Asian Providers

Does anyone know if Lory has worked before in LA or OC under same or different name at CA-kdolls? I thought I saw her pic before. And is she coming to LA or OC to work next wk?

[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6177599]I've read quite a bit of reviews about lory and wanted to see if the hype was real. After seeing her I left satisfied.

She is definitely young around mid 20's, late 20's top. 5'4 ish, on the thicker side but not fat (athletic build). People say she looks better than her pics on the site, but I feel like it was the other way around for me. She still has a pretty face tho. Her face reminds me of a sexier version of yuggietv and her body is slimmer than yuggie.

Attitude is probably her best quality. She made me feel like I was her bf and made me feel like she was happy to be with me the entire session. Very playful attitude throughout which made the session memorable.

English is amazing. Probably the best English speaking kgirl I've been with (better conversationalist than Petra).

Sex was average to above average. She hasn't been doing this for that long. About a year now so she has much to improve but she was more than willing to try all the positions I wanted. Her shaved pussy was tasty af and I spent a good 10 minutes dining that kitty up. She got a thicker ass than most kgirls so K9 was my fav. Finished with CIM which hit the spot.

Only con for me was she prefers LFK over DFK.

Sunday is her last day before she heads back to LA. I don't think she's worth the drive to LA just to see, but if she comes back to San diego, I would repeat with her.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SkankHuntt42;6175101]I don't post really but I had to step in here. I saw Salty, whos not "new" by any means. She's just a rebrand of Haru I believe from 3-4 months back at MKC. I can't remember the exact name she went by but we've saw each other in June. She's maybe in her late 20's and no way in hell could pull off 22. She's a 5 or 6 looks like and performance wise a 4 or 5.[/QUOTE]Hmm. What a woman! Had an amazing time. Definitely a few repeats are required.

I specifically asked if she had been to San Diego before and she said no. She said hopes to come back regularly. Good news for me bad news for other ladies.

Your comments point out something I've often lamented about some of (maybe the majority of?) the reviews here. And not just in the Asian Providers section, though reading through the last couple pages of posts prompted me to have this thought once again, so I'm posting it here.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and we all have different tastes. That's OBVIOUS and I think everyone here is smart enough to know it. But for those that leave reviews (not singling you out, PewPew, you did a pretty good job here) - please, please, please, please, PLEASE BE DESCRIPTIVE when describing the girls' looks. Everyone does a pretty good job describing the action / passion / etc. But we MUST do a better job describing the provider's physical appearance.

Let's say one guy enjoys more athletic / thick / curvy women, but another likes thin / skinny / toned women. It does the 2nd guy ABSOLUTELY NO GOOD AT ALL if the first guy writes a review that just says, "the door opened and she was REALLY hot! People need to do their best to describe body type. Tall? Short? (GIVE A HEIGHT ESTIMATE OR RANGE!) thick? Thin? (this can vary by taste somewhat, but compare her to a celeb or porn star body-wise if you have to!) toned? Soft? Belly? Flat stomach? Major or minor stretch marks or cellulite? Flawless skin? Maybe a ROUGH age estimate? (20's, late 20's / early 30's, 30's, late 30's / early 40's, etc, etc) any noticeable man made upgrades? Breast size and appearance? Clean shaven / racing strip / a little more / full Bush? Long or short hair? Acne? Scars?

Would I expect ANY reviewer would comment on ALL that stuff? Almost certainly not! But the more descriptive we can be, the better it is for everyone. We could definitely use more people comparing the girls they see, whether it's body or face or both, to celebs / social influencers / porn stars / etc.

Things can be so YMMV when it comes to service (based on chemistry and other factors). Appearance is MUCH less likely to be YMMV if people are descriptive beyond "I thought she was really hot", or "she was a little thick for my taste", or "she was alright but she didn't have much of an ass".

In the end, MOST of us are here to try and help each other. Maybe there are some shills / bookers / marketers, and maybe there are some dudes just here to get a thrill from posting / bragging about their conquests. But MOST I think, especially the people with longer posting histories, are here to help. Well if we really want to help, let's be as descriptive as possible. Whether you're posting reviews in the open, or offering honest feedback via questions you get in PMs.

Rant over. And another thanks to those who contribute openly, and those more like myself who do so privately when asked.

Happy hunting to all, and (early) happy halloween!

[QUOTE=SDPewPew;6177599]I've read quite a bit of reviews about lory and wanted to see if the hype was real. After seeing her I left satisfied.

