Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=Inforthewin;6940054]I can totally agree with everything you're saying. My biggest deal with the screening process would be, the booker now having full details of my DL, majority of my personal info that can get me in a nasty bind with my SO and personal life. Correct me if wrong but Read some post about some booker in Boston getting busted and now have close to 30 monger profiles awaiting contact from LE. That's freaking scary to imagine.[/QUOTE]At the very least, Gangnam Booker should ask for references from other K agencies. It's a method that has worked very well in the past.

[QUOTE=WolfWolf79;6940199]Any intel on this one would be greatly appreciated. Loving her look but no DATY has me discouraged.

[URL]https://www.kbeautygirls.com/laelia/[/URL][/QUOTE]Rebrand Celeste, lots of comments written here, young, white, beautiful body and breasts, but cold service, and you can't CIP.

[QUOTE=Stonkz;6940184]She basically a newb. Fresh to be exact. Decent english. She looked like she's mid 20's but she kept the room dark. Body is slim. Her V is tight. Honestly wasn't that memorable LOL. She basically had no routine. But I'm going to repeat because her V felt good and tight. Def not magnum approved.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the update. Kinda what I figured.

[QUOTE=ChefBoyardee;6893117]I wasn't initially interested in Minji because of the obviously fake pictures (…) if you like newer fob girls, I recommend. If you want polished veteran service, I would suggest someone else. Personally, I had fun and will repeat, but manage your expectations in terms of technique.[/QUOTE]I was today years old when I discovered where Minji's pics were lifted from. See IG: at jaeheeng.

Speaking of newer girls with low-mileage, Jasmine SG fits the bill, English-speaking, and pics are reliable with normal P.S. True she has a commensurately low-stamina, but she makes my top 3 tight boxes in 2024 for sure. I was pleasantly surprised by her headgame. I don't know if she's social media savvy to know about "Hawk Tuah", but it was deep, with good suction, and wet enough to create some slimy & stringy saliva that she'd play with. I savored watching her voluntarily FF herself until she gagged and eyes water.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6939820]Not necessarily, but no one should be surprised either if it does. Before it more recently sat at 60, the gap between both market rates was 40 for the longest time. 220 versus 260. LSC was the first to 300 earlier this month; others will soon follow.[/QUOTE]I'm not at all familiar with the economics of the trade but I've seen two girls now leave LA to work in other cities because things were apparently slow so I was actually expecting / hoping prices would drop. And these were girls who good looking and provided great service imo.

At the same time I see prices going up so maybe the issue is that customers always want to see new girls or something.

[QUOTE=PaulSgv;6940730]At the very least, Gangnam Booker should ask for references from other K agencies. It's a method that has worked very well in the past.[/QUOTE]I don't know if tighter screenings would prevent counterfeit payments, but why take a chance. The risk-to-reward ratio is just not worth lowering the bar of entry.

[QUOTE=Micca112;6939206]I've been seeing (Bona / Crystal / Ring) regularly and she told me a few times guys have given her counterfeit bills.[/QUOTE]

I might try shelly. I hear great reviews, but my only reservation is that she may be a bit older for my liking.

[QUOTE=AsianAssEater;6940369]Just book Shelly and whoever her duo partner is. Shelly thicc and she was offering duo with candy recently and her TER seems like she was a spinner. So you missed out LOL.[/QUOTE].

[QUOTE=Throwawayhok89;6941139]I might try shelly. I hear great reviews, but my only reservation is that she may be a bit older for my liking.[/QUOTE]Mid 40's with a world class body and world class service as well.

[QUOTE=Stonkz;6940184]She basically a newb. Fresh to be exact. Decent english. She looked like she's mid 20's but she kept the room dark. Body is slim. Her V is tight. Honestly wasn't that memorable LOL. She basically had no routine. But I'm going to repeat because her V felt good and tight. Def not magnum approved.[/QUOTE]How would you rate her face? Would you say she is pretty? Are the pics close?

[QUOTE=EyceeRaw;6941218]How would you rate her face? Would you say she is pretty? Are the pics close?[/QUOTE]I personally would give her a 6 / 10 for her face. I found her to look very different from the pics online. Her eyes are close together in person.

For reference, I'd rate Baby Arin 8. 5 / 10 and Superstar Lucy 8 / 10.

[QUOTE=EyceeRaw;6941218]How would you rate her face? Would you say she is pretty? Are the pics close?[/QUOTE]Jasmine looks like Mihara Honoka (face, not body) but not as skinny. I saw her last week and she's too green. No repeat for me.

Saw Jamie today on her last day in LA today. Good Chinese, nice rimming, nice tits, popped twice.

