/MA AMPs and will continue to do so with the caviot of not mentioning anything 'illegal'.

You/others who share your opinion will continue do what what you want regardless of what I/others say.
However, keep this in mind:
You are, in fact, placing someone in jeopardy while hiding behind anonymity.
If it was your business/freedom on the line, my guess is you would have a different attitude.

More to follow,
J[/QUOTE]

Well I commend your concern for these girls at the Spa's and there protection and privacy! One thing you don't understand is these girls have chosen this line of work knowing fully what the risks are. They know there is a risk of being dragged out in the public eye and being persecuted. They do what they do anyways for the huge payoffs. The more risk the better the pay! So these girls take the chance and overlook what the downside of the chosen profession is.

This website has only one purpose and that is to share information about providers and Spa's with each other. "She made me happy" is sharing nothing! I can go see my hair stylist and she can make me happy, I can go see a massage therapist and she will make me happy, I can go and see a girl at an unfamiliar AMP thinking I can get FS and she did not make me happy cause I wanted FS and all they offer was HJ...How was I to know by a review that said she made another guy happy?? This site is for the purpose of sharing good useful information. Not "She made me happy" posts!

Now one thing I agree with is treating these working girls with respect on here. There is a way to cetainly write about an experience and give details that can be deemed useful and still being respectful of the lady.

I could go on and on with this but clearly there are two different factions here who disagree so enough said. You post how you like and I will post how I like, the great thing about this site is we are all free to post how we wish within the rules Jackson has set forth!


[QUOTE=Jhonny8770](your fact one):
Nothing any of these businesses advertise/mention in their ads is illegal, period.
Yes, they do appear on LEo's radar once advertised, but do not come under severe scrutiny of LEO/other f*ckers until someone (continually) posts 'illegal' activities occuring at their place of business in a public forum for all to see.
Where they advertise/how many times/what's happened to other people who've advertised with said media outlet is irrelevant/moot.

"but they are advertising an illegal activity in a place known for advertising for paid sex" - completely inaccurate/false

(your fact two):
Implied activities mean nothing; to quote you, "There is no way it can be used in court".

(your fact three):
I agree that 10 word/lack of details posts do no one any good.
If you research my posts, I've stated this many times.
However, with a small amount of 'creative writing', posts can be informative without mention of anything illegal.

(your fact four):
We are far from a small fish; have you been paying attention for the past year?!?
OUR ACTIVITIES, SPECIFICALLY MENTIONING USASG, WERE READ ON THE RI STATEHOUSE FLOOR IN FRONT OF THE NATIONAL MEDIA!!!
While they might be heresay legally, our posts/reviews were instrumental in this process and that is a fact.

I don't give 2 sh*its what your doing illegaly with your buddies; no relevance to this forum.
(That is boasting/bragging, BTW)
And I'm truly shocked to find out that cops are corrupt.
Projo went so far as to tell us that these (future) stings will more than likely be forced to use out-of-state 'officials' because................well, you do the math.

Again, look at my posting history (post LH-closing) which you obviously have not done.
My contributions to this forum (and others) are nothing like what you've accused me of posting.
I've placed a large amount of info on RI/MA AMPs and will continue to do so with the caviot of not mentioning anything 'illegal'.

You/others who share your opinion will continue do what what you want regardless of what I/others say.
However, keep this in mind:
You are, in fact, placing someone in jeopardy while hiding behind anonymity.
If it was your business/freedom on the line, my guess is you would have a different attitude.

More to follow,
J[/QUOTE]

Sunday afternoon I had to drive to Lake George NY for a week of work. (Yes I know Lake George is closed for the winter). So I took a small detour to 1021 to check on the latest version of relaxation. When I arrived I was met by BeeBee, a cute 28 year old small girl who told me she has only been there 1 week and everyone else is busy. We had the last room on the left, which I hate.. too small and street noise.

She looked nice, and seemed to know her way around. Right to the TS which was just a little quick but covered all the basics. I tried to talk to her about the slide, but got nowhere. Language problem...The Sauna was not working??, so right back to the room. I passed on the massage and went right to the good stuff.

She really enjoyed my little vibrators. First time for her. On the way out I met the new Yung. She asked when I was coming to see her?? Overall a good visit.

Have fun!!

Tony

Very well worded post Muff I would love James Earl Jones to read the post since the voice would be a killer.

BTW "as requested by him" I have read several of Jh's posts and some are very descriptive both Boston and RI have to say his first person posts (not the comments on others we all make) are very descriptive as to services rendered and almost penthouse forum level. Very well done to a point of hypocrisy of what he wants to protect by not having others say almost the same. I hope he keeps posting I like his style.

All for fun.

Happy D

[QUOTE=Muffythediver]Well I commend your concern for these girls at the Spa's and there protection and privacy! One thing you don't understand is these girls have chosen this line of work knowing fully what the risks are. They know there is a risk of being dragged out in the public eye and being persecuted. They do what they do anyways for the huge payoffs. The more risk the better the pay! So these girls take the chance and overlook what the downside of the chosen profession is.

This website has only one purpose and that is to share information about providers and Spa's with each other. "She made me happy" is sharing nothing! I can go see my hair stylist and she can make me happy, I can go see a massage therapist and she will make me happy, I can go and see a girl at an unfamiliar AMP thinking I can get FS and she did not make me happy cause I wanted FS and all they offer was HJ...How was I to know by a review that said she made another guy happy?? This site is for the purpose of sharing good useful information. Not "She made me happy" posts!

Now one thing I agree with is treating these working girls with respect on here. There is a way to cetainly write about an experience and give details that can be deemed useful and still being respectful of the lady.