She is definitely young around mid 20's, late 20's top. 5'4 ish, on the thicker side but not fat (athletic build). People say she looks better than her pics on the site, but I feel like it was the other way around for me. She still has a pretty face tho. Her face reminds me of a sexier version of yuggietv and her body is slimmer than yuggie.

Attitude is probably her best quality. She made me feel like I was her bf and made me feel like she was happy to be with me the entire session. Very playful attitude throughout which made the session memorable.

English is amazing. Probably the best English speaking kgirl I've been with (better conversationalist than Petra).

Sex was average to above average. She hasn't been doing this for that long. About a year now so she has much to improve but she was more than willing to try all the positions I wanted. Her shaved pussy was tasty af and I spent a good 10 minutes dining that kitty up. She got a thicker ass than most kgirls so K9 was my fav. Finished with CIM which hit the spot.

Only con for me was she prefers LFK over DFK.

Sunday is her last day before she heads back to LA. I don't think she's worth the drive to LA just to see, but if she comes back to San diego, I would repeat with her.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Wahoo2000;6179464]Your comments point out something I've often lamented about some of (maybe the majority of?) the reviews here. And not just in the Asian Providers section, though reading through the last couple pages of posts prompted me to have this thought once again, so I'm posting it here.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and we all have different tastes. That's OBVIOUS and I think everyone here is smart enough to know it. But for those that leave reviews (not singling you out, PewPew, you did a pretty good job here) - please, please, please, please, PLEASE BE DESCRIPTIVE when describing the girls' looks. Everyone does a pretty good job describing the action / passion / etc. But we MUST do a better job describing the provider's physical appearance.

…
[/QUOTE]I agree wholeheartedly with this comment but I think a lot of the comments that were left were made ambiguous on purpose. If someone gave a very descriptive detail of a girl and that girl turns out to be completely opposite of what the description provided was, people would NOT hesitate to leave a bad counter review exclaiming how that user made an inaccurate assessment of a girl.

If a girl isn't getting enough business, some users may leave ambiguous reviews for this purpose, to draw attention to such a girl.

Like you said, if a girl's ambiguous review is wrong, you might just think, "this user has really bad taste" and you'd just ignore it meanwhile feeling salty about it. But you wouldn't leave a counter review. I would encourage all users to leave a review regardless if a girl is not good to look at or not.

I'm not saying ugly providers don't deserve business, but ugly providers should be aware that they are not as aesthetically pleasing and offer better service at more reasonable rates. For example, Yoji / Ash. She is not cute by any means and not a real spinner, but her excellent attitude and service make up for her shortcomings. And that's why she gets repeat business. A lot of these providers think they're 10's, when they're 6/7'a at best. But we will still gladly pay to see those 6/7's if the service outperforms the looks.

[QUOTE=SkankHuntt42;6175101]I don't post really but I had to step in here. I saw Salty, whos not "new" by any means. She's just a rebrand of Haru I believe from 3-4 months back at MKC. I can't remember the exact name she went by but we've saw each other in June. She's maybe in her late 20's and no way in hell could pull off 22. She's a 5 or 6 looks like and performance wise a 4 or 5.[/QUOTE]I agree mostly, I saw Salty last week sometime. The comparison to Petra from an earlier post is far off. Salty has bleached blonde hair that looks like it has been bleached one too many times, she does not have a super attractive face. She is girl next door type looks, not the head turner type of looks like Petra. She is not a kisser, barely any kissing during the session and no DFK for me. All business in the shower as well, no preview BBBJ. Her build is skinny, but she has no tone to her muscles and feels too soft / mushy to the touch. She reminded me of Bora in that regard, however Bora's skin is incredibly soft and smooth. Her skin is not as smooth and soft as the top girls like Petra and Tatum, or Jazmin, purple, bora, etc. She has a very small frame, could be a borderline spinner if your were 6' or taller. I am guessing she is 5' at most. We went through all the positions, although I particularly like mish while holding her legs up high. She took a pounding from me, I am not huge, but not small either and she took it like a champ. I will also say that she is a cuddler and likes to cozy up and cuddle after sex. If that is something you like, then she might be worth your while.

So she is probably late 20's or so, she is attractive enough, like a girl you have picked up from a bar right at closing. Not the hottest girl in the bar, but about the 3rd or 4th hottest. She is a fun enough time, but if there are other top girls available, I would opt for them. For example, if Yoji / Ash is available then I would opt for her (and she also offers BBFS for those that want that). If Petra or Tatum is here, then it is a no-brainer to go with them. So all in all, I had a fun time. She is certainly boneable, but she is not so pretty that I can't take my eyes off of her. She is not exceptionally talented in the sack like Tatum or ash or Petra, etc. But she is a fun enough time. She offers BBFS, which I did not partake in. Some of you might enjoy that, but that is not a plus for me. Overall I had an enjoyable time, but it wasn't memorable. I may repeat with her depending upon the talent that is in town.

