That there are pics on there that were on the Hoosier Hotties site well before they closed. I did wonder if they ever updated their ages.
Printable View
That there are pics on there that were on the Hoosier Hotties site well before they closed. I did wonder if they ever updated their ages.
[QUOTE=Ilapp;1182467]OH, OK, like I was letting some great secret out of the bag with that comment! Hahahahah! It is why you are who you are and why those that love you do so much (and often I guess I should add). It is good to see you back around more often, brightens days that otherwise are grey.[/QUOTE]Shut the front door! . I'm happier than a squirrel with a big nut.
[QUOTE=Ilapp;1182468]That there are pics on there that were on the Hoosier Hotties site well before they closed. I did wonder if they ever updated their ages.[/QUOTE]Good point.
Ilapp had given a glowing report of Kayla on BP at:
[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/you-wont-believe-your-eyes-with-this-hot-blonde-mama-31/4136036[/url]
However, I just noticed this morning that this seemingly new provider is using the same pics at:
[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/london-b-londe-bomshell-21/4315784[/url]
The second is an different number, different name, and claims to be 11 years younger. Ilapp confirmed that the woman he saw was about 31, as the ad states, so it appears that someone is scamming Kayla's images.
Ilapp, can you confirm that Kayla's pics are indeed of her?
TA2
[QUOTE=Sensorysrprise;1182780]Shut the front door! . I'm happier than a squirrel with a big nut.[/QUOTE]Front door, back door, getting a big nut, enough already, my old heart can't take all the exciting thoughts. TA2, yes although the pics only show a portion of the face, my impression of the pics was always someone younger and thinner, but I fully believe those are Kayla. Pretty face, the curve and shape of the bust protruding in the pic seems to be of her very magnificent pair that I had the pleasure to meet, the proportion of the waist and the rear seems accurate and the shape of the leg appears to be the same. Not knowing she was who I was going to meet I wasn't expecting to see the live version of those pics when we met, and when I saw her did I go, oh wow, that is the girl in the pics on BP? No, but I can see that is her, and what I saw was a pretty woman with a great body and one whom I had a very good time with. I did try to call and warn "her" about it when I saw that ad post, didn't get through, not surprising, but I am sure someone will notice soon.
[QUOTE=Tryinagain2; 1183044]Ilapp had given a glowing report of Kayla on BP at:
[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/you-wont-believe-your-eyes-with-this-hot-blonde-mama-31/4136036[/url]
However, I just noticed this morning that this seemingly new provider is using the same pics at:
[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/london-b-londe-bomshell-21/4315784[/url]
The second is an different number, different name, and claims to be 11 years younger. Ilapp confirmed that the woman he saw was about 31, as the ad states, so it appears that someone is scamming Kayla's images.
Ilapp, can you confirm that Kayla's pics are indeed of her?
TA2[/QUOTE]Kayla has a very nice body and I'm glad that someone was fast to report. Now for someone to use another providers pictures is alway bad. Don't matter if she looks close to her. Has anyone have infor on this 2nd provider?
[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/london-b-londe-bomshell-21/4315784[/url]
[QUOTE=Tryinagain2; 1183044]The second is an different number, different name, and claims to be 11 years younger. Ilapp confirmed that the woman he saw was about 31, as the ad states, so it appears that someone is scamming Kayla's images.
[/QUOTE]The second ad is down, now, after the reveal. Why wouldn't both be her? Wouldn't be the first advertiser with multiple names, multiple numbers, and a malleable date of birth.
[QUOTE=Davidonecall; 1183089]Kayla has a very nice body and I'm glad that someone was fast to report. Now for someone to use another providers pictures is alway bad. Don't matter if she looks close to her. Has anyone have infor on this 2nd provider?
[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/london-b-londe-bomshell-21/4315784[/url][/QUOTE]I've actually seen Kayla I believe also known as Stephanie twice. The second time I saw her by mistake after she changed her pics and name. Both times she did not look half as hot as the photos. I'm up in the air whether they are of her at a younger point in her life or of a completely different person. When I saw her she looks ok enough, kind of average looking and older than the photos, so I felt mislead.
I would not as been as displeased as I was if she did not kick me out for mistaking me for LE both times! The first time I dressed up nice with a button up and slacks. I believe there was a rumor of a undercover cop dressing as such. In any case I just about had to put my foot in the door to make sure I had my wallet. She proceed to call me after the fact claiming I was knocking on her door long after I was driving down the highway. And I had a long drive home as I do not live in Indy proper. At the time I thought she must have been on drugs but now think it could have just been crazy paranoia.
The second time I saw her we realized after a short period of time we knew one another. She did give me a decent massage but we both decided to end the session early as she could not proceed as being too freak out at the possibility that I was LE. At least I didn't have to pay anything so I wasn't too pissed. One thing I can say about her physically is she has very nice breasts, one of the best I've seen. I did get a chance to touch them but that is as far as things went.
Later I went and saw Nancy whom I think she also knows and had a good time. Nancy was paid without hassle and I left happy. Too bad it could have been Kayla but I was kind of glad it didn't happen as the pictures are not accurate. I never see a provider who posts old or fake pics so I'd have to give Kayla a do not recommend.
This is a little late, however, I felt I should give credit to one amazing gal. I was able to schedule last minute with SlutCake, but I needed to allow her 30 min as she was finishing up some other business. She is an ATF and I have lots of great times with her, but I had never tried the Nuru. She turned me into her slippery and smooth personal pommel horse. I think she recently returned from furthering her education in Nuru, she can sign me up as a new student!