I could go on and on with this but clearly there are two different factions here who disagree so enough said. You post how you like and I will post how I like, the great thing about this site is we are all free to post how we wish within the rules Jackson has set forth![/QUOTE]

While I am concerned for the girls protection, I'm more concerned with its (the RI AMP industry's) survival for my own selfish reasons.
I want to be able to utilize their services in the future, but eventually the constant barrage of the finger-pointers rhetoric, fueled in part by us, will force LEo to act (again).

Again, like HD, you accuse me of 10 word/no info posts when, in fact, I post exactly the opposite of that and frown on it (even with the alphabet quoted).
Did you even search my reviews prior to your accusation?

And as far as the girls choice to work in a high risk job: Yes, you're right; they do assume the risk freely.
But more arrests will cause these girls to rethink their willingness to come here and we'll end up like MA with desperate, 50 yo ladies who offer no xtras.
You'll pine/wax/j*rk-off for the excellent choice of 20 something, PYT's we currently have in the stables.
Is this what you want?
Why would you want to heap additional risk/stress upon all that currently exists?
Because you can?
Just to help out some noob who doesn't want to do a simple search or RTFF?

I read on the escort side some 1 post guy asked for info and was reponded to with 3 numbers and a 'password', WTF?!?
Is this what we've come to?
"I want to help someone out to get a piece of tail; that's what this site was created for".
That could not be further from the truth.

Jackson and other forward thinkers like him (her?), created these sites/forums to aid us in our ability to hobby SAFELY (LEo, drugs addicts, ripoffs, poor service are weeded out through posting).
That safety also extends to the SP's (SW's, AMP's, escorts).
We keep them safe through discretionary posting.
Is posting the illegal activity of a stagnant-address provider being discrete?!?
I think not, no matter what spin is put on it.

Think about it.


[QUOTE=Muffythediver]Well I commend your concern for these girls at the Spa's and there protection and privacy! One thing you don't understand is these girls have chosen this line of work knowing fully what the risks are. They know there is a risk of being dragged out in the public eye and being persecuted. They do what they do anyways for the huge payoffs. The more risk the better the pay! So these girls take the chance and overlook what the downside of the chosen profession is.

This website has only one purpose and that is to share information about providers and Spa's with each other. "She made me happy" is sharing nothing! I can go see my hair stylist and she can make me happy, I can go see a massage therapist and she will make me happy, I can go and see a girl at an unfamiliar AMP thinking I can get FS and she did not make me happy cause I wanted FS and all they offer was HJ...How was I to know by a review that said she made another guy happy?? This site is for the purpose of sharing good useful information. Not "She made me happy" posts!

Now one thing I agree with is treating these working girls with respect on here. There is a way to cetainly write about an experience and give details that can be deemed useful and still being respectful of the lady.

I could go on and on with this but clearly there are two different factions here who disagree so enough said. You post how you like and I will post how I like, the great thing about this site is we are all free to post how we wish within the rules Jackson has set forth![/QUOTE]

First, thanks for the compliment, HD.
I do put a lot of 'me' into my posts, but then again why wouldn't I.
And like most of you, I'm here to gather/share information and have been very forward/detailed with my reviews.
(On another board, my original OS post has 25,000+ hits)
Hope all got the info they were looking for and made everyones visit a little smoother/less awkward (especially for the girls).
Some may not appreciate the long-version review of a visit.
Me, I think it's the only way to pass on what you've learned.
If it's not to your taste/liking, ignore me/the post and move on.

That being said, what you failed to learn from reading my posts is all my reports (save 1) after the loophole closed have no mention of anything illegal for stagnant addresses (RI AMPs) other than that I was there; no hypocrisy.
After posting my visit w/ Yoyo, I realized my error and my next post (same night - Kitty) was discrete.

BTW - I will continue to post (when I have the green!).

More to follow,
J


[QUOTE=HappyDave]Very well worded post Muff I would love James Earl Jones to read the post since the voice would be a killer.

BTW "as requested by him" I have read several of Jh's posts and some are very descriptive both Boston and RI have to say his first person posts (not the comments on others we all make) are very descriptive as to services rendered and almost penthouse forum level. Very well done to a point of hypocrisy of what he wants to protect by not having others say almost the same. I hope he keeps posting I like his style.

All for fun.

Happy D[/QUOTE]

Looks like Donna Hughes is at it again. She must have her panties in a bunch because the prostitution cases aren't going anywhere. Today's Projo even mentions the conversations of this board.

[url]http://www.projo.com/opinion/columnists/content/CL_achorn23_03-23-10_9KHNJGH_v12.4059bc7.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor[/url]

Not to toss the tennis ball back and forth since I think the whole board is sick of us now but Boston I believe you posted very descriptive of Geisha Girls and some others. Prostitution has always been illegal on the northern side of the boarder.

For the record this is my last post on the topic of posting as started by me.

[QUOTE=Jhonny8770]First, thanks for the compliment, HD.
I do put a lot of 'me' into my posts, but then again why wouldn't I.
And like most of you, I'm here to gather/share information and have been very forward/detailed with my reviews.
(On another board, my original OS post has 25,000+ hits)
Hope all got the info they were looking for and made everyones visit a little smoother/less awkward (especially for the girls).
Some may not appreciate the long-version review of a visit.
Me, I think it's the only way to pass on what you've learned.
If it's not to your taste/liking, ignore me/the post and move on.

That being said, what you failed to learn from reading my posts is all my reports (save 1) after the loophole closed have no mention of anything illegal for stagnant addresses (RI AMPs) other than that I was there; no hypocrisy.
After posting my visit w/ Yoyo, I realized my error and my next post (same night - Kitty) was discrete.

BTW - I will continue to post (when I have the green!).

More to follow,
J[/QUOTE]