So to just complete the comparison to Petra. Petra (for me at least) is hot enough that if I had photos of her nude I could easily jerk it to them. Even though I have seen her a lot of times, she is just a really beautiful woman. If I had the same photos of Salty, it would be much harder to jerk it off to her. She just isn't as beautiful. Petra is a 9/10 in my eyes, Salty is a 6 or 7. Hth.

She is on the shorter side. Attractive but not really beautiful. Probably mid 30's. She is curvy. Could probably stand to lose a few pounds but looked good to me. Far as I could tell she doesn't speak much English and wasn't much of a talker. She doesn't look like her HX pics.

Positives. Very attentive. Willing to do whatever I asked. BB is an option. For whatever reason, her pussy felt particularly great. Warm, wet, tight, and inviting. She seemed to be enjoying our activities or at least not hating them.

Negatives. Very little DFK. She made it pretty obvious that she wasn't into it which was a downer for me. BBBJ was only ok.

Neutral. Very low-key personality. She's not a bundle of energy like Ash or a sensuous lover like Petra, but she holds her own.

Overall I would recommend. Not the best that SDAG has had on offer but a lot better than the worst.

[QUOTE=Waab182;5890974]Anyone have any info on the new girl Mini at FEC? Pics look familiar.[/QUOTE]If it is the same Mini working SDAG. I can tell you this she does not do DFK blamed my mustache.

[QUOTE=TrustyHairlip;6182005]I agree mostly, I saw Salty last week sometime. The comparison to Petra from an earlier post is far off. Salty has bleached blonde hair that looks like it has been bleached one too many times, she does not have a super attractive face. She is girl next door type looks, not the head turner type of looks like Petra. She is not a kisser, barely any kissing during the session and no DFK for me. All business in the shower as well, no preview BBBJ. Her build is skinny, but she has no tone to her muscles and feels too soft / mushy to the touch. She reminded me of Bora in that regard, however Bora's skin is incredibly soft and smooth. Her skin is not as smooth and soft as the top girls like Petra and Tatum, or Jazmin, purple, bora, etc. She has a very small frame, could be a borderline spinner if your were 6' or taller. I am guessing she is 5' at most.[/QUOTE]Very YMMV then I guess, because Salty sucked my face off (in a good way). Agree on the gnd looks.

Hi all,

I'm jumping into the SD Kgirl scene a bit. What / who is FEC? And where can I find their ads / information?

I know SDAG. Looking to have options here. I've been up to OC a couple of times, but would really like to do more closer to home. Thanks!

[QUOTE=SDLaidBack;6184153]Hi all,

I'm jumping into the SD Kgirl scene a bit. What / who is FEC? And where can I find their ads / information?

I know SDAG. Looking to have options here. I've been up to OC a couple of times, but would really like to do more closer to home. Thanks![/QUOTE]FarEastCuties on Humaniplex. Get an account there, pay the 25 to get out of quarantine and then join the noobz club there to see how that site works.

[QUOTE=TrustyHairlip;6185135]FarEastCuties on Humaniplex. Get an account there, pay the 25 to get out of quarantine and then join the noobz club there to see how that site works.[/QUOTE]Thanks, appreciate the response. Been meaning to get in there via means of a gift card. I'll do that today.

Sandra99.

Any Pleasers?

Any feedback about FEC Celine? The pic seems nice and her boobs (at least from the pic) seem big. When I asked the booker for more info, the booker said, "she is new". :

Sigh.

[QUOTE=DogRice;6188029]Any feedback about FEC Celine? The pic seems nice and her boobs (at least from the pic) seem big. When I asked the booker for more info, the booker said, "she is new". :

Sigh.[/QUOTE]She's been with Peach Cafe in San Jose, BookerGray and now FEC-SD. Looks like straight GFE and D cups on all three sites but no reviews found yet.

Thank you, Sir! Always resourceful you are!

I am "hungry" for some huge natural boobs, but not sure her D cups are natural. Will ask the booker again.

[QUOTE=SirBishop;6188062]She's been with Peach Cafe in San Jose, BookerGray and now FEC-SD. Looks like straight GFE and D cups on all three sites but no reviews found yet.[/QUOTE]