I'm not sure how she was gliding her body, legs, hips and wonderful breast all over my body but I'm a huge fan! One second I would see her feet by my head, then the next I would feel her toes intertwined with mine. I don't know how she does it, but she makes this experience so erotic. She uses coconut oil, and I was at first concerned that I would smell like a stripper or spring break beach party. This stuff has virtually no scent and was extremely easy for her to wash off my body in shower we shared afterwards. I almost had as much with her in the shower as I did with the massage.
One: there's no reason to report on her just "to keep her honest". Let's work on getting hobbyists to be honest in the first place. Lacy's excellence is constant.
Two: no one needs a YMMV warning about her, but consider one in reverse. Your milage might vary according to what you're willing to bring to her. Either she's psychic, or she has the body intelligence of a great athlete. Andreas Segovia once said that great musicianship depended not on technique, but on beauty coming from within. He was a great guitarist, and I'm a lousy one, but I bet I have more fun with Lacy. So maybe it works for pervs, too.
[QUOTE=B Beall;1183205]The second ad is down, now, after the reveal. Why wouldn't both be her? Wouldn't be the first advertiser with multiple names, multiple numbers, and a malleable date of birth.[/QUOTE]10 years difference, with the same pics? Doesn't make sense to me. Not even the dumbest hobbyist is going to fail to notice that.
Now, I don't know Kayla, haven't met her, have no axe to grind about either ad, but she impressed Ilapp, and his impressions have impressed me in the past. She's also honest enough to have posted what he considered her real age for months now, so I highly doubt she's behind the second ad with all different info. Someone likely stole her pics. I only posted about it so someone didn't go into a bad situation with that one w / o any suspicion. It really doesn't matter any more than that to me.
TA2
The 2nd referenced ad is down now.
[QUOTE=Tryinagain2; 1183044]Ilapp had given a glowing report of Kayla on BP at:
[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/you-wont-believe-your-eyes-with-this-hot-blonde-mama-31/4136036[/url]
However, I just noticed this morning that this seemingly new provider is using the same pics at:
[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/london-b-londe-bomshell-21/4315784[/url]
The second is an different number, different name, and claims to be 11 years younger. Ilapp confirmed that the woman he saw was about 31, as the ad states, so it appears that someone is scamming Kayla's images.
Ilapp, can you confirm that Kayla's pics are indeed of her?
TA2[/QUOTE]
I have tried to imagine what it is like to be an independent provider. There must be lots of worries to over come just to increase your collection of portraits of dead presidents.
As a long time hobbiest, I have been lucky that I have never had a regrettable experience. Since I am new to this forum, I wanted to put that out up front because this review is mixed.
[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/its-time-for-fun-with-a-mature-beauty-39/4251123[/url]
First, if that picture is her, it is dated, really dated. Nothing about that picture resembled the girl that opened the door. I am not in search of perfection but due expect truth in advertizing. My tastes are wide so this was not a deal breaker. OK, I had the option to turn around but I did not. I had made the drive. I was there.
Oh, yeah she set the timer on her phone too. WTF? I had not seen that since the days (mid 80s) when you could drive out Washington St. To Hendricks County and get 1/2 an hour for a couple of jacksons. That day a provider used one of those big dial cooking timers.
The worst was over.
Once we got started, I am happy to report she was friendly, warm and responsive! GFEish, up to a point. Above average in attitude. Average effort. $.8
[QUOTE=Tryinagain2; 1183283]10 years difference, with the same pics? Doesn't make sense to me. Not even the dumbest hobbyist is going to fail to notice that.
[/QUOTE]But presumably the scammer doesn't realize it? (You ever work with the general public? Takes about two days before you swear off saying "Nobody will ever fall for that" for life.)
Hey, I applaud your catching it, and warning others; I was just curious why it "appeared someone was scamming her picture" rather than her posting two ads. I've seen stranger things than someone losing 7 years in an afternoon. I've seen stranger things than someone mistakenly typing "24" when she meant to type "27" or something else below the magic 30 mark. That, a different name, and a different number aren't exactly mortal sins in this business.
But they might give someone pause. Ilapp vouched that the woman in the ad was roughly 30, genuine, fun, and hot, and *might* be the subject of the pics. That's not the same thing as attesting that she posts to BP while under oath.
Pics have always been a peanut-and-shell game.
There are several possible girls behind a pic appearing in an escort ad. The girl in front of the camera, the girl who posted the pic that caught our eye, and the girl who will show up to see us. How many times have we left an appointment happy with what we saw and got, thinking it was her but we were not entirely sure?
We noticed Kayla of Indianapolis first. Then we learned that Anichka is also using the same pics. A Google of Anichka's phone links to [I]Katyah[/I] of South Bend whose ad displays pics having a completely different look.
The second girl we notice to have posted the same pics, Anichka, is no indication she is the scammer. All we know is the order we saw them. But Anichka and [I]Katyah[/I] of South Bend are compromised by their phone number being linked and [I]Katyah[/I] of South Bend having a completely different look. This could mean Kayla of Indianapolis and Anichka are the same. It could mean Anichka and [I]Katyah[/I] of South Bend are using the same phone as girls sometimes do. This situation usually raises more questions than we can answer, becomes circular or leads to a dead end. Only the photographer knows for sure.
What we can take to the bank is Ilapp had a chance face-time with Kayla of Indianapolis who he knew to be the girl behind the ad presently up, and he vouched her approximate age, that the pics of the woman in front of the camera used in her ad were close to the girl he met, and that she was hot. Period. That's good enough for me. There's not much that Ilapp can say on the subject of being the girl in front of the camera because the pics are cropped. But Ilapp saw her with his own eyes and gave her legitimacy by what he said and by being clear on the limits of what he said.