I would rate their faces:

Jasmine 8, Jamie 7, Ina 10.

Service wise, Ina still beats them in all departments. She has a different outfit everyday and changes upon request with zero complaints.

So what's the deal with Minji did you guys break her in yet? Any bros seen her yet? Or do I have to wait longer until she learns? Thanks.

[QUOTE=ZebraZebra;6941359]Jasmine looks like Mihara Honoka (face, not body) but not as skinny. I saw her last week and she's too green. No repeat for me.

Saw Jamie today on her last day in LA today. Good Chinese, nice rimming, nice tits, popped twice.

I would rate their faces:

Jasmine 8, Jamie 7, Ina 10.

Service wise, Ina still beats them in all departments. She has a different outfit everyday and changes upon request with zero complaints.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Bbaka10;6941296]I personally would give her a 6 / 10 for her face. I found her to look very different from the pics online. Her eyes are close together in person.

For reference, I'd rate Baby Arin 8. 5 / 10 and Superstar Lucy 8 / 10.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the reports. Of the available girls, I think I'll still with Ina for now.

[QUOTE=Inforthewin;6940054]I can totally agree with everything you're saying. My biggest deal with the screening process would be, the booker now having full details of my DL, majority of my personal info that can get me in a nasty bind with my SO and personal life. Correct me if wrong but Read some post about some booker in Boston getting busted and now have close to 30 monger profiles awaiting contact from LE. That's freaking scary to imagine.[/QUOTE]So I can speak to this. I was the user who posted the news to this forum about Boston Ten the day of, with links to the news and affidavit. The affidavit says outright that the Feds put the place on surveillance. They even had government officials who were using the agency with government issued phones, so all they had to do was confiscate their own employee's phones and read their texts. The Feds do not lie on their affidavits, and they do not ask for a warrant to raid (and blow their cover) until they already have an open and shut case. It's very different from how state or city police operate. Once they raid they already had everything proven. They have up to a 99% conviction rate when taken to trial, compared to around 50% for many local cases brought by state or city.

They are not going to bother raiding the booker and working backwards through their records, or begging the defendant's lawyers for follow-up info for leniency. They are only interested in federal crimes. Because first of all they said at press that they themselves cannot pursue the mongers since it is not a federal crime. What they did was investigated the owners (wire fraud and enticing to cross state lines), which is a federal crime, and handed the side-effect of their investigation over to state officials. Prostitution is a state crime, and in Boston I believe a felony (it is a misdemeanor in California). And true to that months later Boston took over the case after being handed everything. They did almost no investigation themselves. The Feds have already moved on as they are only interested in the fraud and enticement. I. e the owner and straw man renter. They have no interest in putting their staff on merely state crimes. But they will keep looking at agency owners, as their original informant dates back many years.

To be clear, they did all of the surveillance themselves. They did not need to seize any records since that is a lot less reliable and also they are not interested in simple prostitution (again, that is not a federal crime. It is 100% legal in a few parts of the US). Specifically, they are looking at people who invite workers to come to the US, host the work, and act as straw men for that. Many years ago mongers did exactly that with kgirls in Seattle. That is pretty much the only way Feds will directly investigate mongers. So dont do that (i.e try to start your own kgirl agency while also being a customer). Bad idea, but they really tried it there. Note that Seattle has kgirl agencies still long after, business as usual. Don’t be the nail that sticks out.

I will say local enforcement varies by city a lot. Things are super rampant in places like COI where It is hard to find a stripper that doesn't fuck. Whereas in SD it is hard to find a stripper that does. When strip clubs in COI get raided, it is for drugs or weapons. They dont really care about the fucking, they have better things to do. They'll make a token effort then business as usual. So what Im saying is over time shops set up wherever they can thrive. And they will thrive for decades in some areas. Nobody cares. The law even got more lax. Go out on the streets and there are more streetwalkers now than in decades.

[QUOTE=TomKeen;6939360]For guys who always complain about the prices in LA, what's the incentive to get more people into the hobby with very little screening? Seems very unsafe. Wouldn't it make sense to have fewer mongers so that the prices go down? Do you work for these agencies? I want to know how helping newbies benefits the rest of the mongers who have been in the game[/QUOTE]What do you mean what's the incentive?

Whats the incentive to post on this forum? It's the same incentive. (and obviously I'm talking about real mongers who don't get any cookie points from pos and girls for posting here).

The prices never really go down, if you're trying to frame it as less new mongers=lower prices, I don't think it works this way.

Bay Area has had lower prices for a while because girls can serve more and make more.

Why should we not help newbies? Do you only help someone when there's an incentive attached?