Suck it up and keep posting
[QUOTE=Vegasboy As I stated I have been reading this forum for a while and all of the reports were very consistant regarding this place. That is why I was surprised that I had the experience I did. One of you asked me to describe the place, I did and never saw a response.
I just don't get it. I did the report only because I thought my experience was diffferent that 99% of the reports I had read regarding this place and then the inference is that I am lying (What would be my objective if this were the case). Hey whatever you believe you believe. Why do some of you seem to be so put out by the fact that not everyone has the same experience every time they go to a particular place of business. I thought the idea of this forum was to exchange information, thus I did that only because mine was different that most others is all.
I have frequented a few of the other establisments such as Spa A and B but my experiences were similar thus I did not report because I did not want to be repetitive. On another note I did go to Massage RX on 138 and unfortunately found that at least the person I saw was not at all one who was willing to consider anything other than a legit massage, despite my very persistant efforts. Even though she did replace the towel I conveniently left off. But even though I had no luck, I certainly would not call one of you a liar if your experience was different.
[/QUOTE]
VB - you described exactly the reason that you got some shit about your report. You have been reading the forum for awhile and 99% of the reports about Angel's are the same. Then lo and behold a newbie poster visits the place and gets extra special double-probation secretive service. What are the odds? If you have indeed been reading the forum you would have known that some indeed do post BS for effect or becasue they are schills for a place. So when a new poster comes up with something against the norm or the grain it is looked at with more scruitany. It's always been that way and always will. I have seen both Angel and amy many times and i found your post hard to believe based on MY experiences and the experiences of many others.
As far as some of your other visits let us know about them even if it is the same. You might have had different ladies not mentioned here or your visits may validate other posters info. I have seen more than a few questions about Massage RX asked. You went, had info and could have given us that info about the girl you saw and kept someone from wasting their time and money.
And lastly just some advice.....pissing off the 'senior' posters is probably not the way to endear yourself to us and get the backchannel info that is out and about and not always posted. and we all have UTR ladies that we know about.
So forget it...make some visits...post them and join the community. SO
I'll see your WW and raise you a Jasmine...
[QUOTE=Tim S]Last week went to WW one evening. Slow, nobody there but me. Chow-shi greeted me. It was my second time with her. She does a fairly crappy massage but is very,very good with the teasing and the finish and allows access to all the goods.
WW is good because it is local and fairly consistent (at least my results have been consistent.) I just wish the girls would dress a little more sexy, you know? Also, a younger one wouldn't hurt either![/QUOTE]
Thanks for the report Tim! It's nice to see that we have two good options in Waltham... Here's mine:
Took a spin over to Jasmine today - called on my way and they weren't busy. I asked who was working and she replied "you want to try new girl?" - of course! I'm always looking to expand my experiences.
Was met at door by Helen - she looks a lot like Amy, with just a touch of baby fat, but petite and cute nonetheless. I put her at mid-30's. She was my provider. Told me that Lily was also on duty (taller, thin one - not the fake amy).
Frankly, I would write my usual book from here, but you can really just read my previous reviews of this place, as it was almost identical. Decent "strong" massage, little bit of teasing pre-flip. After flip, she did some head and neck, leaving me flapping in the wind for a few, but then her build-up and continued teasing was very good. Went for the oil, and we were off to the races, with under-shirt access to what turned out to be nice, small B's.
Her technique was fine, and she appeared to enjoy what she was doing. Only negative was when one of you mongers called about 15 minutes in (i'm still on my stomach), and she asked you to come in 40 minutes - FYI I could hear your entire convo because either you have the loudest voice ever, or her phone volume is set to megaphone... You gave the name "John" and said you were bringing a friend.
She was a little taken aback by that because if you bring a friend, one of you would have to wait for me to finish.
In the end, I got almost a full hour, but I could tell that she was rushing a little to finish me off and to change the room over.
I was sent on my way with a life saver and typical pleasantries. Helen says she won't be there that long. I would recommend her if you go in the next few days. If Lily is there, she's good too - see past reports.
So, I'm thinking that it's good to have two decent providers in Waltham - should serve to keep the House Fee at .6 and the customer service in top-notch form. I agree with Tim that none of the girls are under 30, but if there's roaming and good HE, I'm willing to close my eyes and use my imagination!
Looks: 7 (cute, but not young-looking)
Atmosphere: 9 I like the place a lot, just not the Kenny G
Massage: 7-8
Attitude: 10
Extras: 9
House fee - .6 + .4 tip
I think Jasmine has become a viable 1st or 2nd choice to WW - whichever one is available will get the job done.