[QUOTE=Nrlmus; 1402739]Not to sound like your priest / minister / rabbi / guru (change your guru if it's a guru though) Asket but you shouldn't be using prostitutes especially when you are unmarried because first of all it's illegal and second because you should be saving yourself for that one and only that you're planning to stay faithful to her for the rest of your life.
If I had betting money I would surely bet against it (that you will stay faithful to her for the rest of your life) or if you manage to do that I will surely bet that your future wife would not. Considering the user name you chose which I suppose comes from the word "Asceticism" which calls for "refraining from sensual pleasures and the accumulation of material wealth" you should be able to deal with your physical desires, moreover welcome the challenges of that desire so you could conquer them like a true Ascet.
Seriously speaking however, if you'd only knew how many marriages stay together because of wonderful ladies like Kat and others like her who sacrifice their bodies and souls to insure that our male imperfections get an outlet. As far as I'm concerned they all should be commended for it because if it wouldn't be for them many married men that currently use their services would start acquiring mistresses, which means getting into emotionally based relationships on the side. That would definitely make divorce rate, high as it is, sky-rocket. After all that's what women mostly do nowadays. They don't call male escorts, instead they acquire lovers, which means entering into relationships on the side and as a result more often then not leave their families for those extra-curricular activities. What I'm trying to say is with what married mongers do here there is no negative consequence to their families. If they wouldn't do this however, chances are there would be some.
Moreover, I venture to say that if prostitution were to be legalized a lot of cops and lawyers and others involved with law-enforcement establishment would lose their jobs because both crime and the divorce rate would plummet. So in immortal words of an immortal man."legalize it, don't criticize it!" Let's all hold hands and praise the Lord on that! LOL
As for Kat's protocol or my protocol who cares. She establishes her protocol in order to protect herself. Obviously the more she knows the safer she feels. We on the other hand, have an exact opposite goal. The less she knows the safer we fell. Something's got to give and something always gives. Kat asks for more, if she doesn't get it, she weighs if she can do with less in order to still get business. If at any point she starts feeling that business is not worth the risk, she lets business go.
We, on the other hand, do exact opposite. If provider asks questions I give out only what I feel is safe for me to give out. If it hits the threshold that I consider not to be safe I'd let provider go.
Obviously, offer more money to Kat and it may lower her safety threshold, or if I like the provider's looks and / or the way she sounds it may (highly unlikely though but theoretically possible) lower mine too. Each sets up their own safety threshold and lives by it or dies by it and lowers or heightens it depending on circumstance. There is risk involved for both parties here, so both try to minimize it the best they can and see fit. There is no right or wrong.[/QUOTE]Very well put and I couldn't add anything further. And BTW. At the risk of being told to STFU. Kudos also to Santa66. And at the risk of no one caring. I certainly know who I share info with and who shares it back. SO
